The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 22, 2024, 00:02:01 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351065 Posts in 28638 Topics by 6845 Members
Latest Member: DonA
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  The Cal-look classifieds
| |-+  For sale!
| | |-+  NEW CB 2289 cam
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: NEW CB 2289 cam  (Read 4115 times)
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« on: September 05, 2010, 13:36:13 pm »

in the box,
115 euro
Logged
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2010, 11:24:07 am »

exchange for an FK8 anyone?
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2010, 11:41:39 am »

Keep it, you will be very happy with it.
Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2010, 18:24:53 pm »

beetlebug,
bought this recently
unless they can work together Smiley
Logged
volkskris
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 456



« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2010, 19:27:29 pm »

beetlebug,
bought this recently
unless they can work together Smiley
niiccee Grin your car will be even more nuts to drive Shocked Cheesy
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2010, 19:44:02 pm »

They can work together perfectly well. A poor NA engine will be a poor turbo engine. I`m using a aggresive NA cam in my own turbo engine, works excellent.
Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Baked Beetle
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 54


« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2010, 21:04:14 pm »

I'm running one in my 1914 at 15psi.

The cheater cam is great imo.
Logged
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2010, 23:28:42 pm »

mmm...
I was thinking something like an fk 8 to keep the rpms down because i have a quite heavy valvetrain.. Huh
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2010, 06:37:32 am »

mmm...
I was thinking something like an fk 8 to keep the rpms down because i have a quite heavy valvetrain.. Huh


What rockers? The 2289 is easier on the valve train.
Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2010, 07:54:55 am »

CB 1.4s

44 mm inlet valves, heavy udo lifters, cb 650 springs.
I m a bit worried about floating the valves ??
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2010, 09:21:17 am »

Peter,

The goal is to have as little spring pressure as possible without floating the valves. You will free HP and generate less heat with less spring pressure.  K800`s and such are a primitive, stone age approach (but it works).

BB

CB 1.4s

44 mm inlet valves, heavy udo lifters, cb 650 springs.
I m a bit worried about floating the valves ??

Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2010, 09:54:25 am »

Hey Beetlebug,
Sorry, but i dont know exactly what you want to say..
Do you mean my setup would be OK or not,
or do you mean that i have to lighten my valvetrain and use lighter springs.
What cam/heads are you using?

Thanks for the advice!
Peter
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #12 on: September 10, 2010, 09:57:47 am »

Hey Beetlebug,
Sorry, but i dont know exactly what you want to say..
Do you mean my setup would be OK or not,
or do you mean that i have to lighten my valvetrain and use lighter springs.
What cam/heads are you using?

Thanks for the advice!
Peter

PM
Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!