The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 01, 2024, 03:16:02 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350869 Posts in 28606 Topics by 6828 Members
Latest Member: GSW Racing
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  Balancing Con Rods
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Balancing Con Rods  (Read 4958 times)
Fast Eddie
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 82



« on: November 22, 2011, 23:25:25 pm »

i got a new set set of rods for my type4 from european motorworks. they look good and i am happy with them, but i thought i would weigh them and found  about 5 grams difference between them the lightest and heaviest. 2 weigh 515g and 2 520g i think.

is it worth balancing them? if so, what is the procedure, big end first? or little end first?  or different?/?


cheers. Smiley
Logged
Jesse/DVK
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 817


'64 2176cc


WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2011, 13:13:41 pm »

You could use those of the same weight at the opposite cilinders.
Logged

Der Vollgas Kreuzers
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1417


« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2011, 06:51:12 am »

....is it worth balancing them?
Yes, you must balance them.  A 5g variance is the stock spec limit.  That's good for an engine that doesn't go over 4500-5000 rpm.  Since you're likely to rev higher, you'll need to balance them.
The proper way is to take them to a shop that can balance them.  Needed are special fixtures to support them while weighing each end.

The ghetto way to balance them is to take the caps off and match them.  Then match the other half.
Logged
Fast Eddie
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 82



« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2011, 10:24:31 am »

i am making a support for both ends at work, which i can hold in a vice. i have scales accurate to 0.5grams.
i have watched different methods of balancing, i have paid for it to be done before aswell. i just want to do it myself this time.  Smiley
the thing i want to know is which end to balance, like i said, i have watched different people and on the net, some start by weighing the whole lot and then just taking the difference from one end. others seem to weigh both ends and match them.. what would you do??
cheers  Smiley
Logged
JIMP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 337


WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2011, 13:26:39 pm »

Eddie

I have recently build a fixture of my own, re;atively easy to find materials, some half an hour work on a lathe and about two hours to complete, seems to me working really good -because of the bearings probably used-, I'll try today to make some photos and upload them for you, cheers

Friendly

Dimitrios
Logged
Mike Lawless
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 386



WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2011, 20:00:29 pm »

You should balance both ends. Each end should weigh the same as the others, and the rod should weigh the same overall.
Logged

Winner, 2009 Bakersfield March Meet
2006 PRA Super Gas Champion
2002-2003 DRKC Champion
http://www.lawlessdesigns.com
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1417


« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2011, 04:44:58 am »

i am making a support for both ends at work, which i can hold in a vice.

To verify your fixture, load your rods and measure the ends. Then reload the rods again to see if you get the same readings.
Logged
JIMP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 337


WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2011, 21:15:44 pm »

Eddie, sorry for the delay, here are some pics for you, hope they help a bit





Logged
Fast Eddie
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 82



« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2011, 12:22:24 pm »

thanks for the pictures Dimitrios, very helpful.
Quick question about the set up, and all the others that i have seen, why is it necessary to hang the rod with the chains?
can they just not be supported at one end?
cheers again.
Logged
Dr P.
Newbie
*
Posts: 5


« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2011, 11:47:24 am »

The idea with the chain is to make it hang as free as possible. If the supporting jig is not well built it will be impossible to get consistent readings. Due to this I made a dead simple balancing ijg. It is a piece of wood with a piston pin at a height that makes the rod horizontal. The "feet" of the jig consist of 3 wood screws (to make it always support on all 3 feet).

It works only with one length of conrods (screws have to be on the center line of the big and small end respectively). The readings of this one are much more consistent compared to a hanging version i made.

Balancing jig

Edit: forgot to mention that the supporting screws are in the wrong position on the pictures. The pics were taken from the first prototype I made without access to the conrod. Just guessed the initial location.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2011, 11:49:53 am by Dr P. » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!