The Cal-look Lounge

Cal-look/High Performance => Pure racing => Topic started by: benssp on May 06, 2008, 12:52:38 pm



Title: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 06, 2008, 12:52:38 pm
thought i'd start this, please post up anything you've done to your bug to save weight and what saving in kg/lb's


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on May 06, 2008, 13:20:22 pm
thought i'd start this, please post up anything you've done to your bug to save weight and what saving in kg/lb's

Just removed ALL the asphalt in a 67 - all in all that was 23 kg. including the garbage bag.

Best rgs
BB


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 06, 2008, 13:23:34 pm
I know phil(beardie weirdie) has saved 400g a side by removing his jacking points


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on May 06, 2008, 13:39:42 pm
I don't know how much weight it saved, but I chopped out most of the inside of my doors - just left the handle area and the edge of the big hole to strengthen it. You'd never know if I'd fitted doorcards! ;)
Phil's also used aluminium and titanium bolts on his car, and has race weight wings! :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 06, 2008, 14:03:06 pm
phil and pete shattock have a weight saving obsession, I think pete removes his Fram filter forracing!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on May 06, 2008, 14:32:52 pm
phil and pete shattock have a weight saving obsession, I think pete removes his Fram filter forracing!

So if you do like them and take it ALL THE WAY how light will your pan car be?

 



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 06, 2008, 14:39:48 pm
petes car is about 600ish kilos :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on May 06, 2008, 14:59:20 pm
petes car is about 600ish kilos :o

Maybe he can share with us what he has done to get the weight down so far. Tekken`s pan split race car was 595 kg last year with a "heavy" turbo engine and autocraft gearbox. I do believe that is about how far you can go with a pan car.

BB


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 06, 2008, 15:17:45 pm
Tekken`s pan split race car was 595 kg last year with a "heavy" turbo engine and autocraft gearbox. I do believe that is about how far you can go with a pan car.
You need to have a look at the SSB.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on May 06, 2008, 15:31:45 pm
Tekken`s pan split race car was 595 kg last year with a "heavy" turbo engine and autocraft gearbox. I do believe that is about how far you can go with a pan car.
You need to have a look at the SSB.


If I remember correctly the SSB was 1400lbs when it did the 11.03/122 mph run?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on May 06, 2008, 16:32:11 pm
petes car is about 600ish kilos :o

Maybe he can share with us what he has done to get the weight down so far. Tekken`s pan split race car was 595 kg last year with a "heavy" turbo engine and autocraft gearbox. I do believe that is about how far you can go with a pan car.

BB


Little Pete has gone a bit mad - reducing the thickness of the gears in the gearbox, drilling holes in everything bolt on, but leaving the body as Wolfsburg intended!  :o Original wings, doors and everything! :D Proper work of art...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 06, 2008, 16:40:03 pm
thought i'd start this, please post up anything you've done to your bug to save weight and what saving in kg/lb's

Oh dear I could spend some serious time on this thread!  But in brief mine is 1300lbs 590KG.  I've not drilled the main body or pan - except the jacking points which I felt were not useful as so old, and also were a wind resistance..  Everything that bolts on or removes in any way has been removed or drilled or replaced with lighter.  Just apply it to everything on the car.  Bought different handles to find the lightest, use nasty tinware as thinner, drill the ignition key/door strikers, obviously all the nuts, bolts and washers.  356 generator is the lightest - hope to sheath it in ally and ball mill the case like Porsche 550.  Cut the tops off the shocks, buy ally shocks, ally trans mounts, ally traction bar, drilled linkage/arms.  Anything you can see that comes off - remove and drill.  I love swarf!  Incidentally ally floorpan bolts save 324grams.  Drilled my headrest and seat bases.  Still looking to have the rear axle nuts made in titanium.  Also the rocker adjustment nuts.  Even bought two differing sets of front lights to choose the lightest chrome surrounds.  There's loads more but I'll be here forever and I need my pillar drill time.  Overall the car still looks roughly stock and not cut out at all.  Oh and I must mention aircraft wiring, much lighter.

Cheers ben.  By the way do you have any Scat stickers at SSP - small 2 inch?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 06, 2008, 17:05:03 pm
thought i'd start this, please post up anything you've done to your bug to save weight and what saving in kg/lb's

My top 4 easy choices would be:

1)glass.  get rid.  Super duper heavy
2)wings - 22lb to save using fibreglass.  Also remove running boards and bumpers.
3)rotational weight - swap the wheels, brakes, calipers, studs, washers, nuts, tyres all for the lightest
4)battery/starter/alternator


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on May 06, 2008, 17:21:14 pm
Good thread :)

I lightened up the metal behind the rear side panels, just fit one up and you can see there is a lot of metal that can be removed. Put the panel back on, and no one is the wiser 8)
Remove the center rear seat belt thing that is welded to the underside of the parcel shelf. Heavy.
Every last thing associated with the heater.
Use fiberglass, plexiglass, and aluminium liberally.

The goal for my '67 is to have it down to 1500lbs (682kg) with me in it, race weight... and NOT have it look like it has been gutted like a fish.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ottobros on May 06, 2008, 17:28:50 pm
petes car is about 600ish kilos :o
do you have pictures of this car


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on May 06, 2008, 17:38:23 pm
(http://www.offdrc.co.uk/images/gallery_2007_001/photo_2007_001_085.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on May 06, 2008, 17:43:09 pm
Beardie - thank you for sharing! I have only heard about your car and your work but unfortunately never seen it live. I hope I soon will have the pleasure.

590kg - well, got something to reach for there that`s for sure.

BB


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jim Ratto on May 06, 2008, 20:54:18 pm
this is a good post.
Weren't the original cal-look cars stripped of any superfulous fat? Huh Sarge? HUH?
I see the cars that grace magazines as cal-look cars as being too complex and too fat. I think guys building cars here in the States need to work on not hanging so much "stuff" on their cars, and not yet even worry about gun-drilling and shaving weight here and there. My own car is too heavy in my opinion. I don't know what it weighs, but I have not paid enough attention to saving weight when modifying the car. Oil system alone on my car, between the big Berg sump (that I would run, no matter the weight, for engine's well being), the heavy cloth-covered-stainless braid AN-8 oil lines, the steel AN-8 fittings, the heavy Setrab cooler... I imagine it all adds 30-40lbs to the curb weight (dry). Heavy fake BRM's, heavy 205/65 tires, Berg traction bar, Berg intermediate mount, stock drums.... in an effort to make things stay put it's going to add weight. Unless I was to think before I just bolted parts on "out of the box"
If I were to re-do another hotrod approach on a Bug, I'd look for even the small places to save lbs. Take a look at Ferdinand Piech's campaign in the 1960's with the Porsche cars. Every piece of the racecars had a head engineer that was responsible to trim as much fat as they could, without jeopardizing durability. Look at a 1960's Porsche racecar.... holes everywhere. Even the ignition key. Piech demanded that the wiper switch on the dash of the 907 have its retaining nut machined down thickness wise to save 1/2 a gram or something. They resorted to beryllium for the brake rotors (ungodly expensive and dust was deadly poisonous).
Instead of impressing everybody with how much "stuff" can be hung on a car, why not impress everyone with how quickly the car goes, stops, corners, and how long your parts live?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jim Ratto on May 06, 2008, 21:21:59 pm
here are some ideas aside from what has been mentioned..

if bumpers are necessary or "desired" drill lower brakcets (On 1967 & down)
replace steel girder of Berg traction bar with aluminum oval tube
deburr engine case(inside and out) and inside rocker chambers of heads and trans case
minimize wiring in car, replace ignition switch with simple on-off rocker for power and one way rocker for starter
deburr and trim rear lower shock boss on swingaxle tube
deburr and polish trailing arms (front suspension) and pitman arm off steering box
gundrill brake drums i.e. Ron Lummus
open backing plates up
gundrill pedal stems on brake and clutch, reduce square area of pedal pad section
gundrill face of accelerator pedal
gundrill parking brake, door check rods
gundrill front hood hinges, delete springs, delete decklid spring, remove "louvered" area inside rear air grill
gundrill metal "body" portion of brake shoes
gundrill all wiper motor and linkage mounts
lightest wheels that are legal for street
gundrill carb linkage bracket (if applicable) or use lighter push/pull, drill coil bracket, alternator strap, alternator pulley
manicure intake manifolds to minimum material up near carbs
17mm wrench size 12mm nuts in place of 19mm in all places applicable.
11mm wrench size 8mm nuts in place of 13mm in all places applicable
more to think about later.






Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on May 06, 2008, 22:02:38 pm
As you have all obviously realised weight saving is certainly a way of making the most of your engine and gearbox combination, but you might just like to look at the cost benefits once you have done the obvious ditching interior, bumpers, glass and had some fun with some hole saws. Say your car weighs 1600lbs and you have 160hp that’s 10lbs per 1hp. 10lbs is easy to find when you're unbolting bumpers and the like but when your into one off fabrication of parts and exotic metals like mag, titanium, inconol and even ali its very easy to run up some nasty bills. Needless to say if you’re really going for it and budget is not an issue get stuck in to the hp chase and the weight loss program but I think there comes a point financially where you want to go back to the motor rather than the weight of the car.

Also one other thing weight loss is great for performance but its not so good for our little rear engine cars when your going through the traps at 110-120 mph on a breesy day so a bit of weight to keep the bloody things on the ground is not all bad in my book and that is coming from some one who has spent far to much money on reducing the weight of the car.

Like most things in life it’s about striking a balance, but don't let me dampen your enthusiasm with the hole saws!

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jason Foster on May 06, 2008, 22:44:36 pm
I crew chief for the BAD BEHAVIOR S/G car of Daniel Kurtzman and that car weighs 1460lbs no driver. It is all steel.  We ditched the glass and went plexi, run ercos, aluminum beam, 1 race trim seat, 5 point lummus 4130 bar, engine has two small squirrel fans and a small alternator. Door panels are aluminum. Headlights removed replaced with plexi covers. Gas tank removed replaced with 1 gal. fuel cell. Thats about it.
   



                     


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on May 07, 2008, 02:25:19 am
Also one other thing weight loss is great for performance but its not so good for our little rear engine cars when your going through the traps at 110-120 mph on a breesy day so a bit of weight to keep the bloody things on the ground is not all bad in my book and that is coming from some one who has spent far to much money on reducing the weight of the car.

I agree with you, that is why my car will have the trans raised slightly to get the car (and what little weight there is) down a little more... hopefully it will be stable enough for mid to high 11's... ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on May 07, 2008, 08:44:12 am
On my old Oval I managed to shave off about 30 lb per door by ditching the winder mechanisms and making a simple hand slider mech. The glass was ditched for perspex and the quarter lights were also ditched in favour of perspex. I ground the chrome off the door handles so they were bare aluminium and polished them to look chrome. I then took the hole saw to all of the metal hidden behind the door panel. The difference in before and after was incredible. Picking up a complete stock door requires strength/hernia op. Post diet, the door could be picked up with one hand 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ESH on May 07, 2008, 10:06:07 am
...Also one other thing weight loss is great for performance but its not so good for our little rear engine cars when your going through the traps at 110-120 mph on a breesy day so a bit of weight to keep the bloody things on the ground is not all bad in my book and that is coming from some one who has spent far to much money on reducing the weight of the car...

On the plus side though as you add power the advantage then becomes that you can then put weight back in where you need it, mainly further forward and lower. Getting the weight out of the top of the car like the glass can only help top end stability. That said it would be a shame having bought all that titanium to bolt lead bars to the pan, drilled or not...

(http://www.offdrc.co.uk/images/gallery_2007_001/photo_2007_001_004_sm.jpg)  (http://www.offdrc.co.uk/images/gallery_2007_008/photo_2007_008_023_sm.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 07, 2008, 10:08:57 am
As you have all obviously realised weight saving is certainly a way of making the most of your engine and gearbox combination, but you might just like to look at the cost benefits once you have done the obvious ditching interior, bumpers, glass and had some fun with some hole saws. Say your car weighs 1600lbs and you have 160hp that’s 10lbs per 1hp. 10lbs is easy to find when you're unbolting bumpers and the like but when your into one off fabrication of parts and exotic metals like mag, titanium, inconol and even ali its very easy to run up some nasty bills. Needless to say if you’re really going for it and budget is not an issue get stuck in to the hp chase and the weight loss program but I think there comes a point financially where you want to go back to the motor rather than the weight of the car.

Also one other thing weight loss is great for performance but its not so good for our little rear engine cars when your going through the traps at 110-120 mph on a breesy day so a bit of weight to keep the bloody things on the ground is not all bad in my book and that is coming from some one who has spent far to much money on reducing the weight of the car.

Like most things in life it’s about striking a balance, but don't let me dampen your enthusiasm with the hole saws!

Peter


Wise words mate.  I only have 170 horse or so so didn't mind going a bit lighter.  If I had double that i would be more reluctant to take weight off.  So far I've only reached 113mph and the car has always felt very safe and secure at the top end.  Still it has been a bit pricey - however there's nothing like adding weight to the mix whenever someone needs to replace a worn part or needs a different spec item.  Definitely worth thinking about eg if you need new shocks - make sure the ones you buy are lighter than the ones you have!  Do that every time and suddenly your ETs are improving bit by bit.

And congrats on the 12.1!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: alex d on May 07, 2008, 10:13:35 am
aluminium cylinders would certainly make for a lighter engine...


by the way, didn't some of the early short wheel base 911s have a  ballast in the nose for better weight distribution?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on May 07, 2008, 15:18:46 pm
Hi,

I really like this thread. Weight is a key to why our beloved cars are behaving the way they do. Both how the handle on start and how they can perform so good with "limited" horsepower.
I got in to VWs just for this reason. Me and my partner were working building lightweight aircrafts.
With the flight designers and engineers and material available, we decided to build a much lighter version of car than at the the time very popular Volvo dragsters. They started at 450 kg.
We did not decide immediatley on engine until we saw this wheel lifting 1958 beetle called St Moritz Fashion in 1976.
Now we had a clear target with the lightest possible engine....story goes on. Anyway,the car weighed 300 kg and had almost as much HP as the Volvos.
So what am I saying? I love this focus on weight.

BUT in class racing the safety is well defined and not so when you drive on the streets or not so defined like Blackraces.
It actually hurts me to see so many cars without even a roll bar.
That is to me a minimum if you dragrace.
If you also drive the streets with a potential car, you need a cage and linked up to your front end.
Please consider it seriously.

Also be very careful with drilling a little bit too much or lightening anything that could be safety related.

That is not my "just my few cents" but rather input on a much higher value. Your well being.
 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 07, 2008, 15:40:21 pm
Tekken`s pan split race car was 595 kg last year with a "heavy" turbo engine and autocraft gearbox. I do believe that is about how far you can go with a pan car.
You need to have a look at the SSB.


If I remember correctly the SSB was 1400lbs when it did the 11.03/122 mph run?
I think that's with the driver.

Mark told me that he spent some time at the auto parts store looking at headlights.  He found some that were 100% plastic.  Very difficult to find.  I've only found 1 plastic H4 over the years, and it was that odd French yellow.

if bumpers are necessary or "desired" drill lower brakcets (On 1967 & down)
Aluminium.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 07, 2008, 16:09:52 pm
here are some ideas aside from what has been mentioned..

if bumpers are necessary or "desired" drill lower brakcets (On 1967 & down)




I've replace the bumpers with ally tbars, then cut off the excess ally past the mounting holes, then drilled the inner flat bar, then hollowed out the actual tbar from the bottom up.  Finally mounted with just one shortened ally bolt and smaller ally washer


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Casey on May 07, 2008, 16:19:30 pm
Saving weight has been a priority in my car too. I have only the bare necessities. It dose not looked cut up though. I left all original glass too. I did weight it all and came up with 130-140lbs I took out of it. Should be good for 2 tenths or so. We always talk about the "car" weight, well look at the beer drinkin' drivers!!! The car doesn’t go down the track by itself. I have been trying to lean down myself. Lost 20lb over a year or so. If you want your fast time slip, I vote John Rayburn as your driver!! Sorry John I couldn't resist. Casey


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 07, 2008, 16:20:48 pm
incidentally the lightest starter motor I could find was the Brise Electrical porsche 911 based one, 2,577 grams.  It's a great starter too.  Significantly lighter than the Hi-Torque and more reliable.

Also I saved 8 grams by hollowing out the 3 pinch bolts on the transmission plus I cut and dished the heads on them.  Coudn't find them in Titanium as they were a weird fit.

ERCO race weight wheels are 2 pounds lighter each than original BRMs.  And I shaved a few grams on the tyre valve using ally bolt in valves.  M&H slicks were miles lighter than Phoenix.

Varley Red Top 15 is the lightest battery I could find but still weighs in at a hefty 10 pounds.  AVO ally shocks are each over a pound lighter than Konis.

Still need to single skin my glovebox lid and rear valence.  Then replace the braided fuel line with solid.

Other tips use light weight oil like a 5W, much lighter over 6 litres.  Anyone know the relative weight saving of Nitrogen in the tyres over normal air?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jim Ratto on May 07, 2008, 16:33:49 pm
Saving weight has been a priority in my car too. I have only the bare necessities. It dose not looked cut up though. I left all original glass too. I did weight it all and came up with 130-140lbs I took out of it. Should be good for 2 tenths or so. We always talk about the "car" weight, well look at the beer drinkin' drivers!!! The car doesn’t go down the track by itself. I have been trying to lean down myself. Lost 20lb over a year or so. If you want your fast time slip, I vote John Rayburn as your driver!! Sorry John I couldn't resist. Casey

 >:(


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 07, 2008, 16:38:01 pm
incidentally the lightest starter motor I could find was the Brise Electrical porsche 911 based one, 2,577 grams.  It's a great starter too.  Significantly lighter than the Hi-Torque and more reliable.

Also I saved 8 grams by hollowing out the 3 pinch bolts on the transmission plus I cut and dished the heads on them.  Coudn't find them in Titanium as they were a weird fit.

ERCO race weight wheels are 2 pounds lighter each than original BRMs.  And I shaved a few grams on the tyre valve using ally bolt in valves.  M&H slicks were miles lighter than Phoenix.

Varley Red Top 15 is the lightest battery I could find but still weighs in at a hefty 10 pounds.  AVO ally shocks are each over a pound lighter than Konis.

Still need to single skin my glovebox lid and rear valence.  Then replace the braided fuel line with solid.

Other tips use light weight oil like a 5W, much lighter over 6 litres.  Anyone know the relative weight saving of Nitrogen in the tyres over normal air?
You're a sick man Phil ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Adele AW on May 07, 2008, 16:57:04 pm
This is good stuff! I'm lightening mine but on the less extreme side of things and going with a bit more glass fibre body parts! I have a bonnet, wings, carbon running boards, should be ordering doors this week and I'm having a decklid made also based on my 59 year decklid!

I've got lightweight strange brakes all round with rear Erco's and Weld fronts with M&H slicks/front runners and I'm having the seats built into the cage.

Also the hosing I have is the lightweight cloth braid from Jegs, it has all the same 'properties' as the stainless steel braided hose but much lighter!!

Steve


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rocket Ron on May 07, 2008, 19:27:01 pm
Start off with a late base model  European 1200 circa 1970-73
No body trim, single horn grill, No padding on the dash or steering, Minimal carpet and sound deadening just rubber mats,  Minimal instruments ie no fuel gauge or dash grill, minimal  headlining no window trim, thinner steel  construction to the body shell. I think its several kg lighter ( i think i’ve read 50kg) than an early 60’s late 50’s car and short panels ie less weight

Not too bad a start.  ;)

then you guys can get all anal about weight saving form there  ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on May 07, 2008, 20:52:30 pm
Hey Phil/Pete if you ever go for a Chevy journal crank on a future engine, let me know as I have a set of Jet titanium conrods stashed away for a rainy day. They weigh in less than 2/3 of the weight of H-beams! 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: colin jardine on May 08, 2008, 00:14:51 am
Interesting read!!  I've not really looked too far into weight saving with my car yet....there are some good tips here :)

Anyone know the relative weight saving of Nitrogen in the tyres over normal air?

Nice idea!  Nitrogen is slightly lighter than air, but not by much.....something like an 8% saving.....i've read somewhere pro cyclists use nitrogen in their tyres as being an inert gas it's not affected by temperature change like air is.  I wonder if drag racers anywhere do this too to ensure consistency?!?

Something like Helium would give good weight savings, problem is it's so light it would probably escape through the sidewalls!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on May 08, 2008, 01:46:39 am
Nitrogen is (somewhat) widely used for tires. It helps the rubber last longer, and doesnt fluctuate like normal compressed air does.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 08, 2008, 07:20:42 am
....  Nitrogen is slightly lighter than air, but not by much.....something like an 8% saving.....i've read somewhere pro cyclists use nitrogen in their tyres as being an inert gas it's not affected by temperature change like air is.  I wonder if drag racers anywhere do this too to ensure consistency?!?
That is a myth.  Nitrogen behaves according to the Ideal Gas Law, just the same as air, which, by the way is 78% Nitrogen.  There is no weight savings by replacing the 21% Oxygen with Nitrogen.




Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ESH on May 08, 2008, 09:07:05 am
...There is no weight savings by replacing the 21% Oxygen with Nitrogen...

The only advantage I can think of is that filling from a bottle rules out impurities/contaminants. I think old lower mileage tyres sometimes suffer from rotting from the inside out which is probably due to moisture in the 'air'. It might go some way to preserving older rarer tyres.

 :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 08, 2008, 13:21:17 pm
nice pics of tranny stuff......I just drilled my clutch cable conduit which is also well over engineered.  It's amazing how so many of the original VW parts were overengineered for strength.  May try to get some pics on here if I get the time


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on May 08, 2008, 13:22:02 pm
May try to get some pics on here if I get the time

Please do.

BB


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: John Rayburn on May 08, 2008, 15:12:40 pm
Saving weight has been a priority in my car too. I have only the bare necessities. It dose not looked cut up though. I left all original glass too. I did weight it all and came up with 130-140lbs I took out of it. Should be good for 2 tenths or so. We always talk about the "car" weight, well look at the beer drinkin' drivers!!! The car doesn’t go down the track by itself. I have been trying to lean down myself. Lost 20lb over a year or so. If you want your fast time slip, I vote John Rayburn as your driver!! Sorry John I couldn't resist. Casey
                                                 I'll drive!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on May 08, 2008, 15:31:58 pm
Saving weight has been a priority in my car too. I have only the bare necessities. It dose not looked cut up though. I left all original glass too. I did weight it all and came up with 130-140lbs I took out of it. Should be good for 2 tenths or so. We always talk about the "car" weight, well look at the beer drinkin' drivers!!! The car doesn’t go down the track by itself. I have been trying to lean down myself. Lost 20lb over a year or so. If you want your fast time slip, I vote John Rayburn as your driver!! Sorry John I couldn't resist. Casey
                                                 I'll drive!!
I'm lighter than you!  >:( ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: danny gabbard on May 08, 2008, 16:08:41 pm
any hardware could be changed to AN washer's and jet nuts  and if there's no budget get them in titanium


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 09, 2008, 07:18:04 am
nice pics of tranny stuff......I just drilled my clutch cable conduit which is also well over engineered. 
What is that part?

I also drilled a 9/16" dia hole through the center of the clutch cross shaft in the gearbox.  It is the late 20mm one.  That, plus the holes in 1st gear idler above was good for ¼kg.

Here is the mid mount I made out of aluminium.  Almost 2kg less than the iron one Berg makes.  I could drill it for even more weight reduction.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 09, 2008, 09:07:22 am

What is that part?

[/quote]

It's the metal bracket that sits on the side of the gearbox that the clutch cable passes through before it reaches the clutch release arm.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 09, 2008, 09:12:29 am
[Here is the mid mount I made out of aluminium.  Almost 2kg less than the iron one Berg makes.  I could drill it for even more weight reduction.
[/quote]

That is very cool!!!!  I spent a full day drilling my Berg mid mount - around 100 holes.  Took the weight down from 2.3kg to 1.9kg.  But it's still MEGA heavy - that's like carrying nearly another starter motor.  I use the Berg solid ally buffers, again I drilled vertically through them to take out some of the metal.  That ally mid mount is a work of art - do you know the weight?  The only concern I would have is that I thought this part would be subject to pretty big forces on launch so was concerned about ally.  I have an ally front mount which was a pound lighter than the grey rubber VW one and an ally rear mount but no ally mid mount!  Have you launched yet with this mount?

I'll try to get photos this weekend.

Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Steve D. on May 09, 2008, 17:52:56 pm
Here is the mid mount I made out of aluminium.  Almost 2kg less than the iron one Berg makes.  I could drill it for even more weight reduction.

Careful Bruce, I made a snubber bar (Mohr midmount style) out of aluminum.  I had to remove it a few months ago and revert back to good 'ol steel because the aluminum one was starting to look like a boomerang.  This was with 170hp and radial tires in a daily driver.

P.S. shame on you people for even talking about Berg products in a thread about lightweight parts.  The only lightweight stuff Berg ever made was made a long, long time ago.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 10, 2008, 02:52:01 am
Steve, got a pic of the mount you made?

The one I posted a pic of is not the one in my car.  That one is for a 4 gear.  I also made a version of the same mount for a 5 gear.  Since I have a 5 in my car, that is the mount I used.

That brings up the heftyweight Berg 5 parts.  Weilding the grinder, I took out almost 1/3 of a kilo off the 5 speed gear carrier and the 5 speed nose cone.

Phil, the solid aluminium spacers Berg sells are really dumb.  There's no need to make them from 2" dia Al.  1" bar stock drilled to clear the M10 bolt will work fine.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bewitched666 on May 10, 2008, 15:30:15 pm
i drilled holes in my pan of my first dragbeetle 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: nicolas on May 10, 2008, 22:01:17 pm
this is sooo cool. i have a type3 and that car is sooo heavy, but i plan on saving some weight as well. clean all arches and drill holes and finish it properly. amausing what crap and excess weight a car gathers over the years. it is not a racecar though so it will still be heavy. but it is a winwin situation as long as safety is not conserned.

and i started jogging. that should get me 8 kilos lighter, if i can keep it up...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 11, 2008, 00:03:05 am
My homage to Mark Herbert and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap plastic Rossi headlights, shocking quality but very light :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 11, 2008, 10:42:38 am
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)

Welcome to the lounge Uncle Mark ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 11, 2008, 10:46:42 am
some ideas here ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XUKOUbp_PA


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 11, 2008, 10:54:42 am
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)

Welcome to the lounge Uncle Mark ;D

Aloha ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 11, 2008, 17:02:52 pm
May try to get some pics on here if I get the time

Please do.

BB

(http://)(http://)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 11, 2008, 17:04:23 pm
[Here is the mid mount I made out of aluminium.  Almost 2kg less than the iron one Berg makes.  I could drill it for even more weight reduction.

That is very cool!!!!  I spent a full day drilling my Berg mid mount - around 100 holes.  Took the weight down from 2.3kg to 1.9kg.  But it's still MEGA heavy - that's like carrying nearly another starter motor.  I use the Berg solid ally buffers, again I drilled vertically through them to take out some of the metal.  That ally mid mount is a work of art - do you know the weight?  The only concern I would have is that I thought this part would be subject to pretty big forces on launch so was concerned about ally.  I have an ally front mount which was a pound lighter than the grey rubber VW one and an ally rear mount but no ally mid mount!  Have you launched yet with this mount?

I'll try to get photos this weekend.

Phil
[/quote]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 11, 2008, 17:05:21 pm
nice pics of tranny stuff......I just drilled my clutch cable conduit which is also well over engineered.  It's amazing how so many of the original VW parts were overengineered for strength.  May try to get some pics on here if I get the time


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 11, 2008, 17:06:49 pm
all the above are some shots of my car as promised.  I'm rubbish with a camera sorry!

Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 67worshipper on May 11, 2008, 20:30:11 pm
phil nice pics mate.this is  lightening to the obsessive.changing the subject a little but are you racing at garys picnic at the end of the month at shakey?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 12, 2008, 09:01:30 am
Everybody has aluminium caster shims, right?  How about these ones made from Magnesium!

Don't forget to drill your heavy aluminium caster shims.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 12, 2008, 09:55:08 am
phil nice pics mate.this is  lightening to the obsessive.changing the subject a little but are you racing at garys picnic at the end of the month at shakey?

yes I am aiming to be at Gary's Picnic, my tow vehicle is being restored at present, we are on for meeting the deadline but you never know with vans.  Keeping everything crossed - will know better nearer the day.  Bug's ready to roll anyhow.
Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 12, 2008, 09:58:05 am
Everybody has aluminium caster shims, right?  How about these ones made from Magnesium!

Don't forget to drill your heavy aluminium caster shims.


How could I have been so stupid?  I have triple shims and they are all hole free.  An obvious thing to do!  Definitely got to be worth at least 40 grams if not more, on 6 total plates of ally.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Roman on May 12, 2008, 16:31:51 pm
I can see you have a hole drillled the hand brake handle, but have you shortened it? It is at least 1" too long! Just cut it off and re-tread the brake release button wire.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter on May 12, 2008, 17:08:00 pm
do you guys skip breakfast or eating as well before you race?
it might save you a few 100 g as well :)
another idea is to clip your nails, cut your hair, go running in 40deg so you lose a few litres of water, it will save a few grams too, maybe even more,
or dont eat at all, the money you save you can put in your car


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jon on May 12, 2008, 17:24:00 pm
Super cool stuff Beardie wierdie... ! Truly inspiring stuff!!
Have you thought about giving blood the day before? ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on May 12, 2008, 17:27:22 pm
Bruce, who made those caster shims?

Pretty cool stuff here guys!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 67worshipper on May 12, 2008, 19:12:56 pm
phil nice pics mate.this is  lightening to the obsessive.changing the subject a little but are you racing at garys picnic at the end of the month at shakey?

yes I am aiming to be at Gary's Picnic, my tow vehicle is being restored at present, we are on for meeting the deadline but you never know with vans.  Keeping everything crossed - will know better nearer the day.  Bug's ready to roll anyhow.
Cheers
Phil
the reason i asked phil is id like a OFF hoody please ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 67worshipper on May 12, 2008, 19:13:43 pm
a medium one please.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 14, 2008, 06:04:03 am
Bruce, who made those caster shims?
Don't know for sure.  I found them at a swap meet years before any aftermarket co offered the Al ones.  I think the guy said they were genuine VW.  I heard it was a fix VW did for cars that didn't meet the caster spec.

Have you guys removed the inspection cover plate under the back seat?  That's ¼ kilo there.  How about replacing the steel one at the front frame head with a thin Al one?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 14, 2008, 06:30:39 am
Also I saved 8 grams by hollowing out the 3 pinch bolts on the transmission plus I cut and dished the heads on them.  
Other tips use light weight oil like a 5W, much lighter over 6 litres.  
What are these 3 "pinch bolts"? 
How about changing the large M18 bolts in the ends of the frame horns for the later bolts?  The early ones have a 27mm head, late ones have a 20mm head. The late ones must be lighter.

The viscosity of oil does not relate to the density.  IOW, a liter of  SAE 5wt. oil isn't lighter than a liter of SAE 50wt.

..... I left all original glass too. ....

Stock VW glass is 5mm thick.  If you take all the side glass into a glass shop, you can get them to make you new ones from 4mm glass.  20% lighter!  Or if you have big cajones, go for 3mm glass.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 14, 2008, 06:35:05 am
How could I have been so stupid?  I have triple shims and they are all hole free.  An obvious thing to do!  Definitely got to be worth at least 40 grams if not more, on 6 total plates of ally.
Check their length first.  I have seen aftermarket ones that are unnecessarily long.  The Mg ones above are 60mm long.  Ya think I should drill the Mg ones? :P


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 14, 2008, 09:10:40 am
[Check their length first.  I have seen aftermarket ones that are unnecessarily long.  The Mg ones above are 60mm long.  Ya think I should drill the Mg ones? :P
[/quote]

Oh yeah get the drill on 'em!  Tucked away they are never seen so it's gotta be done :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 14, 2008, 09:11:25 am
a medium one please.

Not a problem, I'll check our stocks to make sure we have the size......


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 14, 2008, 09:14:10 am
How about changing the large M18 bolts in the ends of the frame horns for the later bolts?  The early ones have a 27mm head, late ones have a 20mm head. The late ones must be lighter.

V. useful...although I was planning on getting them made in titanium but in the meantime I'll search out a late late set


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on May 14, 2008, 18:45:19 pm
I find a nine inch grinder comes in handy when I am after losing an ounce or two... ;D

(http://img110.mytextgraphics.com/photolava/2008/05/14/grind-fg87bm30.jpeg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: danny gabbard on May 14, 2008, 22:13:20 pm
doe's anybody still acid etch body's anymore


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: jamiep_jamiep on May 16, 2008, 10:11:18 am
Awesome thread guys - love the work you've done on the bug Phil - would love to see some more pictures if you have any. Think I might invest in a heavy duty drill & bit set... I'm already on a diet to get myself down in weight before Bug Jam ( my wife refers to the diet as "Operation Race Weight"!) so think I might allow myself a few hot dogs this weekend and resign myself to lightening the bug instead.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 16, 2008, 10:20:44 am
Awesome thread guys - love the work you've done on the bug Phil - would love to see some more pictures if you have any. Think I might invest in a heavy duty drill & bit set... I'm already on a diet to get myself down in weight before Bug Jam ( my wife refers to the diet as "Operation Race Weight"!) so think I might allow myself a few hot dogs this weekend and resign myself to lightening the bug instead.



Cheers matey :)  I use screwfix drills in packets of 5 (titanium coated) in steps of 0.5mm:

http://www.screwfix.com/search.do;jsessionid=MLP0SYNLWHASECSTHZOCFFY?_dyncharset=UTF-8&fh_search=erbauer+HSS+drill+pack

I went from 2mm to 10mm in half mm then up to 20mm in 1mm increments.  Two packets of most meant I started with around 300 drills.  All my holes I start with 2mm, drill all holes and then work upwards to 2.5mm etc.  I'm also too fat but I'm last on the list for lightening!  It will happen eventually.....

In future when I drill stuff I'll take photos of it all off the car so I can post some better shots.

Cheers
Phil






Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Dokke/DFL on May 17, 2008, 20:59:23 pm
Really awesome thread !!!
Such a nice job Phil !!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on May 19, 2008, 10:19:45 am
doe's anybody still acid etch body's anymore

I had my doors done, but that's because even with paint stripper I couldn't get rid of the horrible 80's graphics! :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rocket Ron on May 26, 2008, 20:13:08 pm
Sorry thought you were all a bit anal but I can see now how adictive this could be  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 67worshipper on May 26, 2008, 20:49:38 pm
its all about one thing! makin it run faster! it can get obsessive as pete has already said.there comes a time when going back to the motor is imminent!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Joe_G on May 28, 2008, 22:59:38 pm

(http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=16667;image)

Those holes look familiar, almost like they were done by someone else!!! ;) ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 30, 2008, 09:41:53 am
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=616617

Nikasyl Barrels


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on May 30, 2008, 17:00:42 pm
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=616617

Nikasyl Barrels

And of course slipper skirt pistons will help too! ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 58vw on June 01, 2008, 06:39:55 am
very cool thread...gave me all kinds of ideas....but first...need to go to jenny craig..could drop 40lbs there alone ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Harry/FDK on June 02, 2008, 16:29:40 pm
Super cool stuff Beardie wierdie... ! Truly inspiring stuff!!
Have you thought about giving blood the day before? ;)


 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Harry/FDK on June 05, 2008, 19:13:47 pm
Super cool stuff Beardie wierdie... ! Truly inspiring stuff!!
Have you thought about giving blood the day before? ;)

How about having hefty sex before youre run ?  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: nicolas on June 05, 2008, 20:03:46 pm
nah, you want to sleep after sex, not dragrace


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Steve D. on June 06, 2008, 00:14:30 am
How about having hefty sex before youre run ?  ;)

What's that- getting it on with a fat chick, or using a trash bag as a contraceptive?

...guess it beats "wimpy wimpy wimpy"...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 19, 2008, 07:31:08 am
I've recently discovered a new metal to use.  I call it DRILLIUM  :)

The arm in the middle is what I started with at 143g.  On the left it's now 76g.  I showed it to one of the engineers at work and he agreed it's strength hasn't been compromised given the meager forces applied to it.  The arm on the right is probably what most early cars have.  It weighs in at 102g.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ian c on June 19, 2008, 22:07:20 pm

(http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=16667;image)

Those holes look familiar, almost like they were done by someone else!!! ;) ;)


how much wieght would be saved by drilling a standard 56 door like that ??



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ian c on June 19, 2008, 22:09:10 pm
nah, you want to sleep after sex, not dragrace

please dont mention SEX and DRAGRACE in the same sentence !!!

if my girl reads this she'll be making all kind of jokes about my 10 second passes  ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Harry/FDK on June 25, 2008, 19:19:36 pm
10 second passes, you can't blame her Ian. ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: nicolas on June 25, 2008, 20:21:37 pm
nah, you want to sleep after sex, not dragrace

please dont mention SEX and DRAGRACE in the same sentence !!!

if my girl reads this she'll be making all kind of jokes about my 10 second passes  ::)

10 seconds, impressive, most impressive,  ;D, but do you count your aftersex cigarette in those 10 as well?  ;D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: jamiep_jamiep on June 26, 2008, 10:05:19 am
nah, you want to sleep after sex, not dragrace

please dont mention SEX and DRAGRACE in the same sentence !!!

if my girl reads this she'll be making all kind of jokes about my 10 second passes  ::)

10 seconds, impressive, most impressive,  ;D, but do you count your aftersex cigarette in those 10 as well?  ;D ;D

You wait till AFTERWARDS for a cigarette nicolas? Wow, what a considerate guy... ;) My wife has to hold an ashtray the whole way through. hahah j/k


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ian c on June 30, 2008, 20:40:26 pm
ashtray ??
thats what belly-buttons are for !!! :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on July 14, 2008, 13:44:43 pm
how about this, weight saving fans ;D

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/pix/medium/2155555.jpg)

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=635629



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on July 14, 2008, 13:48:03 pm
how about this, weight saving fans ;D

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/pix/medium/2155555.jpg)

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=635629



 :o :o :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: jamiep_jamiep on July 21, 2008, 13:39:24 pm
Would the light weight Porsche wheel nuts (aluminium?) work with any other aftermarket wheels? Or is it possible to buy similar light weight nuts from another source that may be used? Anyone know the weight difference per full set, Stock vs. 911 type?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: j-f on July 21, 2008, 13:44:02 pm
Nicolas gives me yesterday a flywheel he previously use on his fastback.
I weigh it ant I found an impressive 3.6kg / 7.4lb  :o :o



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on July 21, 2008, 13:45:59 pm
Would the light weight Porsche wheel nuts (aluminium?) work with any other aftermarket wheels? Or is it possible to buy similar light weight nuts from another source that may be used? Anyone know the weight difference per full set, Stock vs. 911 type?

porsche nuts are 14x1.5mm radiused so they will work with most 4 lug porsche wheels and maybe Erco's with the washers, you could fit them to 5 lug if you opened up the holes on the drums and fitted press in studs ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ian c on July 21, 2008, 21:26:07 pm
Would the light weight Porsche wheel nuts (aluminium?) work with any other aftermarket wheels? Or is it possible to buy similar light weight nuts from another source that may be used? Anyone know the weight difference per full set, Stock vs. 911 type?

porsche nuts are 14x1.5mm radiused so they will work with most 4 lug porsche wheels and maybe Erco's with the washers, you could fit them to 5 lug if you opened up the holes on the drums and fitted press in studs ;D
i thoiught they vwere bigger than that ??
i also thought they had a "balanced" locking nut , and a RED-DOT opposite the valve stem ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on October 27, 2008, 15:45:22 pm
these bearing caps should save a bit of weight ;D

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=400954


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jim Smith on October 27, 2008, 17:33:52 pm
I had a customer a while back with a hill climb car who had spent weeks using a hole saw to lighten everything inside his car. He had done a really nice job, and was sure he could "feel" the difference it had made. Was"nt untill he had left and i started putting in a new lighter cage that i discovered that he had left at least 90% of the cut out metal in the bottom of the 1/4 panels and doors!!!

 Time well spent!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on October 27, 2008, 17:40:35 pm
I had a customer a while back with a hill climb car who had spent weeks using a hole saw to lighten everything inside his car. He had done a really nice job, and was sure he could "feel" the difference it had made. Was"nt untill he had left and i started putting in a new lighter cage that i discovered that he had left at least 90% of the cut out metal in the bottom of the 1/4 panels and doors!!!

 Time well spent!!

 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: kev d on October 27, 2008, 19:02:27 pm
Not weighed it yet but this lot must be worth something :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: tikimadness on October 27, 2008, 21:56:03 pm
Not weighed it yet but this lot must be worth something :o

I think it is at least half a second lying in the trailer :P

Michael


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on December 31, 2008, 02:06:27 am
Not weighed it yet but this lot must be worth something :o

Thats gotta be at least 50 kg worth of premium German steel there. :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ian c on December 31, 2008, 03:55:41 am
yip .
worth a fortune on thesamba

:D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on December 31, 2008, 14:38:24 pm
yip .
worth a fortune on thesamba

:D

 ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 22, 2009, 12:48:33 pm
Just had a call from a friend of mine who can get floor pan washers made in 2.5mm thick Aluminium, ball park figure is £2 each bit if I can get enough interest/orders that price will come down ;D PM me if you're interested ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on January 22, 2009, 14:45:55 pm
Just had a call from a friend of mine who can get floor pan washers made in 2.5mm thick Aluminium, ball park figure is £2 each bit if I can get enough interest/orders that price will come down ;D PM me if you're interested ;D

saves around half a kilo if you do all 24, made a set last year.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on January 22, 2009, 15:15:48 pm
Just had a call from a friend of mine who can get floor pan washers made in 2.5mm thick Aluminium, ball park figure is £2 each bit if I can get enough interest/orders that price will come down ;D PM me if you're interested ;D

saves around half a kilo if you do all 24, made a set last year.

Same as going for a long walk the day before the race, or a long session in the bed.. and it`s cheaper too.... depending if you had to pay for the company in your bed.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 22, 2009, 16:03:24 pm
If you do both that's a kilo ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ian c on January 22, 2009, 19:35:16 pm
Just had a call from a friend of mine who can get floor pan washers made in 2.5mm thick Aluminium, ball park figure is £2 each bit if I can get enough interest/orders that price will come down ;D PM me if you're interested ;D

saves around half a kilo if you do all 24, made a set last year.

Same as going for a long walk the day before the race, 
or if youre fat and lazy like me , you can buy the lightwieght washers then you can eat a big beef buritto while waiting on the start line and not worry about putting any wieght on  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 22, 2009, 19:56:04 pm
You could eat the Burrito loaded with Chilli, take a crap and save even more ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 22, 2009, 20:39:32 pm
Think I'm gonna eat a chilli burrito,during sex,while sitting on a toilet that I had to walk 5 miles to,before each race. ;D Oh and I am interested in the ally washers dude,need to count how many I will need.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 22, 2009, 20:44:38 pm
Thought you might so I've already ordered yours(and i've got a source for ali bolts too), you need all the help you can get :P

Checked on Etos and you need 18 for a late car, your oval might need more or less................or the same


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: lowfastbus on January 22, 2009, 21:02:58 pm
I just used normal steel washers, they might even weigh less the the original style washers in aluminium.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 22, 2009, 21:09:15 pm
saves around half a kilo if you do all 24, made a set last year.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Harry/FDK on January 22, 2009, 21:14:52 pm
Is there a way to drill, seal, inject it with Helium, so i can loose the springs and hinges?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 23, 2009, 21:47:58 pm
you need all the help you can get :P


:o Easy now cheeky lad or Uncle Buck might have to fetch the hatchet from the trunk of the car  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 25, 2009, 11:11:19 am
:o Easy now cheeky lad or Uncle Buck might have to fetch the hatchet from the trunk of the car  ;D

A drill would be more practical, what with this being the weight saving thread, phil west can hook you up with the best drill bits ;D

(http://home.cogeco.net/~vip/unclebuck.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 25, 2009, 23:18:28 pm
 ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Wünderwolff on January 26, 2009, 08:51:28 am
This weekend, I have cut out the doorstopper thing in my A-pillar. In my case it was more form over function, as I probably added more weight in welding rod than I took out. But there is some gain to be made if you want to. In the mousetrap behind the A pillar, in the trunk, there is a really bulky plate to prevent your door from pulling the doorstopper all the way through your pannelling. It is very hard to reach (hence I did not take it out, remember form over function here  ;D) but there might be a massive 250gr. x 2 to be saved.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 27, 2009, 05:35:27 am
Alright guys, get your asses out of the pub and into your lockup.  A little bit of time every few days will produce results.  Here's the latest results from the pillar drill:

This is the bracket that bolts to the gearbox's side cover to hold the rear end of the bowden tube.  The stock steel one on the left is about 60% of what it used to weigh.  Next, I bent up one out of ally.  It's less than half the stock one's weight even without all the holes it's gonna get.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: the beard on January 29, 2009, 13:26:57 pm
Here's my latest weight savings:

Autometer guages - drilled the ally mounts that they come with - 10 grams
Drivers side heater tube behind seat - 300 grams (other side still to do)
Single skin glovebox lid and make ally hinges - 250 grams
Ashtray - remove the box and leave the fascia - 289 grams
Solid ally fuel line and fiitings (from braided) - 489 grams
carpet tucked into sill plate - 310 grams per side
Wiring - switch to thinwall and remove headlight/indicator harnesses - 600 grams
Titanium plates and nuts for Seat harnesses under floorpan - 100 grams
Ally bolts on the back of the speedo, glovebox - 25 grams

Still to do - lighten door hinges and front and rear bumper mounts.  Disassemble raptgop and lighten.  Swap Berg solid iron deep sump for EMPI thin quality light one.  Get rid of that 4,750gram windscreen.  That's about all I'll have time for.

Car down to 1,332lbs/605.5kg including windscreen swap which gives me another 6kg to break the magic 600kg barrier.
Cheers
Phil



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on January 29, 2009, 15:18:49 pm
Good work Beardie 8)

Soon you will be able run a 12 with just a 30 hp motor! So, with a stock Bug weighing in at around 750 kilos you have managed to shed around 150 and without any drastic body mods. That's absolutely fantastic. I wonder what Mr. Shattock's car is weighing in at now? Pete? You broken the 600 kg barrier yet?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 29, 2009, 15:33:23 pm
Good work Beardie 8)

Soon you will be able run a 12 with just a 30 hp motor! So, with a stock Bug weighing in at around 750 kilos you have managed to shed around 150 and without any drastic body mods. That's absolutely fantastic. I wonder what Mr. Shattock's car is weighing in at now? Pete? You broken the 600 kg barrier yet?

Pete's is a Streetcar :P


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: the beard on January 29, 2009, 18:02:10 pm
yep she still looks pretty much bone stock bodywork-wise, not a bad weight loss considering I've got that goliath weight Quaife in there.  I've pretty much not cut any of the original metalwork on the car and she's still got a stock beam up front.  One day I hope I might get it back up to street legal status - will add back a fair few pounds but would be nice to see what she can do running wipers and a rear view mirror!  Of course I'm still running the street motor, there's a possible normally aspirated 10 if I ever stop drilling and put the right lump in!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 30, 2009, 06:50:24 am
I've got that goliath weight Quaife in there. 
If the gearbox is ever apart, have the flange of the Q cut down like a cloverleaf.  Dead weight and rotating.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: jamiep_jamiep on January 30, 2009, 10:51:31 am
Good work Beardie 8)

Soon you will be able run a 12 with just a 30 hp motor! So, with a stock Bug weighing in at around 750 kilos you have managed to shed around 150 and without any drastic body mods. That's absolutely fantastic. I wonder what Mr. Shattock's car is weighing in at now? Pete? You broken the 600 kg barrier yet?

Pete's is a Streetcar :P

With no headlight wiring?!

 ;D :o :o :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on January 30, 2009, 11:27:55 am

With no headlight wiring?!

 ;D :o :o :o
? don't get it, Pete's has headlight wiring,wipers and is 'kin quick for a 1776 street car ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: jamiep_jamiep on February 06, 2009, 17:29:21 pm
Wiring - switch to thinwall and remove headlight/indicator harnesses - 600 grams

Have I got the wrong end of the stcik from the above Ben? WOuldn't be the first time!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: jamiep_jamiep on February 06, 2009, 17:30:28 pm

With no headlight wiring?!

 ;D :o :o :o
? don't get it, Pete's has headlight wiring,wipers and is 'kin quick for a 1776 street car ;D

That ain't in dispute, +its kool & the gang too!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on February 06, 2009, 23:55:22 pm
This might be a worthwhile addition... or should that be 'subtraction'?
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=716893 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=716893)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 69Stu on February 08, 2009, 19:00:40 pm
Where are people getting their Aluminium bolts from in the UK ?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on February 08, 2009, 19:33:49 pm
http://www.nylonalloys.co.uk/cgi-bin/shop/nylon-alloys-categories.pl?ALUMINIUM|METRIC| it's worth searching through there bolts, some that are slightly longer work out cheaper ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 69Stu on February 08, 2009, 19:56:07 pm
http://www.nylonalloys.co.uk/cgi-bin/shop/nylon-alloys-categories.pl?ALUMINIUM|METRIC| it's worth searching through there bolts, some that are slightly longer work out cheaper ;D

Cheers ben.

Any news on the Aluminium floor pan washers ?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on February 08, 2009, 20:00:26 pm
I'll speak to him tomorrow ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Harry/FDK on February 10, 2009, 20:20:30 pm
Also: www.tastynuts.co.uk


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 18, 2009, 09:30:42 am
Heres one for the serious only :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Martin on March 18, 2009, 11:53:19 am
I can see Phill buying some more drill bits now!   lol


Title: Re: The weight saving thread / Ali nuts and bolts
Post by: Stephan32 on March 18, 2009, 13:30:19 pm
Hi Guys,

Would be great I f somebody would put together a complete package set to purchase!
I am some what of an idiot when it comes to srews and sizes I need to order  ???

Cheers anyway Stephan  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on March 23, 2009, 11:22:34 am
Actually I picked up another 170 drill bits last week!

Drilled springplates?  Open end to torsion bar covers so they can just fall out?  Man this is really scary stuff.  Not for me!

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 23, 2009, 16:05:05 pm
Actually I picked up another 170 drill bits last week!

Drilled springplates?  Open end to torsion bar covers so they can just fall out?  Man this is really scary stuff.  Not for me!

Cheers
Phil

Phil,there were factory open ended covers on later cars so that would be no problem


cheers richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ESH on March 23, 2009, 20:57:31 pm
... Actually I picked up another 170 drill bits last week ...

Ballast?  ???


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on March 24, 2009, 08:13:48 am
Actually I picked up another 170 drill bits last week!

Drilled springplates?  Open end to torsion bar covers so they can just fall out?  Man this is really scary stuff.  Not for me!

Cheers
Phil

Phil,there were factory open ended covers on later cars so that would be no problem


cheers richie

Whoops! Soz not familiar with all the modern VWs and their new fangled high tech modifications  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 10, 2009, 13:35:04 pm
Titanium axle nuts.  58 gms rotational weight saved.

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: GeirH on April 10, 2009, 14:04:28 pm
...and when everything else has been done, don't forget to delete your text-messages on your cellularphone.... ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on April 10, 2009, 14:46:44 pm
Titanium axle nuts.  58 gms rotational weight saved.

Cheers
Phil

Phil,I cant believe you arent using open ended wheel nuts :o :o  You need to sort that out double quick ;) :D  Cant imagine how much all this Ti stuff is costing


cheers richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on April 10, 2009, 17:27:29 pm
Very nice phil, looks like you've got 3 grams of pain on those drums, another 6 grams of rotational weight you could lose ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Nico86 on April 10, 2009, 18:41:38 pm
...and when everything else has been done, don't forget to delete your text-messages on your cellularphone.... ;D

... and to go to the toilet before a run ! :D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 10, 2009, 20:34:40 pm
What's with the steel split pin?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on April 10, 2009, 20:54:34 pm
What's with the steel split pin?
Don't worry, it's made of 'Doesn'tweighadamnium'...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 12, 2009, 08:26:27 am
What's with the steel split pin?

Yep just temporary, I think I can knock some up in Titanium......


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 12, 2009, 08:29:42 am
Titanium axle nuts.  58 gms rotational weight saved.

Cheers
Phil

Phil,I cant believe you arent using open ended wheel nuts :o :o  You need to sort that out double quick ;) :D  Cant imagine how much all this Ti stuff is costing


cheers richie

Actually they are Porsche ally nuts so really light - wouldn't trust open ended ally surely there's not enough strenth in it.  Otherwise I'd have some!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 12, 2009, 10:30:05 am
The ol' drilled pedals routine.

Weight before - 2183gm
Weight after - 1938gm

Saving: 245gm.

Although I did hack off at least 55gms of underseal from around the pedal area so I'm down about 300gm.

Weight loss does include a couple of replacement titanium bolts.

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 12, 2009, 10:31:53 am
couple of other pics of the arms and the replacement Titanium plate I made


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 67worshipper on April 12, 2009, 10:40:50 am
just obsessive phil ;D what more can i say ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 12, 2009, 18:09:57 pm
I would have drilled much bigger holes in the clutch pedal shaft.  The forces on it are nowhere near what the brake pedal gets.
Anyone know what the late pedal assembly weighs?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on April 12, 2009, 20:00:47 pm
You could have made a bigger slot in that titanium plate dude  ;) :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 13, 2009, 00:07:51 am
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)
I spent quite a bit of time BSing with Mark about lightweight stuff.  I think he'd be all over this part (123g):
Anyone know what the stock one weighs?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 13, 2009, 10:26:07 am
I would have drilled much bigger holes in the clutch pedal shaft.  The forces on it are nowhere near what the brake pedal gets.
Anyone know what the late pedal assembly weighs?

That's a fair point.  I've taken more out of it now.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 13, 2009, 10:29:03 am
You could have made a bigger slot in that titanium plate dude  ;) :)

Actually I've jumped the gun getting the pics, pretty sure I'm going to have to in order to get the adjustment on the pedal stoppers.  It's just a bit of a bugger to grind out.  Right now I have pillar driller's elbow and can look forward to titanium filer's shoulder!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on April 13, 2009, 11:10:52 am
You could have made a bigger slot in that titanium plate dude  ;) :)

Actually I've jumped the gun getting the pics, pretty sure I'm going to have to in order to get the adjustment on the pedal stoppers.  It's just a bit of a bugger to grind out.  Right now I have pillar driller's elbow and can look forward to titanium filer's shoulder!

 :D :D :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on April 13, 2009, 19:22:28 pm
Wow! I just love the Ti axle nuts 8). How much for a pair please Phil?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 13, 2009, 20:28:54 pm
Wow! I just love the Ti axle nuts 8). How much for a pair please Phil?

They are a bit sexy I admit!  Sorry, Pete's machinist had some leftover Ti so ours were a one off.....


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: WCB Hitler's Hot Rod on April 14, 2009, 09:09:03 am
All this drilling makes me want to get another piercing...
http://www.myinterestingfiles.com/images/2008/03/extremebodypiercing_8.jpg


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Trond Dahl on April 14, 2009, 09:12:18 am
All this drilling makes me want to get another piercing...
http://www.myinterestingfiles.com/images/2008/03/extremebodypiercing_8.jpg

thats way to heavy... even if they are titanium


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 28, 2009, 08:57:51 am
I was talking to Eric Ballard last week and asked him about his lightweight car he ran in the late 80s.
He said he removed all the double skinning from the inside, such that you couldn't tell from outside that the car had been gutted.

In his gearbox, he lightened many of the parts.  He core drilled the mainshaft (but not past 2nd gear)  He said he removed over 1.1 kg from the ring gear alone.  The gears were narrowed and drilled.  I think he said the axles were drilled too.

The end result was that he had a drag car that weighed under 450kg without driver.  And that included a roll cage and wheelie bars.  And all steel body panels.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: cal-look 56 on April 28, 2009, 17:51:59 pm
Very imppressive stuff.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: nicolas on April 29, 2009, 09:00:04 am
I was talking to Eric Ballard last week and asked him about his lightweight car he ran in the late 80s.
He said he removed all the double skinning from the inside, such that you couldn't tell from outside that the car had been gutted.

In his gearbox, he lightened many of the parts.  He core drilled the mainshaft (but not past 2nd gear)  He said he removed over 1.1 kg from the ring gear alone.  The gears were narrowed and drilled.  I think he said the axles were drilled too.

The end result was that he had a drag car that weighed under 450kg without driver.  And that included a roll cage and wheelie bars.  And all steel body panels.

we need a seperate post off this cars and even more details ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on April 29, 2009, 14:20:19 pm
I'm sure if we ask Russell nicely he will post up some pictures, but under 1000lbs is seriously light for a floor pan car even when it is a racecar. I've seen some pictures of the spring plates on it, maybe even earlier on this thread (I can't remember much these days), but there was a lot of light weight air where steel used to be!

The challenge is out! Has anyone got a steel beetle ready to race on a floor plan that’s under 1000lbs / 450kg (no driver) other than Russell.

As luck would have it I’m just off to the machine shop now, to swap a steel bracket for an aluminum one but I think it might take something a bit more drastic for me to be in the running!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: cal-look 56 on April 29, 2009, 16:33:05 pm
I use to have a car that was about 1100lbs and I can tell you it was a handfull to drive.  1000lb car will will surely be worst. Gotta have big balls for sure. ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 67worshipper on April 29, 2009, 22:54:26 pm
oles pink panther car must be getting close to a 1000lb.i know its not all steel and a racecar but sure is cut away ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on April 29, 2009, 23:23:55 pm
oles pink panther car must be getting close to a 1000lb.i know its not all steel and a racecar but sure is cut away ;)

Oh yeah its Cut up - you gotta love the inner heater channel removal ;) :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: . on May 02, 2009, 02:20:43 am
Why not inflate the tires with Helium and make the whole car lighter !?!
 ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 02, 2009, 03:17:30 am
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)
I spent quite a bit of time BSing with Mark about lightweight stuff.  I think he'd be all over this part (123g):
Anyone know what the stock one weighs?
Does anybody know what a stock glass headlight lens weighs?  Does anyone know where to buy these plastic headlight lenses?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 02, 2009, 03:22:58 am
Not VW, but you get the point.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lids on May 02, 2009, 10:17:11 am
Have just started to save weight on my bug, the cheapest and easiest way seems ot put myself on a diet.  Therefore no coke or chocolate for me until i reach my target weight and save 15kg!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 16, 2009, 11:36:55 am
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)
I spent quite a bit of time BSing with Mark about lightweight stuff.  I think he'd be all over this part (123g):
Anyone know what the stock one weighs?
Does anybody know what a stock glass headlight lens weighs?  Does anyone know where to buy these plastic headlight lenses?

I would like to get my hands on a pair of those 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on May 16, 2009, 12:22:14 pm
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)
I spent quite a bit of time BSing with Mark about lightweight stuff.  I think he'd be all over this part (123g):
Anyone know what the stock one weighs?
Does anybody know what a stock glass headlight lens weighs?  Does anyone know where to buy these plastic headlight lenses?

500g ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 16, 2009, 12:51:09 pm
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)
I spent quite a bit of time BSing with Mark about lightweight stuff.  I think he'd be all over this part (123g):
Anyone know what the stock one weighs?
Does anybody know what a stock glass headlight lens weighs?  Does anyone know where to buy these plastic headlight lenses?

500g ;D

See, now I want a pair even more ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 17, 2009, 05:25:28 am
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)
I spent quite a bit of time BSing with Mark about lightweight stuff.  I think he'd be all over this part (123g):
Anyone know what the stock one weighs?
Does anybody know what a stock glass headlight lens weighs?  Does anyone know where to buy these plastic headlight lenses?

500g ;D

See,now I want a pair even more ;D
I know where you can get a pair of plastic lenses in French yellow.  LMK and I'll set it up. 
Are the yellow headlights still legal in France?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 17, 2009, 20:44:19 pm
My homage to Mark and the SSB was to get a pair of those cheap,plastic,Rossi headlights,shocking quality but very light :)
I spent quite a bit of time BSing with Mark about lightweight stuff.  I think he'd be all over this part (123g):
Anyone know what the stock one weighs?
Does anybody know what a stock glass headlight lens weighs?  Does anyone know where to buy these plastic headlight lenses?

500g ;D

See,now I want a pair even more ;D
I know where you can get a pair of plastic lenses in French yellow.  LMK and I'll set it up. 
Are the yellow headlights still legal in France?

Hey Bruce

Many thanks for the offer.

Unfortunately I live in the UK,where you cant use yellow lenses :(,I am after some clear one's like yourself.

I will give you a shout if I manage to source some clear lenses over here ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: eugene on June 03, 2009, 10:49:36 am
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on June 06, 2009, 17:07:25 pm
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)


These look very promising,gonna keep my eye on this to see if they go into production.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: volkskris on June 18, 2009, 17:36:14 pm
start with a late car and buy some carbon stuff by remmele-motorsport :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: tikimadness on June 18, 2009, 19:49:01 pm
start with a late car and buy some carbon stuff by remmele-motorsport :)

Will you please stop the cursing! ;D

Michael


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: volkskris on June 18, 2009, 20:51:37 pm
start with a late car and buy some carbon stuff by remmele-motorsport :)

Will you please stop the cursing! ;D

Michael
and you can give the look.
look at this car: http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,1300.390.html
lates are great, and carbon can be painted you know... ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 21, 2009, 17:06:53 pm
I was looking at the trans filler plug a few days ago and noticed a couple of variations.
The one on the right should be lighter, right?  Nope, on the other side, the hex socket is deeper on the middle one.  Also, I've always observed the plug is longer than it needs to be, extending past the inner wall, with some still sticking out the outside.
So a few minutes on the grinder gets you the left one.
Right one : 32g
Middle : 28g
Left one: 18g
Not much, but every bit helps.




Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bernard Newbury on June 21, 2009, 18:59:43 pm
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)

I believe Simon at Paintbox ( 01376-573463) is producing these but maybe Phil can confirm this.  Bernie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 23, 2009, 14:46:36 pm
Yes the plastic lenses are currently being manufactured and will be available for purchase soon.

Here's my latest pillar drill exploits.  Weight before = 473gm.  Weight after = 247gm.  Total saving for 2 hinges = 452gm = near enough a pound off.

There's more to drill out of them but I'll bang 'em on for a bit just to check operation.

Cheers


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on June 23, 2009, 17:26:13 pm
Looks good, great idea! :) Why not drill much larger holes though? To retain strength you could dimple die them.
Do you have a goal weight in mind?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 23, 2009, 18:04:23 pm
Yes very much I am aiming for sub 600kg 1320lb.  Was weighed last week at 1,333lb.  Which is now 1,332lb!  So am looking for another 12lb to hit my mark.

Found another 2lb in changing the Berg sump to an EMPI one - don't have precise figures for that yet but that leaves me 10lb.

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: tikimadness on June 24, 2009, 19:39:37 pm
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)

I believe Simon at Paintbox ( 01376-573463) is producing these but maybe Phil can confirm this.  Bernie

Is there anbody who can bring a set for me to EBI3?

Michael


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dirk zeyen on June 24, 2009, 21:01:02 pm
hello,

phil your idea is very cool, another part to save weight is the linkage. build my one on in alloy, the heaviest parts are the bearings, but it works great. my car is a street-car but i really like to save some weight.

dirk


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 27, 2009, 04:32:39 am
Here's my latest pillar drill exploits.  Weight before = 473gm.  Weight after = 247gm.  Total saving for 2 hinges = 452gm = near enough a pound off.

There's more to drill out of them but I'll bang 'em on for a bit just to check operation.
Have you drilled holes in the hood prop linkage bits?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 27, 2009, 06:34:29 am
Here's my latest pillar drill exploits.  Weight before = 473gm.  Weight after = 247gm.  Total saving for 2 hinges = 452gm = near enough a pound off.

There's more to drill out of them but I'll bang 'em on for a bit just to check operation.
Have you drilled holes in the hood prop linkage bits?

yes


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 27, 2009, 06:35:11 am
I was looking at the trans filler plug a few days ago and noticed a couple of variations.
The one on the right should be lighter, right?  Nope, on the other side, the hex socket is deeper on the middle one.  Also, I've always observed the plug is longer than it needs to be, extending past the inner wall, with some still sticking out the outside.
So a few minutes on the grinder gets you the left one.
Right one : 32g
Middle : 28g
Left one: 18g
Not much, but every bit helps.




Mine are the hollow ones


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 27, 2009, 06:36:42 am
hello,

phil your idea is very cool, another part to save weight is the linkage. build my one on in alloy, the heaviest parts are the bearings, but it works great. my car is a street-car but i really like to save some weight.

dirk
I drilled mine.  I'd like to get Ti tube to make my own....


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on June 27, 2009, 11:28:29 am
I was watching something about F1 the other day - How about making your header from "INKANEL" F1 exhaust tubing VERY LIGHT, A Bitch to work though apparently  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 27, 2009, 18:05:07 pm
Why can't you make a muffler from aluminium?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 29, 2009, 13:17:16 pm
40gm saved.  Cheers Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on June 29, 2009, 14:19:28 pm
Phil, the edges of the holes look rather sharp - how about counter-sinking them? Gets rid of a stress riser (not that round holes have stress risers, but you know what I mean!), removes sharp edges and also loses a bit more material!  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 29, 2009, 14:26:38 pm
sorry mate no can do.  Once the workshop reaches 40C / 104F  - I'm outta there!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on June 29, 2009, 16:04:51 pm
sorry mate no can do.  Once the workshop reaches 40C / 104F  - I'm outta there!

Woo! That's even hotter than my classroom! I just had one of the Year 10 lads nearly faint with the heat! :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on June 29, 2009, 17:50:19 pm
(http://www.jmrmfg.com/images/dimple.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ESH on June 29, 2009, 20:39:02 pm
... sorry mate no can do.  Once the workshop reaches 40C / 104F  - I'm outta there! ...

Lightweight!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Martin on June 30, 2009, 11:54:43 am
... sorry mate no can do.  Once the workshop reaches 40C / 104F  - I'm outta there! ...

Lightweight!  ;D

Crack a cold beer and carry on!   lol


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on July 01, 2009, 22:46:13 pm
is it me, or does the crank gear look like it's been machined down?

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/pix/2716402.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: cpalma on July 02, 2009, 14:22:54 pm
looks like it, i think i saw the same thing done in Geer's pro-stock? motor in one of those hot vw's issues (crank gear narrowed to match that on the cam). Any benefit to doing this?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on July 21, 2009, 18:24:22 pm
You may have already spotted these Phil/Pete, but if not, they sound mighty cool for your rides...

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=745441


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on July 27, 2009, 22:08:29 pm
I've been doing my best to ignore the weight saving thing, as best as an addict can anyway, so I don't need any encouragement from you to get distracted! Having said that they do look nice.......

But I'm being good and concentrating on getting the car running again, which all being well should be in the next 2-3 weeks to get some miles on the motor on the street to check all is well before getting to the track at the end of the month, and of course popping round to yours for a brew! Can't wait to see your car for real and better still see it go!

Fingers crossed for good weather!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on August 07, 2009, 17:03:12 pm
I'm after a tiny ally drag button bottom pulley as light as possible to replace my current one weighing in at 2,722gms.

Anything available in the UK?  I like the look of the CE one in the US but it's not in stock.

That's big weight right at the back of the car...

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SteveW on August 07, 2009, 17:15:05 pm
Have you thought about rear disk brakes Phil? I know it's quite a costly thing to change but there is huge weight losses to be had removing the drums!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on August 07, 2009, 17:44:38 pm
gotta be wide 5.  Don't know of any complete rear disc setup in wide 5 that's lighter than stock except maybe the Neal and we're talking mega money


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SteveW on August 07, 2009, 18:17:48 pm
Is that because of your existing wheel set-up your looking for wide 5? You could always ask Jack to make a wide 5 hub to fit the lightweight brakes! Out of interest how much are the neal brakes? The Jaycee ones are about $1k a set


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on August 08, 2009, 07:25:54 am
Partly due to the existing wheels which fit really well and also I just like the wide 5 look.

Reckon a set of those lighweight ones from Jack would be lovely in a wide 5.  They would be a fair bit heavier than yours due to the bigger hub.  As long as the offset was the same and he could supply 14mm studs they would be v. nice!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on August 11, 2009, 21:22:55 pm
Hi all,

Just had go at making some bonnet hinges having been inspired by young Phil, 152grams each, total saving of 1.4kg for the pair,

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Joe_G on August 11, 2009, 21:28:05 pm
Very nice but won't they show the rest of the car up!!!!! :-)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on August 11, 2009, 21:29:51 pm
well you have to start somewhere, and at least mine runs... ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on August 11, 2009, 21:31:34 pm
Hi all,

Just had go at making some bonnet hinges having been inspired by young Phil, 152grams each, total saving of 1.4kg for the pair,

andy

could you make mesome herr marriot, i'll hold your torsion bars to ransom ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Joe_G on August 11, 2009, 21:34:04 pm
well you have to start somewhere, and at least mine runs... ::)

So does mine now ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ESH on August 11, 2009, 21:40:56 pm
... Just had go at making some bonnet hinges having been inspired by young Phil ...

What's so odd about those?  ???

 :P


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on August 11, 2009, 22:43:00 pm
could you make mesome herr marriot, i'll hold your torsion bars to ransom ;D

So have these mythical bars turned up?

If so we'll meet on the bridge at midnight and exchange hostages, wear a red carnation,

grey squirrel


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on August 11, 2009, 22:59:12 pm
Impressed! Especially as you have access to an aluminium spot welder 8) Luxury! Very nice indeed Andy 8) 8) 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on August 11, 2009, 23:08:00 pm
could you make mesome herr marriot, i'll hold your torsion bars to ransom ;D

So have these mythical bars turned up?

If so we'll meet on the bridge at midnight and exchange hostages, wear a red carnation,

grey squirrel
Good evening nighthawk, I will rendezvous with the enigma parts decoder in the morning as i have been to the motherland last weekend and have not as yet been to HQ! I have a day and a half in the control centre before operation SCC, I will message you in the morning ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on August 12, 2009, 00:01:43 am
Those look very nice!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 12, 2009, 06:01:56 am
Hi all,

Just had go at making some bonnet hinges having been inspired by young Phil, 152grams each, total saving of 1.4kg for the pair,

andy
Wow, you've lowered the bar by a 100g over Phil's hinges.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 12, 2009, 06:02:43 am
Phil,
have a look at this pic of your car you posted from the previous page:

http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=31521;image

What's with the extra long fender bolts?  One that's 10mm shorter will do.  Then you can also use aluminium bolts.  Or even lighter still is nylon bolts.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 12, 2009, 06:07:19 am
..... you have access to an aluminium spot welder .....
It's all the same.  The spot welder doesn't know the metal between the jaws.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on August 12, 2009, 06:25:29 am
Phil,
have a look at this pic of your car you posted from the previous page:

http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=31521;image

What's with the extra long fender bolts?  One that's 10mm shorter will do.  Then you can also use aluminium bolts.  Or even lighter still is nylon bolts.


The bolts are already ally - they are the shortest I could find (15mm thread length) but I you know of a UK supplier that will do a 10mm M8 in the potassium bichromate I'm up for it.  I suppose it would save me about 1gram per bolt.  To compensate I only use every other bolt in the wings and removed the wing beading.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on August 12, 2009, 06:29:35 am
Hi all,

Just had go at making some bonnet hinges having been inspired by young Phil, 152grams each, total saving of 1.4kg for the pair,

andy
Wow, you've lowered the bar by a 100g over Phil's hinges.


Yep that's 95 grams less - from thinner material and the far bigger holes.  Since fitting mine they are fairly wobbly side to side with the bonnet up so Andy's are going to be really unstable if there's a gust of wind.  That said I will start to make the holes bigger.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on August 12, 2009, 07:53:48 am
Bruce is right, a spot welder is a spot welder, the only difference is that you need plenty of grunt to spot weld ali, over 10kw normally. Thankfully mine is 3 phase. To spot weld ali with a single phase welder there is a little trick, slip a thin bit of mild steel between the ali and the welding tips and hey presto ali spot welding. This increases the resistance and there fore the heat generated. Still takes a long duration though, some times over 2 seconds.

You are right Phil they are quite thin but a i wont be leaving the bonnet up in a gale and the flaring does dramatically stiffen the ali. I shall fit them at the weekend and do a wobble test, they are only in the prototype stage at the moment.

Andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on August 12, 2009, 08:48:37 am
..... you have access to an aluminium spot welder .....
It's all the same.  The spot welder doesn't know the metal between the jaws.

Try spot welding ali with a regular commercial spot welder... it aint happening ;D. You need massive electrical power to spot ali ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on August 12, 2009, 16:46:33 pm
I would venture that it is stronger with the dimple die'd holes. Nice work!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on August 12, 2009, 20:05:25 pm
Thanks for the kind words but the proof of the pudding is in the eating etc etc. It does help that I have access to some pretty funky metal working tools in my job and the advice of some old guys who've seen it all before. ;D come Saturday afternoon I'll probably have another pile of twisted ali to sort out!

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on August 25, 2009, 18:48:16 pm
Well, I fitted the now patented ali hinges on my '66 and despite very minor lateral deviation they work as advertised and to top it all help to knock nearly .25 second off of my PB!

Andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 07, 2009, 02:28:23 am
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)

I believe Simon at Paintbox ( 01376-573463) is producing these but maybe Phil can confirm this.  Bernie

Looks like this part is a dead-end.  The 'tard who makes them wants $850USD/pr.  :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 07, 2009, 02:32:06 am
I was at Alan U's workshop a couple of days ago and saw these BMW forged aluminum rocker arms on the bench.  Wow were they ever light.  Too bad we can't get such a part for our engines.  Note the steel wear pads.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 07, 2009, 02:55:46 am
Elsewhere in Alan's shop I found this tiny Nissan horn.  Next to a '50s VW type horn, it's a real flyweight.

VW horn: 877g
Nissan: 172g

Reduction: a massive 705g!  (1.55lbs)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on September 16, 2009, 15:27:55 pm
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)


Simon from Paintbox now has plastic lenses available to buy I've put an ad in the for sale section.  Very light.

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on September 17, 2009, 16:31:08 pm
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)


Simon from Paintbox now has plastic lenses available to buy I've put an ad in the for sale section.  Very light.

Cheers
Phil

Been looking for something like this for ages,reserved a pair today  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on September 20, 2009, 22:13:51 pm
200mm KEP 1700# pressure plate vs aluminium version of the same. Savings of 1,528.7 grams or just under 3lbs 6oz


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on September 20, 2009, 22:22:22 pm
Standard issue cast iron dual circut master cylinder vs aluminium "76 Bus" master cylinder. Savings of 620.7 grams, over one pound and nearly half as light.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 21, 2009, 07:10:09 am
Do you know the bore diameter of that Bus MC, Zach?
Notice the shaft sticking out.  That means it is designed to work with a vacuum booster.

Here's one from a BMW (529g) :


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on September 21, 2009, 17:16:10 pm
Not sure of the diameter. There are a few different aluminium master cylinders that can easily be adapted to a Beetle, so I was just showing the possible weight savings.
Does the BMW one interchange well for a Beetle?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on September 21, 2009, 17:23:25 pm
I am running a bus master in my 66, definitely lighter.

(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/SE9s6spOUCI/AAAAAAAACSM/7_kvWvUz0aQ/s400/IMG_7714.JPG)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on September 22, 2009, 13:04:04 pm
(http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=34315;image)

Pete Shattock has one of these on his 1776, seems to work ok  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Woodentop on September 22, 2009, 13:57:50 pm
Has anyone got any opinions or weight details of 4 quart sumps,
Have got a Berg one on at moment and it weighs a lot but is there a lighter one, maybe CB Performance
Phil, did you swap yours mate

Woodentop


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on September 22, 2009, 14:04:06 pm
Has anyone got any opinions or weight details of 4 quart sumps,
Have got a Berg one on at moment and it weighs a lot but is there a lighter one, maybe CB Performance
Phil, did you swap yours mate

Woodentop

Paul, i'll go an weigh an Empi one, I know they're lighter because Phil had one! ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: cpalma on September 22, 2009, 14:36:31 pm
Hi Zach, who sells those aluminum pp's?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Woodentop on September 22, 2009, 18:02:20 pm
What can i say ben, that is very much appreciated buddy. just need some 4mm Alu tooling sheet for a sump plate and that should  all work a treat.

Just a note to all other weight weenies by the way, we swapped the Berg 52 carbs to Jenvy TB's and saved apprx 4kg, we originally swapped because the 52's wern't flowing enough so we picked up the cfm and what a bonus, 4kg's!!! and its weight hanging out the back of the car

Woodentop


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on September 22, 2009, 18:03:01 pm
Not sure how you go about getting one, really. I've heard that they were available for years, but never saw anything on KEP's website. This one I just happened to stumble upon on eBay :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 23, 2009, 02:02:21 am
Have got a Berg one on at moment and it weighs a lot ...
Everything Berg makes is heftyweight.  If you are trying to save weight, just don't buy Berg bits.
If you have the extra wide Berg sump, I think it weighs in around 5½ kilos.
For a street car, you don't need 4 extra liters.  With a 1½ qt sump and a spin-on filter, my oil change volume is almost 5 liters.  Anything more than this is just extra weight.  My vintage Lang deep sump is less than 1½ Kilos.  Not only is it 4 kilos less than the Berg sump, it holds 1.75 kilos less oil. 
Total savings :  5.75 kg or 12½ lbs.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on September 23, 2009, 08:05:30 am
In terms of the pressure plates, Kennedy still do them, and when I bought mine (recently) the 200mm were off the shelf, but the 180mm were special order. I have to say they were really good to deal with and shipped all the bits out top speed.

Be aware that the ali version should only be used with a regular disc like a Dakin or similar, not a puck or a Black Magic etc.

Hey Woody, I had thought about a folded ali sump, but Richie found me an old Berg magnesium one a while back so I never persued it, but its a nice idea.....as its all hanging out the back there!

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Woodentop on September 23, 2009, 09:22:58 am
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the tip buddy, this one is for my race car but will take up your advise for my steetcar though.

Peter, that is a top idea, may need to call Mr Taylor, he is awesome at stuff like this

Woodentop


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: John Maher on September 23, 2009, 10:15:58 am
Has anyone got any opinions or weight details of 4 quart sumps,
Have got a Berg one on at moment and it weighs a lot but is there a lighter one, maybe CB Performance

Woodentop

Paul,

Your Berg sump is the 4qt deep version, whereas the Empi large capacity sumps are shallower and wider (copy of Berg wide-glide).

The shallower depth wider sump is more practical for a street car but the extra depth of the Berg 4 quart race sump is my choice for a wet sump drag car, where ground clearance isn't an issue. You can run the oil level lower without risk of exposing the pickup tube entry. This puts more distance between the sump contents and  rotating assembly.

Hey, you lightweight guys, this saying might come in handy one day...
"Mass'll Save Your Ass"  ;)





Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on September 23, 2009, 11:06:39 am
Has anyone got any opinions or weight details of 4 quart sumps,
Have got a Berg one on at moment and it weighs a lot but is there a lighter one, maybe CB Performance
Phil, did you swap yours mate

Woodentop

Hey Woodie,

I had all the exact weights on my pc but the hard drive just gave up the ghost so I lost the info.  However I do recall:

EMPI ally 3.5qt, wide sump, bought from SSP - 3.85KG
Berg ally 3.5qt  wide sump same as above, bought 10 yrs ago - 4.85KG.  Incredibly a full kilo heavier made of the same material and the same size - must be thickness!
Old Berg 4 qt sump came in at 4.25KG, not sure if Mag or ally.

Needless to say I will be using the cheapy quality EMPI one going forward.

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Woodentop on September 23, 2009, 12:29:55 pm
Thanks John,

I agree, would want to go with same depth dimensions anyway to save messing with existing pick up tube, i can see me dragging some 3mm 6082 ali sheet out of the rack and asking trailer to fab one and coppying the Berg one for size and shape. A few strategically placed pillars tagged inside should make it a bit more structural. Guess it also needs to look nice in case my lack of mass bites my ass and it all goes rubber side up! :o

Woodentop


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on September 23, 2009, 19:44:34 pm

"Mass'll Save Your Ass"  ;)


 ;D ;D ;D That's a funny one... made me chuckle. Keeno


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on September 24, 2009, 01:56:34 am
I saw this thread on the samba about plastic lenses and thought people hire might bee interested..
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759 (http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=359759)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_tmtBdtv1P1I/Sh91-Waf4AI/AAAAAAAAHtE/KbH9Opp3YCU/s576/lens.jpg)


Simon from Paintbox now has plastic lenses available to buy I've put an ad in the for sale section.  Very light.

Cheers
Phil

Been looking for something like this for ages,reserved a pair today  ;D

Picked my pair up from the Paintbox the other day,very nice and very light,58g each versus 586g each for my glass ones  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 24, 2009, 02:51:03 am
Hey, you lightweight guys, this saying might come in handy one day...
"Mass'll Save Your Ass"  ;)
Heathen!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 24, 2009, 03:00:39 am
200mm KEP 1700# pressure plate vs aluminium version of the same. Savings of 1,528.7 grams or just under 3lbs 6oz
(http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=34315;image)

I sent a message to KEP, and they don't make a Type 1 clutch where the stamped part is Aluminium.  What is that clutch you weighed for?

KEP said their aluminium Type 1 clutch is a "Stage I with aluminum face".

How does this work?  Anyone ever used a clutch with an aluminium shoe?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SlingShot on September 24, 2009, 06:09:29 am
200mm KEP 1700# pressure plate vs aluminium version of the same. Savings of 1,528.7 grams or just under 3lbs 6oz

I sent a message to KEP, and they don't make a Type 1 clutch where the stamped part is Aluminium.  What is that clutch you weighed for?

KEP said their aluminium Type 1 clutch is a "Stage I with aluminum face".

How does this work?  Anyone ever used a clutch with an aluminium shoe?

The shoe is aluminum but there is a fairly thick coating on the contact surface, It could be some type of metal/plasma spray.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: cpalma on September 24, 2009, 09:30:55 am
hey guys, i stumbled onto the "aluminum face" KEP pp ib the optional selection and it says the same thing in the site - 2.5-3lbs wgt. reduction. It also says with a sprayed on matrix to reduce wear (wonder what that is?)....but if it helps quicker revs why not. Plus 110usd on top of the pp price, check this out:

http://www.aircooled.net/new-bin/viewproductdetail.php?keyword2=CFP0003


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 25, 2009, 04:59:56 am
Also from the Aircooled.net page:

"We do NOT recommend this if you are planning on burnouts, clutch slippage will hurt the face of the Pressure Plate."

Where's the fun in that??!?

I wonder if this aluminium shoe has the same propensity to wear into a cone shape like the iron one does?  Anyone used one of these clutches?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on September 25, 2009, 10:03:56 am
Anyone used one of these clutches?

Here ya go! ;)

In terms of the pressure plates, Kennedy still do them, and when I bought mine (recently) the 200mm were off the shelf, but the 180mm were special order. I have to say they were really good to deal with and shipped all the bits out top speed.

Be aware that the ali version should only be used with a regular disc like a Dakin or similar, not a puck or a Black Magic etc.

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on September 29, 2009, 12:39:45 pm
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=852152 shotgun lightening :o

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/pix/2853655.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 30, 2009, 07:55:35 am
In terms of the pressure plates, Kennedy still do them, and when I bought mine (recently) the 200mm were off the shelf,
Peter
Peter, have you installed this yet?  What's it drive like?

On another board, someone stated that the face is coated with a "Tungsten/Cobalt" coating.  That should wear quite well.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on September 30, 2009, 08:19:44 am
I have not used the 180mm one yet, but I have used the 200mm one for two races which was 9 burnouts and 9 full passes. I've also done around 500 road mikes. The first meeting there was no problem at all with 2 12 sec passes and 3 in the 11's (the car with me in it weighs around 1560lbs (Phil can you remember as I appear to have lost the weigh in bit of paper the MSA guy gave us) and has around 170-180hp). The second meeting I messed up the first burn out as I did not tape up the button on my Hydraulic handbrake and it slipped the clutch. After each of the 4 runs that weekend the clutch did smell but there was no sign of slip on my data logger so I'm guessing there is not an on going problem as the car ran 2 more 12 sec passes and another 2 11's and was OK with the drive home which is a bout 2 1/2 hours long.

Obviously it will depend on your combination (weight and power / torque) but if you’re in this sort of Ball Park, you should be fine. Interestingly when the pressure plate was first fitted we did try shimming it, and there was more pressure available. From memory it was almost exactly 170 out of the box, and I think we had it to around 200 with 0.5mm shims (I would need to check the actual figures but it was in that order). It was not shimmed when installed, it was just to check what we had, if we needed it.

The motor will be out of the car in 3 weeks time so I'll check to see how the parts are looking and post up here with what I find.

Hope this helps

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on September 30, 2009, 17:56:22 pm
Peter,

your car weighed in at 1346lb if i remember correctly, exactly 30lbs lighter than mine, although not for long.... ;)

cheers

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on September 30, 2009, 18:03:06 pm
Thanks Andy,

I'll have a look through my stuff tonight, as I've lost a timing slip as well. It doesn't bode well for the Club, if the chief paper shuffler, is loosing all his paperwork!

See you soon Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on September 30, 2009, 18:06:07 pm
old age is a terrible thing, it's a good job you're not driving to sweden on your own :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on October 02, 2009, 07:55:03 am
Peter,

your car weighed in at 1346lb if i remember correctly, exactly 30lbs lighter than mine, although not for long.... ;)

cheers

andy

Actually his ticket said 1,340lbs although that included the helmet at 3.3lbs so actual car weight was a smidge under 1,337lbs, or roughly 606KG.

Another 6 kilos to break the magic 600 mark!

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on October 02, 2009, 13:53:17 pm
Thanks guys, the poor old man actually found his time slip, and the bit of paper with the weights on (1346lbs actually) in my wallet. It’s just a shame there was no money in there, but finding the previously lost bits of paper softened the blow!

So the car is 1343lbs and I weigh in at 155lbs with my suit and helmet etc, so my all up race weigh is around 1498lbs now in race trim (no muffler, fan belt, oil cooler, or heavy old radials) so it will be quite a bit heavier at the stop lights on the street. I think the majority of the weight loss this year has come from revolving parts in the gearbox and engine (wheels as well) so its not just dead weight in the car either, it’s mostly revolving, which is obviously good. I don't think I'll be saving another 10kg though, in fact if anything the car will be heavier next year I suspect.

So Phil you are still the lightest by some margin, but look out Woodentop is coming in 2010 (I think he really is this time too!) and don't forget Heir Marriot, as he will no doubt be scheming over the winter, to take your crown with all his fangled aircraft technology! Not forgetting Greg, as he seams to have weight “problems” these days too!

I'm looking forward to the 2010 weigh in contest already.

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on October 02, 2009, 14:05:45 pm
whoops sorry mate I actually read the ticket with the last digit as a zero but evidently it's a '6'.

Mine ended up at 601kg / 1323lb before me but I'm not skinny like you so mine was 1500 with me in it.  So you've done me by 2 pounds.  Likewise once I put the bigger motor in she's gonna weigh a heck of a lot more.

Plus as you say once Woodie arrives all bets are off - I reckon way lighter than either of ours.  Oh and in theory Jim's tube chassis came out at 1298 (if I remember right?) but that was before the Pauter block which must have added, what, 50lbs?  The Sting was 1330 I think but that's gone now.  Which means I may just have it until Woodencar blow us all away.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on October 02, 2009, 14:15:36 pm
whoops sorry mate I actually read the ticket with the last digit as a zero but evidently it's a '6'.

Mine ended up at 601kg / 1323lb before me but I'm not skinny like you so mine was 1500 with me in it.  So you've done me by 2 pounds.  Likewise once I put the bigger motor in she's gonna weigh a heck of a lot more.

Plus as you say once Woodie arrives all bets are off - I reckon way lighter than either of ours.  Oh and in theory Jim's tube chassis came out at 1298 (if I remember right?) but that was before the Pauter block which must have added, what, 50lbs?  The Sting was 1330 I think but that's gone now.  Which means I may just have it until Woodencar blow us all away.


Well as I weigh a hell of a lot more than you two (probably the two of you put together!) I'm going to need something seriously light! I'm going to race just a bonnet on a floorpan I think! :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on October 02, 2009, 18:18:16 pm
Race driver for rent. Weighs in at 126lbs (57.2kg)... ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on October 02, 2009, 19:21:41 pm
at least none of us have gone this far.... yet

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on October 11, 2009, 18:17:57 pm
More anorexia, just under a kilo,

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on October 17, 2009, 20:37:34 pm
I am running a bus master in my 66, definitely lighter.

(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/SE9s6spOUCI/AAAAAAAACSM/7_kvWvUz0aQ/s400/IMG_7714.JPG)

Hey Chris

Is that an ali or iron master cylinder ?

Cheers Pas


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on October 20, 2009, 00:15:01 am
No its not aluminum.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: bill stipe on October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm
Bosch SR15N.  Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid.  Came from a swap meet this past weekened.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on October 21, 2009, 16:22:52 pm
Also from the Aircooled.net page:

"We do NOT recommend this if you are planning on burnouts, clutch slippage will hurt the face of the Pressure Plate."

Where's the fun in that??!?

I wonder if this aluminium shoe has the same propensity to wear into a cone shape like the iron one does?  Anyone used one of these clutches?

Some Swedish friends built their own billet pressure face for the Kennedy. I am not sure how they solved the face but not with coating. Probably a separate replacebale riveted steel face.
It worked quite well as proven when they became class winners for several years with their buggy..and the clutch as far as I remember. They did a lot of burnouts, for sure.
These are the same guys that built their own 61.2 mmTerminators from billet plus many more inventions.
The Bug Professors son and father Martin and Ambjörn Karlsson.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on October 21, 2009, 17:29:53 pm
Bosch SR15N.  Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid.  Came from a swap meet this past weekened.

I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on October 22, 2009, 16:59:54 pm
Bosch SR15N.  Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid.  Came from a swap meet this past weekened.

I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!

Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on October 23, 2009, 03:59:45 am
Even better, it comes off the heavy end of the car.  Don't forget to drill a few holes in the flange!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on October 23, 2009, 04:30:15 am
Bosch SR15N.  Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid.  Came from a swap meet this past weekened.

I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!

Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!

Thats incredible!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on October 23, 2009, 07:25:43 am
Bosch SR15N.  Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid.  Came from a swap meet this past weekened.

I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!

Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!

Over here we use a Brize engineering starter which is basically based on an early 911 unit, but all newly built.  They come in at 2,577 gms complete.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on October 23, 2009, 17:24:10 pm
Bosch SR15N.  Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid.  Came from a swap meet this past weekened.

I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!

Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!

Over here we use a Brize engineering starter which is basically based on an early 911 unit, but all newly built.  They come in at 2,577 gms complete.

Really? I'd love to see some more pics/info on that one.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on October 24, 2009, 08:19:39 am
Bosch SR15N.  Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid.  Came from a swap meet this past weekened.

I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!

Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!

Over here we use a Brize engineering starter which is basically based on an early 911 unit, but all newly built.  They come in at 2,577 gms complete.

Really? I'd love to see some more pics/info on that one.

http://www.brise.co.uk/Porsche_starter_motors.html

It's the middle one, for the 911.  Reliable and powerful - mine starts in a flash with this baby.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on October 24, 2009, 17:44:10 pm
Here are the comparison numbers for those starters.
The Brise starter is 550g lighter than the Bosch, but costs $220 more (plus shipping)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on October 24, 2009, 17:54:46 pm
I've had one of the Brise starters in my car now for over three years and it's always been ultra reliable, cranks over a high comp engine really easy and looks cool too, and half a kilo is half a kilo,

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SlingShot on October 25, 2009, 00:24:31 am
This blows em all out of the park  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on November 05, 2009, 12:52:09 pm
A tiny one this time, brake hose clips genuine 7.8g, stainless 5.5g saving 13.8g per car, not including the rust on old ones ;D and they're shiny :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on November 05, 2009, 18:56:10 pm
Where do you get stainless ones?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on November 05, 2009, 20:01:58 pm
Where do you get stainless ones?

www.vwheritage.com  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: The Ideaman on November 05, 2009, 20:23:43 pm
200mm KEP 1700# pressure plate vs aluminium version of the same. Savings of 1,528.7 grams or just under 3lbs 6oz
(http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=34315;image)

I sent a message to KEP, and they don't make a Type 1 clutch where the stamped part is Aluminium.  What is that clutch you weighed for?

KEP said their aluminium Type 1 clutch is a "Stage I with aluminum face".

How does this work?  Anyone ever used a clutch with an aluminium shoe?
Scott Sebastian runs my old one in his class 11 car.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on November 08, 2009, 19:59:09 pm
Does anyone know what the weight difference is between a super diff and a quaife lsd? I keep hearing that they are heavy but how heavy is heavy?

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Martin on November 08, 2009, 21:29:12 pm
Ask Peter,

Its quite a lot.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Steve D. on November 08, 2009, 21:49:18 pm
Can't help you with the weight of a quaife, but off the top of my head my old T1 IRS ZF weighed in at 16.5lbs if I remember correctly, and my 091 Peloquin TBD is roughly a fokken tank.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on November 09, 2009, 08:43:37 am
I shall give Mr E a call later,

andy



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: FIDDE on November 09, 2009, 12:54:23 pm
How many kg is it in a single skin body,if i remove all the the inner panels?.The bulkhead and the rear sheet metal
is already gone,and its going to be replaced with 0.7 alu panels,is it worth the job?what do you think?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 58vw on November 10, 2009, 08:41:28 am
has anyone had sucess with an aluminum beam in a full bodied car? do they hold up? pros? cons?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on November 10, 2009, 10:54:39 am
I've got one in my '66, it's stood up to a years worth of wheelies and street driving with no real problems,
it's a jamar one with the billet shock towers. If you get one be sure to check the alignment of the top and bottom adjusters, the one i got was out by about 1.5 mm and caused a bit of head scratching when it came down to sorting the camber!

Saved around 15 kg over the original b/j beam

And they look good too, my mot tester was v. impressed

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on November 10, 2009, 10:59:09 am
has anyone had sucess with an aluminum beam in a full bodied car? do they hold up? pros? cons?

Pete Shattock and Andy Marriot from the Outlaws both run aluminium beams, Andy only swapped over recently but Pete has been running one for several years, having driven all over europe with it. Both run stock stroke motors in all steel cars (Pete has a 1776 '61, Andy has a 1914 '66) running 11.9's and 12.0's!

I'm sure either of them would chime in with more help! ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 58vw on November 10, 2009, 17:41:40 pm
thanks for the input guys ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on November 10, 2009, 22:42:06 pm
As Andy and Neil have already said there is no problem in principal with and ali beam with a street car but I would suggest you keep an eye on two things. The bushes in the beams don't necessarily fit to well and I've ended up making new ones (speak to Paul Woodhead on here about suitable material) and now the bushes fit the beam and the arms very nicely so there is no play. The other issue is if you use a standard steering box you need to be carefull that when you bolt it up to the beam that the you do not over tighten the clamp as the beam goes out of round and pinches the arm in the beam and you loose free suspension travel on that side of the car with some nasty handling consequences. I ended up locating the steering box and torquing it to the recommended VW spec 22-25ft-lbs (I think) and reaming the bush in position in the beam, to ensure you still have free travel. 
There is one other thing the look good with the wheels up off the startline!

Hope this helps

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 58vw on November 11, 2009, 01:30:39 am
thanks peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on November 12, 2009, 21:51:45 pm
Door hinges in aluminum ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 13, 2009, 04:16:25 am
Door hinges in aluminum ;D

Dibbs!

Did ya make more than 1 set?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on November 13, 2009, 13:58:21 pm
Door hinges in aluminum ;D

Dibbs!

Did ya make more than 1 set?
Mail me
You might want a door skin of carbon fiber  500g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on November 14, 2009, 01:12:38 am
Door hinges in aluminum ;D

Dibbs!

Did ya make more than 1 set?

If you are making more than one set of these,I am sure there will be a few people on here who are interested (me included).


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: C.O.R. on November 14, 2009, 07:54:47 am
We're interested as well...not to be rude, but do you have a price in mind?

Aloha, Frank

Castagnetti Ohana Racing
Honolulu and Hilo


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Griebel on November 14, 2009, 19:17:25 pm
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PK72ALI-_i0/Sv7wYYFJ26I/AAAAAAAACtM/MLowSczu7hY/s1600/vw%2B024%2B(Small).jpg)

A bit of d.i.y...0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses  ;)

Cheers from Griebel


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 15, 2009, 08:30:27 am
A bit of d.i.y. -0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses  ;)
Planning on making more?

I'm liking what Stephan did to his coil bracket:



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Griebel on November 15, 2009, 09:21:51 am
A bit of d.i.y. -0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses  ;)
Planning on making more?

.



This was my very first "pull", but yes,-I'm planning to make more....Casting a model of the old symetric lenses too.....


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on November 16, 2009, 21:35:48 pm
A bit of d.i.y. -0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses  ;)
Planning on making more?

.



This was my very first "pull", but yes,-I'm planning to make more....Casting a model of the old symetric lenses too.....

Keep us posted  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Straight Time on November 21, 2009, 14:06:17 pm


Some great ideas for weight saving here but what about safety issues ?

Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?

Any ideas as i'm now stripping my 67 for a full rebuild though it will be road biased with some strip action.

Anyway, dont we need a bit of weight at the front end . . . . . .   ???


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 21, 2009, 19:39:05 pm
Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?
When you're looking at the fasteners for the steering or suspension, leave the original steel bolts in there.  To hold the wings on, aluminium is plenty strong enough.  How much does a wing weigh?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on November 21, 2009, 19:53:37 pm
Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?
When you're looking at the fasteners for the steering or suspension, leave the original steel bolts in there.  To hold the wings on, aluminum is plenty strong enough.  How much does a wing weigh?

Or if your budget allows replace steel bolts for titanium. ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on November 22, 2009, 08:44:45 am
Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?
When you're looking at the fasteners for the steering or suspension, leave the original steel bolts in there.  To hold the wings on, aluminium is plenty strong enough.  How much does a wing weigh?

Steel rear wing = 8lbs
Steel front wing = 12lbs

Day Mouldings rear wing = 4lbs
Day Mouldings front wing = 6lbs
(Race weight wings)

Total weight saving = 20lbs


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rocket Ron on December 09, 2009, 19:33:59 pm
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=745441



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 181 on December 10, 2009, 16:50:34 pm
can you say

light:-)

(http://lh6.ggpht.com/_nKjezkastzY/SyDTpIDlRAI/AAAAAAAADik/7kuZwTylcko/s640/DSC01929.JPG)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on December 10, 2009, 17:30:41 pm
Whoa... what is that?! Very cool!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 181 on December 10, 2009, 22:29:40 pm
Hand built racing car for a 1950 Great German Trophy. I suppose these are 16" VW wheels.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on December 10, 2009, 23:46:13 pm
You're right... very cool!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Simpsonshoe on December 31, 2009, 17:23:31 pm
at least none of us have gone this far.... yet

andy
Rifle drilled.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: vw-bigblock on January 01, 2010, 01:19:09 am
A preview of my new racecar, still some metal to remove     ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on January 09, 2010, 02:29:05 am
Remove over 6 lbs from engine parts. Over 1lb. [attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3][attachment=4]just from the rods!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on January 09, 2010, 02:35:28 am
more pics, champhered 1600 wrist pins, moved keepers in, 94mm dished 10cc pistons over an ounce per piston[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on January 09, 2010, 18:46:28 pm
I love the rods, but are you sure they aren't going to break at hig rpm? I assume you are going to chamfer the holes on the rods to avoid stress risers which will lead to cracks? Great addition to the thread! keep the pix coming 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: mr horsepower on January 09, 2010, 21:02:45 pm
Hi the  stres on the rod is going thru the shoulder of the rod the rest is just fill up material lightning the rod like this make it do his job so good as posible  just push the force from the combustion on the crank and when it comes up it wil not take as much weight with it les mass
so ill think it wil be stronger in a combo that suits it

henri.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 09, 2010, 23:45:26 pm
It's about time you showed up here, Mark. :)
Are those stock VW rods?  What does each rod weigh?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on January 09, 2010, 23:53:29 pm
 The stock rods are 470 grams total, I have run the rods at over 6000 RPM on an 82 stroke and then REVVED IT!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on April 24, 2010, 23:05:44 pm
So I was thinking about how I could reduce the rotating mass on my Erco's.I wanted to use the tapered washers that my wheels came with so that ruled out using 14mm Porsche alloy radius lugnuts, so I found some 12mm tapered alloy lugnuts.

Not a huge saving I know (800g less than the lugnuts the wheels came with) but every little counts. ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on April 24, 2010, 23:10:51 pm
Now an even smaller (who said pathetic) saving,swapped rubber wheel valves for alloy ones,a massive 28g saving. :o

Not using dust caps waaaaaaay too heavy :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 25, 2010, 01:46:04 am
It's all worthwhile.
Generator pulley nut & steering wheel nut:


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: TexasTom on April 25, 2010, 01:57:08 am
Now that's drawing the line ... you guys are SICK.
 ;)



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 08, 2010, 13:13:28 pm
hollow trans plugs came in at 20g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 12, 2010, 08:02:41 am
Stock: 168g
Drilled: 114g 
= 32% less


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on May 12, 2010, 10:08:38 am
This has to be my favourite thread ever 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on May 23, 2010, 04:28:41 am
Some good stuff here!! :o

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_search.php?search_author=Steve+Hogue


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 25, 2010, 21:54:09 pm
Some good stuff here!! :o

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_search.php?search_author=Steve+Hogue

WOW  :o

Impressive stuff,love the drilled rear torsion bar tubes and swing arms.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rocket Ron on May 25, 2010, 22:19:07 pm
I like the air ducts to the drums , nice  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 26, 2010, 08:12:31 am
Stock 3-4 shift rod = 130g
Hollow 3-4 shift rod = 93g
Difference = 28%


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 26, 2010, 08:16:11 am
Frame horn bolts : 262g/pr.
modified : 204g/pr
22% less.

Pulley bolt : 99g, modified : 69g
30% less.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on May 26, 2010, 08:36:14 am
 :D



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on May 26, 2010, 13:15:35 pm
Bruce,

Love all the holes! Is anything safe from the driller killer?

What is all this stuff going on/in?

Keep up the good work as it brightens up my day when I see such ridiculous behavior.

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 27, 2010, 06:54:22 am
..... it brightens up my day when I see such ridiculous behavior.
Join in!

I think Phil said it earlier, VW over-designed a lot of the parts, so most parts can be lightened.

My short term goal is to be able to build all these light bits into a Berg 5 and have the result weigh less than a stock 4 speed.

3-4 fork (bottom) 135 to 106g = 27%
5th fork (top) 117 to 92 = 21%


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: GreenTom on May 27, 2010, 07:32:26 am
lots of holes :D. how much kg will You save totall with this drilling? 50kg?.
Good for me that I don't have to driil anything :D cuz I save 50kg in total weight of the car + driver in really  easy way. I weigh 55kg :) so comparing to guys that weigh 80-90kg :) thats easy way to lighten weigh. BTW I'm not on the diet or have some kinda diesies :D

But I like this thread. Any one made some tests with for example with drilled rods? they look really weak wht RPM's they'll survive?

cheers
Tom.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 27, 2010, 10:10:05 am
..... it brightens up my day when I see such ridiculous behavior.
Join in!

I think Phil said it earlier, VW over-designed a lot of the parts, so most parts can be lightened.

My short term goal is to be able to build all these light bits into a Berg 5 and have the result weigh less than a stock 4 speed.

3-4 fork (bottom) 135 to 106g = 27%
5th fork (top) 117 to 92 = 21%

Yes agreed amazing stuff and good to see - you must have a fairly decent setup to drill all this, I have been struggling with an old pillar drill for a while now but a lathe would be lovely!  What machinery do you use for bits like this?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on May 27, 2010, 14:26:06 pm
Bruce,

As Phil suggests I too love the quality of your work.

I can confess to my gear selector forks having holes in them as well, but not as many as yours (mine have been fine by the way).

I've also been rather extravagant with the framehorn bolts and made them in Titanium, but you will be pleased to hear, in the time honoured fashion they have blind holes in them and a taper to the head of the bolt much like yours. Sad but true!

I too have a 5 speed to build (the box I refer to above is a 4 speed) and interestingly I was thinking along the same lines that it would be good to get to the same weight as a stock 4 speed, so I hope you make it. 

Keep up the good work, and keep the pictures coming.   

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 30, 2010, 19:20:14 pm
Frame horn bolts : 262g/pr.
modified : 204g/pr
22% less.

Pulley bolt : 99g, modified : 69g
30% less.
Peter gave me another idea.

Frame horn bolts, now 192g/pr.  = 27% less
Pulley bolt, now 58g.  =  41% less


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 30, 2010, 19:26:01 pm
I can confess to my gear selector forks having holes in them as well, but not as many as yours (mine have been fine by the way).

I've also been rather extravagant with the framehorn bolts and made them in Titanium, but you will be pleased to hear, in the time honoured fashion they have blind holes in them and a taper to the head of the bolt much like yours. Sad but true!
Pictures?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: deanosvws on June 06, 2010, 00:30:49 am
you lot are mad. hope its not contagious.
cheers dean


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 07, 2010, 05:09:24 am
Come on guys, I can't do it all!  Let's see your ideas.

These are the 2 dowel pins that locate the gear carrier to the main trans case.
Stock = 41g/pr
Drilled = 14g/pr  = 66% less


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 07, 2010, 05:14:46 am
This is the reverse gear's lever.
Stock = 48g
Drilled = 30g  = 33%


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 07, 2010, 05:44:45 am

 - you must have a fairly decent setup to drill all this, I have been struggling with an old pillar drill for a while now but a lathe would be lovely!  What machinery do you use for bits like this?
I've got nothing!  My job has me driving a desk, but every once in a while I help out where we have a small workshop with a pillar drill.  After work I give it a workout.
I also have a mate who works in a machine shop and likes doing VW jobs, so he does some.

One thing that really helps is good drill bits.  Look at this one from Boeing Surplus.  These are very sharp and they last a long time.  Notice how there's a step in the drill?  It's designed to drill sheet metal.  The step goes in first and produces a wobbly hole.  Then it acts like a pilot for the second part, making a perfectly round hole.  They are also very cheap; they sell them by the pound.  The only drawback is the limited number of sizes.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on June 07, 2010, 11:57:30 am
Hi Bruce I have a photo for you but don'know how to post it here! I'll see if I can find and adult to show me how!

Peter[attachment=1][attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on June 07, 2010, 22:50:52 pm
This is the reverse gear's lever.
Stock = 48g
Drilled = 30g  = 33%

Great drill work Bruce,these are like little works of art in there own right. 8)

Shame that they have to be hidden away inside the box !


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on June 08, 2010, 13:45:47 pm
Hopefully this will work! Lightened Grade 5 Ti frame horn bolt.

[attachment=1]

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on June 08, 2010, 15:11:27 pm
We need the weight for it, is it drilled through to?  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on June 08, 2010, 23:17:02 pm
Frame horn bollt have blind holes and weigh 62g each

I had my hub nuts around as well they weigh 53g each.

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: cameron shorey on July 11, 2010, 07:26:31 am
What? Is this thread stalled? Surely, there must be some more weight saving ideas!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rule09 on August 03, 2010, 18:10:30 pm
What about sandblasting the body a few times extra?
To make the sheet metal thinner..
To bad i just painted my bug last year..  :-[
And left my heating tubes from front to back..  :-[
I think next year when my second engine is ready, (2.7type 4 from Udo becker) i have to start cutting again..


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rule09 on August 03, 2010, 18:45:41 pm
I have 1 set doors extra.. I'm gonna fit then on my bug..
Than i gonna try a bit of weight saving with sandblasting and cutting away inside metal and drilling holls in the side..
See what it delivers..


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rule09 on August 04, 2010, 17:22:34 pm
2 doors are in for sandblasting and than some drilling..


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: volkskris on August 04, 2010, 20:57:02 pm
Just an idea: when you have trim, bore some holes behind it, should save a few grams too :P :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rule09 on August 05, 2010, 18:40:39 pm
i think i'm gonna cut them in half.. No inside metal..
Pics soon..


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 07, 2010, 08:34:45 am
I don't think you'll be able to measure any weight difference by sandblasting.  All you're gonna do is warp the hell out of your panels.  Cutting and drilling is where it's at.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Martin on August 07, 2010, 09:04:17 am
I thought sand blasting just moves the metal around, and doesn't actually remove any.


May be wrong,



Martin


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 09, 2010, 07:52:20 am
Hey guys, here's my secret weapon:

What? Is this thread stalled? Surely, there must be some more weight saving ideas!

Cameron's a machinist and he's got this cool waterjet cutting machine that can zip through hardened steel with ease.  Check out the holes he put in these reverse gears.  I also narrowed the one on the left.  I figure since this gear never breaks, and never wears out, it can stand to lose strength.  I just gotta remember to not do any reverse burnouts. 
Oh ya, original : 142g, drilled and narrowed : 80g.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on November 09, 2010, 21:42:17 pm
Bruce, that's just insane! I would interested to know how much weight you save on your complete gearbox. It would also be interesting to know the parasitic power loss through a lightened drive train compared to stock. 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 10, 2010, 05:32:23 am
The goal is to make my Berg 5 weigh the same as a stock 4 gear.  I've got a running total so far, but I'm not close to done yet.

There are two ways power gets stolen by the gearbox.  One is through friction of the various contact surfaces.  I figure that will be pretty much the same in my gearbox after the weight is cut down since I won't be changing anything on the bearings, and other than the gear in the pic and the coupler, I won't be narrowing the forward gears.  Much. ;)

The second way power is robbed is through the inertia of the rotating parts.  They are all like little flywheels.  They steal hp while you're accelerating.  If they're lighter, they take less power to accelerate them.

The parts on the two shafts of the gearbox are almost insignificant compared to the big players like the flywheel, clutch, crank, diff, brakes, and wheels and tires.  All those parts will be on the chopping block eventually.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on November 29, 2010, 18:38:42 pm
(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TPPjv1L6Q0I/AAAAAAAAMJQ/0_l_MgtmH6M/s640/IMG_5851.JPG)

(http://lh3.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TPPjwWaadYI/AAAAAAAAMJU/02fs3Se2jRE/s640/IMG_5852.JPG)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 30, 2010, 05:26:39 am
Well done Chris.  It's good to have a new convert.

You could go with bigger holes in the e-brake lever.  The strength is in the width.  The metal at the half way point of the width adds zero strength.
Next, drill the cross bar that the lever pulls against.  Have you drilled the brake shoes like in the pic I posted long ago?

The holes in the pan clamps do not reduce their effectiveness.  All of their ridgidity is in the vertical flaps.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on November 30, 2010, 06:01:29 am
I am well on my way.  :)

I plan on going bigger on the lever. I just need to grab some smooth step bits.

(http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/3275/image1812.jpg)

I will hit the shoes and the cross bar this weekend.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on December 08, 2010, 14:46:28 pm
bump for this thread. i like it a lot, but not much to contribute for now.  :(


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on December 08, 2010, 15:38:04 pm
just remember

i dint weigh the weight, but sometime last year i changed out the original SC master cylinder on my 66.

i wanted to try something different so i fitted an aluminium master cylinder from a late model Nissan 4 cylinder car.

it was designed to work with a booster, but i just took it, redreilled the holes to follow the the holes inour VWs .

it sure is a lot lighter but i am not sure what the bore size is.

seems to be working OK so far.



main reason wasnt even for weight, i wanted the reservoir to be ontop of the MC and the ATE late model DC costs USD140 in my area, the Nissan MC can be found in near mint condition for USD20, so i decided to try it out and if it doesnt work, just swap back a VW unit. so far no issues yet.

(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakebefore.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakebefore1.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakefinish2.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakefinish.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakefinish3.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on December 15, 2010, 01:51:35 am
Another small weight loss, 15g saving on a stock steering column clamp. ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on December 15, 2010, 10:31:32 am
Another small weight loss, 15g saving on a stock steering column clamp. ;D

Tha's one bit I might not take anything out of... :o :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on December 15, 2010, 17:20:09 pm
Another small weight loss, 15g saving on a stock steering column clamp. ;D

Tha's one bit I might not take anything out of... :o :D

Hey Neil

Fear not it is still very strong, the strength seems to be in the folded edges of the clamp, ( back me up on this one Bruce ;D) I gave it a good old twist in the vice and it is still rigid. Phil West has been running a very similar clamp to this, and we both know how thoroughly he likes to test his car ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on December 15, 2010, 17:44:16 pm
Tha's one bit I might not take anything out of... :o :D
it is still very strong, the strength seems to be in the folded edges of the clamp, ( back me up on this one Bruce ;D)
Indeed!  There's nobody on this board with enough strength to break that.
I was thinking of making something like that from Al, although it would be difficult to best the weight of yours. 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on December 16, 2010, 20:59:45 pm
Bus reservoir has to be lighter than the stock set up.

(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TQpq8bBJScI/AAAAAAAAMR4/B3u4t9Ijwus/s640/IMG_6338.JPG)

Finished brake parts-

(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TQpq9CmSFNI/AAAAAAAAMSA/Zju-94sCtFk/s640/IMG_6355.JPG)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Wünderwolff on December 16, 2010, 21:22:30 pm
So much paint, it must make the parts make weigh in heavier than before the drilling  ;) ;D

This really is my favourite thread ever! Don't stop the drilling!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on December 17, 2010, 02:39:35 am
Bus reservoir has to be lighter than the stock set up.

(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TQpq8bBJScI/AAAAAAAAMR4/B3u4t9Ijwus/s640/IMG_6338.JPG)


I agree, all we need to do now is to find a suitable alloy single circuit master cylinder, that has to be even lighter ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on December 17, 2010, 10:17:16 am
Bus reservoir has to be lighter than the stock set up.

(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TQpq8bBJScI/AAAAAAAAMR4/B3u4t9Ijwus/s640/IMG_6338.JPG)


I agree, all we need to do now is to find a suitable alloy single circuit master cylinder, that has to be even lighter ;)

Having had partial brake failure on a dual circuit street car, I'd much rather run a dual circuit m/c and forgoe the third helping of Cristmas pud!

Has anyone thought of the weight of the wiring on the cars? I was reading Andy Frost's Red Victor 3 (street-legal Pro Mod!) build up, and he said about using aircraft wiring as it's much lighter than automotive?

http://www.rodsnsods.co.uk/forum/garage/redvictor3-started-last-5064

Have a look through - it's awesome!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on December 17, 2010, 13:20:23 pm
just remember

i dint weigh the weight, but sometime last year i changed out the original SC master cylinder on my 66.

i wanted to try something different so i fitted an aluminium master cylinder from a late model Nissan 4 cylinder car.

it was designed to work with a booster, but i just took it, redreilled the holes to follow the the holes inour VWs .

it sure is a lot lighter but i am not sure what the bore size is.

seems to be working OK so far.



main reason wasnt even for weight, i wanted the reservoir to be ontop of the MC and the ATE late model DC costs USD140 in my area, the Nissan MC can be found in near mint condition for USD20, so i decided to try it out and if it doesnt work, just swap back a VW unit. so far no issues yet.

(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakebefore.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakebefore1.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakefinish2.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakefinish.jpg)
(http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/pupjoint1/brakefinish3.jpg)

Looks like its leaking abit  :-\

Thats alot of effort dude - you could have just used a standard dual circuit master and a VOLVO reservior  :)

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=220707020027&viewitem=&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on December 17, 2010, 13:38:10 pm
nope, it has been a year now so far it hasn't leaked a drop. the ones u see are not leaks, forgot what they were.

the nissan MC came with the reservoir installed, aluminium and way lighter, plus they are everywhere in this part of the world.

not much extra work, just redrill and retap the mounting holes.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on December 18, 2010, 02:44:10 am
Bus reservoir has to be lighter than the stock set up.

(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TQpq8bBJScI/AAAAAAAAMR4/B3u4t9Ijwus/s640/IMG_6338.JPG)


I agree, all we need to do now is to find a suitable alloy single circuit master cylinder, that has to be even lighter ;)

Having had partial brake failure on a dual circuit street car, I'd much rather run a dual circuit m/c and forgoe the third helping of Cristmas pud!

Has anyone thought of the weight of the wiring on the cars? I was reading Andy Frost's Red Victor 3 (street-legal Pro Mod!) build up, and he said about using aircraft wiring as it's much lighter than automotive?

http://www.rodsnsods.co.uk/forum/garage/redvictor3-started-last-5064

Have a look through - it's awesome!

Now I like single circuit iron m/c's and I like dual circuit alloy m/c's, but which is best? There's only one way to find out.........get the scales out  ;D

Not sure if it's the same stuff Neil but thinwall wire is supposed to be a lighter alternative to regular auto wiring, price isn't too bad either. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Automotive-cable-wire-1mm-32-0-2-16a-thinwall-/220598569082?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item335cb3087a


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on December 18, 2010, 16:28:57 pm
Vehicle wiring products have thin wall cable, Bernie used it in the new loom ;D

http://www.vehicle-wiring-products.eu/VWP-onlinestore/cable/thinwall.php


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on December 18, 2010, 22:02:53 pm
I don't see much weight savings by reducing the insulation a tiny bit.  Notice how they make no claims of how much weight is removed?

Anyone found a source for aluminum wire?  That will weigh significantly less.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: paul_f on December 19, 2010, 00:02:29 am
I don't see much weight savings by reducing the insulation a tiny bit.  Notice how they make no claims of how much weight is removed?

Anyone found a source for aluminum wire?  That will weigh significantly less.

The weight saving comes from being able to using smaller size wire as the insulation can cope with it without breaking down.   From the ratings on VWP website, the 1mm2 standard cable can cope with 8amps but the 0.5mm2 thinwall can cope with 11amps.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on January 03, 2011, 04:20:12 am
Every little bit counts right  ;D

(http://lh3.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TSE_jOhFHiI/AAAAAAAAMaM/Kxo8XM29iCo/s640/IMG_6612.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 03, 2011, 06:31:10 am
That's right Chris.
did you drill out the e-brake pivot pin yet?

Now guess which one weighs 24g, and which one weighs 8g?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on January 03, 2011, 06:33:05 am
Is one a repop?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 03, 2011, 06:39:14 am
Is one a repop?
You could say that.  Yesterday I "repop'd" them from aluminium.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on January 03, 2011, 16:27:39 pm
Nice drop of madness you have going on there Bruce!

Great quality work as ever too.

I don't have much of interest to contribute at the moment, but its good to see this threat is alive and kicking.

Peter


Is one a repop?
You could say that.  Yesterday I "repop'd" them from aluminium.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: TexasTom on January 04, 2011, 01:18:53 am
Is one a repop?
You could say that.  Yesterday I "repop'd" them from aluminium.

Those are super nice Bruce ... you gonna make more to sell? ::)
Tom


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 04, 2011, 09:44:14 am
Depends on how much gets thrown at me. ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: TexasTom on January 04, 2011, 13:37:04 pm
Is this enough? ;D
[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on January 05, 2011, 00:07:01 am
Very nice work Bruce!

Think they are lighter than the billet ones out there? They sure look nicer.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 05, 2011, 06:25:59 am
I'm sure they are lighter.  Mine are 2mm thick everywhere.  Just like stock.  The billet type ones are thicker.
I didn't make them to be lighter than the billet ones. I just don't like any of the billet stuff you can buy.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on January 05, 2011, 10:34:35 am
Hi Bruce. Nice brackets! Out of interest, how did you press the swages into them? Very trick, did you make some kind of former? Regards, Matt


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 05, 2011, 17:49:04 pm
, did you make some kind of former?
VW did.
After I cut out the Al from 2mm sheet and made the two bends, I put a stock steel bracket on each side, then squished them together.  It's not ideal because there's no allowance for the thickness of the material, but it does kinda work.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on January 06, 2011, 08:27:51 am
Ah... Good thinking Bruce. I like your style  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 08, 2011, 01:17:33 am

Anyone found a source for aluminum wire?  That will weigh significantly less.

How about this stuff.

http://delphi.com/news/featureStories/fs_2009_10_23_001/

Not sure how you get your hands on it though.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: danny gabbard on January 08, 2011, 19:42:59 pm
, did you make some kind of former?
VW did.
After I cut out the Al from 2mm sheet and made the two bends, I put a stock steel bracket on each side, then squished them together.  It's not ideal because there's no allowance for the thickness of the material, but it does kinda work.
Very cleaver!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 08, 2011, 21:42:55 pm
, did you make some kind of former?
VW did.
After I cut out the Al from 2mm sheet and made the two bends, I put a stock steel bracket on each side, then squished them together.  It's not ideal because there's no allowance for the thickness of the material, but it does kinda work.
Very cleaver!!
Now, what other parts can you make using that technique?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 22, 2011, 22:48:49 pm
Another small saving, single skinned the glove box door.

Not sure how much lighter it is yet, need to weigh it.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 23, 2011, 08:12:51 am
Well done.

Don't forget to drill the hinges!

What do you think about making it from alloy?  I think 1.2mm would make it rigid enough.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on January 23, 2011, 20:20:05 pm
(http://lh3.ggpht.com/_WfCoy6mmPwA/TTR6Bh2IBMI/AAAAAAAAMgw/MIQQjR-dY70/s640/IMG_6997.JPG)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: speedwell on January 23, 2011, 22:04:43 pm
what do you think about those brake drums ::) ,they aren't on a car ,but on a sand buggy ,very light no back plates  :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 23, 2011, 23:32:41 pm
Well done.

Don't forget to drill the hinges!

What do you think about making it from alloy?  I think 1.2mm would make it rigid enough.

Shouldn't be too difficult, just need to work out how to attach it to the hinges.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Nikke on January 28, 2011, 21:53:17 pm
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PK72ALI-_i0/Sv7wYYFJ26I/AAAAAAAACtM/MLowSczu7hY/s1600/vw%2B024%2B(Small).jpg)

A bit of d.i.y...0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses  ;)

Cheers from Griebel
Could somebody please make these to fit type 2s too..


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on February 19, 2011, 01:25:42 am
Aluminium mid mount made from 10mm plate, I haven't weighed it yet but it should be lighter than a 4mm steel one I think.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on February 19, 2011, 02:13:24 am
Your thicker Al plate will be 15% less than the thinner steel one. 
IMO, you could have made it thinner.

Are you going to make an Al rear bracket?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on February 19, 2011, 02:25:40 am
Your thicker Al plate will be 15% less than the thinner steel one. 
IMO, you could have made it thinner.

Are you going to make an Al rear bracket?

Hey Bruce

I think you are right and I will have another made in 8 or maybe even 6mm plate. Most steel ones I have seen are 6 or 8mm so even this 10mm one will be substantially lighter.

I will have an Ali  rear one made up eventually but I already had the steel one so thought why not hit it with the lightening stick, there is still plenty more material I can take out it.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on February 19, 2011, 20:52:29 pm
Very nice indeed, Pas! You could take a drill to those metal brackets you welded to the chassis... A few grammes there to be shed! Looking good, can't wait to see it finished!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Basti on March 05, 2011, 21:25:28 pm
I like this ones....;)

They are out of titan!

Get yours at csp!! ;)

Basti


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on March 06, 2011, 21:51:06 pm
I like this ones....;)

They are out of titan!

Get yours at csp!! ;)

Basti

I want some, better start saving   :o ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 07, 2011, 08:29:32 am
€, £, $??


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Diederick/DVK on March 07, 2011, 09:04:03 am
169 EUR

http://www.csp-shop.com/cgi-bin/cshop2/front/shop_main.cgi?func=det&wkid=13062508040&rub1=Rear%20Axle&rub2=Wheel%20Bearings&artnr=24478a&pn=0&sort=0&all= (http://www.csp-shop.com/cgi-bin/cshop2/front/shop_main.cgi?func=det&wkid=13062508040&rub1=Rear%20Axle&rub2=Wheel%20Bearings&artnr=24478a&pn=0&sort=0&all=)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: chuckv8 on March 12, 2011, 02:54:18 am
169 EURO !!!!!!!! It's more than twenty bucks!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 16, 2011, 05:03:38 am
169 EUR
I can't do it!  That's 2 € per gram.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jon on March 18, 2011, 14:04:56 pm
169 EUR
I can't do it!  That's 2 € per gram.

Have you then also considered that your wallet will be 1267,5 grams lighter due to the missing the 169 missing Euro coins?  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Nico86 on March 18, 2011, 18:09:01 pm
169 EUR
I can't do it!  That's 2 € per gram.

Have you then also considered that your wallet will be 1267,5 grams lighter due to the missing the 169 missing Euro coins?  ;)

Yep but if you pay with bank notes and you got the difference in coins you have it in the a**!   :D :D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Matt Tobias on March 25, 2011, 06:44:34 am
My '65 is all torn apart at the moment, so what better time to put as many parts on a diet before they get put back together?  Here is the handbrake and pivot pin.  It may get shortened at the handle a couple of inches.
Sorry I don't have the exact weight, but that pivot pin was really heavy for what it was!
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a246/tobiism/Josie/DSC09112.jpg)
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a246/tobiism/Josie/DSC09113.jpg)
next up is the pan washers!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 26, 2011, 05:01:26 am
Looks good, Matt.  It's good to have another convert.
Take out the ratchet piece and drill the hell out of that too.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Matt Tobias on March 27, 2011, 04:27:54 am
Looks good, Matt.  It's good to have another convert.
Take out the ratchet piece and drill the hell out of that too.

I tried to drill the ratcheting pawl (the one pinned in side the lever) and that damn thing must be hardened!  My drill bit wouldn't touch it! 
I'll have to drill the rest of the ratcheting mechanism as well. 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ben67 on March 30, 2011, 03:17:57 am
OK so I'm into this, but i would like to see how some of you lay out your drill patters


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on March 30, 2011, 16:54:17 pm
Does anyone have any data on seat weights?  I just weighed mine and it came in at a rather shocking 5.91kg, surely there's lighter ones out there?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Matt Tobias on March 30, 2011, 23:22:44 pm
OK so I'm into this, but i would like to see how some of you lay out your drill patters

A great way to do it is to tape a piece of graph paper to the part and use an automatic center punch to lay out a grid.  Keep in mind the size of the holes you're going to drill and modify your layout on the graph paper.
Another thing to remember if you're going to layout holes that get progressively larger is that the spacing between the holes is going to change.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on March 30, 2011, 23:53:48 pm
OK so I'm into this, but i would like to see how some of you lay out your drill patters

A great way to do it is to tape a piece of graph paper to the part and use an automatic center punch to lay out a grid.  Keep in mind the size of the holes you're going to drill and modify your layout on the graph paper.
Another thing to remember if you're going to layout holes that get progressively larger is that the spacing between the holes is going to change.

That is an AWESOME little bit of info - I have ALWAYS wondered about that - SO simple  ::)  :D ;) :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 31, 2011, 05:51:00 am
Does anyone have any data on seat weights?  I just weighed mine and it came in at a rather shocking 5.91kg, surely there's lighter ones out there?
Have a look into the reproduction Speedster seats.  Some are formed from ally sheet, then with some padding.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on March 31, 2011, 13:03:11 pm
Does anyone have any data on seat weights?  I just weighed mine and it came in at a rather shocking 5.91kg, surely there's lighter ones out there?
Have a look into the reproduction Speedster seats.  Some are formed from ally sheet, then with some padding.

What seat have you got at the moment Phil? I'm guessing a Jaz or a Kirkey - they're pretty light - and how about punching some holes and then flanging them? I know Pete S has some speedster seats without padding, and we know he's into his light weight stuff too!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on March 31, 2011, 15:58:10 pm
Actually I don't know what they are,can't remember but they're not marked.  Steel tube frame and padding so no real place to lighten them.  I reckon ally's the way forward....


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on March 31, 2011, 16:24:49 pm
Actually I don't know what they are,can't remember but they're not marked.  Steel tube frame and padding so no real place to lighten them.  I reckon ally's the way forward....

A friend of mine had a Kirkey seat for his F2 stock car, and it was amazingly comfy, much more figure hugging than the Jaz one, which looks a bit like a bucket to me... Only problem is that being a stock car seat, it has a lot more side bolster than you need in a drag car, but you could cut it down a lot!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on March 31, 2011, 16:32:31 pm
And they do drag seats too.
http://www.kirkeyracing.com/index.php?link=browse&code=Series16
You could ask one of the oval racing companies to tag one onto their next order?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on March 31, 2011, 17:37:09 pm
And they do drag seats too.
http://www.kirkeyracing.com/index.php?link=browse&code=Series16

Same model I have, I will try and get it on the scales Phil and let you know the weight.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on March 31, 2011, 17:53:26 pm
very nice thanks guys.  Will have a good look at their website too.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on March 31, 2011, 20:13:23 pm

Same model I have, I will try and get it on the scales Phil and let you know the weight.


Preferably without you in it! ;D

Phil, you've got unneccesary steel in your car! don't tell Pete :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on March 31, 2011, 23:45:38 pm

Same model I have, I will try and get it on the scales Phil and let you know the weight.


Preferably without you in it! ;D


I'm built for comfort not speed  ;D

Phil weight is 5.4 kg with no cover (way too heavy ;D), so not a great saving. I think I will be putting a few holes in mine like Neil suggested, should easily get it below 5kg  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 01, 2011, 07:30:58 am
I see their lightest seat is the sprint lightweight which comes in at around 4kg without cover (pic attached hopefully).  I like the drilled look!

PAS have you run without the cover?  Is is comfortable?  Neil you mentioned your mate's was ok - without the cover?  I reckon there's got to be an extra pound or two in a cover.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on April 01, 2011, 07:51:16 am
They are suprisingly comfy with the cover. Without the cover they are race only but you can always buy a padded cycle shorts.

BB





Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on April 01, 2011, 08:19:27 am


PAS have you run without the cover?  Is is comfortable?  

No not yet, I have only sat in it for mock up purposes so far (I did find it pretty comfortable without a cover on though). Like BB suggested, for racing I am not using a cover but for the street I am getting a seat pad made up by Bernie.  


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: tikimadness on April 01, 2011, 18:36:47 pm
I have a kirkey without padding in my oval and it's much more comfortable then you would think.  ;)

Michael


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lids on April 01, 2011, 20:02:57 pm
In the interests of getting a decent time in the summer, I am heading up stairs to go on the cross trainer, think the 5 stone excess i'm carrying needs to be shed first!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Basti on April 03, 2011, 15:03:23 pm
I like this version! 9 kgs less with a new battery!
And it has the same power tha a standard 65ah!

Let me know if you like one ;)

[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on April 03, 2011, 19:25:07 pm
Phil, avoid giving yourself asteroids and go for the cover. To offset the slight weight disadvantage you could always trim your beard, get titanium spectacle frames or go for a good dump before you race...  ;D

In all seriousness, this is my favourite thread by far and long shall it continue  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Diederick/DVK on April 12, 2011, 09:41:53 am
I was reminded of this thread when I swapped my stock starter for my Skoda starter last Sunday. Minimal effort, huge weight reduction.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: AntLockyer on April 12, 2011, 14:47:07 pm
I was reminded of this thread when I swapped my stock starter for my Skoda starter last Sunday. Minimal effort, huge weight reduction.

How much reduction? What Skoda was it from?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Diederick/DVK on April 12, 2011, 18:10:31 pm
i didn't actually weigh it on a scale, but it's almost half the size.

http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,6655.msg187097.html#msg187097 (http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,6655.msg187097.html#msg187097)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: AntLockyer on April 13, 2011, 07:59:58 am
Cool, I wonder what it will be like on a high comp motor.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rocket Ron on April 13, 2011, 10:31:41 am
I'm told by a friend that they work better than my hi torque starter motor, he tried both  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on April 14, 2011, 10:35:20 am
Hmmmm anyone got a Part No: for this starter ??? Or better still a link to a supply ???  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Diederick/DVK on April 14, 2011, 16:37:12 pm
those are listed in the link i provided. got mine off german eBay over a year ago ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on April 14, 2011, 21:42:53 pm
those are listed in the link i provided. got mine off german eBay over a year ago ;D

Cool cheers dude  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on April 15, 2011, 03:00:32 am
I think this is what we need.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=390173135566&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

Brise starters are top quality and the lightest available (I think) at 2.5 kg but cost nearly £400 with delivery, the Skoda units weigh 3kg and cost £90.

http://www.brise.co.uk/Porsche_starter_motors.html


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Elnef on April 15, 2011, 05:20:10 am
I had a high torque starter on the weight yesterday 3,9kg

John


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jon on April 15, 2011, 08:16:46 am
Cool, I wonder what it will be like on a high comp motor.

That would depend on your cam.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Diederick/DVK on April 15, 2011, 10:30:29 am
i prefered a used OEM starter over a (possible China-made) replacement part.
those old skodas don't last very long anyway, so i bet a used starter deserves a second life in a proper car  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on April 15, 2011, 19:38:22 pm
i prefered a used OEM starter over a (possible China-made) replacement part.
those old skodas don't last very long anyway, so i bet a used starter deserves a second life in a proper car  ;D

I emailed the seller yesterday asking who the manufacturer is and if they are new or recon, I will let you know what the reply was.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on April 19, 2011, 20:35:32 pm
Porsche 356 Carrera GT brakes with aluminium shoes and RSK Spyder aluminium wheel cylinders :o

(http://porsche356registry.org/356talk/download.html?id=3550&t=1)

And the RSK drums that cover them up :o

(http://porsche356registry.org/356talk/download.html?id=3556&t=1)

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/pix/medium/2385624.jpg)
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=706514


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on April 20, 2011, 15:09:21 pm
i prefered a used OEM starter over a (possible China-made) replacement part.
those old skodas don't last very long anyway, so i bet a used starter deserves a second life in a proper car  ;D

I emailed the seller yesterday asking who the manufacturer is and if they are new or recon, I will let you know what the reply was.

I had a reply from the seller today and they are not OEM but new copy units, so I presume they are Chinese.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rocket Ron on April 20, 2011, 15:42:01 pm
Porsche 356 Carrera GT brakes with aluminium shoes and RSK Spyder aluminium wheel cylinders :o

(http://porsche356registry.org/356talk/download.html?id=3550&t=1)

And the RSK drums that cover them up :o

(http://porsche356registry.org/356talk/download.html?id=3556&t=1)

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/pix/medium/2385624.jpg)
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=706514


look cheap and nasty better send them to me , I'll pay the postage  :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: kingsburgphil on April 21, 2011, 01:20:30 am
Porsche 356 Carrera GT brakes with aluminium shoes and RSK Spyder aluminium wheel cylinders :o

(http://porsche356registry.org/356talk/download.html?id=3550&t=1)

And the RSK drums that cover them up :o

(http://porsche356registry.org/356talk/download.html?id=3556&t=1)

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/pix/medium/2385624.jpg)
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=706514
Wow!  Did you win the Lottery?  That stuff was rare and expensive thirty years ago when we ran a
set up like that on our Formula V/slalom car.  Needless to say I'm pea green with envy  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on April 21, 2011, 01:50:31 am
No no no, they aren't mine! I wouldn't have a clue what to do with parts like that, that setup is worth more than my car. I just saw the pics on a 356 site, and put them here. ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: kingsburgphil on April 22, 2011, 04:55:30 am
You never know, perhaps some day you might have the means to purchase a set of brakes like those.  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 14, 2011, 21:09:11 pm
Sorry folks I have nothing to contribute at the moment, instead I have a couple of weight saving questions that hopefully some of you will be able to address.

Firstly a question on fasteners, I am planning to use aluminium fasteners wherever possible on my build, i.e anything that is not safety critical, wings, doors, trim etc. For the safety critical areas, suspension, steering, engine/gearbox mounts etc. I am going to use titanium as much as possible. So what is my question? Well in an attempt at keeping costs down I wonder if I can use aluminium nuts with titanium bolts ? I know Porsche, for example, use alloy wheel nuts with steel studs, so can this thinking be reapplied to other components ? I am thinking spring plate/axle bolts, front trailing arm/stub axle bolts etc. Can I replace the steel gearbox casing nuts for alloy? Also is a particular grade of Ti and ali required?

Lots to think about there I know and would appreciate any input.

My second question is a little more straightforward, has anyone compared the weight of different brake set ups ? I am planning on using stock 5/205 drums all round but if I were to switch to disc brakes would I see any weight saving ?  

Again thanks for any input.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lightning on May 15, 2011, 23:24:56 pm
Interesting idea using alloy hardware. As long as you keep your car out of salty water, there shouldn't be a problem to mix materials. When it comes to strength there might be some issues depending on the alloy and heat treatment. In general, both aluminium and titanium has a lower tensile strength and hardness than steel, this limits how much tension they can handle. E.g. if an M8 bolt needs 30Nm torque, this might snap an aluminium bolt or stretch a titanium bolt beyond it's elastic limit. The suppliers I know for alloy bolts clearly advise not to use these fasteners for important components like brakes and suspension.

Have not weighed discs vs. drums, but would say that discs have more stopping power per kilo than drums!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 17, 2011, 18:45:49 pm
Interesting idea using alloy hardware. As long as you keep your car out of salty water, there shouldn't be a problem to mix materials. When it comes to strength there might be some issues depending on the alloy and heat treatment. In general, both aluminium and titanium has a lower tensile strength and hardness than steel, this limits how much tension they can handle. E.g. if an M8 bolt needs 30Nm torque, this might snap an aluminium bolt or stretch a titanium bolt beyond it's elastic limit. The suppliers I know for alloy bolts clearly advise not to use these fasteners for important components like brakes and suspension.

Have not weighed discs vs. drums, but would say that discs have more stopping power per kilo than drums!

Thanks for the input lightning, I agree about using alloy bolts for brakes/suspension etc, a strict no no.

I will try and get some info on the strength of the nuts below.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280668167297&var=580030238469&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

I have looked into titanium strength grades, grade 5 is the most commonly used grade in the aerospace and automotive industries and is an alloy of Titanium aluminium and vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V). It has a tensile strength of around 1000 Mpa and hardness of Rockwell 36, which I think, is comparable to high tensile steel.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Carsten on May 18, 2011, 13:11:47 pm
Some more :
http://www.isa-racing.com/index.php/cat/c851_Aluminiumschrauben.html

;-)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: vaughn bros on May 21, 2011, 17:15:50 pm
I saved a little weight on my front LP Beam. I removed the shocks and shock towers, shock bolts and snubber horns.
I added lighter friction shocks. I removed about 5 inches from the beam width (torsion leaves and tubing weight).
I removed the brake drums, backing plates, all brake hardware and hoses. I removed the steel wheels and replaced them with 6lb magnesium wheels.
Heres some pics.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: vaughn bros on May 21, 2011, 17:20:14 pm
More pics...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SPRasmussen on May 21, 2011, 19:07:15 pm
What does that alu peice do ? Is it like on a old splitbug with rear suspention or ? 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: vaughn bros on May 21, 2011, 19:37:54 pm
What does that alu peice do ? Is it like on a old splitbug with rear suspention or ? 


These are dry, adjustable tension, friction shocks. I have 22 ft lbs torque currently. The more tight, the more friction. If I tighten them to 40ft.lbs., then they become permanent in one position. I have access to the center tension bolt from underneath (do not have to remove tank).


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SPRasmussen on May 21, 2011, 20:09:20 pm
That is pretty cool. how does they "fell" compaired to normal shocks ?

And where can you buy them ?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: vaughn bros on May 22, 2011, 07:40:27 am
That is pretty cool. how does they "fell" compaired to normal shocks ?

And where can you buy them ?

Thank you sir. Here is a link to Speedway Motors.
http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Mr-Roadster-Friction-Shocks,3799.html

They feel like normal shocks, no difference.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 31, 2011, 04:26:20 am
Can I replace the steel gearbox casing nuts for alloy?
Not all of them.  I'd say you can use M7 alloy nuts for the nose cone.  Not a lot of stress there. 

The side cover nuts are different.  Their torque spec is higher than normal (22ftlbs), indicating it's a high stress location.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 31, 2011, 16:24:32 pm
Can I replace the steel gearbox casing nuts for alloy?
Not all of them.  I'd say you can use M7 alloy nuts for the nose cone.  Not a lot of stress there. 

The side cover nuts are different.  Their torque spec is higher than normal (22ftlbs), indicating it's a high stress location.

Thanks Bruce exactly the kind of advice I am hoping for. I am not using a front mount on my gearbox anyway, so I would think the stress on the studs/nuts there will be less. I guess a good way to check what material I use in what location would be to have a look through a workshop manual for torque settings. I still need to gather info on what kind of torque you can apply to alloy nuts. 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on June 14, 2011, 21:08:22 pm
Does any one out there have good data on the weights of the various wide five disc brake set ups out there (csp, jamar etc) for link pin front end and there weight saving over stock front drums,

Andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on June 14, 2011, 21:59:55 pm
Just got a Bus CSP disc brake setup and inc the box it came in it weighed 27 kilos! Bug CSP kit is slightly smaller, but still has the heavy cast iron/steel calipers etc. Figure around 20-23 kgs for Bug setup.
My Wilwood setup is pretty damn light, haven't weighed it yet, but loads lighter than stock drums. Hard to find these days though...
Ah, here's a thought. I have a Jamar disc/hub setup that you could have very cheap. Quite light if I remember rightly. No calipers or brackets, but to a man of your callibre, no problemo! Thinking about it, it might be a Neal hub and disc combo... I got it off Bernie so long ago I can't remember. I think he had it on his 67 for a while...
A 67 will be balljoint, so probably no good to you. Jeez, I am rambling... I haven't even had a beer. Yet...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SteveW on June 15, 2011, 07:36:38 am
Does any one out there have good data on the weights of the various wide five disc brake set ups out there (csp, jamar etc) for link pin front end and there weight saving over stock front drums,

Andy

I'm not sure of the weight but my front brake set-up (strange disk and caliper etc) is super light. Mine is chevy pattern granted, however CSP/RLR now make it in a wide 5 pattern and I can't imagine it would be massively heavier.

Steve


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on June 15, 2011, 08:58:15 am
Thanks Mat , I turned my back on ball joint front ends a while ago...

There's no doubting the quality of the csp disc brake stuff but they are damned heavy, If I could prove the conection I could probably take them to court over my bad back ;D

I'm currently just doing a bit of speculating due to enforced down time, so no racing at all this year, hopefully next year my health will be better.

Steve, I'll have a look at the rlr stuff and see what gives,

Andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on June 15, 2011, 09:11:33 am
just had a quick look at the rlr site , only seem to do a wide 5 rear kit at the mo...

any one out there got a old stlye wilwood kit they want to sell??

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SteveW on June 15, 2011, 09:17:01 am
They might be on the csp site, I'm sure I've seen the fronts!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 15, 2011, 18:49:59 pm
Does any one out there have good data on the weights of the various wide five disc brake set ups out there (csp, jamar etc) for link pin front end and there weight saving over stock front drums,

Andy

Hi Andy,

Neal wide 5 front ally hub/disc, including bearings and washer 5.58kg.  Wilwood caliper 850gm including pads.  No data for caliper bracket although that's ally.

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on June 15, 2011, 19:13:28 pm
Hi Phil,

do you know if the neal kit adds any width to the front track?

andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 15, 2011, 20:48:14 pm
Hub depth from rear of inner hub seal to outside of outer hub bearing (excl. washer) is 80mm.  What's your equivalent for stock drums?  My thoughts are it's the same.

Cheers


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on June 15, 2011, 21:02:45 pm


Cheers  Phil

I will go and have a measure as soon as I am allowed out of the house after our new arrival, no time soon if the missus has anything  to do with it

andy





Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 15, 2011, 21:47:52 pm
good luck!  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on June 16, 2011, 02:53:46 am

any one out there got a old stlye wilwood kit they want to sell??


x 2  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on June 16, 2011, 12:06:17 pm
Andy, I've got the CB kit for dropped spindles for my split - I'll weigh the caliper and hub and get back to you on that. Gut feeling is that the hub isn't too heavy, but the caliper is a chunky piece! :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 19, 2011, 10:38:45 am
Does any one out there have good data on the weights of the various wide five disc brake set ups out there (csp, jamar etc) for link pin front end and there weight saving over stock front drums,

Andy

Hi Andy,

Neal wide 5 front ally hub/disc, including bearings and washer 5.58kg.  Wilwood caliper 850gm including pads.  No data for caliper bracket although that's ally.

Cheers
Phil

Caliper mounting brackets 311gm.  So the total weight of the entire Neal kit including bearings is 6.7kg per side.  13.2kg for front brakes sounds like a lot!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on June 19, 2011, 17:38:51 pm
Does any one out there have good data on the weights of the various wide five disc brake set ups out there (csp, jamar etc) for link pin front end and there weight saving over stock front drums,

Andy

Hi Andy,

Neal wide 5 front ally hub/disc, including bearings and washer 5.58kg.  Wilwood caliper 850gm including pads.  No data for caliper bracket although that's ally.

Cheers
Phil

Caliper mounting brackets 311gm.  So the total weight of the entire Neal kit including bearings is 6.7kg per side.  13.2kg for front brakes sounds like a lot!

Ok, I just went to my garage and did a bit of weighing and measuring,

stock 58-64 front drum complete with 12mm screw in studs, bearings and hub seal came in at a healthy 6.1kg

front shoes (drilled, about 35g lighter each than stock) springs, adjusters, bearing washer and end cap and retainers springs and cups were 1.2kg

front backing plate with wheel cylinder 1.5kg

making a grand total of 8.80 kg per side.

Bear in mind that I didn't use my Nasa calibrated scales to weigh these with, just a good quality pair of kitchen scales instead but there appears to be at least 4kg saving available doing the Neal disc swap plus you would gain the reduced rotational mass advantage of disc brakes too,

Unfortunately it would appear that they would also add about 20mm to the track each side if Mr West is right with the 80mm reading thus requiring a beam narrowing, and I'm not sure if they will clear zero off set centerlines, I'm waiting on an email from a contact in the states on this

Andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 20, 2011, 06:42:45 am
Yeah Nasa do indeed calibrate my scales monthly.  Not!

Still the 0.5kg rotational saving is not bad - that's with the standard 14mm press in steel studs too.

My beam is 2" narrowed, with zero offset ercos (which fit fine over the wilwoods) and cb performance dropped spindles.  It's not that narrow with all that lot on, maybe there is an offset on the Neals.  Fairly sure there's a bit of an offset from those spindles.

The ercos have a 2 stepped inner, diameter 12.5" and 14.5", let me check this morning and see which bit goes over the calipers.  Then you'll be able to compare your centrelines inside diameter.  Failing that you could always bring the rim along to a meet and try it over my setup.  Cheers


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 20, 2011, 07:24:39 am
... with the standard 14mm press in steel studs ....

 Ti ?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 20, 2011, 07:45:47 am
actually no (not yet?), it's £100 a corner to go that route (gulp)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 20, 2011, 07:47:16 am


The ercos have a 2 stepped inner, diameter 12.5" and 14.5", let me check this morning and see which bit goes over the calipers.  Then you'll be able to compare your centrelines inside diameter.  Failing that you could always bring the rim along to a meet and try it over my setup.  Cheers
[/quote]

Checked and you will need a minimum of 12.5", the inset ercos are very tight clearance on those calipers.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on July 11, 2011, 21:40:34 pm
Your thicker Al plate will be 15% less than the thinner steel one.  
IMO, you could have made it thinner.


Hey Bruce

I think you are right and I will have another made in 8 or maybe even 6mm plate. Most steel ones I have seen are 6 or 8mm so even this 10mm one will be substantially lighter.


An update on this, I've had a 6mm ali gearbox mid mount made and this is the result.

Mild steel mount [attachment=1]


6mm ali mount[attachment=2]

Just under 400g saved  ;D  


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SPRasmussen on July 12, 2011, 08:53:48 am
2 month on this one = 10kilo body weight drop  :D :D

(http://www.cykelgalleri.dk/uploads_large_wm/144490.jpg?05-07-2011_13:19:58)

Car is under 700kg with driver  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Elnef on July 13, 2011, 05:34:06 am
2 month on this one = 10kilo body weight drop  :D :D

(http://www.cykelgalleri.dk/uploads_large_wm/144490.jpg?05-07-2011_13:19:58)

Car is under 700kg with driver  ;)

 :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on July 13, 2011, 10:45:58 am
I've been going to the gym for the last three months and I've PUT ON two pounds! :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 09, 2011, 08:25:08 am
Here is the IRS rear trailing arm pivot bolt.  Stock is completely solid and a hefty 251g each.  My drilled ones are 123g, for a reduction of 256g, or 51%.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on August 09, 2011, 20:57:02 pm
A half a pound saving on just two bolts! Good work Bruce  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 13, 2011, 05:24:01 am
If Phil needed these, he'd make them from Ti! 
His bolts would be 143g for the pair instead of 502g.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 05, 2011, 22:43:56 pm
We've got a local restoration shop that specializes in pre-war, high end European cars.  I saw this coil bracket on one of the work benches.  It is made from 1mm Al.  At first, I thought there's no way that would survive, but then I realized it is mounted to the car body, not the shaking engine.  I didn't get a weight on it, but I'm sure you can use your imagination.




Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 19, 2011, 04:35:23 am
I drilled this last year.  What I learned from this, is that drilling small holes in sheet metal is a colossal waste of time!!!

251g --> 168g = 33%


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on September 19, 2011, 21:40:31 pm
Maybe a waste of time, but looks the dog's danglies  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on September 19, 2011, 22:11:22 pm
Remember Bruce every little counts :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on October 18, 2011, 08:09:01 am
I don't think we've discussed batteries yet.

I remember talking to Mark Herbert years ago about Odyssey motorcycle batteries.  I know a couple of guys that tried the PC680.  It's got 680A of cranking (for a short time), and it does work in a VW.  But you don't have much reserve.  It weighs 6.8kg.  That's pretty good compared to the normal antique battery most of us use. (12-15kg)

Today I found out about the new Lithium batteries.
http://www.solomotoparts.com/product.php?productid=48290&cat=539&page=1#more_details
It's only got 500 cranking amps, but look at the weight!  1.35 kg!!!

That is the biggest battery they make.  If it wasn't enough, you could get 2 of the next size down and put them in parallel to get 720A.  The total weight for two of them, 2.1kg.  And they are super tiny too.
http://www.solomotoparts.com/product.php?productid=43444&cat=0&page=1

This co is in the OC.  Who's going to be the first to go there and buy one for their VW?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on October 18, 2011, 12:33:19 pm
I use the 680, mixture of race and street use with an alternator. It cranks a 2387 9.4:1 easily. Its never gone flat in 4 years even with all electrics on and I have a  heated front and rear screen in my Ghia. I like the sound of this lithium battery, I thing 500 cranking amps could do. with a ghia you have to get rid of all the weight you can.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Nikke on October 18, 2011, 16:49:48 pm
Porsche top models can be ordered with a very light Li-battery,but the price is out of this world.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on October 19, 2011, 15:34:08 pm
If the Lithium batteries are similar to the Lithium-Polymer units used in radio controlled cars, they're great until something goes wrong... They need to be charged in an explosion-proof bag, so I don't think I'd want one behind my drivers seat... :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: mymedusa on October 19, 2011, 16:47:37 pm
i try this starterbatterie next.
http://autsys.tkk.fi/intranet/as-0.3200/attach/S11-20/GWL-LFP-Product-LP12V20AHB.pdf

116euro
http://www.ev-power.eu/?p=p_48&sName=lifeypo4-batteries-%2812v%29
if 4 more people want one we could get them for each 108 euro.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: DWL_Puavo on October 19, 2011, 21:46:43 pm
New lithium starter batteries are of LiFePO4 type, they won't catch fire or explode pretty much from anything. Way more safe than Li-Ion or lead-acid batteries. Also dis/re-charge rates are way up from Li-Ion. Recharge is also better than in lead-acid, however lead-acid still has the greates discharge rate. The downside is about half of energy capacity of Li-Ion, still way better than from lead-acid. Oh, and the price, that too :)

Bare 3,7V cells can be have for a couple hundred euros for the battery that could start up a car easily and fully reload in about 5 minutes. Not sure however if there's suitable modules to handle the recharge part.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on November 01, 2011, 13:16:10 pm
a friend of mine recently ordered some titanium parts for his mini from here

www.titanclassics.com

i emailed them if they are oing to make anything for aircooled vws


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on November 29, 2011, 18:47:23 pm
After seeing Bruce's thread a few posts up I thought I'd make a coil bracket out of some Mil spec 50A titanium I have lying around (cheers Brad!). It measures 0.020" (0.5mm) and is incredibly strong for such thin sheet - easily up to the task of holding a coil. Anyway, I weighed a stock VW bracket and it weighed in at a hefty 74 grams. The ti bracket weighed in at a measly 12 grams! A weight saving of approx 84% ! Long live the diet  8)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00085.jpg)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00087.jpg)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00089.jpg)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00104.jpg)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00100.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dannyboy on November 29, 2011, 19:46:18 pm
ive got a bag of filler from the guy who is respraying my racecar will weigh it when i get it all together  ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on December 03, 2011, 20:44:31 pm
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00087.jpg)
I bet the bolt is a major % of the weight!

I'm scratching my head trying to figure out how to form that.  Do you put in the 4 bends, then just wrap it around the coil?

BTW, I see several opportunities on your engine.  Pictures at 11.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on December 03, 2011, 20:59:56 pm
Bruce, I measured both brackets without the bolts, so there is a great additional weight saving to be had if you used a ti bolt or even ali item.

To make the bracket I simply put the four bends in then wrapped the curve around the coil. Very simple and easy to do. I was going to punch larger holes in the bracket as I reckon 10 grams is easily achievable. Maybe will on the next bracket - I might even make a small batch if anybody wants one? Even at 12 grams the bracket is rediculously light. Picking it up seems to trick the brain as what's in your hand weight-wise doesn't compute with the size of bracket...

Keep posting pix of your lightening work Bruce; it's inspirational  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: tikimadness on December 03, 2011, 21:04:20 pm
I'll take one Matt ;D Guess postage won't kill me  ;D ;D

Michael


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on December 03, 2011, 21:20:05 pm
Coolio. I will put you down on the list Michael. If we get another four people I'll make a small  batch. You are right, it won't cost more than letter rate to post   ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ianmac on December 03, 2011, 21:36:20 pm
Coolio. I will put you down on the list Michael. If we get another four people I'll make a small  batch. You are right, it won't cost more than letter rate to post   ;D

Mat, I would take one for the ghia  8) must come and see you soon for a pasty and a chinwag ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on December 03, 2011, 22:22:29 pm
Cheers Ian! Two on the list :)
Pop round anytime dude - I'll have the kettle ready 8)
We need to tweak your motor on the rolling road soon. Can't wait to see what it puts out. Should be quite exciting  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Greasy Dave on December 04, 2011, 18:48:07 pm
I too am interested,but, i don't want to blow my tiny budget on a coil bracket.What sort of price would we be looking at ? Thanks Dave.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Harry/FDK on December 04, 2011, 20:08:40 pm
One more please. Just let me know.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lids on December 04, 2011, 20:10:01 pm
I too am interested,but, i don't want to blow my tiny budget on a coil bracket.What sort of price would we be looking at ? Thanks Dave.

As above but again dependent on price.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on December 04, 2011, 21:03:12 pm
I figure on £30 each due to them being handmade. If we get ten orders I can make them for 25. A titanium bolt costs about £5 and an Ali bolt costs about £1.50  so let me know if you guys need a ti bolt or Ali or just the bracket.  I know it's not exactly cheap, but it's not made in a Chinese sweatshop - rather a Cornish pasty fueled engineer! :) Postage about £1 uk and £2 europe. U.s. £3


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: tikimadness on December 04, 2011, 21:18:08 pm
I thin the only way to go is with a titanium bolt.Those aluminum ones are way to heavy ;D ;D

Michael


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on December 04, 2011, 21:26:08 pm
The Ali bolt is lighter! Not as strong though, although it doesn't need to be strong as it does not do much...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lids on December 04, 2011, 21:56:43 pm
Go on then put me down for one.

Matt have you moved shop yet?  As your website has gone haywire and is in microsoft latin!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on December 04, 2011, 22:45:23 pm
Ha ha! Yes, my website is fubar! I no longer have access to it to maintain its upkeep. My web designer has moved to South Africa and is supposed to be sorting it sometime soon...
I have moved workshop to Wadebridge. Pop in sometime for a cuppa and pasty :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lids on December 05, 2011, 19:09:24 pm
Ha ha! Yes, my website is fubar! I no longer have access to it to maintain its upkeep. My web designer has moved to South Africa and is supposed to be sorting it sometime soon...
I have moved workshop to Wadebridge. Pop in sometime for a cuppa and pasty :)

Thats the arse end of Cornwall!  why didn't you move further south on the Lizard, then i could bring my mums pasties round :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on December 05, 2011, 19:21:36 pm
The Lizzard eh? Do you have webbed feet by any chance?  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dannyboy on December 05, 2011, 20:01:07 pm
matt needs to be close to rick stiens place for his lunch  :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lids on December 05, 2011, 20:56:00 pm
The Lizzard eh? Do you have webbed feet by any chance?  ;D

Nah, but we do have the best beach in Cornwall (church cove as seen on Dr Martin)!!!! and i can walk there  :P


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on December 15, 2011, 13:03:39 pm
I guess this is the place to find more information or maybe the topic has been covered, in that case I have to drop it and search better.

Drum brakes being lighter up front than a disc setup?

Friend of mine is rebuilding a very nice car and he is weight conscious.
Now the car has regular disc brakes.
He will change for drums as he will save sevaral kilos on doing this.
In my opinion, if you are rebuilding why not get a drag-racing lightweight setup and save many kilos versus drums and stock discs.

Anyone have real comparison facts on this topic?
Suppliers? Jaycee, S&W or Lummus or other suggestions?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy M. on December 16, 2011, 08:49:01 am
Does any one out there have good data on the weights of the various wide five disc brake set ups out there (csp, jamar etc) for link pin front end and there weight saving over stock front drums,

Andy

Hi Andy,

Neal wide 5 front ally hub/disc, including bearings and washer 5.58kg.  Wilwood caliper 850gm including pads.  No data for caliper bracket although that's ally.

Cheers
Phil

Caliper mounting brackets 311gm.  So the total weight of the entire Neal kit including bearings is 6.7kg per side.  13.2kg for front brakes sounds like a lot!

Ok, I just went to my garage and did a bit of weighing and measuring,

stock 58-64 front drum complete with 12mm screw in studs, bearings and hub seal came in at a healthy 6.1kg

front shoes (drilled, about 35g lighter each than stock) springs, adjusters, bearing washer and end cap and retainers springs and cups were 1.2kg

front backing plate with wheel cylinder 1.5kg

making a grand total of 8.80 kg per side.

Bear in mind that I didn't use my Nasa calibrated scales to weigh these with, just a good quality pair of kitchen scales instead but there appears to be at least 4kg saving available doing the Neal disc swap plus you would gain the reduced rotational mass advantage of disc brakes too,

Unfortunately it would appear that they would also add about 20mm to the track each side if Mr West is right with the 80mm reading thus requiring a beam narrowing, and I'm not sure if they will clear zero off set centerlines, I'm waiting on an email from a contact in the states on this

Andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on December 16, 2011, 13:46:26 pm
Thanks Andy!
...and thanks you other guys for this input. In general very good input on this thread.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 04, 2012, 07:27:19 am
I have always remembered a story about how Mark Herbert once went into the auto parts store to look at headlights.  He opened up all the brands, trying to find ones made from plastic instead of glass.  Since hearing that, I too have been searching.

I found a single one in Mexico City about 6-7 years ago, but it had the illegal French yellow lens.

Last week while in Mexico escaping winter, I stopped in at an independent VW parts store.  On the shelf were headlights.  When I picked one up, I knew the holy grail was in hand!

With the H4 bulb in place they weigh in at a flyweight 192g.  This compares to 529g for the common Bosch glass H4.  
Total savings: 674g for a pair.

[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on January 04, 2012, 14:29:41 pm
Smart! Reminds me, the aftermarket, chincy, late model headlight rings are also much lighter than a factory ring. I sift through them in swap meets in search of SB12's :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Harry/FDK on January 04, 2012, 15:52:32 pm
Cool story's !


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 05, 2012, 19:30:46 pm
I have always remembered a story about how Mark Herbert once went into the auto parts store to look at headlights.  He opened up all the brands, trying to find ones made from plastic instead of glass.  Since hearing that, I too have been searching.

I found a single one in Mexico City about 6-7 years ago, but it had the illegal French yellow lens.

Last week while in Mexico escaping winter, I stopped in at an independent VW parts store.  On the shelf were headlights.  When I picked one up, I knew the holy grail was in hand!

With the H4 bulb in place they weigh in at a flyweight 192g.  This compares to 529g for the common Bosch glass H4.  
Total savings: 674g for a pair.


Nice score Bruce, I would love to get my hands on a pair of those. Don't suppose you picked up more than one set when you were down there did you?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on January 05, 2012, 23:17:20 pm
This thread REALLY make me wonder just how light weight you could make a "stock vw"  :)



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 06, 2012, 10:16:53 am
 I would love to get my hands on a pair of those.
But what would you do with them? ;)  Hint: Napoleon really HATED the British.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 06, 2012, 10:38:57 am
This thread REALLY make me wonder just how light weight you could make a "stock vw"  :)
I've thought of that too.
There are some parts you can't lighten significantly.  The engine and trans cases.  You're not going to reduce the weight of the floor pan by much.  Or the bare body shell and doors/lids/wings.  Same goes for some suspension/steering parts.
However, many of the bolt-on bits can be lightened quite a bit.  If you went back to the parts I've been hacking up, I post the original weight and the reduced weight, then the % reduction.  I have found that 25-30% isn't too hard to cut out.  I'm guessing you might be able to apply these techniques to 40-50% of the car.  This gives a range of 80 - 125kg.  Then you'd still have a car that looked complete with all it's necessary parts.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on January 06, 2012, 17:20:36 pm
This thread REALLY make me wonder just how light weight you could make a "stock vw"  :)
I've thought of that too.
There are some parts you can't lighten significantly.  The engine and trans cases.  You're not going to reduce the weight of the floor pan by much.  Or the bare body shell and doors/lids/wings.  Same goes for some suspension/steering parts.
However, many of the bolt-on bits can be lightened quite a bit.  If you went back to the parts I've been hacking up, I post the original weight and the reduced weight, then the % reduction.  I have found that 25-30% isn't too hard to cut out.  I'm guessing you might be able to apply these techniques to 40-50% of the car.  This gives a range of 80 - 125kg.  Then you'd still have a car that looked complete with all it's necessary parts.

Yeah I noticed your %'s - The IRS arm bolts where amazing!!!!! Soooooo much weight in just 2 bolts  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 07, 2012, 16:06:54 pm
 I would love to get my hands on a pair of those.
But what would you do with them? ;)  Hint: Napoleon really HATED the British.

Bruce, that hint is a little too cryptic for me! apologies for wearing my stupid head. I will give it a  ;D anyway.

But seriously, if you know how/where I can get these give me a shout ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 07, 2012, 18:51:08 pm
After conquering Europe, Napoleon decreed that everyone on the continent must switch sides of the roads.

These LHD headlights I have are "Autolux" brand, made in India.

I know this is one of their products:
http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=ACC-C10-7580
There are many details on this one that are exactly the same as the plain H4s I just got.  I don't know if this one is plastic.  This seller hasn't returned my inquiry.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 07, 2012, 20:39:01 pm
After conquering Europe, Napoleon decreed that everyone on the continent must switch sides of the roads.

These LHD headlights I have are "Autolux" brand, made in India.

I know this is one of their products:
http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=ACC-C10-7580
There are many details on this one that are exactly the same as the plain H4s I just got.  I don't know if this one is plastic.  This seller hasn't returned my inquiry.

Ahhh I got ya  ;D, and here am I thinking you guys drive on the wrong side of the road   ;)

The LHD need not be a problem you can buy stick on film lens divertors in Europe to correct that.

Thanks for the lead on the headlights, I suspect the backs at least are plastic, the back of the bowls look very similar to the back of the plastic (also Autolux, made in India) Rossi style headlight rings I have. Not sure about the lens though.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 09, 2012, 10:54:34 am
This might be the same manufacturer:

http://www.mamotorworkstv.com/vw/product/h4-headlight-european-style-each_361051/

The black mounting ring is similar.  The 3 tabs for adjusting are exactly the same.  It's missing the H4 in the center of the lens.  And this one has an extra bulb below the main one.  Too bad they're out of stock.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on January 10, 2012, 22:24:52 pm
Designed and made some new caliper brackets today out of T6 aluminium for All Torque. Steel 312 grams, Ali 88 grams. A total of 448 g saved!! A fraction under a lb  8)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00154.jpg)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/15window/DSC00155.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Mirco Jufer on January 13, 2012, 22:58:42 pm
Team Royalflush with the new Wheels for 2012... ;D ;D ;D[attachment=1][attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: henk on January 14, 2012, 19:03:11 pm
that looks REALLY light,those skinny wheels.

henk!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Mirco Jufer on January 14, 2012, 23:23:10 pm
Yes they are...and very Nice too ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasteddie63 on January 15, 2012, 07:03:01 am
Schley's Lightning Bug Backing Plates
(http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u487/fasteddie63/TheseDays155.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 17, 2012, 07:15:40 am
There's got to be more of that on the car???


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 17, 2012, 07:20:21 am
M-B, here's another part with 35% reduction:


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on January 17, 2012, 14:25:03 pm
Looks like there's room for another pair of holes inboard of the ones already there?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 25, 2012, 08:09:02 am
You're right, Zach.  The reason I didn't drill any there is because the bending moment is maximum at the point where the wing meets the body, and since I've seen the odd stock one bent, I thought I would suffer the penalty of carrying around the extra 1-2 grams.

Found this pic on another forum.  This guy is attempting to recreate Muffler Mike's experiment of watching how much oil stays in the left head at rpms.  I noticed the valve cover he sacrificed is stamped from sheet Al.  Can you imagine what that weighs?
I sent the guy a message and he only had the one, and can't remember where he got it from.  A couple of days later, he suggested maybe JC Whitney.  A search of their site yielded nothing.

Anyone know who makes this?
[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on January 25, 2012, 08:19:49 am
Hi Bruce. Has your Ti turned up yet? Regards, Matt


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 26, 2012, 07:25:25 am
Just got it!

It sure is deceptive.  The strip is 30mm by 240mm, and it only weighs 15g!

Is there anyone else making a light coil bracket?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: TexasTom on January 26, 2012, 12:51:01 pm
You're right, Zach.  The reason I didn't drill any there is because the bending moment is maximum at the point where the wing meets the body, and since I've seen the odd stock one bent, I thought I would suffer the penalty of carrying around the extra 1-2 grams.

Found this pic on another forum.  This guy is attempting to recreate Muffler Mike's experiment of watching how much oil stays in the left head at rpms.  I noticed the valve cover he sacrificed is stamped from sheet Al.  Can you imagine what that weighs?
I sent the guy a message and he only had the one, and can't remember where he got it from.  A couple of days later, he suggested maybe JC Whitney.  A search of their site yielded nothing.

Anyone know who makes this?
[attachment=1]

I believe Scat used to sell those years ago ...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 28, 2012, 05:29:34 am
I believe you are right, Tom!

Here's the current Scat stamped steel valve cover from their catalogue, and the one from the previous page.  The raised rectangle pressed around the bumps for the bail appear to be the same.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on January 28, 2012, 06:19:31 am
Ali rear axle bearing cover,both IRS and swingaxle available


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on January 29, 2012, 02:25:29 am
IRS version weighs 141grams,dont have any stock ones here to compare though

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on January 29, 2012, 03:02:21 am
Cool. How much?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on February 19, 2012, 03:54:44 am
Steel: 69g
Ally: 26g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on February 19, 2012, 05:31:35 am
Good thinking :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ED2.4 on February 19, 2012, 18:45:13 pm
Ali rear axle bearing cover,both IRS and swingaxle available

Hi,
stock swing axle one is 366g !!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lightning on February 19, 2012, 22:23:43 pm
Steel: 69g
Ally: 26g

Forgetting to fit them: 0g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Martin on February 25, 2012, 18:00:51 pm
Inlet trumpets for a GT3 V8 made from Nylon..... weigh fuck all!



(http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/autocraft/bd19559b.jpg)

Next up is the GT3 T6 Pedals part way though the operations, but you get the Idea, I'll weigh them when there finished.

(http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/autocraft/4ca4a9ae.jpg)



busy at Taylor Machine ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 04, 2012, 08:56:35 am
Will you be making VW pedals??

The plastic trumpets are not a new idea.  40 years ago, Porsche installed these plastic ones on production cars.  This one got a little burnt, so it looks odd.

[attachment=1]


A few year ago where I worked, I was tasked to dispose of some redundant office furniture.  When going through one desk formerly occupied by an engineer, I found what I thought was a piece of ¼" x 1" x 18" stainless steel flat bar.  When I picked it up, it felt light.  Really light.  I've since confirmed it's Ti. My problem is, I can't think of anything for the car to make with it!  ???

Anyone got any good ideas?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on March 04, 2012, 19:29:38 pm
Titanium steering wheel nut...

[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on March 08, 2012, 13:24:28 pm
Steel steering wheel nut works out lighter:


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on March 08, 2012, 14:15:47 pm
Bugger!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: leec on April 23, 2012, 14:28:56 pm
Hi Guys,

I'm having some Ali floorpan washers made up. Will post a pic soon. Depending on how good they look would
anyone else be interested in some?

Lee


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on April 25, 2012, 02:46:08 am
leec, I'd be very keen on a set. I had been thinking the same thing but hadn't got around to making them. I was also thinking titanium bolts to go with them.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: leec on April 25, 2012, 15:25:24 pm
Hi,

I'm picking up the first set this Friday. Will post a pic and go from there. Price will depend on quantity.

Lee


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Simpsonshoe on June 14, 2012, 02:04:26 am
(http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h226/Mag001776/tn_1200_9005_JPG.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 16, 2012, 08:57:00 am
Steel steering wheel nut works out lighter:
(http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=58176;image)

Are you sure about that, Phil?

[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 16, 2012, 09:05:33 am
Here's the comparison with the stock early steering column nut.
[attachment=1]

The early nut is 37g.  Even if you didn't want to join in on the sillyness of some of us, you can reduce weight by switching the early steering column nut with the late one.  It's only 26g.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on June 17, 2012, 09:40:35 am
Steel steering wheel nut works out lighter:
(http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5293.0;attach=58176;image)

Are you sure about that, Phil?

[attachment=1]

Nice!  That looks a bit Ti to me?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Chris W on June 17, 2012, 16:17:43 pm
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ljouCPlOo8M/T9tQT-mxzBI/AAAAAAAAOcE/fIvYrDAuGJk/s800/IMG_4238.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Erlend / bug66 on June 17, 2012, 16:44:27 pm
Like  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 17, 2012, 18:28:15 pm
Nice!  That looks a bit Ti to me?
Indeed!
Previously, I mentioned I had a piece of ¼x1" Ti flat bar.  That's what I used to make these nuts.
Here's the generator nut:
[attachment=1]

What else can I make from this Ti flat bar?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: SlingShot on June 26, 2012, 03:39:27 am
Nice!  That looks a bit Ti to me?
Indeed!
Previously, I mentioned I had a piece of ¼x1" Ti flat bar.  That's what I used to make these nuts.
Here's the generator nut:
[attachment=1]

What else can I make from this Ti flat bar?

Gland Nut Washer ??


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on June 26, 2012, 05:57:54 am
Nice!  That looks a bit Ti to me?
Indeed!
Previously, I mentioned I had a piece of ¼x1" Ti flat bar.  That's what I used to make these nuts.
Here's the generator nut:
[attachment=1]

What else can I make from this Ti flat bar?

Gland Nut Washer ??

Crank pulley washer...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dannyboy on July 02, 2012, 22:30:23 pm
wosp motorsport starter motor 3.2kg feels pretty light whats a stock one weigh?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy198712 on July 02, 2012, 22:34:54 pm
How are you guys making your fuel pump and dizzy block offs? must be some saving to be had there!
is EFI lighter then carbs?

really enjoyed this thread!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on July 05, 2012, 07:27:37 am
wosp motorsport starter motor 3.2kg feels pretty light whats a stock one weigh?
Pay attention in class.  From page 10 of this topic:
Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on July 05, 2012, 07:29:21 am
How are you guys making your fuel pump and dizzy block offs? must be some saving to be had there!
is EFI lighter then carbs?
Stock FI case!  No machining for the pump = no block off.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on July 05, 2012, 07:36:20 am
What else can I make from this Ti flat bar?
Gland Nut Washer ??
Crank pulley washer...
The bar I have is only 1" wide.  The pulley washer is over 43mm in dia.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Griebel on August 14, 2012, 11:14:35 am
Hi,- The "Leichtbau Lenses" can be seen on a certain yellow turbo convertible,at SCC next weekend  ;)
Available as symetric units and for split type 2's also...

Cheers from Griebel

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PK72ALI-_i0/Sv7wYYFJ26I/AAAAAAAACtM/MLowSczu7hY/s1600/vw%2B024%2B(Small).jpg)

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nI3bjL9KHnk/T6RL9B6s4hI/AAAAAAAADQM/Rj_dEXDtCrc/s640/headlight1.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brezel on August 16, 2012, 10:22:58 am
the hoods

Front 3.0 Kg

Rear 1.3 Kg

 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on August 16, 2012, 19:43:40 pm
Now that's light!  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on December 05, 2012, 18:25:09 pm
Saved 30 pounds compared to CB ball joint brakes


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Basti on December 06, 2012, 10:02:17 am
what kind of brakes are these?
Looks really nice!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on December 06, 2012, 13:46:43 pm
Mine, I'm a cnc machinist.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Basti on December 06, 2012, 13:51:55 pm
well done!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Andy Sykes on December 06, 2012, 20:07:29 pm
Saved 30 pounds compared to CB ball joint brakes

Very very nice   ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on December 07, 2012, 01:27:19 am
Love it!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on December 07, 2012, 02:06:10 am
Thinking about a rear set now. Our class has a 1700 pound (771kg)min. With driver, I have 60 (27 kg) to go. I think I can get 15 more off me, I have been cycling a bit lately.

I have 356 aluminum rear brakes now. I am thinking about a set of cnc  or make my own rears. The Cnc's look pretty similar to mine, I can profile them so they don't show through the windows. I just don't know if I will save any weight.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Shag55 on December 08, 2012, 15:54:49 pm
Saved 30 pounds compared to CB ball joint brakes
those are nice Nobars!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on December 31, 2012, 21:17:40 pm
Not sure if there's much of a weight saving, infact the allen bolt looks like it will weigh a few g's, but a nice piece ;D

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=1252462 (ftp://http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=1252462)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Stripped66 on January 01, 2013, 15:25:56 pm
Not sure if there's much of a weight saving, infact the allen bolt looks like it will weigh a few g's, but a nice piece ;D

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=1252462

And it works great!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on January 01, 2013, 15:59:45 pm
That's mine too, thanks guys.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on January 01, 2013, 16:03:47 pm
That's mine too, thanks guys. Not really a weight savings but you could drill it full of holes where you can't with the stocker.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Dominick Luppino on January 03, 2013, 17:48:22 pm
Looks real nice!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on January 04, 2013, 05:44:39 am
Thanks Dom.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on January 10, 2013, 01:30:20 am
I have swapped stainless steel floorpan bolts and washers for titanium and aluminium ones.

Stainless fasteners = 1100g. Ti/Ali fasteners = 176g. Total saving = 924g.

The stainless bolts were massively over length, so I went for shorter ones.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: 1960 ragtop on January 13, 2013, 02:45:11 am
Just finished reading every page of this thread. This stuff is insanely cool.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dannyboy on January 13, 2013, 19:16:14 pm
removed my repro steel rear wings and the inner rear quarters added a set of robs gasser wings and thats almost 10kgs saved  :D and i reckon ive got at least 100 grms of glas to trim as well  ::) :D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on January 14, 2013, 04:52:42 am
I thought I told you about this page Johnie?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 22, 2013, 05:38:00 am
Just finished reading every page of this thread. This stuff is insanely cool.
Let's see your ideas!

I removed 330g from the cross shaft.  That's almost 3/4 of a lb to the metrically declined.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on February 25, 2013, 17:38:02 pm
Weighed a couple of cases today:

Mag 10.34kg (incl. M12 studs and long M8 case studs)

Ally 18.11kg (including all studs not head studs).  Felt really heavy when lifting!

Cheers
Phil


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on February 26, 2013, 00:51:08 am
I don't have an exact weight, but when the ball joint for a '73 Super falls out the bottom of the box and lands on the top of your foot, it weighs somewhere between "bloody hell!" and "holy crap!".


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Stripped66 on February 26, 2013, 02:36:21 am
I don't have an exact weight, but when the ball joint for a '73 Super falls out the bottom of the box and lands on the top of your foot, it weighs somewhere between "bloody hell!" and "holy crap!".

Nothing a drill-bit can't fix.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on February 26, 2013, 05:29:16 am
I don't have an exact weight, but when the ball joint for a '73 Super falls out the bottom of the box and lands on the top of your foot, it weighs somewhere between "bloody hell!" and "holy crap!".

Nothing a drill-bit can't fix.

Hehehe......
Cool thread!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: magic on February 26, 2013, 09:29:12 am
I don't have an exact weight, but when the ball joint for a '73 Super falls out the bottom of the box and lands on the top of your foot, it weighs somewhere between "bloody hell!" and "holy crap!".

HA HA HA HA HA.........  :D  Yes Modnrod, you could easily make a thread with the different weigh of  things!......  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on March 30, 2013, 16:55:04 pm
I make all my circuit cars unit construction with no floor pan bolts or rubbers, all stitch welded, also stiffens the shell noticeably. i used to cut the roof panel out and mould a GRP panel, good weight saving and very good for the corner handling, but its now been outlawed.
analogue instruments are heavy and high CoG with all the wiring, as for monster tachs! low mount a digi dash and go quicker.
tripod joints are far lighter than c.vs, Porsche turbo joints are madness.  F1 cars are all tripod jointed.
dont forget the driver either, ive put on 9lb over the winter, thats got to come of soonest lol.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on March 31, 2013, 00:17:45 am
GKN G169 tripod 160g lighter than a std type 1 CV. Not sure they would last to long for those on here with a good drop of power and traction. I'm giving them a go with 230hp and 165ftlb in a 1500lb car.
If all goes to plan this week should know if they work next weekend.

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Martin on March 31, 2013, 10:15:24 am
Peters Axles.... 300M 8mm gundrilling.... lightest axles ive ever made!

(http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/autocraft/Axles.jpg)

and a 356 Flywheel  5.99lbs

(http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/autocraft/photo-5.jpg)



martin


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on March 31, 2013, 19:06:04 pm
Good to see your on it peter, tripods have to handle 700 hp for 2 hrs in F1, so you should be fine if the alignment is good, given a dragway may offer higher shock loads off the lights, ive got 3lb of my middle  guts so far, the easy bit, the rest will come of once i get trackside in a few weeks :D.
you are of course using LI- ION battery's i hope.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fasterbrit on March 31, 2013, 20:00:01 pm
Not been on here for a while, but am still impressed with the ideas people come up with. I've heard bone is pretty dense and weighty, so opted to replace some of mine with a couple of bits of titanium. The only drawback I can see is six weeks on crutches...
Keeno  :D

[attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ianmac on March 31, 2013, 20:23:05 pm
Matt you've got the longest toes I have ever seen  :P


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: benssp on March 31, 2013, 20:26:05 pm
Looks like a muppet skeleton

(http://cdn.jazjaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Kermit_xray_thumb.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on April 01, 2013, 20:28:36 pm
Good to see your on it peter, tripods have to handle 700 hp for 2 hrs in F1, so you should be fine if the alignment is good, given a dragway may offer higher shock loads off the lights, ive got 3lb of my middle  guts so far, the easy bit, the rest will come of once i get trackside in a few weeks :D.
you are of course using LI- ION battery's i hope.

The idea of using the tripod joints came from formula cars but I was surprised to see the size of the tripod when it arrived and although the roundy roundy cars often have more power they are often much lighter and don't have the traction we have of the startline so I'll remain sceptical till I know it works!

Yes have the LI-ION battery, but no charger as yet as they are still out of stock so I suspect I will be using my trusty redtop 15 at UKDD but apparently they are due this coming week so you never know.

Have you ever checked the centre of gravity of your cars?

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on April 01, 2013, 20:45:47 pm
tri-pod joint..... so thats what they are called  ::) I have started seeing ALOT of these on modern FWD cars mainly on the INNER joints, I have thought they looked like a MUCH more efficient system  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brian e on April 01, 2013, 23:50:46 pm
Here are some push rod tips I made.  I still need to run them through the oven and heat treat them. 
.7oz's per 16 lighter then the regular tips that come with the standard chro-mo cut to length sets.  I could have removed a little more in a few places, but these were a quickie experiment.  I think I will try titanium next for a little more weight savings.  I will be adding them to my own .035" wall 4130 tube. 
(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1044497.jpg)

Brian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on April 02, 2013, 01:01:46 am
That's seven tenths of an ounce? As in about 20g? Lot of work I'm sure, but they look good. I like your thinking.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brian e on April 02, 2013, 04:25:30 am
That's seven tenths of an ounce? As in about 20g? Lot of work I'm sure, but they look good. I like your thinking.

Yeah, 20grams difference.

The first one was a little work, but now there are easy.  We have a swiss CNC lathe at work.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on April 02, 2013, 09:39:03 am
Here are some push rod tips I made.  I still need to run them through the oven and heat treat them. 
.7oz's per 16 lighter then the regular tips that come with the standard chro-mo cut to length sets.  I could have removed a little more in a few places, but these were a quickie experiment.  I think I will try titanium next for a little more weight savings.  I will be adding them to my own .035" wall 4130 tube. 
(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1044497.jpg)

Brian

How much does it add that the bigger hole will fill with oil? I would think that with ti it might actually be heavier with the oil than the Ti left in there?

cheers richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jon on April 02, 2013, 14:34:08 pm
Here are some push rod tips I made.  I still need to run them through the oven and heat treat them. 
.7oz's per 16 lighter then the regular tips that come with the standard chro-mo cut to length sets.  I could have removed a little more in a few places, but these were a quickie experiment.  I think I will try titanium next for a little more weight savings.  I will be adding them to my own .035" wall 4130 tube. 
(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1044497.jpg)

Brian

How much does it add that the bigger hole will fill with oil? I would think that with ti it might actually be heavier with the oil than the Ti left in there?

cheers richie

That depends on if you are competing in dry or wet class Richie... ;)
How about running them empty (air) and make a separate oil line to the rockershaft... might even save in something on spring tension.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Martin on April 02, 2013, 16:19:50 pm
or you could run a nylon tube down the center of the pushrods reducing the diameter, so it holds less oil but still flows oil.... ;)


Martin


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brian e on April 02, 2013, 16:56:12 pm
I had thought about both of these options.  I even sourced some thin wall nylon tube that will fit nicely into the newly drilled end hole.  I might try it out on these. 

I also like the no oil option with a separate spray bar or feed line to the rocker shaft. 

Some light 356 style lifters with a small diameter body will be next.  Probably not before winter though. 

I will heat threat these tips and get them into an engine in the next few weeks for testing.  The next run will have a few more little changes to shave a tiny bit more off each of them.     

Brian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy198712 on April 02, 2013, 18:12:01 pm
I had thought about both of these options.  I even sourced some thin wall nylon tube that will fit nicely into the newly drilled end hole.  I might try it out on these. 

I also like the no oil option with a separate spray bar or feed line to the rocker shaft. 

Some light 356 style lifters with a small diameter body will be next.  Probably not before winter though. 

I will heat threat these tips and get them into an engine in the next few weeks for testing.  The next run will have a few more little changes to shave a tiny bit more off each of them.     

Brian

how much do the 356 lifters weigh?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on April 02, 2013, 18:18:05 pm
Some more clever ideas coming out, as to the roll centre Peter, No, ive not calculated it, but bugs are quite good with some work, seat is low and light,  i sit as low as i can, to the point where i have to guess where the track margins are  if im unsighted in a dog fight lol, gear box is raised to drop the roof line, i have to run at 40mm max ground clearance or i would go down lower,  i am looking at 13" wheels as there are good gains to be had from them, and the very latest KEVLAR TYRES, all the latest compounds and very very... LIGHT.. my pet hate is the big wheel fashion for "lookers", they miss out on so much free cornering power and wonder why they have problems lowering their cars, more so on 02/3 supers...
but off topic...   
 one good thing about the brazilian floor pans and panels is they are very very light, i love all the paper thin re pro panels, ;) so light...
Monika boy, Yes, ive seen tripods on street cars, as you say on inner joints, they dont have the angle range to steer and drive..
Now, if i had 2 grand sterling id buy a carbon skid lid, another 1.5 kilos saved lol
up untill the early 80's we could run alloy roll cages, but i suppose they had to go, Banned unfortunately.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brian e on April 02, 2013, 18:23:09 pm


how much do the 356 lifters weigh?

here is some pretty good info and pics.  I was just going to do a type 1 lifter with a smaller stem and make some smaller ID bushings for the case.

http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,8438.0.html (http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,8438.0.html)

Brian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on April 02, 2013, 19:04:41 pm
Here are some push rod tips I made.  I still need to run them through the oven and heat treat them. 
.7oz's per 16 lighter then the regular tips that come with the standard chro-mo cut to length sets.  I could have removed a little more in a few places, but these were a quickie experiment.  I think I will try titanium next for a little more weight savings.  I will be adding them to my own .035" wall 4130 tube. 
(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1044497.jpg)

Brian

How much does it add that the bigger hole will fill with oil? I would think that with ti it might actually be heavier with the oil than the Ti left in there?

cheers richie

That depends on if you are competing in dry or wet class Richie... ;)
How about running them empty (air) and make a separate oil line to the rockershaft... might even save in something on spring tension.

Jon

I have seen them with blank tips,no hole to do exactly that,the possible downside is that with no hot oil passing through they wont expand at all and the valve lash problem with be even greater.

A spray bar to lubricate the rockers and cool the valve springs would solve the other problems,not a new idea as I think there is a WBX already doing this ;)

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on April 02, 2013, 20:44:51 pm
yes,, i run spray jets to the valve springs on my circuit wassers, but i use tractor technology as its reliable, ive seen it done with an external spray bar system on the Scat heads as they were short on oil supply for circuit racing, but they were still un reliable for any endurance work, my way uses nothing more than a milled channel in the rocker bore leading to a vee shaped grove on the spring side of the rocker, it mimics the spring compression movements and emmits a fan shaped oil jet, very effective and cant go wrong. KISS.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ALB on April 02, 2013, 20:59:05 pm
yes,, i run spray jets to the valve springs on my circuit wassers, but i use tractor technology as its reliable, ive seen it done with an external spray bar system on the Scat heads as they were short on oil supply for circuit racing, but they were still un reliable for any endurance work, my way uses nothing more than a milled channel in the rocker bore leading to a vee shaped grove on the spring side of the rocker, it mimics the spring compression movements and emmits a fan shaped oil jet, very effective and cant go wrong. KISS.

Would it be possible to see a pic or 2? It would be terribly appreciated. Al


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy198712 on April 02, 2013, 22:54:51 pm


how much do the 356 lifters weigh?

here is some pretty good info and pics.  I was just going to do a type 1 lifter with a smaller stem and make some smaller ID bushings for the case.

http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,8438.0.html (http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,8438.0.html)

Brian

maybe a set of TP's 56g lifters would be close alternative?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on April 03, 2013, 20:04:41 pm

Monika boy


 :D :D :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brian e on April 16, 2013, 16:13:50 pm
This was a quick experiment I did over lunch the other day.
Aluminum rocker adjuster nuts.  The set of 8 are 18 grams lighter than 8 stock steel ones.  They dont need huge torque, so they should hold up fine.  Same thing could be done in Ti pretty easy.
(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1049748.jpg)
(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1049747.jpg)
(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1049749.jpg)

Brian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: cameron shorey on April 16, 2013, 21:20:57 pm
This was a quick experiment I did over lunch the other day.
Aluminum rocker adjuster nuts.  The set of 8 are 18 grams lighter than 8 stock steel ones.  They dont need huge torque, so they should hold up fine.  Same thing could be done in Ti pretty easy.
Brian


I made mine out of 7/16" (approx 11mm) Ti hex bar stock.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on May 19, 2013, 21:24:59 pm

Found this pic on another forum.  This guy is attempting to recreate Muffler Mike's experiment of watching how much oil stays in the left head at rpms.  I noticed the valve cover he sacrificed is stamped from sheet Al.  Can you imagine what that weighs?
[attachment=1]

Hey Bruce I think I have an answer for you!

I found a pair of these at a local VW swap meet Yesterday. They are a little beaten up but will straighten up OK.

For comparison here is a picture of one I have fitted with an Al -8 breather fitting against a stock cover fitted with a steel fitting.

Total saving 452g  :)



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on May 20, 2013, 15:06:08 pm
we are beginning to get down to the point were the free speed from weight saving runs out and it gets harder work and costs a lot more, , another 5 kilos can be had from thinking about your clothing, i see drivers with they're day clothes on under their overalls, complete with belt!!  i always air out my race suit after qualies, as all the sweat is in it, one day ill weigh it wet lol, all the latest o/alls are ever lighter, and a pro lite harness loses 1.2 kilos over a 'clubman' spec steel fittings one with 3" webbing and crutch straps, they are heavy,  these and a carbon seat mean speed that shows on the stop watch over one lap, a huge gain over 15 laps. ive even binned the eye bolts for the harness tails, and now wrap them round the rear cage cross bar, and it must only be a mater of time before someone makes a carbon race approved hat for less then a grand sterling.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Mangokid on August 23, 2013, 14:13:58 pm
Still love this thread, BUT I'd like to know more about the drilled stock VW rods. Are they still alive?



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on September 11, 2013, 07:33:06 am
The drilled rods are still running every day! Mark Voegtly


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Mangokid on September 16, 2013, 09:30:19 am
The drilled rods are still running every day! Mark Voegtly

Nice to know ;) Thanx.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Peter Shattock on September 16, 2013, 13:25:09 pm
I ran the aluminium silencer I made a while back for this year. This was broadly half the weight of the steel one in terms of its construction (I made a copy of the previous muffler I ran in 2010). Needless to say the packing weighed just the same so it was not half the over all weight, but needless to say its about as far back as it can get in the car so a nice place to save weight none the less.

I had hoped to get it black anodized before I ran it so it would look just the same as it did before (don't like the look of it as it is) but I was out of time when it came to it as the final fitting up and welding of brackets was only completed at about 10.00pm of the night before first racing the car.

I've made the new one rebuild able so may take it apart this winter to anodize it and see what state the packing is in.

No signs of cracking and its been through plenty of heat cycles now and has bounced around on the street, but only for about 850 miles so not the ultimate test, but so far so good.

Peter


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 20, 2013, 04:09:35 am
The drilled rods are still running every day! Mark Voegtly
Hey Mark, do you have more photos of the parts in that engine?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on September 20, 2013, 20:26:12 pm
yes lots of pics !


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on September 20, 2013, 20:32:49 pm
more


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on September 20, 2013, 21:00:44 pm
WOW!!! :o

That's just cool!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on September 20, 2013, 22:05:36 pm
Wicked cool!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on September 21, 2013, 08:00:04 am
It was a total of 6.5 lbs. weight removal ,over 1 lb just on the rods!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 22, 2013, 01:51:32 am
Is that a Mg cam gear in that last pic?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Lee.C on September 22, 2013, 16:57:04 pm
Seriously cool  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on September 22, 2013, 17:05:18 pm
Is that a Mg cam gear in that last pic?

36 horse maybe?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on September 22, 2013, 17:18:19 pm
Yes the cam gear is mag


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: DKK Ted on September 22, 2013, 23:51:43 pm
Say Mark! Are those the same parts you were lightening up when I was working there? On my Ti rods, can I do the same, or that's not a good idea on them.

Ted


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: markvo on September 23, 2013, 02:21:52 am
 Hey Ted, yes those are the same rods.The titanium rods only weigh about 400 grams total! No need drilling the holes, in the steel rods only removed about 17 grams. it would only be half that in titanium.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on September 23, 2013, 04:29:48 am
What's the specs on that motor?


Title: 1915cc
Post by: markvo on September 24, 2013, 07:25:29 am
94mm bore with 1600 short wrist pins with keepers moved in on both sides ,excessive grinding inside bottom of piston and 10cc dish in Cima  pistons. The dish follows the underside of the piston so as to keep the same thickness all the way across! 69 mm Berg counterweighted crank with all weight removed opposite the counterweight! VZ 25 cam lightened lifters, drilled and grooved crank gear. One of pulley made with steel hub and aluminum pinned and welded fully balanced with a half a gram as a whole rotating unit. 40 by 37.5 heads by Jeff Denham  The rods are 311 b stock rods with hours of grinding and milling and drilling oil grooving etc. You can rev it twice between shifts, very fun ride!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on October 02, 2013, 06:47:09 am
check this out? http://www.pro-bolt.com/


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on November 19, 2013, 03:53:11 am
This coolest thread fell off the first page !?!?!?! Best I fix that!

I've been lying around for a month after illness, so I've had PLENTY of time to consider options on my little Beetle project (eg, get rid of everything else and start fixing the thing!  :D), but one of them is weight of wheel tyre combo's. So as part of my pottering around a bit, I thought I'd weigh some different styles up and contribute to one of my favourite threads.

First up, the 16" alloy wheels with 225/50R16 tyres I had intended to go under the beetle at first, mainly to cover the Supra 300mm/285mm Supra vented discs I had planned for the brakes.
They weigh in at 19.3kg each. OUCH!!!
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Suprawheel_zpsc3a39900.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Suprawheel_zpsc3a39900.jpg.html)

After that I thought that  wider 15" steel wheels would be the go, they're strong, tough, and quite often lighter than they look, while still covering the big brakes. I drive a lot of really crappy roads and corrugated gravel, so cheap thin alloy isn't an option.
I weighed the 15x6.5" steel rims with 205/65R15 tyres on the family Holden Commodore sedan and they came in at 18.4kg, a bit better.
Stock VW Golf 5x112 steel 15x6" rims will fit over the big vented brakes I wanted, and when fitted with 195/65R15 tyres come in at 18.1kg.
Still a bit heavy though, these ones here..........
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/VWpursuit001_zps58b1f170.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/VWpursuit001_zps58b1f170.jpg.html)

The stock 15x4.5" steelies with 165R15s are pretty light after all, they come in at 15.4kg all up........
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/VWwheelpics001_zps75a7dc43.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/VWwheelpics001_zps75a7dc43.jpg.html)

To put that in perspective, the back tyre on the bike (I use the term loosely.......) here is a 17X6" with a 190/50R17, and comes in at 15.2kg, so the stockers are actually pretty good.
*CAUTION* - obligatory and totally unnecessary photo of my 4yr old for no good reason!  ::)
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/Bikes%20and%20scoots/GSXR003_zpsbedcdc05.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/Bikes%20and%20scoots/GSXR003_zpsbedcdc05.jpg.html)

And finally, the old 5-slot 70s-style alloy wheels that are on the car already. I never really liked these things much, not even in the 70s!  :D I know they're lighter than they look though, so I thought I'd get one off and throw it on the scales for a quick comparison. If they don't weigh too much (look at all that chunky aluminium around the slots), then I was thinking they might be an option for the drags if I ever decide to see whaat a 1600 "superstocker" will do in a heavy Superbug.
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/VWwheelpics003_zps3f50b96f.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/VWwheelpics003_zps3f50b96f.jpg.html)

13.6kg each!!!! 14x6" with 195/70R14 radials. WOW!
Maybe I don't need 300mm vented brakes after all. Perhaps I should fit a set of tall 195R14 Redline tyres to the back, keep it up in the air not lowered, and call it done as a "Gasser", HAHA!

Anyway, there you go.  ;)




Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 20, 2013, 02:30:32 am
the Supra 300mm/285mm Supra vented discs I had planned
This is your problem.  Nobody needs discs like that on any Beetle, regardless of use.  You're just adding weight.  By using smaller solid discs, you will outbrake 99% of the cars on the road.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on November 20, 2013, 06:31:11 am
Hey Bruce. In general I agree. I was going to use them because that's what I had available to use as an upgrade, even though it would have been massive overkill! I had at first envisaged a bit of club circuits and roundies for the car, now it will only be a highway cruiser only, so "improved" stock should suffice.
Weight-wise, after machining the stock front hub/rotor down to accept the vented hat over the top (18mm thick 300mm vented vs 12mm thick 278mm solid rotor stock), it was a actually a little bit lighter in total including calipers, but still a bit ridiculous!

I'm still surprised about the light 14" alloy combo though, very noticeable.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 21, 2013, 03:12:26 am
.... vs 12mm thick 278mm solid rotor stock), 
What rotor is this?  The stock VW rotor is less than 10mm thick.

Post the weights of the components.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 21, 2013, 03:16:54 am
I have always remembered a story about how Mark Herbert once went into the auto parts store to look at headlights.  He opened up all the brands, trying to find ones made from plastic instead of glass.  Since hearing that, I too have been searching.

With the H4 bulb in place they weigh in at a flyweight 192g.  This compares to 529g for the common Bosch glass H4.  
Total savings: 674g for a pair.

[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]

On the last trip in Mex I found more of these lights.  This time they were in their original box:

Weight savings per pair with the adjuster plate = 1.52kg



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on November 21, 2013, 21:04:18 pm
I have always remembered a story about how Mark Herbert once went into the auto parts store to look at headlights.  He opened up all the brands, trying to find ones made from plastic instead of glass.  Since hearing that, I too have been searching.

With the H4 bulb in place they weigh in at a flyweight 192g.  This compares to 529g for the common Bosch glass H4.  
Total savings: 674g for a pair.

[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]

On the last trip in Mex I found more of these lights.  This time they were in their original box:

Weight savings per pair with the adjuster plate = 1.52kg



Nice score Bruce. Do you have any you want to sell?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 22, 2013, 04:38:53 am
On the last trip in Mex I found more of these lights.  This time they were in their original box:

Weight savings per pair with the adjuster plate = 1.52kg

Nice score Bruce. Do you have any you want to sell?
Unfortunately, since they take up a considerable amount of space, I wasn't able to bring back very many.  And those are all gone now. 

If there's anyone on here that is really fluent in Español, I think I can find the ph number of the store where I found them in the holy city of Puebla Mexico.  Maybe you could do a mail order.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: tikimadness on January 08, 2014, 20:38:18 pm
I'm going to replace the bearing in my rear trailing arms. Did anybody do any modifications to the piece of tubing between the bearings in the arm?Was thinking of swapping them for pieces of aluminum tube.

Michael


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on January 09, 2014, 06:02:23 am
Carbon door cards and rear seat delete.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 10, 2014, 04:57:03 am
Did anybody do any modifications to the piece of tubing between the bearings in the arm?  Was thinking of swapping them for pieces of aluminum tube.
I wouldn't use Al.  The stock spacer is hardened steel, and I've seen them beat up sometimes.  The compressive stress is considerable.  How about drilling holes cross ways through them?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on January 13, 2014, 01:40:04 am
Carbon rear seat delete.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on April 01, 2014, 09:35:19 am
Old stocker (a few grams of crap as you can see)......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves014_zps5d68dfbc.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves014_zps5d68dfbc.jpg.html)

New and shiny.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves019_zpse693c392.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves019_zpse693c392.jpg.html)

Old retainers/collets.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves018_zps5c9f3874.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves018_zps5c9f3874.jpg.html)

New and shiny......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves021_zpse7dee913.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves021_zpse7dee913.jpg.html)

Old total weight.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves024_zpsbdf10621.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves024_zpsbdf10621.jpg.html)

New and shiny.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves022_zpsb3bd48bb.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves022_zpsb3bd48bb.jpg.html)

Mmmmm, shiny!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Erlend / bug66 on April 01, 2014, 09:58:47 am
Went for a new engine set-up this year.

Away with 69mm crank, in with a 76mm. No significant weight difference.

Mahle A-pistons to Wisecos: 82gram per piston!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jon on April 01, 2014, 11:31:01 am
Went for a new engine set-up this year.

Away with 69mm crank, in with a 76mm. No significant weight difference.

Mahle A-pistons to Wisecos: 82gram per piston!

No significant static weight increase, but the weight is further away from the center line.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Erlend / bug66 on April 01, 2014, 11:51:58 am
You are right Jon.

I compensated with lighter pistons  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: delroyb on April 01, 2014, 15:54:06 pm
Old stocker (a few grams of crap as you can see)......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves014_zps5d68dfbc.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves014_zps5d68dfbc.jpg.html)

New and shiny.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves019_zpse693c392.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves019_zpse693c392.jpg.html)

Old retainers/collets.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves018_zps5c9f3874.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves018_zps5c9f3874.jpg.html)

New and shiny......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves021_zpse7dee913.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves021_zpse7dee913.jpg.html)

Where did you get those Beehive springs and what size are they if you don't mind me asking. Trying to figure out a setup for mine without going to a longer valve.

Old total weight.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves024_zpsbdf10621.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves024_zpsbdf10621.jpg.html)

New and shiny.......
(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/Firemanampnewvalves022_zpsb3bd48bb.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/Firemanampnewvalves022_zpsb3bd48bb.jpg.html)

Mmmmm, shiny!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: delroyb on April 01, 2014, 15:56:54 pm
If you don't mind me asking, where did you get those Beehive springs and what size/pressure are they? Trying to work out a package for mine but trying to avoid going to a longer valve. Ta.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on April 01, 2014, 20:53:30 pm
Hey Gday!
The complete valvetrain setup is off a Mitsubishi Evo8/9.  :D  It probably isn't what you're after, I'm looking in a different direction, these valves are only 35mm inlet and 31.5mm exhaust.

However, member here (and elsewhere) "VINCE", used some common beehive parts for his valvetrain setup, Comp springs and CB longer SS valves. Worth a look, best write-up I've seen, just brilliant. Originally I was going to use standard length 8mm VW SI valves, and Comp beehive springs #26113 (lighter than what Vince used), one of those parts might be what you want perhaps?
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/cca-26113-1/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/cca-1787-16/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/cca-623-16/overview/


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: delroyb on April 02, 2014, 10:15:37 am
I thought they looked small! Cheers for the info anyways


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on April 20, 2014, 14:05:33 pm
The minimum weight 'including driver' for my class (Historic Touring Car 1300cc class) is 720kg (1584lb) which the Mini Coopers manage with ease but i've just corner weighted my 1970 Beetle and i'm 74.5kg (164lb) overweight!!...Without driver my car is 695.5kg (1533.5lb) I'm not fat....just BIG ::)

I already have no interior, cut down doors and lexan windows all round. The rules say the body must remain untouched but I can use fibreglass doors, bonnet and engine lid...even so the 30 odd pounds i'll save with those doesn't make much of a dent in the 164 pounds needed......I'm gonna be on here a lot!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on April 27, 2014, 18:22:34 pm
There are a lot of aircraft manufacturers using Type 1 and Type 4 motors that produce some useful bits...How about knocking 10 pounds off the weight of your engine with a set of aluminium 92 or 94mm barrels (http://www.hummelengines.com/gallery.htm)

Ready....$1300 a set!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 02, 2014, 02:05:06 am
Here's a simple part to form out of Al rod:


The part surrounding it will be a bit more complicated.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Iryanu on May 02, 2014, 09:20:18 am
Here's a simple part to form out of Al rod:


The part surrounding it will be a bit more complicated.

What is that?  ???

Edit that, just saw the file name.

Very good!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 07, 2014, 21:33:30 pm
Looked at getting a Lexan windscreen for my flat screen 1970 bug as it saves around 9lbs.

Basic screen for drag and sprint cars £450!....Or the deluxe option (as used by the BTCC Touring Cars) which is scratch resistant on the outside (so you can use your wipers) and fog free on the inside (so you can see where you are going) so the best option for my circuit racer £990!!!

Hmmm....on reflection I think i'll skip breakfast instead ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on May 07, 2014, 21:37:56 pm
Looked at getting a Lexan windscreen for my flat screen 1970 bug as it saves around 9lbs.

Basic screen for drag and sprint cars £450!....Or the deluxe option (as used by the BTCC Touring Cars) which is scratch resistant on the outside (so you can use your wipers) and fog free on the inside (so you can see where you are going) so the best option for my circuit racer £990!!!

Hmmm....on reflection I think i'll skip breakfast instead ::)

Paul Woodhead at direct plastics can help you out with the correct material at a much better cost and then just cut it yourself, 9lbs is 9lbs after all ;)

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 08, 2014, 01:47:23 am
Ivan McCutchen also mentioned Paul today....I just need to look at the MSA regulations to check the requirements, just in case the scrutes throw a wobbly.

Thanks Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 12, 2014, 04:03:42 am
Pulled apart a mid '75 gearbox recently and found this alteration to third gear that VW made.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on June 13, 2014, 03:42:34 am
Back on page 18 of this topic I posted this pic of a stamped sheet Al valve cover. 

At a recent swap meet I scored a pair of them.  Used and beat up, they conform to our lightweight standards.  A pair of them are almost 400g lighter than stock steel ones!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on June 20, 2014, 10:05:23 am

Found this pic on another forum.  This guy is attempting to recreate Muffler Mike's experiment of watching how much oil stays in the left head at rpms.  I noticed the valve cover he sacrificed is stamped from sheet Al.  Can you imagine what that weighs?
[attachment=1]

Hey Bruce I think I have an answer for you!

I found a pair of these at a local VW swap meet Yesterday. They are a little beaten up but will straighten up OK.

For comparison here is a picture of one I have fitted with an Al -8 breather fitting against a stock cover fitted with a steel fitting.

Total saving 452g  :)



Nice score Bruce.

Not sure if you saw this from page 22 of this thread.  


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 01, 2014, 00:06:22 am
-31%



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on August 01, 2014, 00:55:51 am
-31%



With all of these holes the trans is going to take an extra liter of oil :D

Good work.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: LGK on August 01, 2014, 13:53:15 pm
crankgear zach ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on August 01, 2014, 14:30:25 pm
crankgear zach ::)

Oops, you're right! I guess I got used to Bruce posting light gearbox parts ::)

What is the weight compared to a straight cut gear?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 02, 2014, 00:56:50 am
What is the weight compared to a straight cut gear?
Someone will have to post the weight of a straight cut gear.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on August 02, 2014, 19:42:16 pm
Just weighed mine 278gm cheers


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 03, 2014, 01:39:13 am
With all the holes you drilled in it?

The one pictured above is 184g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on August 03, 2014, 05:41:22 am
I just noticed it only has one oil groove. I've seen many with two, gotta be a few grams left there ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on August 03, 2014, 11:34:50 am
With all the holes you drilled in it?

The one pictured above is 184g
Mine's unmodified - looks like that's nearly a 100gm saving on the drilled one then


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Andy Sykes on August 03, 2014, 12:40:19 pm
Handbrake

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/EC494B4D-6F68-4955-B207-E9115F6ED957_zpsrlnuxd7q.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/EC494B4D-6F68-4955-B207-E9115F6ED957_zpsrlnuxd7q.jpg.html)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/88AEA834-375C-4011-AA6A-92DFF62B9EC7_zpscprjcmhk.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/88AEA834-375C-4011-AA6A-92DFF62B9EC7_zpscprjcmhk.jpg.html)

It's slightly heavier now it's welded

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/F4C50267-4C59-4FC6-98A3-80D8DBF4CC0B_zpsx7skibw4.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/F4C50267-4C59-4FC6-98A3-80D8DBF4CC0B_zpsx7skibw4.jpg.html)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/7771A86B-7B84-4294-A2E6-FC65E1F86362_zpshdc7boon.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/7771A86B-7B84-4294-A2E6-FC65E1F86362_zpshdc7boon.jpg.html)

Ti bolt v steel

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/B33F9E28-C44D-4FA1-91BB-EA9568985C82_zps6dfsdlig.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/B33F9E28-C44D-4FA1-91BB-EA9568985C82_zps6dfsdlig.jpg.html)


(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/574D5EC4-268E-495E-BB50-FCF7919EE7B8_zpsca5aygcr.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/574D5EC4-268E-495E-BB50-FCF7919EE7B8_zpsca5aygcr.jpg.html)

Cheers Andy


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 04, 2014, 01:57:24 am
I just noticed it only has one oil groove. I've seen many with two, gotta be a few grams left there ;)
The pic Mark V posted is what got me go cut up this gear, and initially I wanted to do two grooves like he did.  But when I did the groove, I forgot to do two.  Too late now.

Can you post more pics of your handbrake handle, Andy?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 14, 2014, 23:50:09 pm
Just weighed mine 278gm cheers
What does the gear on the cam weigh?

I was just thinking about the lightened gear I posted about.  If anyone has access to a good engineering shop, how about getting one cut from Ti?  It would weigh just over 100g.
Put that together with a Mg cam gear like the one Mark V posted, you'd have a total cam drive of less than 300g!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brian e on August 15, 2014, 17:57:22 pm
I was just thinking about the lightened gear I posted about.  If anyone has access to a good engineering shop, how about getting one cut from Ti?  It would weigh just over 100g.
Put that together with a Mg cam gear like the one Mark V posted, you'd have a total cam drive of less than 300g!

Send me the Ti material, and the sample gear you want duplicated, and I will cut one out for you with a wire EDM machine.  I have 3 machines here I run all day. 

What if you cut the gear thickness in half and then made a small light spacer?  Do the same to the cam gear?  Cut the crank gear out of 3/8" plate, and turn the front and back faces of the cam gear to match the width?  Way lighter, and probably way cheaper material!!  Huge spring pressures might be an issue for the durability I suppose.  Only one way to find out!!

Brian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on August 30, 2014, 00:34:21 am
Can your machine cut a helical gear? 
If you can only do a straight cut gear, a Ti gear set can't compete with a stock Mg cam gear.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brian e on September 03, 2014, 00:49:48 am
Can your machine cut a helical gear? 
If you can only do a straight cut gear, a Ti gear set can't compete with a stock Mg cam gear.

Yes, the machines are capable of a helical cut, but I'll be damned if I can make them do it.  I tried a couple years ago messing around and couldn't get the code to jive.  We don't have much use for the taper cut in everyday work so I never pursued it. 

So yes, straight cut is all I can do at this time. 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 09, 2014, 23:40:31 pm
Here's a free one.  The steel guide tube is 67g, the plastic one is 32.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on September 11, 2014, 21:43:52 pm
I didn't know you could get a plastic one! Where are they from Bruce?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on September 12, 2014, 07:34:13 am
I want the ferrous one in my circuit car, plastic can melt at race clutch temperatures.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on September 14, 2014, 06:05:31 am
This is worth at least a quick breeze through:
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=418307&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

After it's all said and done he will have taken nearly 800 grams out of an 82mm crank, and reduced windage considerably.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Andy Sykes on September 14, 2014, 15:07:22 pm
I got asked to make a solid early shifter connector so I did and few others have them now and said the work great so I make a lighter one

empi bendy thing

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/EF93EB55-C2BF-495D-9FB4-547BC4343D4E_zpshmoi6t3v.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/EF93EB55-C2BF-495D-9FB4-547BC4343D4E_zpshmoi6t3v.jpg.html)

lighter solid one a good 50% saving

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/D7030D0B-B147-4F25-92B4-D969A4C279D5_zps5orqrzfk.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/D7030D0B-B147-4F25-92B4-D969A4C279D5_zps5orqrzfk.jpg.html)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/7050E756-F847-4444-A7B4-52295C304C8E_zpsdeovqd9z.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/7050E756-F847-4444-A7B4-52295C304C8E_zpsdeovqd9z.jpg.html)

cheers andy



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on September 14, 2014, 19:30:46 pm
Very nice Andy, I will take one.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Andy Sykes on September 14, 2014, 20:24:22 pm
I will bring one to track and fit it myself how about that for sevice lol


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 16, 2014, 03:24:07 am
I didn't know you could get a plastic one! Where are they from Bruce?
Genuine VW!  It's got a part number on it, I will post it soon.  Anyone know the part number of the early steel one?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on September 16, 2014, 16:57:17 pm
I will bring one to track and fit it myself how about that for sevice lol

You can't get better than a Andy Sykes fitter ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on September 16, 2014, 17:56:56 pm
I will bring one to track and fit it myself how about that for sevice lol

You can't get better than a Andy Sykes fitter ;D

Be careful, I think its a trick to get you to actually bring the car to the track :o >:( :D


cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Andy Sykes on September 16, 2014, 18:15:13 pm
Dam I've been sussed out


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on September 16, 2014, 19:56:16 pm
I will bring one to track and fit it myself how about that for sevice lol

You can't get better than a Andy Sykes fitter ;D

Be careful, I think its a trick to get you to actually bring the car to the track :o >:( :

cheers Richie

I'm not falling for that one  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 18, 2014, 01:39:36 am
I didn't know you could get a plastic one! Where are they from Bruce?
Genuine VW!  It's got a part number on it, I will post it soon.  Anyone know the part number of the early steel one?
113 141 181 B
I don't know if you will get this plastic one if you went to your local VW agency.  The early steel collar was used in the mid 80s by Porsche on the 924/944  The Mexican Beetles with their Brazilian made gearbox also had the steel one up to 2003.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dangerous on September 18, 2014, 02:37:09 am
091 bus came with the plastic ones too.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jim Smith on September 25, 2014, 08:37:07 am
These will save a little weight.....3Kg each, early or late.

(http://i499.photobucket.com/albums/rr360/samtrev777/IMG_4546_zps35d1fea3.jpg) (http://s499.photobucket.com/user/samtrev777/media/IMG_4546_zps35d1fea3.jpg.html)

(http://i499.photobucket.com/albums/rr360/samtrev777/IMG_4537_zps0de3a710.jpg) (http://s499.photobucket.com/user/samtrev777/media/IMG_4537_zps0de3a710.jpg.html)

(http://i499.photobucket.com/albums/rr360/samtrev777/IMG_4551_zps85805573.jpg) (http://s499.photobucket.com/user/samtrev777/media/IMG_4551_zps85805573.jpg.html)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy198712 on September 26, 2014, 12:58:32 pm
Thats nice! are they fixed lexan windows only i'm guessing?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Griebel on October 19, 2014, 01:50:43 am
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-l_T7BXMIB_0/VEMGv2adZJI/AAAAAAAADeE/ppFhhtIcMV0/s1600/001.JPG) ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on October 25, 2014, 01:19:26 am
Can you get them without the JPM embossed in them?

Titanium coil strap:



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on October 30, 2014, 01:56:35 am
The Ti coil strap has been in the car for about a year now.  It's quite flexy, so I had to give it a bit more slack on the 12V lead.
The stock strap is over 100g, the Ti one is under 20.
Here's the hefty Al strap (26g) that survived Central America:



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 04, 2014, 03:55:44 am
I thought I found another free one with the oil filler cap.  The common stock one from the 60s and 70s is stamped from steel, and I learned the first ones used in 56 were Al, so I was on the hunt for one. 
It is a disappointment at only 10% lighter than the steel one.  This is very perplexing since Al is only 36% of the density of steel, and the sheet thickness appears to be the same.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on November 04, 2014, 04:14:41 am
Love it.

AL is on the right?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 05, 2014, 03:55:23 am
Yep, identified by the fine serrations on the OD.  Note that it also has Al rivets!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on November 14, 2014, 18:45:45 pm
Heavy 944 cv joints out, lightened and blueprinted 100mm bus units in. More power, less weight, oh yay.[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 16, 2014, 02:44:39 am
I thought I found another free one with the oil filler cap.  The common stock one from the 60s and 70s is stamped from steel, and I learned the first ones used in 56 were Al, so I was on the hunt for one. 
It is a disappointment at only 10% lighter than the steel one.  This is very perplexing since Al is only 36% of the density of steel, and the sheet thickness appears to be the same.
Mystery solved.  It's steel.  I guess the magnet I tested it with was kinda weak.  It has the right colour for Al.  Maybe I will figure out how to form one myself.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on November 16, 2014, 02:45:25 am
Heavy 944 cv joints out, lightened and blueprinted 100mm bus units in. More power, less weight, oh yay.[attachment=1]
Do you have a better pic showing how you lightened it? 
Weights? before and after?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on November 16, 2014, 03:32:11 am
I thought I found another free one with the oil filler cap.  The common stock one from the 60s and 70s is stamped from steel, and I learned the first ones used in 56 were Al, so I was on the hunt for one. 
It is a disappointment at only 10% lighter than the steel one.  This is very perplexing since Al is only 36% of the density of steel, and the sheet thickness appears to be the same.
Mystery solved.  It's steel.  I guess the magnet I tested it with was kinda weak.  It has the right colour for Al.  Maybe I will figure out how to form one myself.

Ahh, that explains it. I went rummaging around my buddy's shop for one, found a serrated one but it didn't pass the magnet test.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on November 18, 2014, 18:44:02 pm
Heavy 944 cv joints out, lightened and blueprinted 100mm bus units in. More power, less weight, oh yay.[attachment=1]
Do you have a better pic showing how you lightened it? 
Weights? before and after?
The pic quality goes away with re sizing for posting here, but they are machined  circumferentialy if you look.
Weights for stock 944 cv = 1490 gms.
Stock 100mm VW Bus = 1410 gms
Lightened bus cv= 1155gms.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 14, 2015, 04:27:04 am
I thought I found another free one with the oil filler cap.  The common stock one from the 60s and 70s is stamped from steel, and I learned the first ones used in 56 were Al, so I was on the hunt for one. 
It is a disappointment at only 10% lighter than the steel one.  This is very perplexing since Al is only 36% of the density of steel, and the sheet thickness appears to be the same.
Mystery solved.  It's steel.  I guess the magnet I tested it with was kinda weak.  It has the right colour for Al.  Maybe I will figure out how to form one myself.
Mystery solved again!
[attachment=1]
At a local swap meet I brought along a magnet and tested oil filler caps.  The one on the right is indeed made from Al.  It's half the weight of steel.  Suspicious is the lack of the VW logo...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on April 14, 2015, 07:37:23 am
Very cool Bruce. I'll keep my eye out for them from now on :)
What are the weights?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 15, 2015, 02:46:49 am
Light and ultralight.  I wonder if the Al one is 356?




Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Simpsonshoe on April 16, 2015, 02:40:05 am
I thought I found another free one with the oil filler cap.  The common stock one from the 60s and 70s is stamped from steel, and I learned the first ones used in 56 were Al, so I was on the hunt for one. 
It is a disappointment at only 10% lighter than the steel one.  This is very perplexing since Al is only 36% of the density of steel, and the sheet thickness appears to be the same.
Mystery solved.  It's steel.  I guess the magnet I tested it with was kinda weak.  It has the right colour for Al.  Maybe I will figure out how to form one myself.
Mystery solved again!
[attachment=1]
At a local swap meet I brought along a magnet and tested oil filler caps.  The one on the right is indeed made from Al.  It's half the weight of steel.  Suspicious is the lack of the VW logo...

That is a damn heavy logo.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 17, 2015, 01:47:01 am
For Zach, Steel: 33g. Al: 16g

Here's a 2nd gear idler I drilled about 10 years ago.  These small holes were good for about 10%  Reducing weight on the two shafts has a double effect.  Less weight down the road, and the synchros work better.  Next one will get more and bigger holes.

(http://images.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/1337478.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 25, 2015, 07:34:24 am
Ti rocker adjuster nuts saved me 1.54gms each so that's just over 12gms off the valve train...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Rocket Ron on April 25, 2015, 08:17:07 am
Ti rocker adjuster nuts saved me 1.54gms each so that's just over 12gms off the valve train...

Special order or off the shelf?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on April 25, 2015, 11:25:51 am
Had 'em made special :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: leec on April 25, 2015, 20:43:41 pm
Had 'em made special :)

Why am I not surprised :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dannyboy on April 25, 2015, 22:54:23 pm
Had 'em made special :)
::) :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on May 01, 2015, 08:53:18 am
Had 'em made special :)
Did you bring any more for the rest of the class?


Hey Zach, did you find an ally oil filler cap at the swap meet on Sunday?  I could swear I found two, but when I unloaded the car, there was only one.
Unless I left the car unlocked.....  I seem to recall you hovering around on that silly bicycle..... ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on May 01, 2015, 16:17:03 pm
 ;D

I didn't find any, I forgot to keep an eye out for those.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 31, 2015, 12:49:21 pm
Weight before: 3919gm


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Phil West on May 31, 2015, 12:50:32 pm
Weight after 3,168gm


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Andy Sykes on May 31, 2015, 16:27:04 pm


(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/44136E09-F731-4082-B86F-B78829EE68D2_zpsyf0tsmf8.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/44136E09-F731-4082-B86F-B78829EE68D2_zpsyf0tsmf8.jpg.html)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/gluemixer/garys%20picnic%202010/9B28ACFF-8ED7-4EB1-B2C2-1522EF1DE2A5_zpsgg8r9pjh.jpg) (http://s71.photobucket.com/user/gluemixer/media/garys%20picnic%202010/9B28ACFF-8ED7-4EB1-B2C2-1522EF1DE2A5_zpsgg8r9pjh.jpg.html)

90% weight saving


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on June 15, 2015, 18:19:29 pm
I thought I found another free one with the oil filler cap.  The common stock one from the 60s and 70s is stamped from steel, and I learned the first ones used in 56 were Al, so I was on the hunt for one. 
It is a disappointment at only 10% lighter than the steel one.  This is very perplexing since Al is only 36% of the density of steel, and the sheet thickness appears to be the same.
Mystery solved.  It's steel.  I guess the magnet I tested it with was kinda weak.  It has the right colour for Al.  Maybe I will figure out how to form one myself.
Mystery solved again!
[attachment=1]
At a local swap meet I brought along a magnet and tested oil filler caps.  The one on the right is indeed made from Al.  It's half the weight of steel.  Suspicious is the lack of the VW logo...


I may have unraveled this mystery. I was rummaging through my friends shop and I found one aluminium cap, no VW logo, but said "FAM" above the rivets. While loading up our very original and complete 1959 bus 36hp engine to take to the Classic last Thursday, I noticed it had the exact same aluminium cap. The next day I was at DPR, they were tearing a few 36hp engines down for cores and a couple of those engines were wearing the aluminium caps as well. So, if you are looking for a lightweight oil cap, look to a 36hp engine. :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on December 06, 2015, 02:50:53 am
I thought I would pull this topic back up so Richie can post pics of what he's doing to the 10 sec car.

Here's a pic of a bunch of parts I took a while ago.  These are the different types of reverse idler gears and mechanisms and their weights.  Not all combinations fit all gearbox casings.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BeetleBug on December 06, 2015, 09:57:07 am
Thank you Bruce for bringing this epic thread back to life.

We need more pictures and weight saving ideas!  :)

Best rgs
BB


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on December 06, 2015, 12:40:02 pm
I thought I would pull this topic back up so Richie can post pics of what he's doing to the 10 sec car.

Here's a pic of a bunch of parts I took a while ago.  These are the different types of reverse idler gears and mechanisms and their weights.  Not all combinations fit all gearbox casings.



Most of my stuff is normal that has been done before on here or not related like a smaller nitrous bottle[14lbs saved]  I don't need to get down to Phil's or Pete's car weights as i will be going 130+mph and a little weight is good, so no need to re invent the wheel ;)
I am going to make a sheet metal sump to loose a little more over berg 4 quart I got at moment and look at back of car mainly

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on December 06, 2015, 21:06:23 pm
I am going to make a sheet metal sump to loose a little more over berg 4 quart ....
Have you located a source for Mg sheet?
Pictures!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Nico86 on February 17, 2016, 03:02:47 am
(http://stancewords.stanceworks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/porsche-917-wooden-shift-knob-lightweight-key1.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on February 17, 2016, 09:41:32 am
(http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh114/spannermanager/image_5.jpeg) (http://s254.photobucket.com/user/spannermanager/media/image_5.jpeg.html)

Lightened valve train saved me a whopping 80 grams per valve over the old heavy set up, no need to say its released more power through lighter valve
Springs, lightened old and lightened new rockers shown for comparison.
(http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh114/spannermanager/image_4.jpeg) (http://s254.photobucket.com/user/spannermanager/media/image_4.jpeg.html)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: jamiep_jamiep on February 17, 2016, 12:09:21 pm
Love it spanners!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on February 17, 2016, 23:57:46 pm
Love it spanners!

Thank you...only costs me time, power, and consumables 🙄 Weight saved on parts breakdown to follow on, I was conservative, it's more like 100 grams per valve over last seasons kit, a mind boggling 2lb overall valve train loss!



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on February 21, 2016, 02:54:15 am
One of the Lounge members is upgrading to a Berg 5, so I started telling him about the possibilities of making a lighter gearbox. In my sales pitch, I highlighted the dual effect of lightening the parts on the input shaft.  The synchros work better when there's less rotational inertia on the input shaft.
Unfortunately, he didn't buy my other argument for the rest of the parts.  Here's some reductions of 1st and 2nd gear:
1st was reduced by almost 10%, second by 15%.  I think I'll do a bit of grinding on 1st before assembly.
[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: hotstreetvw on April 13, 2016, 03:12:50 am
Can anyone give feedback on rear brake weights?  I'm currently running type 3 drums, with ISP West 5x130 hubs.  They are heavy no doubt about it.  How much weight could be saved by something like the Jaycee disc brakes?

I'm looking for solid lb/$ reduction.  Would Lexan be the next step before brakes?

It would be cool to organize the weight savings by lb/$ and throw a list together.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: DWL_Puavo on April 13, 2016, 12:15:08 pm
2-piece drums aren't that heavy at all. Those discs with drive axle hub casted in, are very heavy and not so strong as your current hub. Even if you get a separate disc and hub, there isn't going to be much to be saved. Maybe with some really lightweight brake calipers there could be some total savings, but usually in those conversion sets there is some heavy-ass steel calipers. But I'm quite sure that solid steel discs aren't that much lighter than those 3/4-type's drums.

But for the $$$ : it should be quite easy to build rear brakes around those hubs with separate porsche (or maybe even late transporter?) discs. Then make an adapter plate for radial mounted calipers with handbrake, at least Wilwood has them. Because you already have good hubs, and they really don't come cheap, and comparatively, separate bulk discs and alu lightweight calipers aren't that expensive. We've done this kind of conversion to our old race car with OEM hubs and from kerscher discs where the hub center casting broke and was milled out to fit the oem hubs.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: hotstreetvw on April 13, 2016, 14:33:16 pm
Very interesting.  Thank you for the feedback and ideas.

I have a set of 944 disc brakes but they are from a later model with the small splines.  I never thought about checking the fit of the 944 discs on my hubs.  I'll have a look this weekend and see what I could put together.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 13, 2016, 17:45:24 pm
Before you check the fit, weigh them.  I think you'll find they are quite a bit heavier than your Type 3 drums.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: hotstreetvw on April 14, 2016, 04:02:22 am
I'll weight them.  So the concensous is rear brakes will not help me drop weight.

I guess Lexan is next.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on April 14, 2016, 07:15:17 am
I'll weight them.  So the concensous is rear brakes will not help me drop weight.

I guess Lexan is next.

Loosing rotating weight is really good, we just shipped a Geers brake kit, I will see if I still got total shipping weight but its lighter than stock, don't think you will save as much as all lexan windows will though but works in a different way, of course both is even better ;D

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: hotstreetvw on April 15, 2016, 04:24:47 am
The rotating weight was my original reason for looking at brakes before the Lexan.  If I lost 20lbs with Lexan vs 10lbs of rotating, I'd take the rotating first.

My plan for Lexan will only be 1/4 windows, split windows and the windshield.  I would like to keep the door windows functional and keep them from getting scratched up.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Zach Gomulka on April 15, 2016, 05:15:37 am
You can also replace your headlight glass with flat lexan.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on April 15, 2016, 10:22:51 am
  I would like to keep the door windows functional and keep them from getting scratched up.
Take the glass out of the lower channel and go to a glass shop.  Ask them to make you two new ones from 4mm glass.  Then get them to temper it.  20% weight savings!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: hotstreetvw on April 15, 2016, 14:53:14 pm
Not a bad idea.  I will consider that once the car is painted and seals are replaced so I don't scratch them up.

I emailed Jack @ Jaycee, his rear disc brakes are 8lbs per side.  The website says 6.2 lbs are rotating, I'm guessing per side.  I need to pull a t3 drum assembly and weight it.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: hotstreetvw on April 16, 2016, 01:40:06 am
T3 drum + ISP West Chromoly hub + Studs = 16lbs/side, all rotating weight.  There is no doubt these things are strong as hell, but come with a weight penalty.  This doesn't include the backing plate, shoes, wheel cylinder, hardware or axle nut.  My guess is there is at least 4-5 more pounds there.

I was just on the phone with Shawn regarding my pistons/cylinders, cam etc and asked about his brakes.  He took the time to weight a hub+rotor+caliper+pads.  The only thing he didn't have was the backing plate and studs, less than 10 pounds.

Potential savings of 20+ lbs with a lightweight disc brake swap, with maybe half of that being rotating weight.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on August 16, 2016, 20:17:44 pm
phil and pete shattock have a weight saving obsession, I think pete removes his Fram filter forracing!

So if you do like them and take it ALL THE WAY how light will your pan car be?



 



Well 8 years after you asked this question I can finally report the results of my own weight saving efforts: 525kg/1157 lbs.

All up wet weight, 1956 oval, full pan car with "conventional" running gear, suspension etc. roll cage tagged to 8.5 seconds. This is in race trim, no cooling, charging, working lights, wipers etc.

I've got a few more ideas I want to try so this may well go down.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: leec on August 16, 2016, 20:51:30 pm
Nice one, that is light  :D
Is Phil in the garage drilling more holes in stuff now?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Pas on August 17, 2016, 00:48:14 am
Nice one, that is light  :D
Is Phil in the garage drilling more holes in stuff now?

Thanks Lee

My car is at Phi'ls at the moment for some set up, he's the one who weighed it.

No doubt he will be whacking his car with the lightening stick again this winter  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on August 17, 2016, 16:09:40 pm
  Alu 7075 
(http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa476/PPRMICKE/Tavlingsbil/WP_000259.jpg) (http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/PPRMICKE/media/Tavlingsbil/WP_000259.jpg.html)
(http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa476/PPRMICKE/Tavlingsbil/temporary_3_2.jpg) (http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/PPRMICKE/media/Tavlingsbil/temporary_3_2.jpg.html)
/// Micke


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on December 12, 2016, 01:31:56 am
I don't know how much, grams. Going to an aluminum cell, therefore this is not needed any longer. I'm sure an early grill without gauge is lighter still, but that will have to wait for that elusive and magical "someday" when the car gets repainted


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on December 16, 2016, 18:44:57 pm
Speedo felt unloved.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on December 16, 2016, 18:47:13 pm
I wanted the high beam indicator and turn signal lights to work.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: wph on February 26, 2017, 18:02:32 pm
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-l_T7BXMIB_0/VEMGv2adZJI/AAAAAAAADeE/ppFhhtIcMV0/s1600/001.JPG) ;)

I wonder if these headlight lenses are available, could use a pair.....

Pekka


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Nikke on February 26, 2017, 18:10:32 pm
A Danish(or Belgian) guy made a pair for my bus..think his name was Griebel..nice guy..


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: T11964 on February 26, 2017, 19:37:40 pm
Carsten Griebel is from Denmark  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on March 17, 2017, 12:01:27 pm
Not much real weight saved, but a high percentage.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: numbnuts on March 18, 2017, 08:29:57 am
Nice hinges, are you making any more?

Also, any body have Carsten Griebel contact details? I have no headlight lenses so may as well go for the lighter option, can tey come without the jpm logo?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on March 18, 2017, 16:18:23 pm
Nice hinges, are you making any more?

Not at this point, Sorry. I made 5 sets and they are all spoken for.

I don't know that I'd reccomend them for a steel hood. I'm using on a carbon one, as are all the ones I sold.



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 18, 2017, 18:43:36 pm
Nice hinges, are you making any more?

Also, any body have Carsten Griebel contact details? I have no headlight lenses so may as well go for the lighter option, can tey come without the jpm logo?

I make them as well, just like a regular bosch style lense, LHD and RHD  :)

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 19, 2017, 19:07:27 pm
Can you post a pic, Richie?

Local to me is Al B.  We recently pulled apart his heavyweight B 5speed for some lightening.
Here's 1st and 2nd gear idlers for the pinion shaft.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 19, 2017, 19:09:28 pm
Here's the start of 3rd gear on the pinion shaft.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 19, 2017, 19:11:19 pm
The finished 3rd, along with 5th for the main shaft.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on March 19, 2017, 19:17:26 pm
His 5 speed is one of the first generation run, so it uses the same mid mount as a 4 speed.  Here he drilled the original Berg heavyweight steel mount. Polishing a turd, IMO.  He was happy to get it under 2 kilos.  I showed him the Al 4 speed one I made that's now less than 3/4 of a kilo.

I'll let Al come on here to post the numbers.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on March 20, 2017, 00:14:54 am
I swear every time I break the trans I'm going to pull it apart and do that. I never do...

Nice work.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 20, 2017, 04:59:17 am
Can you post a pic, Richie?


Will do when I get a chance, had a look and no pics of them on this laptop though

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: numbnuts on March 20, 2017, 18:50:33 pm
Nice hinges, are you making any more?

Also, any body have Carsten Griebel contact details? I have no headlight lenses so may as well go for the lighter option, can tey come without the jpm logo?

I make them as well, just like a regular bosch style lense, LHD and RHD  :)

cheers Richie

Cheers Richie I sent you a text about it


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: numbnuts on March 20, 2017, 21:55:33 pm
I was looking for light weight batteries and came across this used by some guys from a racing micra club:

https://www.rapidonline.com/electrical-power/12v-18ah-sla-battery-hzb12-18-18-1172?utm_source=AffWin&utm_medium=Affiliate&awc=1799_1490042986_b093f4a8f9387e7972a54034fdcf7dc1 (https://www.rapidonline.com/electrical-power/12v-18ah-sla-battery-hzb12-18-18-1172?utm_source=AffWin&utm_medium=Affiliate&awc=1799_1490042986_b093f4a8f9387e7972a54034fdcf7dc1)

Might be of use, but from what I can see the Amps may not be high enough at 18A


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: DWL_Puavo on March 21, 2017, 09:40:24 am
In theory, that 18Ah battery should be able to crank normal VW start for about 10 minutes, and it easily should be able to provide you with the starting power needed. For example: 1,2kW, 12V starter = 100A. 18Ah / 100A = 0,18h = ~11 minutes. Cold crancing amps for the battery is stated 732A. So if the real numbers of the battery are even 1/5 of the stated, it should easily work. Throwing another 100€ to the equation, you could have another couple of kg's removed by moving to li-ion battery.

BTW I love that this thread is alive again!

Top tip! If you heat the air inside your drag race beetle from 20c to nice sauna temperature 80c, you save weight about half a kilo!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: numbnuts on March 21, 2017, 13:39:07 pm
Thanks! That battery fits in with my very limited budget so I will go with that one


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on March 21, 2017, 22:22:29 pm
850 g  :)
(http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa476/PPRMICKE/Tavlingsbil/temporary_41_2.jpg) (http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/PPRMICKE/media/Tavlingsbil/temporary_41_2.jpg.html)
/// Micke


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ALB on April 25, 2017, 23:45:49 pm
Hi guys- Those are pics of my pieces Bruce has so kindly posted. I've talked my way into a friend's shop and have been learning to use the lathe and milling table; neat stuff! I had never used equipment like this before and it has been an experience. One of the guys has some 40 years machine experience and every time I go up to Barry's I learn something new. Love the rotary fixture! It sure makes it easy to drill holes in round things. Anyway...

1st gear went from 788 grams to 669, for a weight drop of 119 grams. 2nd gear started at 737 and presently weighs 617 for a saving of 130 g, 3rd gear 607 to 490, less 117g, 5th gear 261- 226g so less 35 grams. I've also re-worked the clutch arm (57g lighter), throw-out shaft (155g), the shift forks (80g), reverse idler shaft (I think that's what it's called- 91g), trans case dowel pins (28g), reverse gear (29g), backside of the ring gear (I'll have to take it to Bruce's for a pic- 399g), frame horn bolts (80g), bowden tube bracket (39g) and the Berg mid mount (over 1,000 g; I've done some more since the pic) for a total weight saving of 2397g (I think) or 5lbs 4oz.

I am looking for a small favor from someone- anyone with a GB 643 midmount, could you please weigh it? I didn't have a scale when I started drilling and filing so I don't know exactly what it weighed initially, so if you could be so kind, thank you in advance. And I understand that due to their construction there's a slight variation in weights, so if 3 or 4 of you could take the time it would really be appreciated. Al

And I'm not finished- I've drilled and ground on the ratchet plate for the hand brake. It went from 81-53g. The handbrake pin went from 42-21g. More to come!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on May 07, 2017, 07:42:17 am
Stock OEM German lifters ('73 1584), minimum resurfacing done.

(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/P1040284_zpshlwt8ypd.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/P1040284_zpshlwt8ypd.jpg.html)

Another well known quality lifter 10 secs later on the same scales.  ;D

(http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc458/MODNROD/VW/P1040285_zpsttlujd8v.jpg) (http://s1212.photobucket.com/user/MODNROD/media/VW/P1040285_zpsttlujd8v.jpg.html)

Just for a comparison.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on May 07, 2017, 07:49:03 am
Stock OEM 35.5mm intake, with spring/retainer/collets.



Mitsi EVO 9 35mm (6.65mm stem) intake, with OEM Mitsi beehive spring/alloy retainer and collets.



Not much good for over 100HP, but fine for me.

The weight of just the retainer and collets is quite remarkable.......



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: xbacax on February 12, 2018, 13:26:00 pm
hello guys,

what is the difference in kilograms/pounds between 4 piece set of glass windows(without front window) in comparison with 4mm lexan set?



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on February 20, 2018, 03:46:36 am
It's gotta be at least half a tenth.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Garrick Clark on February 20, 2018, 18:22:41 pm
  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: NoBars on February 28, 2018, 13:30:09 pm
I did this last year, I made my own out of scrateh resistant coated polycarbonate. 1/8 thick on the rear and 1/4 windows, 3/16 on the doors windshield and vent windows are still glass, door windows roll down. I figure it to be in the range of 25 pounds.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: JeeWee on April 07, 2018, 16:03:43 pm
https://www.csp-shop.de/hinterachse/radlagerdeckel-501-311-311-30064a.html (https://www.csp-shop.de/hinterachse/radlagerdeckel-501-311-311-30064a.html)

428gramm unsprung wait saving by aluminium bearing caps!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on April 08, 2018, 10:16:42 am
I did this last year, I made my own out of scrateh resistant coated polycarbonate. 1/8 thick on the rear and 1/4 windows, 3/16 on the doors windshield and vent windows are still glass, door windows roll down. I figure it to be in the range of 25 pounds.
What are the rules on plastic thickness ?
(1/8")=3mm


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 06, 2018, 23:49:38 pm
(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Oulton.jpg)

Hi Folks, I'm in the middle of rebuilding my historic touring car and since I last raced the minimum weight for the 1300cc class has dropped to 695kg/1532lb (that's the minimum weight of car & driver at the end of the race) so i've got to find an 80kg/176lb weight saving on a car that's basically a bare shell with lexan windows. I wasn't sure that was possible but once i'd stripped the car down to its bare components I was finding weight savings EVERYWHERE! So i'll keep you updated on how i'm gonna get a 675kg/1488lb Beetle (with working lights/wipers etc) down to 595kg/1311lb

Adjustable seat brackets (removed) saving 2196g...My new lighter seat will be fixed from now on.
Tyre inner tubes x4 (removed) saving 3400g...Running tubeless on fresh alloys.
8mm rear wheel spacers (removed) saving 1051g...New alloys will have the correct offset so spacers not required.
Convoluted plastic wiring conduit (removed) saving 447g...Who cares what the wiring looks like!
Fibreglass battery box (removed) saving 1218g...Gel battery, so box not required.
Electric washer bottle (removed) saving 789g...I'll live without windscreen washers.

Only another 71kg/156lb to go!



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on May 07, 2018, 17:18:43 pm
Ian, are they glass headlight lenses still? our lightweight plastic version saves a few ounces[ours weigh about 1.7ounzes each] and never risk having glass on track in an accident.

I will sponsor you a pair if you wanted to try them?

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on May 08, 2018, 09:49:26 am
I love your car Ian, it's very cool!

Are those original alloy Talbot mirrors, or cheap thin and nasty plastic ebay ones with plastic convex lenses?
 ;)
Window winder mechanisms still in the doors?
Li-Fe-Po battery with 330CCA that weighs about 1kg (instead of a 6kg AGM equivalent).
Battery cable lugs with alloy bolts (as bikes have) instead of heavy battery terminals.
New aluminium Brazil chrome strips instead of good German stainless ones?
Did you know that open-ended wheel nuts like you use on old steelies weigh 200g EACH less than shiny chrome mag/alloy closed ones?
What wheels do you use? Rays TE37 or CE28s (like WRC and British rally cars sometimes use) weigh in at less than 3kg each for 14x7".
I can't remember which is which or what way, but Yokohama Advans and Dunlop Sports are nearly 1kg each different in weight for similar performance.

Of course, I can say all this because I'm not paying for them!
 :D
Keep racing, great to see your car out there and on the box, thanks.

PS: lots of corrections, time for bed now, sorry!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 08, 2018, 21:20:38 pm
Hi Ritche, I originally used stock U.S spec headlights but then made polycarbonate copies of them, not just the lens but the whole light (base, bowl everything but the chrome rim) The fully functioning poly headlights weighed 369g each, saving 2430g off the front of the car.
The poly lights were great but a little rough and ready, so the plan was to make polished aluminium copies and using the old poly lenses from the old lights (The lights are purely for wet races so that other drivers can see me so I only need main beam and headlight aim doesn't matter so nice and simple to make).

Thank you very much for the offer of the lenses, i'm not sure i'll do them justice as i'll be running headlight grilles this time (extra weight I know but I'm going for the full period look)....Hold that thought though and i'll get back to you when the car nears completion (some way off yet as you'll see shortly when I create my build thread in the 'In da Werks' section)

Cheers Ian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 08, 2018, 21:59:24 pm
Hi modnrod, The mirrors were cheap and cheerful bullet racing types from a classic car parts website, couldn't see sh*t out of them so I later switched them for some stockish style ones which i'll reuse (but removing the glass and replacing it with mirrored polycarbonate)...As you can see, everything on the car's getting a weight chop!
I'll run through your list:
1. The doors are already gutted with fixed polycarbonate windows, so no winder mechanisms.
2. Already got a 1kg battery...BUT i'm moving it from the front to right next to the starter motor, so the heavy battery cables will be only about 6cm long ( ;) thought of everything me!)
3. Yep!...have cheap alloy trim all round.
4. I've bought a set of 20 polished aluminium wheel nuts to replace the old chrome ones....Chrome=1048g, Ally=360g Saving 688g
5. I had a set of 'Raders' but i'm replacing them with Alloy 'Vintage 190' Porsche 356 style wheels which should save a massive 3kg per wheel!
6. As for tyres i'm stuck with the Championship control tyres 'Dunlop L section historic racing crossplys' size: fronts 120mm wide and rears 128mm wide ( :o Nope that's not a miss print!)

I'll keep posting my progress and weight savings each week
Cheers Ian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on May 09, 2018, 08:06:27 am
Hi Ian, the problem for a circuit car is getting the front working, in short we need weight on the front as axle load is just hopeless to gain tyre temperature if its pared too far down, mine drops off towards the end of the race in terms of understeer creeping in with fuel burn off, it drinks 4 galls over 20 laps and needs care towards the end, braking power also starts to drop off together with the front beginning to wash out, its not bs to say they (the beam axle cars) like some high up cg wise weight up front also, the beams c of g is below ground level, great on the face of it but not so good again for racing and tyre loading, vw knew what they were doing to keep the front benign for the street.  find a way to load that axle mate, or you may need to add weight again, even porsche had to do that.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on May 09, 2018, 08:06:47 am
Hi Ian, the problem for a circuit car is getting the front working, in short we need weight on the front as axle load is just hopeless to gain tyre temperature if its pared too far down, mine drops off towards the end of the race in terms of understeer creeping in with fuel burn off, it drinks 4 galls over 20 laps and needs care towards the end, braking power also starts to drop off together with the front beginning to wash out, its not bs to say they (the beam axle cars) like some high up cg wise weight up front also, the beams c of g is below ground level, great on the face of it but not so good again for racing and tyre loading, vw knew what they were doing to keep the front benign for the street.  find a way to load that axle mate, or you may need to add weight again, even porsche had to do that.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on May 09, 2018, 08:07:27 am
Hi Ian, the problem for a circuit car is getting the front working, in short we need weight on the front as axle load is just hopeless to gain tyre temperature if its pared too far down, mine drops off towards the end of the race in terms of understeer creeping in with fuel burn off, it drinks 4 galls over 20 laps and needs care towards the end, braking power also starts to drop off together with the front beginning to wash out, its not bs to say they (the beam axle cars) like some high up cg wise weight up front also, the beams c of g is below ground level, great on the face of it but not so good again for racing and tyre loading, vw knew what they were doing to keep the front benign for the street. �find a way to load that axle mate, or you may need to add weight again, even porsche had to do that.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 09, 2018, 21:11:50 pm
Hi Spanners: The Mini's have 10 inch wheels, so their tyres rotate twice as much as everyone else, so with the extra tyre temp they usually ambush the rest of us for the first few laps!

Race ready with me on-board the FR/RR bias before was 40.5/59.5%...The plan is to get the car under-weight, then add ballast to try and load the front up a little. I used the corner scales to work out the centre of gravity and its at my left hip as i'm sitting in the car. The crazy thing is, most of the weight saving is coming from below that, so the centre of gravity is gonna be a little worse once i'm done. Alan at GAC said get as much weight below the roll centres as possible, so the ballast should at least help with that.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on May 10, 2018, 20:22:30 pm
good work Ian, them minis... :-\n


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 10, 2018, 22:14:35 pm
Removal of seat belt mounting brackets.

Not expecting many of you to go THIS far (as it's a real ball ache), but I had time on my hands and there are seven hefty brackets hidden inside the body, so all (but one) of them buggers got the chop!

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/B-pillar%20bracket%20640x480.jpg)

Pair of B-pillar top brackets Saving 302g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 10, 2018, 22:18:11 pm
(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/B-pillar%20bottom%20bracket%20640x480.jpg)

B-pillar bottom bracket (only one this time as I need the other side for my harness)  Saving 105g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 10, 2018, 22:20:47 pm
(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Rear%20seatbelt%20centre%20mount%20640x480.jpg)

Centre bracket under the rear seat (This one's easy just 4 spot welds) Saving 350g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 10, 2018, 22:23:19 pm
(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/C-pillar%20bracket%20640x480.jpg)

Pair of C-pillar mounts (These were bigger than I could have ever hoped for) The pair saved me 380g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 10, 2018, 22:28:16 pm
All those seat belt brackets added up to 1137grams

Another 69.863kg to go!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 11, 2018, 23:38:44 pm
Heater Tube removal

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Heater%20tube%20640x480.jpg)
(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/B-piller%20bottom%20cut%20out%20640x480.jpg)

Removing both heater tubes saved 3.3kg

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Rear%20seat%20bracket%20640x480.jpg)

Removing both rear seat mounting brackets (simple to remove as they are spot welded in) saved 580g

Another 65.983kg to go!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 12, 2018, 17:52:37 pm
A number of other weight saving alterations on the main bodyshell were small but as you know it all adds up!

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Steering%20column%20top%20mount%20640x480.jpg)

The original steering column top mount isn't used as the column is mounted a few cm's nearer to the centre of the car (along with the drivers seat for safety/weight distribution) The steering column will be bolted straight to the rollcage. This old mount weighed 101g

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Behind%20A-pillar%20640x480.jpg)

A lot of grinding went on behind the dash, removing metal de-mister ducts, door check strap mountings, unused bonnet and bonnet spring mountings and just a general reduction in any excess metal. Total saving 699g

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Interior%20light%20hole%20640x480.jpg)

The rules won't allow the body to be drilled 'drag racer style' to save weight (The body must look original) but just to be a little cheeky I added a second interior light mounting hole opposite the other one. saving 14g

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Interior%20mirror%20bracket%20640x480.jpg)

The interior mirror has a large bracket and spring spot welded inside the roof. I removed this as i'm making a polycarbonate interior mirror which i'll glue directly to the windscreen. This mirror bracket and spring weighs 105g

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Top%20of%20engine%20bay%20640x480.jpg)

Much the same as behind the dash I did some minor trimming of the engine bay and removed the unused deck lid mountings. All this saved 409g


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on May 13, 2018, 04:31:41 am
Hehehe! Go Ian!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on May 13, 2018, 10:09:37 am
Hehehe! Go Ian!  ;D

Gets under your skin this weight saving business...you start getting a bit obsessive and everyone around you thinks you've lost the plot!  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: kraftkaefer on May 14, 2018, 11:08:14 am
All of my carbon parts on my car are boring now for me..... ;)

If i saw this earlier i´m sure i removed the heater Panels  :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Andrew on August 12, 2018, 19:22:12 pm
Hi Ian,

  Out of curiosity, which battery did you use?

   thanks,


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: numbnuts on August 21, 2018, 12:37:05 pm
I have to feedback that the battery I found earlier in this thread is really good. It has been starting up my 12:1 2854cc motor just fine, I would definitely recommend this battery and for the price it is a bargain over the more expensive race batteries


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on August 31, 2018, 11:14:28 am
Stock bumper mount for late model

[attachment=1]

Cheap and cheerful 60x6mm alloy with a distinct LACK of nice welding or shiny billet, bent in a vice with a hammer.  :D

[attachment=2]



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on September 02, 2018, 20:24:03 pm
Hi Ian,

  Out of curiosity, which battery did you use?

   thanks,

The battery i'm using is a 'Super B' B7800 lithium ion which is tiny (118x80x93mm) It weighs 1320g, capacity 7.8ah, cranking current 450a but it's only recommended for engines up to 1400cc and its not cheap! I'll be moving it from the passenger footwell to an inch away from the starter motor to have the battery cables as short as possible to shed even more weight.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: modnrod on September 06, 2018, 01:43:13 am
Original OEM steel front bumper/mounts = 7.7kg (without mounting bolts).

Bent flat alloy mounts bolted to a "thin summer chrome only" cheap bumper = 3.2kg.

 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: JeeWee on September 06, 2018, 13:09:27 pm
Does anyone know if type 3 rear brake drums are availabe in aluminium? hoped that someone has made that as they are heavy as hell. I thought of modifing a LUPO 3L aluminium rear drum for this but that is not so easy...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on September 29, 2018, 09:01:16 am
I thought of modifing a LUPO 3L aluminium rear drum for this but that is not so easy...
Do you have any pics of these Al drums?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: JeeWee on January 09, 2019, 13:53:38 pm
here is a picture. Only used on the lupo's with the 1.2l tdi engine also called 3L. Of course a front wheel drive car.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 10, 2019, 09:31:55 am
If I assume the bolt pattern is 4x100, the diameter looks pretty small.  Too small for our use is my guess.  But I bet they're light!
Can you measure the inside diameter?  Maybe post a pic of the inside?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Ian Brown on July 07, 2019, 18:54:31 pm
My new rims have just arrived from the States ;D
I wanted to switch to lighter wheels for the 1965 Beetle that I compete with in Historic Touring Car racing (old wheels were JGE Raders) modern rims and split rims aren't allowed so i've opted for 'Vintage 190' Porsche 356 style alloys. Not as light as Tecnomagnesio rims but the Vintage 190 versions are 10 times cheaper!

Vintage 190 claim's that switching to a set of their wheels will save up to 40lbs....I knew this claim was optimistic to say the least, but they'd still be lighter than my old Raders, so ordered them anyway. I'm still not sure how they came to this figure of a 40lbs saving (must have included the weight of the hubcaps, tyres and balancing weights ???) As you can see they are still a decent weight saving and look much sexier than the usual Brazilian made steel 356 copies. BTW these Vintage 190 wheels can be used with early style hubcaps (clips and screws included)

(https://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Steel%20vs%20Alloy%20wheel%204.5.jpg)

(https://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/beany1/Steel%20vs%20Alloy%205.5.jpg)

For me the total weight saving on all 4 wheels is 4122grams (just over 9lbs)....That's going from 5" Raders all round with alloy rear wheel spacers and switching to Vintage 190 (4.5" front, 5.5" rear) no wheel spacers required with these due to the offsets.

For racing i'll be using two sets of wheels/tyres. Vintage 190 (on worn tyres) for the dry and steel 356 copies (on fresh tyres) for the wet where the extra wheel weight isn't such an issue. I'll be painting them all satin black ( :'( Boo I hear you cry) but the car will be repainted in 'VW Medium Brown' so black rims will look a lot  >:( meaner.

BTW plans are afoot to build myself a race car transporter from a T25 (T3, Vanagon) single cab pickup...It's gonna be the dogs danglies!



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on June 21, 2020, 15:57:42 pm
So during lockdown rather than sit on my ass doing nothing I decided to tick off one of my "want to do" list so I have been studying how to make real carbon lightweight panels and finally took the plunge to buy the equipment needed
Next I started by making a mold of some parts I wanted to try to re create, then moved on to trying the vacuum infusion process which looks really easy but isnt!!! ::),I have had a few failures[mostly cosmetic and a couple that were about 90% good but finally cracked it and have made some 67 vented cabrio style decklids, my goal was to produce a decklid with hinge panel and number plate light surround weighing less than 1kg, so far best lightweight "road" version is 1100grams so nearly there, and race weight version is less than 950grams!!! As you can see from the pics even the stock number plate light is stupid heavy compared to what a carbon version can be ;)

I will be making a few to sell now and next will be some stock style oversize rear wings/fenders that bolt on like stock :o ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 14, 2020, 18:19:30 pm
  :o ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on July 14, 2020, 22:38:53 pm
Richie..

WTF??
Thats awesome. Finish looks great too.

How much for the vented 67 lid, light and set of hinges?

What else you got??


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on July 15, 2020, 01:58:08 am
That's awesome, how thick is the layup, do you think it would be stiffer than aluminium?

this is my favourite thread
ta Ian


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Eddie DVK on July 15, 2020, 06:49:11 am
No No Richie no one has a 67,
Just make 68 cabrio decklid.  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 15, 2020, 17:59:55 pm
Richie..

WTF??
Thats awesome. Finish looks great too.

How much for the vented 67 lid, light and set of hinges?

What else you got??

Thanks, £500 for all of it to be painted, £600 if its show finish in pure carbon :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 15, 2020, 18:01:52 pm
That's awesome, how thick is the layup, do you think it would be stiffer than aluminium?

this is my favourite thread
ta Ian

It is 4.5mm thick for the bonnet hinges with several layers of carbon in the lay up, they are really strong and yes aluminium hinges will bend much easier than these will :o 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 15, 2020, 18:03:03 pm
No No Richie no one has a 67,
Just make 68 cabrio decklid.  ;D


I actually have a 68 cabrio decklid as well that needs some bodywork and painting 1st but my aim is to do that over winter and then offer that as well and a 1303 lid


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: bean on July 15, 2020, 18:27:12 pm
almost wish i hadn't sold my 67! just so i could have one of those decklids - look seriously good
of course that would then have meant I'd have needed to get a carbon valance to replace the fibreglass one ( that i didn'f fit and still have )


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Jeff Paull on July 17, 2020, 06:22:53 am
Lithium Batteries are starting to be slightly better priced. This one was $320 including shipping on ebay from China. 6.8lbs. Maintains at 13.8-14.3 volts instead of the typical 13.4 like lead acids. This is nice for running without a belt as it will keep the ignition happy as it will be sitting at 12.5-13.4 or so when not charging at all.

600cca, 40ah.

Coil sitting there just as a reference to size of the battery.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on July 21, 2020, 07:29:02 am
https://www.amazon.com/Replacement-Automobile-Universal-Phosphate-Protection/dp/B082R2GL5B

USD 260 inc shipping
I like this!  Plus several others like the 70ah at 5 kg.
https://www.amazon.com/Replacement-Automobile-Universal-Phosphate-Protection/dp/B082R2ZC67?th=1

[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 02, 2020, 15:59:08 pm
Couple more pieces i made, bumper was straight out the mold this morning ,its 55mm wider to fit wider wings/fenders but regular width coming next and a front :) Then trimmed and weighed along with the bumper support brackets


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 02, 2020, 17:01:04 pm
Even very light parts can be made lighter  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andy198712 on August 03, 2020, 10:07:23 am
Jesus how did i miss this!!  8)

thats some huge weight savings!

What i always found wasn't available in the UK was carbon or even glass short front bonnets...


That are amazing, i couldn't bring my self to paint them though!  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 03, 2020, 20:08:10 pm
All fits good  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Dalland on August 04, 2020, 12:20:24 pm
Looks stunning! ;D

Since you are on a roll.. Would you consider making the front bumpers for late style beetle without the "bumper lights"?
I have yet to find anybody making this versions. ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 04, 2020, 18:07:50 pm
Looks stunning! ;D

Since you are on a roll.. Would you consider making the front bumpers for late style beetle without the "bumper lights"?
I have yet to find anybody making this versions. ::)

Hey

yes it is possible if i can find a really good bumper to take a mold from to use

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Dalland on August 05, 2020, 07:37:21 am
Looks stunning! ;D

Since you are on a roll.. Would you consider making the front bumpers for late style beetle without the "bumper lights"?
I have yet to find anybody making this versions. ::)

Hey

yes it is possible if i can find a really good bumper to take a mold from to use

cheers Richie

Great!
Just let us know here or in your web store when things are moving along.
I find it generally hard to get a good overview of what carbon fiber parts are made, the quality, looks and prices.
For now, I have been in contact with companies in USA, England, Norway, France, Germany and Malaysia. There are a lot of good products but the communication isn't always as professional. ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: AntLockyer on August 05, 2020, 10:15:54 am
All those carbon parts looks superb!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on August 17, 2020, 12:53:18 pm
My car was originally built by Hazze Lindholm in the late 90´s.
I bought it in 2006 and have raced on circuit racing tracks i south Skåne Sweden since then.

I named it Blue Carbon and added few more carbon fibre items to it. Sad thing is that my focus has been on engines and the new Remmele doors I bought many years ago, are still not mounted.
Anyway, my latest project with this car is to make it street legal. Let´s see in spring 2021, if it became true.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on August 17, 2020, 12:57:53 pm
[attachment=1]

[attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 17, 2020, 18:17:00 pm
Cool Frallan 8) Prefer it without the high wing though ;)   How is the finish on the carbon parts? any dry areas at all? still getting odd part thats a little dry in places so looking for something to compare to.
Any chance you could weigh the doors? would be interested to see what they weigh, thanks :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on August 18, 2020, 08:24:42 am
Cool Frallan 8) Prefer it without the high wing though ;)   How is the finish on the carbon parts? any dry areas at all? still getting odd part thats a little dry in places so looking for something to compare to.
Any chance you could weigh the doors? would be interested to see what they weigh, thanks :)

Tend to agree with you Richie, little bit divided on the wing, it is a "bit too much" but I am going to get enough information one day to do back to back driving and see if it makes a lap improvement, or not.
For my street legal approach, of course it is a no no.

Weight of doors?
Was pretty sure I had that data written in a Swedish circuit racer forum but no, only that I am saving pretty much 10 kg per each door vs. the blue steel doors. Compared to the ones I have currently with lexan windows. (no crank mechanism)
Promise I will weigh them soonest, even if they hang very well packed up in the ceiling right now.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 20, 2020, 18:10:41 pm
Made some molds for running boards and stock width early bumpers over last week or so, and made the actual parts now, was ok to take the running boards out today and gave one a basic trim just to see the weight, for reference 1st pic is genuine VW running board, next is an older pattern version then the carbon version ;D :o 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on August 21, 2020, 12:07:25 pm
Made some molds for running boards and stock width early bumpers over last week or so, and made the actual parts now, was ok to take the running boards out today and gave one a basic trim just to see the weight, for reference 1st pic is genuine VW running board, next is an older pattern version then the carbon version ;D :o 8)

Wow!
4.2KG saving

Nice


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 21, 2020, 20:15:45 pm
Made some molds for running boards and stock width early bumpers over last week or so, and made the actual parts now, was ok to take the running boards out today and gave one a basic trim just to see the weight, for reference 1st pic is genuine VW running board, next is an older pattern version then the carbon version ;D :o 8)

Wow!
4.2KG saving

Nice

Yep good isn't it 8)   Stock width carbon bumpers are done, just need trimming and then weigh in time ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on August 22, 2020, 11:09:36 am

Stock width carbon bumpers are done, just need trimming and then weigh in time ;D

Hmm,
I seem to be spending far too much money recently...
Shame to cover the carbon BUT if they were then coated in that 'plastic' chrome stuff youd be able to keep the look of bumpers but with the weight saving of nerf bars...  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: aki on August 22, 2020, 11:45:43 am
Cool stuff! If running board mould be taken with the rubber but without the aluminium list you could just paint it flat black or use rubber dip paint lightly to achieve stock look using stock alu strip on the side. Or just replicate the stock narrow and wide mouldings in carbon and paint it using aluminium/chrome paint. 🤔😁


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spoolin70 on August 24, 2020, 17:13:39 pm
Hi Richie

Well done on the carbon fibre parts, the finish looks really good.

For your reference, I've had carbon running boards for a few years, purchased from CSP. I got one out of the loft earlier and weighed it as a comparison. Sorry, no digital scales available.

[attachment=1]

Just over 400grams. So good job on getting the weight down even more. You can see light through these in places they are so thin  :D

Also, this label is within the weave on the underside, anyone your familiar with ?

[attachment=2]




Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 24, 2020, 17:43:10 pm
Hi Richie

Well done on the carbon fibre parts, the finish looks really good.

For your reference, I've had carbon running boards for a few years, purchased from CSP. I got one out of the loft earlier and weighed it as a comparison. Sorry, no digital scales available.

[attachment=1]

Just over 400grams. So good job on getting the weight down even more. You can see light through these in places they are so thin  :D

Also, this label is within the weave on the underside, anyone your familiar with ?

[attachment=2]




Thanks, good reference there for my weight aims, mine are really strong and thick still, no chance to see through them, probably strong enough to stand on once bolted to car I think, yours look like they are hand laid which if so will always be heavier even with less carbon layeys

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on August 29, 2020, 21:41:22 pm
Hi Richie

Well done on the carbon fibre parts, the finish looks really good.

For your reference, I've had carbon running boards for a few years, purchased from CSP. I got one out of the loft earlier and weighed it as a comparison. Sorry, no digital scales available.

[attachment=1]

Just over 400grams. So good job on getting the weight down even more. You can see light through these in places they are so thin  :D

Also, this label is within the weave on the underside, anyone your familiar with ?

[attachment=2]




Jesus i just looked at price of them from csp!!!



https://www.csp-shop.com/en/body/running-boards-carbon-fiber-898-509-111bk-14879a.html


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on September 23, 2020, 07:25:23 am
Made a 67 rear apron replacement in carbon, nice saving for me there ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on September 23, 2020, 10:55:45 am
Made a 67 rear apron replacement in carbon, nice saving for me there ;D

Richie, youre going to turn me into a pauper!!!  ;) :(


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on September 23, 2020, 20:06:15 pm
Made a 67 rear apron replacement in carbon, nice saving for me there ;D

Richie, youre going to turn me into a pauper!!!  ;) :(


Worse ways to spend your money ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on September 28, 2020, 20:08:10 pm
Today was a good day with both these coming out the moulds 8) bonnet is a little lighter than a raceweight fiberglass version but 10 times as strong


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: johandryselius on September 28, 2020, 20:13:24 pm
Very nice!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Basti on September 29, 2020, 07:04:37 am
Masterclass!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Neil Davies on September 30, 2020, 18:16:03 pm
You're getting good at this!  :D I saw the photos of the old bonnet deforming at speed (maybe on Faceache? Deleted my profile on there now, couldn't be doing with it!) and it looked quite alarming! Have you built any ribs in the back to strengthen it up, or just relying on the material properties and VWs design?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: leec on September 30, 2020, 18:31:11 pm
That bonnet looks amazing  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on October 01, 2020, 07:29:25 am
You're getting good at this!  :D I saw the photos of the old bonnet deforming at speed (maybe on Faceache? Deleted my profile on there now, couldn't be doing with it!) and it looked quite alarming! Have you built any ribs in the back to strengthen it up, or just relying on the material properties and VWs design?

Just relying on the carbon strength with a core material as well as factory pressings, in a simple test fiberglass bonnet deformed on the big top areas with 7kg weight[lead bar] on it and this doesn't deform with 25kg on it in same place[that was all lead bar i had around ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on October 01, 2020, 07:34:58 am
This is the picture Neil mentioned that provoked me to make the carbon bonnet, you can see the fiberglass version collapsing on the top area and this is only at 130mph so going 170 who know how bad it is :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MegaRookie on October 01, 2020, 16:21:19 pm
That looks like some serious elastic deformation on the bonnet. Sorry for asking, but didn't you also have any issues with ground cleance to your bumper brackets at the higher speed?  :o

Ps. The carbon fibre parts you made look really good!

Mark


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on October 01, 2020, 17:29:08 pm
That looks like some serious elastic deformation on the bonnet. Sorry for asking, but didn't you also have any issues with ground cleance to your bumper brackets at the higher speed?  :o

Ps. The carbon fibre parts you made look really good!

Mark

This is 1st time with the splitter front airdam combo so still learning what is needed for it to work best, but no thats lowest it got so nothing rubbing on ground yet


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: stretch on October 02, 2020, 10:52:28 am
Quote
This is the picture Neil mentioned that provoked me to make the carbon bonnet, you can see the fiberglass version collapsing on the top area and this is only at 130mph so going 170 who know how bad it is :o

'Only 130mph'.......  Soe of us dream of that terminal speed.   ;) ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on October 05, 2020, 06:51:32 am
I think the pictures are self-explanatory.

- Remmele CF doors 4,25 kg
- Doors with hinges and window mechanism. No glass. 14,5 kg
- Complete doors including mirror. 20 kg

[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3]



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on October 05, 2020, 06:53:29 am
[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on October 05, 2020, 06:55:45 am
[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3]

These guys are heavy.
I could hardly hold the door with my left hand and take a picture with my right hand. :-)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on October 05, 2020, 07:19:55 am
[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3]

These guys are heavy.
I could hardly hold the door with my left hand and take a picture with my right hand. :-)

Its those fancy aftermarket mirrors that add all the weight :D ;D


Thanks for weighing then though,appreciated :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on October 17, 2020, 16:37:21 pm
Another small saving, factory steel light housings weigh 244g each side, these carbon ones i made 54g, and i will use led lights inside which save another 60g over the normal steel bulb holder and bulbs each side :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on October 24, 2020, 18:32:54 pm
[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3]

These guys are heavy.
I could hardly hold the door with my left hand and take a picture with my right hand. :-)

Its those fancy aftermarket mirrors that add all the weight :D ;D

No heavy mirrors on my car....  ;D
[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on November 18, 2020, 18:48:50 pm
 ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on November 18, 2020, 19:53:01 pm
;D

 ;D ;D ;D
/// Micke


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on November 19, 2020, 08:33:48 am
;D

Richie, I do not know what or how to "beat you" right now. Gasoline refill door in CF?
Replace the roof?
Make a full CF VW tub beetle? That would be cool!  ::)
I guess I should start by installing my doors and the missing rear bumper too.

Anyway, these are two pictures from my workplace. Maybe a CF wheel for our beetles? Naw, price would be silly just to do the tools needed.
I am practical guy and my only formal title is Composite Engineer (diploma from the early 80´s) but I am neither very skilled or have any practice on the topic doing the CF parts myself. So buying the parts is expensive.
But dreaming is fun!

[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on November 19, 2020, 18:46:06 pm
;D

Richie, I do not know what or how to "beat you" right now. Gasoline refill door in CF?
Replace the roof?
Make a full CF VW tub beetle? That would be cool!  ::)
I guess I should start by installing my doors and the missing rear bumper too.

Anyway, these are two pictures from my workplace. Maybe a CF wheel for our beetles? Naw, price would be silly just to do the tools needed.
I am practical guy and my only formal title is Composite Engineer (diploma from the early 80´s) but I am neither very skilled or have any practice on the topic doing the CF parts myself. So buying the parts is expensive.
But dreaming is fun!

[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]


Stuff like carbon wheels is way out of my skill level as well, I do have some winter plans which will really push me though, if i can make it work will be quite out there :o ;) :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on November 21, 2020, 16:57:28 pm
1st "light street" version out mould today, this has some extra carbon where rear tail lights attach, and also mounting edge and around front bottom lip for running board to bolt through but realistically its about as light as you would want to go.  
1st pic is fresh out of mould and second pic is weight after main trimming done but not mounting holes drilled or bumper slot cut out :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on November 22, 2020, 09:01:52 am
I have also been working on fronts, with the added aero pushing down on the front end the top of the front tyre was getting to close to the wing, so I used the bulged fronts i made a few years ago as a pattern, then added more height and area to the bulges for extra clearance, then painted them and created the moulds, unfortunately one didn't work as i had a big chemical reaction between wing surface and mould gelcoat but I finished the one that did and created this from it ;D  Now to fix the other wing and re paint etc to make other side  


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on December 04, 2020, 22:03:37 pm
This is the picture Neil mentioned that provoked me to make the carbon bonnet, you can see the fiberglass version collapsing on the top area and this is only at 130mph so going 170 who know how bad it is :o

thats intreaging as that area would be at lower pressure than the fronta areal, my guess is you have a pressure differential with lower pressure under the hood, i had plastic side windows ,badly fitted, and they came out at the top at around eighty five mph, at the same time as the semaphores lifted out with the rain gutter deflection, is it open to ground under the hood ?
 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on December 04, 2020, 22:28:19 pm


is it open to ground under the hood ?
 

No its filled in best i can do[flat undertray from back of splitter edge to front of floor as wide as possible so doesn't interfere with suspension]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on December 05, 2020, 02:51:09 am
I am upgrading my Karmann Ghia road/track car. I'm trying to get the most weight out of the rotating assemblies, then generally get the car lighter even though I've added a cage and a berg 5. At the moment I'm mostly working on brakes and hubs, I have changing to ventilated disks at the front and I'd like to get them as light as the stock disks.
The disk needs mass to absorb heat, everything else get lighter. So 944 hubs, Ti studs, etc. First up I made these caps, I beat the tops out of sheet aluminium and cut off some 2 1/4 tube, braised them together, sanded and polished them in the lathe ('cos its a hobby  ;D). The hole in the top needs finishing square for the speedo cable.
I'll add some other pictures as time permits.
[attachment=2][attachment=3][attachment=4]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on December 05, 2020, 03:26:21 am
The rear gearbox cradle weighs a bit, and I had seen these alloy ones on a German site but they were no longer made, eventually one came up on the samba. Once bought, I drilled a few more holes, drilled early bolts, they are lighter than the late bolts (19g) and used early washers, lighter as well (3g) than late washers. I know its a bit obsessive  :o but i'm following in the footsteps of many on this thread.
[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3][attachment=4]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: spanners on December 06, 2020, 14:06:06 pm


is it open to ground under the hood ?
 

No its filled in best i can do[flat undertray from back of splitter edge to front of floor as wide as possible so doesn't interfere with suspension]


Ah, ok Richie , ive just seen your pic and that tells me a lot, the air dam and splitter are working very well, you have good negative pressure under there and thats whats deforming the hood, i use a similar setup on my circuit car but have to run at four inches to the deck at rest, the only thing so far ive gained with no serious on track handling testing yet is lower oil and coolant temperatures with lower underside pressure pulling more air through the systems, the next step is a decent rear diffusor to clean up the exit air flow which with our flat fours is something of a corked bottleneck, ive managed to get the cork out ;) somewhat, its a big task but the rewards are there. love the carbon work ur doing, i made a glass roof for my autocross car years back before they were banned. ;) a nice saving in carbon..


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Garrick Clark on December 06, 2020, 15:07:46 pm
Richie, Dare I ask how much 2 fronts and 2 rears would cost.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on December 06, 2020, 18:11:33 pm
Richie, Dare I ask how much 2 fronts and 2 rears would cost.

Rears are £450 each, haven't priced fronts yet as need to make headlight buckets really so can be used on street properly

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ALB on December 08, 2020, 13:30:07 pm
The rear gearbox cradle weighs a bit, and I had seen these alloy ones on a German site but they were no longer made, eventually one came up on the samba. Once bought, I drilled a few more holes, drilled early bolts, they are lighter than the late bolts (19g) and used early washers, lighter as well (3g) than late washers. I know its a bit obsessive  :o but i'm following in the footsteps of many on this thread.
[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3][attachment=4]

How thick is the material on the aluminum cradle?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on December 10, 2020, 00:00:22 am
Alb, I had chance to measure it today, all parts of the cradle are 5mm aluminium.
 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on January 01, 2021, 00:44:33 am
I've been working on my front spindles and brakes. My goal was to have something as light or lighter than the Type 1 disks (278mm), but vented and more thermal mass, and Porsche bolt pattern and still fit in a 15" wheel. I used alloy 944 hubs and vented disks, 282mm diameter, and wilwood Dynapro 4 piston calipers. Lanner in Canada made the brackets to fit the radial mount calipers to the VW (or Mendeola spindles). I cut some mass out of the back of the disk and used Ti fasteners. I ended up saving 1.332 kg
[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3][attachment=4]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on January 01, 2021, 15:23:56 pm
I've been working on my front spindles and brakes. My goal was to have something as light or lighter than the Type 1 disks (278mm), but vented and more thermal mass, and Porsche bolt pattern and still fit in a 15" wheel. I used alloy 944 hubs and vented disks, 282mm diameter, and wilwood Dynapro 4 piston calipers. Lanner in Canada made the brackets to fit the radial mount calipers to the VW (or Mendeola spindles). I cut some mass out of the back of the disk and used Ti fasteners. I ended up saving 1.332 kg


NICE.
Are you going to run ABS or is that just the way the 'vents' appear on the back side of the disc?

Marc


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on January 01, 2021, 17:48:14 pm
I get confused that everyone spends a lot of time trying to get the weight down on the front of the car
It gets even easier and the balance of the car gets worse
On a fast drag racing car, you put all the effort into finding the weight at the front (in a prefect world it is 50-50% or 55-45%)
The same with track racing more weight forward, works much better and the balance gets better and the car goes faster
If the car has 80% rear weight then it is 20% front as standard
Then light 10% until Is it good ???
to reduce weight on rims and tires is good
But a sheet metal rim at the back and a light alloy at the front
If you talk about what the center line of weight distribution is, you work with the chassis of a fast racing car
Maybe you should think twice more
/// M


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on January 01, 2021, 18:38:04 pm
I get confused that everyone spends a lot of time trying to get the weight down on the front of the car
It gets even easier and the balance of the car gets worse
On a fast drag racing car, you put all the effort into finding the weight at the front (in a prefect world it is 50-50% or 55-45%)
The same with track racing more weight forward, works much better and the balance gets better and the car goes faster
If the car has 80% rear weight then it is 20% front as standard
Then light 10% until Is it good ???
to reduce weight on rims and tires is good
But a sheet metal rim at the back and a light alloy at the front
If you talk about what the center line of weight distribution is, you work with the chassis of a fast racing car
Maybe you should think twice more
/// M

Micke, I mostly agree :)  but if you lose 10kgs from 0.5m from front of car, then add 5kgs to actual front of car it is still lighter, but front/rear weight balance is better 8)  I think we agree it is how you place the weight that matters ;) I have 35kg piece of lead that is 3 1/2 inches from ground[car has to have 3inches clearance for track rules] and maybe 1inch from front of car, so basically as far forward as possible.
Everything that is behind that place on car i look at to try lose weight  :o ;D 

Happy new year to you :)  cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on January 01, 2021, 21:05:25 pm
Marc, no ABS for me, its just how much of the vents was left after I cut away the back of the disk that wasn't going to touch the pad.
Micke, I agree about the overall weight distribution and a lot of work is going into lightening the rear of the car to improve overall balance and moving weight inboard. As a road race car I would like it closer to 50/50 then I still consider whether to have the weight close to the centre line for better turning response or forward of the front axle as Richie suggests, for best weight distribution. With that in mind I've got a fibreglass rear bumper and and steel front bumper.
I put a lot of work into the rotating assemblies because the lighter they are the easier it is to accelerate them and get them to change direction and the suspension is much more responsive with less unsprung weight. I agree a light wheel and tire is more important as they are further from the centre line of the axle (spinning forces) but less weight in the hubs/brakes helps the wheels stay in contact with the road better


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on January 02, 2021, 10:00:04 am
Marc, no ABS for me, its just how much of the vents was left after I cut away the back of the disk that wasn't going to touch the pad.
Micke, I agree about the overall weight distribution and a lot of work is going into lightening the rear of the car to improve overall balance and moving weight inboard. As a road race car I would like it closer to 50/50 then I still consider whether to have the close to the centre line for better turning response or forward of the from axle as Richie suggests, for best weight distribution. With that in mind I've got a fibreglass rear bumper and and steel front bumper.
I put a lot of work into the rotating assemblies because the lighter they are the easier it is to accelerate them and get them to change direction and the suspension is much more responsive with less unsprung weight. I agree a light wheel and tire is more important as they are further from the centre line of the axle (spinning forces) but less weight in the hubs/brakes helps the wheels stay in contact with the road better
Glad you think that way
There are many pitfalls when building a car for track racing / street
A tip that can be good to know
As the lateral force on the wheel suspension That it wants to flex a lot
Like the spider pin that often wants to bend by the lateral force
Then the whole spider wants to flex if you do not choose the right material
How to notice this is that the brake pads want to leave the disc after cornering   And you get a long brake pedal
/// M


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: karmi on January 26, 2021, 21:11:58 pm
Plastic screws for fenders  ;)[attachment=1][attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on January 27, 2021, 01:39:37 am
14 g saving is not a lot, but..... there are a lot of these bolts. And it's cheap and easy, and they don't rust, win, win, win.
Good work  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on January 27, 2021, 21:59:51 pm
Plastic screws for fenders  ;)[attachment=1][attachment=2]

Did you buy or print them yourself??

Cheers


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: karmi on January 28, 2021, 00:37:27 am
Bought from e-bay. Are from Cina, but are ok. 36 screws for the fenders are 36x14g = 504g. No rust and if you have a crash, the side wall won't bend because it will break off.  ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Eddie DVK on January 28, 2021, 08:03:14 am
Bought from e-bay. Are from Cina, but are ok. 36 screws for the fenders are 36x14g = 504g. No rust and if you have a crash, the side wall won't bend because it will break off.  ;)

 ;D :D nice.

You maybe have a link?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: karmi on January 29, 2021, 01:13:18 am
https://www.ebay.de/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2047675.m570.l1313&_nkw=Kunststoffschraube+Sechskantschraube+Schwarz+Nylon+Bolzen+DIN+933+M8+M10+M12&_sacat=0


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Eddie DVK on January 29, 2021, 07:48:32 am
https://www.ebay.de/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2047675.m570.l1313&_nkw=Kunststoffschraube+Sechskantschraube+Schwarz+Nylon+Bolzen+DIN+933+M8+M10+M12&_sacat=0

Thanks


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Bruce on January 31, 2021, 21:04:01 pm
Wow, they're cheap too.  A box of 50 delivered for around $9USD.

A couple of years ago, I looked at the fender bolts and bought Al ones (3.6g each). They were quite a bit more $ than the nylon ones.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 01, 2021, 08:54:35 am
Wow, they're cheap too.  A box of 50 delivered for around $9USD.

A couple of years ago, I looked at the fender bolts and bought Al ones (3.6g each). They were quite a bit more $ than the nylon ones.

I have been getting them from mcmastercarr for a few years now, anything non structural gets them ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on February 02, 2021, 01:24:55 am
I remember discussion once about if you could get a Berg5 down to the weight of a 4 speed. Anyway when 'Dangerous' Dave Butler built my gear box I asked him to see what weight he could get out of it. My old box was fairly basic with a super diff, where the new one is all Weddle, plus a Quaife which is heavy. Any way Dave spent a day or more drilling and at the lathe.
first the Quaife

[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]

a fair bit of gear drilling

[attachment=3]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on February 02, 2021, 01:37:47 am
modify the ring gear

[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]

The mainshaft also got a thrust bearing (no weight saving)

[attachment=3]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on February 02, 2021, 01:41:12 am
The end result......  the 5 speed was 5.7 kg heavier than the 4 speed, but I think it was a great result considering the amount of new metal that goes into a 5 speed, not to mention the Quaife.

[attachment=1]

[attachment=2]

I finished up rifle drilling the clutch shaft and a few holes in the arm.

[attachment=3]

I hope to fit it in the next few weeks.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MeXX on March 15, 2021, 20:44:11 pm
Steering wheel with SFI approved quick change hub....
549,6g
[attachment=1]

[attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MeXX on March 21, 2021, 18:01:44 pm


[attachment=1]


[attachment=2]


[attachment=3]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MeXX on March 22, 2021, 11:27:52 am

[attachment=1]


[attachment=2]


[attachment=3]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 29, 2021, 18:09:35 pm
I needed some radio blanking plates and rather than just use "heavy stock metal" ones I decided to make some in carbon ;D 1st one out weighed 13grams [stock is 91g] and fits just like stock 8) have made a few more now & have a couple of extras to sell maybe if there is interest


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on April 02, 2021, 21:31:10 pm
Had to make a glovebox lid as well, made it double skinned and bonded together so it works like the stocker 8) amazing to see that the stock version is over 0.5kg!!! :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MeXX on April 08, 2021, 19:58:37 pm
[attachment=1]

[attachment=2]

[attachment=3]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on April 08, 2021, 20:19:24 pm

[attachment=1]

[attachment=2]

[attachment=3]

What's the before and after Mexx??


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MeXX on April 08, 2021, 20:25:52 pm

What's the before and after Mexx??

238g vs 127g per side... So -218g...😜


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on April 16, 2021, 10:26:09 am
I finished my new axles for 944 alloy trailing arms.
I got some Vanagon axles gun drilled, and bought lightweight T2 race prep cv's from GKN. I'm also using Stage 8 cv bolts.
I was hoping to get the finished set up lighter than the old T1 axles but I missed by 46 grams  >:(
[attachment=1][attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on April 18, 2021, 11:32:26 am
I finished my new axles for 944 alloy trailing arms.
I got some Vanagon axles gun drilled, and bought lightweight T2 race prep cv's from GKN. I'm also using Stage 8 cv bolts.
I was hoping to get the finished set up lighter than the old T1 axles but I missed by 46 grams  >:(
[attachment=1][attachment=2]



Good effort getting so close 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ALB on May 16, 2021, 15:39:39 pm
I finished my new axles for 944 alloy trailing arms.
I got some Vanagon axles gun drilled, and bought lightweight T2 race prep cv's from GKN. I'm also using Stage 8 cv bolts.
I was hoping to get the finished set up lighter than the old T1 axles but I missed by 46 grams  >:(

Great project!  What diameter are the Vanagon axles?  Weight before drilling?  How big was the drilled hole and weight after drilling?
Thanks in advance for answering my questions.  Al


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on May 17, 2021, 03:11:10 am
Alb, thanks for your interest.
the axles are 27mm, much bigger than T1.
There are formulae for working out the strength lost with drilling, it is approximately 10% for a hole 1/2 the diameter. So the axles are way stronger to start with, and very little strength is lost with the drilling. So I had them drilled with a 13mm drill. I also had them shotpeened to make them less likely to crack and the gun drilling has a very fine finish like reaming/polishing so the inner surface is really good too, no stress risers. You can see the gloss on the finish in the last photo
[attachment=1]
[attachment=2]
[attachment=3]

you can see the weight loss on the scales, over 1/2 kilo per axle


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on June 02, 2021, 03:23:36 am
I opened the tunnel and got rid of old fuel line, heater control tubes and the jack points.... nearly 2 Kg  :D

[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MeXX on June 02, 2021, 04:49:30 am
Shifting rod....

Thin wall CrMo 332.3g
[attachment=1]

Vs Carbon 87.7g
[attachment=2]

[attachment=3]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on June 02, 2021, 09:18:48 am
I am very envious, that is very light.
I see a carbon gear shift rod in my future


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: MeXX on June 02, 2021, 10:15:00 am
I am very envious, that is very light.
I see a carbon gear shift rod in my future

yep... it is all about weight transfer.....
(to transfer weight out of the car)

MeXX


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: dangerous on June 02, 2021, 12:21:07 pm
You know what is funny Martin?
My Engine push rods were 350g ea.
 :D :D :D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ALB on June 23, 2021, 14:48:34 pm
Alb, thanks for your interest.
the axles are 27mm, much bigger than T1.
There are formulae for working out the strength lost with drilling, it is approximately 10% for a hole 1/2 the diameter. So the axles are way stronger to start with, and very little strength is lost with the drilling. So I had them drilled with a 13mm drill. I also had them shotpeened to make them less likely to crack and the gun drilling has a very fine finish like reaming/polishing so the inner surface is really good too, no stress risers. You can see the gloss on the finish in the last photo
you can see the weight loss on the scales, over 1/2 kilo per axle

Thanks for posting that.  That kind of weight drop per axle is fantastic! Al


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on October 10, 2021, 16:11:25 pm
got some fender bolts made in titanium, could make them even lighter, but i wanted to keep the stock dimensions

(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224183.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224182.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224181.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224180.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224178.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224177.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224176.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224175.jpg)
(https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2224174.jpg)

40 bolts and washers - less 280g only


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: samotorsport on October 10, 2021, 20:53:47 pm
Some weight reduction on S:t Moritz


(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211010/24bc350307408703c2af5836830128a3.jpg)

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211010/e62b8b5c1949001f22a31cf08214f860.jpg)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on October 11, 2021, 06:49:18 am
oh I do like a bit of drilling   ;D  I hope you were able to do it on the pedestal and weld in later.
and those Ti fasteners add up nicely for very little effort, just apply dollars!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on October 15, 2021, 06:00:38 am
A tale of 2 starters
…..well 4 starters actually.
When I first built my engine I used a standard SR15 starter which is rated at .6 ish kw. But it was unhappy turning over my engine with 9.4 compression, it cranked slow and was pretty heavy (5.3kg)

[attachment=1]

So then I got a SR17 stickshift starter in the .7 - .9 kw range and it did well but what a porka, 5.8 kg

[attachment=2]

Once I went on my weight loss kick I found the new Brazilian starter 6004AA0021 had the same .9 kw but a whole lot less weight (2.8kg), and cheap too.

[attachment=3]

So engine rebuild and 11:1 compression calls for a bit more grunt so the options I could find were:
Wosp 1kw, 1.4kw and 2 kw starting at about 4kg
IMI 1kw, 1.4kw and 2 kw starting at about 3.6kg
And the winner….
Brise 2kw and 2.7kg with a very neat axial gear design

[attachment=4]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on October 15, 2021, 14:09:40 pm
A tale of 2 starters
…..well 4 starters actually.
When I first built my engine I used a standard SR15 starter which is rated at .6 ish kw. But it was unhappy turning over my engine with 9.4 compression, it cranked slow and was pretty heavy (5.3kg)

[attachment=1]

So then I got a SR17 stickshift starter in the .7 - .9 kw range and it did well but what a porka, 5.8 kg

[attachment=2]

Once I went on my weight loss kick I found the new Brazilian starter 6004AA0021 had the same .9 kw but a whole lot less weight (2.8kg), and cheap too.

[attachment=3]

So engine rebuild and 11:1 compression calls for a bit more grunt so the options I could find were:
Wosp 1kw, 1.4kw and 2 kw starting at about 4kg
IMI 1kw, 1.4kw and 2 kw starting at about 3.6kg
And the winner….
Brise 2kw and 2.7kg with a very neat axial gear design

[attachment=4]


nice. where can I buy the Brise starter? 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on October 15, 2021, 21:27:18 pm
I got mine from Brise direct, I sent an email through their web site and Tim Brise sent me an engineering drawing to check if it would fit
https://brise.co.uk/?v=6cc98ba2045f




Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: pupjoint on October 15, 2021, 21:54:40 pm
I got mine from Brise direct, I sent an email through their web site and Tim Brise sent me an engineering drawing to check if it would fit
https://brise.co.uk/?v=6cc98ba2045f




thanks. looks like they make great stuffs. wish they can also make a proper high amp alternator for the type 1


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on January 30, 2022, 15:05:30 pm
After the fire when rebuilding the Old cabrio i used a steel decklid as thats all i had, now with all this lightweight stuff i decided it needed something to, this is for it straight out mould :o 8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: brewsy on January 30, 2022, 21:52:03 pm
After the fire when rebuilding the Old cabrio i used a steel decklid as thats all i had, now with all this lightweight stuff i decided it needed something to, this is for it straight out mould :o 8)

Still havent even unpacked mine Richie!!  ??? ::)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 10, 2022, 08:40:26 am
I think the pictures are self-explanatory.

- Remmele CF doors 4,25 kg
 
[attachment=1][attachment=2][attachment=3]




Fredrich, what do the remmele doors look like on inside?, all cut out or have factory style pressing? I am making doors now, yes cabrio doors are a little less material but 1st one is done and weighs 1.870kg :o ;D I have done it with the factory cabrio pressings on inside and added pieces where holes were so it is much stronger and I can make them thinner, plan is to do some big window [67 on] saloon doors as well 

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: leec on February 10, 2022, 11:10:11 am
That door looks amazing  :)

Not knowing a lot about this at all, I assume they are two pieces bonded together?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on February 10, 2022, 13:42:04 pm

[
Fredrich, what do the remmele doors look like on inside?, all cut out or have factory style pressing?
cheers Richie
[/quote]

Flat on the inside. Very nice fit but no enforcement or ribbing.

[attachment=2]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 10, 2022, 18:55:58 pm

[
Fredrich, what do the remmele doors look like on inside?, all cut out or have factory style pressing?
cheers Richie

Flat on the inside. Very nice fit but no enforcement or ribbing.

[attachment=2]
[/quote]

Thanks, i did contemplate doing it like that, wold have been much simpler but am sure it would need to be thicker to have similar strength :)

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 10, 2022, 18:56:58 pm
That door looks amazing  :)

Not knowing a lot about this at all, I assume they are two pieces bonded together?


Yep just like a stock door, 2 pieces joined together :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: leec on February 10, 2022, 20:17:16 pm
Very impressive.
Are they going on the pan cab or the chassis cab?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 13, 2022, 09:43:05 am
Very impressive.
Are they going on the pan cab or the chassis cab?

Chassis car, I haven't even seen the other car for 2 years nearly!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 27, 2022, 12:53:31 pm
Both sides are now done, decided to fabricate my own hinges as the stock VW hinges are really heavy, with everything I removed  weight saving is 31lbs per side[just over 14kg] so total of over 60lbs is huge  :o  I will add some lead right at front of car now to help the front to rear weight balance and car will be lighter as well ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on March 09, 2022, 15:06:38 pm
[attachment=1]

How about this weight saving?
The company I work for (Composite Design Sverige AB) has been on the journey with Koenigsegg since the first prototype.
So a lot of inventions started here. Like the CF rims. Since some years they do them inhouse. But we did several hundred.
This one is built for Micke Svens Spezialmotorer.
He does retro axial driven horisontal cooling for Porsche racing engines. We deliver in CF and regular epoxi fibreglass.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on March 09, 2022, 15:13:42 pm
[attachment=1]

This is what was manufactured by us and used in the world record holding 407 km/h Koenigsegg run in USA.
Niklas Lilja, the driver not only likes the rims but says that with that huge reduction in large diameter rotational weight, the car behaves significantly different in many ways, handling, braking and acceleration. All improved so much he can simply feel it.
Not for us VW freaks (yet) but very cool!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on March 09, 2022, 15:16:56 pm
[attachment=1]

Last one and what I expect to see soon on our cars.
The Koenigsegg valve covers. This is not so difficult to do for our engines.
Who will be first?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Frallan on March 09, 2022, 16:42:48 pm
[attachment=1]

Ha ha ha!  ;D
I had a visitor at work and when I saw these in the conference room, I could not hold myself.
How about this 2 kg weight saving?
Engine rotational mass! Not just on the car.

No, stop before you get lost in dreams, the design and purpose is for OEM engines, that are usually not opened/serviced.
They are glued in place with a special tool.  Yeahh and a special glue.
Well, in fact there is a tool to take them apart too.
No engine has run with them yet, but I can say that the theoretical numbers for fuel savings, makes them very interesting and gives a payback.
Not for aircooled VW engines and not for racing, as designed today.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 09, 2022, 18:54:34 pm
[attachment=1]

Last one and what I expect to see soon on our cars.
The Koenigsegg valve covers. This is not so difficult to do for our engines.
Who will be first?

Some very nice parts Frallan 8)  Like the fan & ring a lot ;D 

I made valve covers for my engine already but have not used them as was concerned about the heat aspect causing it to leak

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Eddie DVK on March 10, 2022, 07:33:52 am
Whooooooooooooooo  :o
Frallan, that is impressive, damn cool.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: mikko k on March 10, 2022, 09:57:32 am
Very very nice parts! 👍 But not for poor racers.. 😥


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: andrewlandon67 on March 30, 2022, 18:55:56 pm
So I was chatting with some buddies last night and I came up with an idea for a rear-seat delete made out of canvas and a couple of strengthening ribs. My idea is to have it anchored at the points where the rear seat crossbar is bolted down, then have it stretch up and hook into the little metal extrusion for the rear parcel tray carpet, with one rib running across the middle, right where it meets the rear wheel wells, and one running across the front, between the anchors, to keep it from pulling too far back. It's obviously still adding weight over just taking everything out alltogether, and it's not quite as practical as a big storage box, but I think it's a neat concept that could be done cheaply and still look good enough for a street car, while providing the necessary "cover" over the battery. I'll try drawing it up later this week and upload pics here.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: karmi on March 31, 2022, 01:19:09 am
 ;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: karmi on March 31, 2022, 01:27:00 am
[attachment=1]
;)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: karmi on November 24, 2022, 21:26:02 pm


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: karmi on November 24, 2022, 21:33:31 pm


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on January 10, 2023, 21:18:58 pm
Nearly a year ago I said i was going to make some big window beetle carbon doors, finally got round to it now, and small window doors will be available to in next week or so, all the moulds for both early and late are ready to go. this is 1st late outer out of mould today ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on January 11, 2023, 11:03:36 am
Great work Richie!

Just wish I could afford to get some 914 doors done in CF! The weight saving would be even more impressive as the later 914 doors have side-impact bars incorporated, access to which is hard without chopping up the doors.

[attachment=1]


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on January 12, 2023, 19:01:49 pm
Great work Richie!

Just wish I could afford to get some 914 doors done in CF! The weight saving would be even more impressive as the later 914 doors have side-impact bars incorporated, access to which is hard without chopping up the doors.

[attachment=1]

Thanks :)  am surprised no one makes lightweight doors for them already then with that being the case


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Fastbrit on January 12, 2023, 23:26:58 pm
You can buy glassfibre doors (in theory - delivery is sketchy to say the least) but they're £1500 a pair plus carriage and the rest from Germany...


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on January 14, 2023, 17:14:29 pm
You can buy glassfibre doors (in theory - delivery is sketchy to say the least) but they're £1500 a pair plus carriage and the rest from Germany...

that seems way to much for glassfibre, can't see anything special about the doors that would make them time consuming to make to justify that cost :o Wish I could get that much for glassfibre cabrio doors!!!


Anyway back to the carbon stuff, other late outer is done  :)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 06, 2023, 19:34:52 pm
Am sure the cheapo plastic headlight rings are light but made these to replace some aftermarket steel ones, decent saving  8) 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 08, 2023, 22:10:11 pm
 :D ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on February 10, 2023, 03:37:15 am
What  very nicely made 'bit' is that?   


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: mikko k on February 10, 2023, 04:28:22 am
What  very nicely made 'bit' is that?   

Cover for turning signal at front wing.


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on February 10, 2023, 08:27:34 am
What  very nicely made 'bit' is that?   



What  very nicely made 'bit' is that?   

Cover for turning signal at front wing.

Yep, was given some moulds and moulds for these were in box so had to make some ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on April 28, 2023, 17:53:49 pm
One negative to the carbon decklids was using the stock steel hinges, they are nearly 1/3rd of the weight of a decklid which is crazy :o  I have started looking at 3d printing as an option for making small parts moulds and this lead into trying to make some hinges, got one half of one made just to see weight[ I didn't make this myself, someone I know made it for me] and it is certainly light so now to make 2 complete hinges and see how they work  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 06, 2023, 07:11:47 am
I got some 3d printed hinges finished and on a couple of cars now testing durability, when I went to fit up a carbon door i started thinking about how much all the bolt on stuff weighs, most of it doesn't need to be that heavy as it will never see the millions of day use VW allowed for in the original design. I did some research on "forged carbon" parts and made my 1st mould, this is result ;D A decent weight saving but it can be so much thinner than the original in the handle part as its solid compared to stock being hollow. 
Working on some other moulds now that this worked 8)

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 08, 2023, 07:42:16 am
1st part of the door hinges, 55g compared to 209g for the factory part  ;D


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 16, 2023, 07:41:50 am
 ;D  yes that is a carbon shifter handle[about half the weight] and alternator pulley [1/3rd the weight]  :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 23, 2023, 12:17:41 pm
 :)  Doors fitted to car with new hinges and handles, all works good


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 29, 2023, 17:33:52 pm
More stupidity  ;D  Fuel tank clamps in carbon, steel 24g, carbon just over 7g each, 4 is 29g!!!


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: ibg on July 30, 2023, 03:48:38 am
you just need to sell them with titanium or aluminium bolts, though aluminium might be a bit weak in a crash situation  :o


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on July 30, 2023, 17:06:43 pm
you just need to sell them with titanium or aluminium bolts, though aluminium might be a bit weak in a crash situation  :o

I will try not to crash then ;D   Did fit a pulley today to one of my cars and seems to work ok, will give it some milage and high rpm tests now and see if it falls apart :o :D


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxwOAIo1W0w


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on December 25, 2023, 11:17:44 am
 ;D 


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Nico86 on March 23, 2024, 01:10:12 am
Still the best thread on the entire internet  8)


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: BFB on March 24, 2024, 15:41:14 pm
Those valve covers are definitely cool, id bet you could sell those especially if you made a set thatd clear ratio / high lift rockers.
Only argument i might see against them would be heat transfer. How much heat is normally dissipated thought an aluminum cover though?


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 26, 2024, 09:03:56 am
Those valve covers are definitely cool, id bet you could sell those especially if you made a set thatd clear ratio / high lift rockers.
Only argument i might see against them would be heat transfer. How much heat is normally dissipated thought an aluminum cover though?


How much lift clearance do you need? these clear 650thou lift already, probably more but not built anything for a while with vw style covers that lifts more than that :) and I don't run aluminium covers anyway ;)

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: PPRMicke on March 26, 2024, 09:35:52 am
Can't figure out how to lighten a Vw front
You can put lead in the front if you have to drive fast
Because having the front wheels 1m up in the air does not give good times
/// M


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: richie on March 26, 2024, 19:48:16 pm
Can't figure out how to lighten a Vw front
You can put lead in the front if you have to drive fast
Because having the front wheels 1m up in the air does not give good times
/// M


While i mostly agree, if we do more work on the front end aero to try create more downforce then we can safely run a lighter car  8)

cheers Richie


Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: mymedusa on April 02, 2024, 10:13:24 am
Bugwelder in Germany has 2 new Alternativ(Drehstrom!), old Style 90mm and 105mm
45Ah 12v

90mm =   2,5kg
105mm = 3,1kg



Title: Re: The weight saving thread
Post by: Catbox on April 23, 2024, 21:23:48 pm
This thread has always been fun to read to see the innovations that come out.

Those carbon parts are awesome Richie.