Title: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Jim Ratto on December 04, 2006, 22:20:42 pm Good memories here, again, of days gone by, friends and I in college, and very poor....eating leftovers from Mom and drinking cheap, cheap beer. Working full time at a VW shop, I had "an unfair advantage" when it came to motor parts, but my friends were somewhat more limited. My garage was the birthplace for some pretty cool, low-dollar motors that actually lived and ran fairly well. We'd sit around and talk parts, drink that cheap beer, and scheme about how to make motors with a few pennies. I guess this is where the Sweep the Floor motor family was born.
My good old friend, the infamous Lil Frank, had a S.T.F. 94 x 69 that we made out of decent junk in my shed, Mexican std case, c/w 69mm, stock VW rods, Pauter 40 x 35 heads, K8 with old Eatons, and a good pair of 48's he found cheap and a swap meet 6lb Crown flywheel. Motor was a snap to put together, and was drip free, and ran like a caged lion. Once the tach needle got past 4K, hang on, you were going for a ride. Really fun motor in his otherwise stock sunroof '67. A sleeper. Another S.T.F. low budget little monster actually had two lives. Started out as 1776 street motor, Engle 120 with 1.25's, 40 x 35 heads home-ported by McNulty, 10.5:1, 48's and merged header....all used crap we had laying around, Darrel and I. Built it to see what a 1776 would do. Bolted it in his lightened (gutted interior) '66 bug, took it to Sac and went 13.01 at 100mph on slicks. After this, we tore the poor thing down, stuffed used 94's in it, along with Engle FK10, added some old midget 42 x 37 heads we found at school, put it back in same '66 Bug and went 12.81 at 104. Coupla guys in our old club too, in college, eating caffiene and beer only, all their money went into VW's....both built really fast small motors. One guy built a truly streetable 1776 that ran on 92 octane, Engle 125, 40IDFs, stock valved heads he ported himself, 8.7:1, ran 15.24 at Sears Point in 1995, stock weight '68 Bug with little 185 radials. And of course my old friend S.O.D.A 'Bryan', and his little '65 Bug, 1679cc, stock valved heads, Web 110 (like Engle 120), 40IDFs, pump gas, went 14.71 at Sac, stock '65 Bug with radials. Bryan sure could make the most of a little motor. I think tough little cc motors are a lot of fun, always fun to surprise a V8 with a sub-2-liter in a little stock looking VW. Got any stories?? Let's hear them here!! Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Diederick/DVK on December 04, 2006, 22:43:36 pm truly inspirational jim ;D
i suppose your friend soda bryan could really take **** out of caffeine guy for going faster :o ;) Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Frank LUX on December 04, 2006, 23:18:38 pm Cool... ;) ;D ;D ;D
You don't always need those Big $$$$ Monsters to go Fast... Frank Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Lids on December 05, 2006, 10:19:57 am I have been running a 1914 for about 6 years, remember the first time i took my brother up the road in it. He never had a front seat to sit in and was flung all over the place, so funny. He never came out with me again.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: The Ideaman on December 05, 2006, 21:48:23 pm Back in the day, around the end of 1980, we built an 1835 with NPR's and an 8 dowelled Mance crank. It had an engle 100, 4tuned exhaust, single quiet pack and ported stock heads with Kadrons. I thought it was really fast, but in reality it only was a high 15 second car. My neighbor at the time was big into buggies, so he walked me through the build. Remember the screamer kits from the back of HVW's? Put one with an 019 on it. Ran a 10.5lb flywheel in my 66 sedan after burning up a 180mm clutch. Drove it 15k over 2 years nearly every day in AZ. When it came apart the cylinders were scored pretty badly and the heads were cracked, but the crank was still .010/010". The 66 did okay for itself street racing in 1st and 2nd. I outran a v8 LUV truck til the top of second and then he passed me like I was sitting still. Sure do miss the days of 79 cent premium gas and living with my parents with no bills other than insurance and car parts.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Russell on December 05, 2006, 22:38:50 pm The race shop ghia was 73,74 and 75 winner and only run a 1835cc, small is best, but a 2332cc is way more fun.......
Russell Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Zach Gomulka on December 06, 2006, 05:38:11 am 1600cc, 14.87 @ 88mph, daily driven. My little claim to fame ;)
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: herrvee on December 06, 2006, 08:58:28 am I drive actually a 1641 with ida's. It is very fun to drive but my 8*33 trans stock is not the perfect one to run with, I swap it this winter.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Lee.C on December 06, 2006, 20:54:19 pm I ran a 16.2 with my 1641 and a single weber 40dcn carb on a DDS manifold - It spun the wheels all the way through first too ;D ;D ;D
So there's more to come - I'll keep you posted :) Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: benssp on December 07, 2006, 19:47:23 pm 1600cc, 14.87 @ 88mph, daily driven. My little claim to fame ;) Ooh, what's the spec? ;D Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Diederick/DVK on December 07, 2006, 21:08:44 pm thought i'd cover for you here zach:
1600cc, 110x1.25, 8.5:1, AJ Sims 044 40x35.5, 44idfs, 1 1/2" merge. In my light daily driver '67 bug went 14.8 @ 88mph. It is still running in my friends stock weight '67, we drove it to Drag Day (about 900 miles round trip) and averaged about 30mpg. Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: benssp on December 08, 2006, 11:28:15 am thought i'd cover for you here zach: 1600cc, 110x1.25, 8.5:1, AJ Sims 044 40x35.5, 44idfs, 1 1/2" merge. In my light daily driver '67 bug went 14.8 @ 88mph. It is still running in my friends stock weight '67, we drove it to Drag Day (about 900 miles round trip) and averaged about 30mpg. Thanks, what's the final drive on the gearbox? ;D Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Zach Gomulka on December 08, 2006, 17:10:01 pm I used a 4.12 r=p, 3.80, 2.06, 1.48, 1.04. Its gets 30 mpg in my friends stock weight '67, he has stock gearing too.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Gregor/DFL on December 10, 2006, 12:02:07 pm I ran a 16.2 with my 1641 and a single weber 40dcn carb on a DDS manifold - It spun the wheels all the way through first too ;D ;D ;D So there's more to come - I'll keep you posted :) As I am also running a little 1641 cc- please let me know the specs of that 1641-16.2 is amazing! Seems like IŽll have to rework my engine if kept in the car ;) Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Lee.C on December 10, 2006, 18:44:13 pm You do realise it was in my Manx - its still pretty impresive I think for a baby 1641 on a single carb
Anyway here's the spec's: AS21 case - full flow oiling 69mm counterweighted crank with lightened and balanced rods 87mm barrells and pistons Engle 100 cam Stock dual port heads (slightly ported to remove all the sharp corners) 32mm oil pump (race trim) deep sump (race trim) Boosh 009 dizzy with electronic ignition kit Power pulley (smaller diameter) Lightened and balanced and 8 dowelled 200mm flywheel "Bolt up" rocker sharfts with swivel feet adjusters Cromoloy pushrods Straight cut timing gears DDS center mount "RAM" type manifold with a single Weber40dcn14 Carb (with 24mm venturi's) the two end piece's of the manifold although stock have been heavily ported Hope this helps dude :) Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Diederick/DVK on December 10, 2006, 21:47:25 pm looks pretty solid monkiboy!
just two general questions: - is a 32mm oil pump not overkill? i've read that it will blow the oil with too much pressure. i've been advised not to go over 26mm (or was it 28) for my 1776... - secondly, a power pulley, how well does that go for street driving? does it overheat quickly? i am familiar with the extra power it should give... thanks! Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Lee.C on December 10, 2006, 23:40:59 pm Yeah man trust me this is one solid/strong engine it revs to about 5500rpm and will cruz at 80-85mph all day long ;D it will also do well over 100mph ;D ;D ;D and pulls like a train ;D ;D ;D
About the oil pump - the only reason I went so big ie 32mm was because I have mounted a oil filter and large cooler in the back of the manx which is ABOVE the engine and I also used 1/2 inch braided oil lines which are pretty fat so I thought whith all this extra capasity and the fact that the filter and cooler are above the engine this size pump would give me an even pressure throughout the system - also with this extra cooler the power pulley does not seem to be a problem - I have never had a temp or pressure guage on this engine and I have put over 5000 miles on her this year and I changed the oil every 1000 miles cos the engine was new and I felt this would be a good move but it has never run "HOT" and the oil light on the speedo has never come on :) I will put some guages on it for next year but I am sure it will be fine :) And I agree about the power pulley's you can feel the difference for sure :) Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Lee.C on December 17, 2006, 03:43:37 am here's a little pic of my baby :)
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Zach Gomulka on December 17, 2006, 07:05:57 am Nice detail!!! Im diggin the white cannons!!!
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Tobi/DFL on December 17, 2006, 09:04:28 am Wow, what a nice detailed engine! I wished I had those Race Trim valve covers and deep sump as well! :P
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Lee.C on December 17, 2006, 13:12:17 pm Cheers guys - but did you also see the Race trim pushrod tubes ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Zach Gomulka on December 17, 2006, 17:44:24 pm Love it! Im a bit of a Race Trim fanatic myself ;)
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Rune on December 17, 2006, 23:52:19 pm I guess Ian Clark's (WPS) 1776cc split bug would be worth mentioning. Ran mid 12's with it did'nt he?
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: deanosvws on December 18, 2006, 00:52:37 am Ian did ran 12.7s from memory with the 1776 and then ran 12.3s with a 1850. I also ran a pb with my 1776 of 12.96 this year,some more work over the winter and i hope for some quicker times next year.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Rune on December 18, 2006, 10:41:57 am Cool, do you have some specs on those 1776's Dean?
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: deanosvws on December 22, 2006, 23:50:16 pm i cant remember the specs on Ian's engine as it was a few years ago now, apart from it ran a engle 125, & a set of jeff denham heads. my engine is very simular spec, iam running a engle 130 with 1.25 ratio rockers,10.1 c/r, a set of lee maynard heads 40x37.5, scat i beams, & a stock 69mm crank, everything balanced etc. this isnt a big money engine, iam allways on a tight budget so ive been tring to get as much out of it as possible. there is a bit more work to do on the engine over the winter to see if i can get some more power out of it.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: ESH on December 23, 2006, 01:07:15 am Love it!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/SanchoPancho/General/uknostalgia1.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/SanchoPancho/General/uknostalgia2.jpg) Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: leec on December 23, 2006, 20:51:25 pm i cant remember the specs on Ian's engine as it was a few years ago now, apart from it ran a engle 125, & a set of jeff denham heads. my engine is very simular spec, iam running a engle 130 with 1.25 ratio rockers,10.1 c/r, a set of lee maynard heads 40x37.5, scat i beams, & a stock 69mm crank, everything balanced etc. this isnt a big money engine, iam allways on a tight budget so ive been tring to get as much out of it as possible. there is a bit more work to do on the engine over the winter to see if i can get some more power out of it. When you say 'stock', surely its counter weight crank? Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Ulcera on December 23, 2006, 22:20:22 pm Hi guys,
Fantastic engine Monkyboy,but I'm so curious ;D what kind of wheels are on the Manks?American racin torque thrust?Do you have a pic of it?thank you boy and Merry Christmas Ulcera The RagTop Garage Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: deanosvws on December 23, 2006, 22:44:06 pm yes lee it is a stock 69mm crank. i couldnt afford a counter weighted crank at that time when i originally got the engine bits together. its lighter than a c/w crank is revs up a treat but it just means the case will get more of a pounding.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: leec on December 23, 2006, 23:00:16 pm yes lee it is a stock 69mm crank. i couldnt afford a counter weighted crank at that time when i originally got the engine bits together. its lighter than a c/w crank is revs up a treat but it just means the case will get more of a pounding. Wow! What do you rev it to? I looked at your car at avon park at the end of october (came up with Martin aka gold65turbo) its spot on. Are you still selling the gearbox? Lee Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Martin Greaves on December 23, 2006, 23:04:10 pm Hi lee welcome to the lounge dude. ;D
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: leec on December 23, 2006, 23:08:35 pm Hi lee welcome to the lounge dude. ;D It would be rude not to! Lee Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Lee.C on December 24, 2006, 00:28:12 am Hi guys, Fantastic engine Monkyboy,but I'm so curious ;D what kind of wheels are on the Manks?American racin torque thrust?Do you have a pic of it?thank you boy and Merry Christmas Ulcera The RagTop Garage Thanks for the comments on the engine dude - its my little baby :) its an awsome engine and pulls like a train :) The DDS manifold works really well as does the old style 3 bolt weber As for the Wheels they are Original Cal Part mags (in wide 5 pattern/ 205-5) They are all aluminuim and have a huge offset :o and from what I can tell they are pretty rare I also spent approx 15 hours polishing the rim on each wheel :P here's a pic that "Lids" took at Stonner park earlier this year. Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: deanosvws on December 30, 2006, 19:01:26 pm cheers lee sorry i havnt answered your question, been away for christmas. sorry the gearbox is sold and on its way to norwich i am afraid.
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: leec on December 31, 2006, 00:18:18 am cheers lee sorry i havnt answered your question, been away for christmas. sorry the gearbox is sold and on its way to norwich i am afraid. Oh well, Ive just bought an engle 125 and am looking at building a budget motor similar to yours, If you wouldnt mind could you email me a spec of yours? croftsian @ aol. com (no spaces!) Lee Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: deanosvws on January 02, 2007, 01:04:55 am no problem i wil send it as soon as i get a chance, most of the spec is on page two
cheers deano Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Jim Ratto on October 18, 2012, 06:16:23 am someday we will have to have a good laugh about all those nights I would get my room-mate at the time fiercely jealous of anybody else in our club that he might have the slightest suspicion of "somebody out-gunning" him ::). I'd drag home stuff like short IDA welded manifolds from Buggy House, write "John" on them in black marker and just leave them on the coffee table for all to see. Or a Vertex mag with "Sheep" written in Marks a Lot on it. This guy would have veins standing out of his forehead.
The joys and miseries of living with gearheads. ;D Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Peter Shattock on October 21, 2012, 13:07:53 pm A quick update on the old 1776 Ian ran in his split. When Ian built his 1850 I bought his old 1776 and gearbox. Over the following years Ian and and I kept making small improvements and eventually we got to a point where it ran a string of 11.9's. The car was light for a street car at around 1500 lbs with me in it. It remained a street car all this time and was driven to and from the track and back then I had more free time so did quite a lot of street miles too.
The good news is the engine and box has now gone / going to a new home and Mark the new owner plans to continue developing the combination over the coming years, so watch this space for news from Mark once he gets the car finished! The other thing is that it was a very reliable combo that was great fun to drive! Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Dead Dog on October 23, 2012, 13:28:44 pm My Beetle is 1914cc omex 600, t3/4 turbo makes 206 bhp
in a street weight car running slicks my PB is 11.85 @ 107 (average top speed is usually 114~ish) Not bad at all for a almost full weight street legal (with road tyres!) car with an ikkle 1914 :D Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: BeetleBug on October 23, 2012, 14:42:38 pm Let us not forget this little 1641 managing a 9.55 - 142 mph earlier this year:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCDQ28HLFMQ&feature=g-all-u - Standard crank - Standard flywheel - FK89 - 044 CB heads Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Dead Dog on October 23, 2012, 15:09:44 pm Thats Amazing!
Title: Re: Little Engines That Could! Post by: Diederick/DVK on October 23, 2012, 16:33:13 pm unreal!!
|