The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 05, 2024, 05:42:25 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350879 Posts in 28608 Topics by 6828 Members
Latest Member: GSW Racing
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  In Da Werks
| | |-+  1:3 Pauter rockers Geometry
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 1:3 Pauter rockers Geometry  (Read 4736 times)
Paulus
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 93



« on: April 21, 2011, 20:37:04 pm »

Hello,

I'm busy with setting rockergeometry on my 2017 engine but i just dint get it!
If read many topics for setting the geometry but i cant find how to get the pushrods lined up straight with the adjusting screw.

The problem is that if i want to get them lined up i have to shortening the pushrod and screw the adjusting screw out. But if i want them to get straight @ half valve lift the adjusting screw gets to far out of the rocker.
I first set the rollertip contact to the valve as it should be and after that i cant adjust the shims under the rockerblock anymore, so i cant use the shims to get the pushrod length right.

Do i need lash caps if i use pauter rockers? maybe they can get it right?

I hope someone knows how i can get the rockergeometry how it should be.....

Paul
Logged

Less is More !
Taylor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 577



« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2011, 20:32:24 pm »

Sounds like to pushrod is too short. Do you have an adjustable one?
Logged
Paulus
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 93



« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2011, 16:56:59 pm »

Indeed....it sounds like the pushrod is to short. But! If i make it longer the angle between the rod and adjusting screw just gets bigger at halve lift.
What is more important: the angle between rod and adjuster or the path that Te rollerrocker makes on the valvestem?
Logged

Less is More !
Harry/FDK
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3613


Every Rule Was Made To Break, Even Callook...


« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2011, 17:15:27 pm »

Hi Paul, first you NEED an adjustable p/rod. Second, from what i read about Peter's comment on my topic, is to get the adjusterscrew in line at half valve lift with the pushrod. Third, start shimming then measure...
Logged

Done ? Not Yet.
Paulus
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 93



« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2011, 17:41:31 pm »

Hi harry,

Im gonna make me a stronger adjustable pushrod tommorow. But the fact is that pauter says, first shim te rockerblocks so the rockers roll correctly over the valvestems. And second maessure the pushrod lenght. So i cant change anything with shimming the rocker blocks.....
Logged

Less is More !
Type1/DVK
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 315



« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2011, 19:26:08 pm »

here a picture @ half lift:



We measured them and at the looks of it they were near perfect. There are his old pushrods and with the pauters it came out nicely. Could be a bit better tough.

Rockerblocks are shimmed, and rollers are nice on the stems. To me by the looks of it they should be a few mm shorter, but then the adjusterscrew get to deep (2-3windings inside the screw) any longer pushrod will get the alignemt further out.. what now?

To me the rockerblock needs a flat extra shim but i don't know now what that will do to the roller/stem issue.
Logged

DDD#8 - 14.74sec @ 1776cc - Member of:  DVK ~ Der Vollgas Kreuzers  - www.ultimatevw.nl - and racing engines
Harry/FDK
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3613


Every Rule Was Made To Break, Even Callook...


« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2011, 20:41:43 pm »

Hi harry,

Im gonna make me a stronger adjustable pushrod tommorow. But the fact is that pauter says, first shim te rockerblocks so the rockers roll correctly over the valvestems. And second maessure the pushrod lenght. So i cant change anything with shimming the rocker blocks.....

That's when the dial gauge come's in, so you can excactly: 1, find half lift at the cam, 2, find the best combo of shims, to avoid  coilbind. Just my 2 cents.

Harry
« Last Edit: April 26, 2011, 11:51:45 am by Harry » Logged

Done ? Not Yet.
tikimadness
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 966



« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2011, 21:15:36 pm »

I used lashcaps on my type 4 cause that's what the instructions said Wink

Michael
Logged

member of team YAC ; the guys who write history.

GASSER GARAGE  a few friends creating history.

NIDGAFWYT
TexasTom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1518


12.58@106, 7.89@89 Texas Motorplex 10/18/09


« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2011, 23:27:36 pm »

Have you read and followed these instructions?

http://www.pauter.com/RockerInst.htm

Hope this helps,
TxT
Logged

Work, work, WORK!

Modesty accepted here ...
Type1/DVK
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 315



« Reply #9 on: April 26, 2011, 23:59:49 pm »

Quote
With rocker assembly secured to the head without pushrods and at zero lift (valve closed) the rocker/roller tip should contact the tip of the valve or lash cap at approximately 1-1.5mm (.040-.060") BELOW center. If it is below center more than this amount, you must shim the rockers out from the head until it meets this dimension. If it is at center or above center at zero lift, something must be done to increase the valve tip length (add lash caps) or machine the head surface pads where the rockers are held down. NOTE, this is very unusual and can only be the case if valves or seats are of non-standard configuration causing shorter than stock valve tip-to-rocker pad relationship or if you have aftermarket heads, the pads may be higher than stock or the studs are in other than stock location in relation to guide centerline. In either case, correcting this problem requires re-machining the pad, relocating the stud or the use of other than our rocker assembly. To continue, ideally roller tip should contact valve tip at .040-.060" below center at 0 lift and .040-.060" above center at full lift. (See drawing & photos, at bottom.)

Yes, these were in the manual and we took this in our measurements. Rollertip is nice out of center (below center) from what i know, no lashcaps were needed then? Remachining is not the case all stock setup. Could he need a thicker shim on the surface pads?  Think we have to await the adj.pushrod then Wink
Logged

DDD#8 - 14.74sec @ 1776cc - Member of:  DVK ~ Der Vollgas Kreuzers  - www.ultimatevw.nl - and racing engines
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!