Title: 2276 cam thoughts Post by: The Ideaman on July 16, 2007, 04:52:53 am It is time for a new motor for my 1967 streetcar. Car is a streetcar only, with little to no track time ever. It presently has a 2176 (94x78.4),but I've got most of the workings for a 2276. New engine will be built around a set of Fred Simpson L6T's with 40x37.5 valves. I'm either going to use an SLR 296 on 106lc's or CB's 2288. Motor will have 45 dellorto's, 1 5/8th's exhaust and 9 to 1 compression. VW journal crank, lightened flywheel and 5.4" rods. Car has 4.12 ring and pinion with 1.48 and 1.04 3rd and 4th. Thoughts or opinions are welcomed.
Title: Re: 2276 cam thoughts Post by: John Rayburn on July 16, 2007, 04:56:37 am I think either an FK8 or a W130 with 1.25's would work great with that setup
Title: Re: 2276 cam thoughts Post by: The Ideaman on July 16, 2007, 05:10:08 am 2176 has a w120 and 1.1's. My last 2276 had a k8 and I did like the driveability. I'd prefer to use 1.4 rockers.
Title: Re: 2276 cam thoughts Post by: Lids on July 16, 2007, 06:14:55 am webcam 86b
Title: Re: 2276 cam thoughts Post by: Alan Uyeno on July 16, 2007, 06:50:51 am What do those heads flow at .550 valve lift?? are those aggressively ported? mild fluff and buff??
No sense going with a big cam if your not flowing big numbers. In the realm of a k8, webcam 86B, Eagle/cb 2288 will not dissapoint you. Do yourself a favour and sleeve your mag case with silicon bronze sleeves or use an aluminum aftermarket case. You can go more aggressive on your cam and get a rampy one like the fk40 series or a pauter cam. That'll get you into your power band much faster and keep you pulling hard. An fk44 or 45 will pull hard much faster than a k8. Ramy cams are much harder on the lifter bores. Title: Re: 2276 cam thoughts Post by: JS on July 16, 2007, 20:03:32 pm Very happy with the K8 in my 2276. Both on street and strip.
Title: Re: 2276 cam thoughts Post by: louisb on July 16, 2007, 20:12:29 pm The K8 and the 86b are fairly close right? With the 86c being between the FK-10 and the FK-87?
Thanks, --louis |