|
Title: web cam 251 Post by: Robban on September 05, 2011, 09:21:55 am I´m building a new t1 drag engine this winter, and i thinking of using the web cam 251, does anyone úsing it, or have any experience wiht it?
The engine spec: 2332cc, CR 13,4:1 5,5" rods, C/E 48/38 heads with stainles valves and K800 springs. Title: Re: web cam 251 Post by: Rasser on September 05, 2011, 18:25:34 pm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYDU_X3mt_s web251 ;)
Title: Re: web cam 251 Post by: Torben Alstrup on September 12, 2011, 11:08:05 am Hello.
If your engine is going to be all drag, I would consider a regular Fk89 or the CB version. The Web 251 seems to be a hairswith lower than the Fk89. But if it was for a semi street car I would take the 251, as it is somewhat more usable in the lower rpm and also idles nicer than the 89. T Title: Re: web cam 251 Post by: Robban on September 13, 2011, 20:21:01 pm Fk 89 web 251
Valve lift 1.4:1 .582 .630 Cam lift .416 .450 Adverticed Duration 328* 324* Duration @ 0.50 282* 285* Lobe Center 108* 108* Title: Re: web cam 251 Post by: Torben Alstrup on September 14, 2011, 01:08:11 am The 0,630" on the Web is @ 1,5 ratio.
Like I wrote earlier. if you want to go all out in that range, try the CB version. T Title: Re: web cam 251 Post by: neil68 on September 14, 2011, 02:26:03 am I have a Web 251 in my current 2332 cc and it measured out to 0.590" with 1.4 rockers (cam comparison chart says 0.421" at cam and 0.588" with 1.4's).
Title: Re: web cam 251 Post by: Deadly1 on September 25, 2011, 20:45:54 pm Cam specs show Webcam 251 to have a little more lift than Engle FK89, slightly less "advertised" duration and slightly more actual duration at .050 lift. In my motor with Berg "so called" 1.45 rockers I measure almost .660" lift. Car ran 10.44 @ 127 -1575lbs. Wayne
|