The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 29, 2024, 15:36:36 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351083 Posts in 28639 Topics by 6845 Members
Latest Member: DonA
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  Valve Springs?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Valve Springs?  (Read 5934 times)
andy198712
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1063



« on: June 28, 2012, 13:20:19 pm »

What would you all use and what installed height ect for this engine.

2180, daily driven ish. in the UK

CB044  40x35 valves

engle FK8 cam

bugpack forged 1.4's


i'm guessing dual springs but which ones? or the honey comb ones?

All the best

Andy
Logged
andy198712
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1063



« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2012, 13:21:06 pm »

forgot to add, i wont be racing it. wont see more then 6-6.5k ever and even that rarely (he says)
Logged
TexasTom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1518


12.58@106, 7.89@89 Texas Motorplex 10/18/09


« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2012, 14:13:40 pm »

Is the valve stem height not already set?
What are the rest of the valvetrain components ... lifters, pushrods, retainers, etc.? It all adds up! LOL

TxT
Logged

Work, work, WORK!

Modesty accepted here ...
henk
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 654


« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2012, 19:46:36 pm »

i have a set springs for sale.
i never used them they where in the heads that i bought but had to change them with cb vw650

henk!!!
Logged
andy198712
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1063



« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2012, 20:00:27 pm »

Is the valve stem height not already set?
What are the rest of the valvetrain components ... lifters, pushrods, retainers, etc.? It all adds up! LOL

TxT
I thought spring height was when you shim the springs? I may be way off lol
Cb Bigfoot lifters, yet to buy pushrods but will be hd Alu, and the retainers are the cb ones, chromoly I think they are, again cb single groove collets,
Hoover mods and will probably drill a small hole in the pushrods to act as oil squirters.

Dry sump, crank Fired ignition, EFI.......

Hope that helps Smiley
Logged
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5675



« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2012, 21:45:13 pm »

The cam seems a little big for that rpm,with it I would be shifting about 6800/7000rpm,you may need to machine the valve guide and boss down a little but will only know that when you roll it over to find lift at the valve,unless you go with some exotic spring combo then a vw dual will work,the CB VW650 seems to be working well,and they seem to last better than alot of cheaper VW duals,and if you are going the lighter route with ally pushrods then spend a little more on the retainers and get the Ti version.
I will keep my opinion on 92s and bigfoot lifters to myself though Shocked

cheers richie
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
andy198712
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1063



« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2012, 22:46:48 pm »

The cam seems a little big for that rpm,with it I would be shifting about 6800/7000rpm,you may need to machine the valve guide and boss down a little but will only know that when you roll it over to find lift at the valve,unless you go with some exotic spring combo then a vw dual will work,the CB VW650 seems to be working well,and they seem to last better than alot of cheaper VW duals,and if you are going the lighter route with ally pushrods then spend a little more on the retainers and get the Ti version.
I will keep my opinion on 92s and bigfoot lifters to myself though Shocked

cheers richie

Thanks richie,
If budget allows near the end of the build I may switch to tool steel lifters, I just got the big foots cheap tbh. And the only down side seems to be a little extra weight that will be voided by the Alu push rods.
I want to use Alu purely for the reduced noise, not so much for weight saving.

Do you think it's worth getting Ti parts on a daily?

I already have the dual springs that came on the cb heads, they have 1000 miles on them and when I live them up they are different heights..... So I'm guessing there junk?

With the rpm range. I guess I always like to have a little extra to call on now and again when the mood takes me, much like the power delivery on my ZX9R nice power and great for riding, and always has that massive reserve of power should I be in the mood Grin

I'll get a picture of my current springs and you can see what I mean.

Thanks

Andy Smiley
Logged
TexasTom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1518


12.58@106, 7.89@89 Texas Motorplex 10/18/09


« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2012, 00:45:34 am »

If the valves aren't lining up in their heights ... That's a problem! Something wrong with the valve job or a seat (big surprise!).

ANYTHING you can affors to use that will lighten the valvetrain without sacrificing reliability is a good thing.

TxT
Logged

Work, work, WORK!

Modesty accepted here ...
Neil Davies
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3437



« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2012, 09:19:18 am »

I will keep my opinion on 92s and bigfoot lifters to myself though Shocked

cheers richie

I wondered about the 92's myself! Andy, why the 92mm pistons? If you've had no machining work yet then you may as well go for 94's, but if the work has been done then put in 90.5's - they're the same size holes in the case and head IIRC. That'll give you 2110cc, but the thicker wall barrels will be better for a regularly driven street car. 2110 might be better suited for the valve sizes too, although rpm will really be the limiting factor.
Logged

2007cc, 48IDFs, street car. 14.45@93 on pump fuel, treads, muffler and fanbelt. October 2017!
andy198712
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1063



« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2012, 11:24:50 am »

If the valves aren't lining up in their heights ... That's a problem! Something wrong with the valve job or a seat (big surprise!).

ANYTHING you can affors to use that will lighten the valvetrain without sacrificing reliability is a good thing.

TxT

Duely noted about the weight saving, am I right in thinking it will raise the rev limit before valve float ?

I wasn't very clear, when the springs are removed from the head, lined up on the table, I can see they are slightly different heights.  If that makes sense?

Thanks Smiley
Logged
andy198712
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1063



« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2012, 11:30:10 am »

I will keep my opinion on 92s and bigfoot lifters to myself though Shocked

cheers richie

I wondered about the 92's myself! Andy, why the 92mm pistons? If you've had no machining work yet then you may as well go for 94's, but if the work has been done then put in 90.5's - they're the same size holes in the case and head IIRC. That'll give you 2110cc, but the thicker wall barrels will be better for a regularly driven street car. 2110 might be better suited for the valve sizes too, although rpm will really be the limiting factor.


Hello,
The heads and cases are 90.5 so wanted to stay at that.
I do actually have some used 90.5's but I really need to check them out, missing the odd fin too.
I gt the Mahles 92's new cheap, and thought the forged 92's would e better then the 90.5 which I'm guessing are cast? (any way to check?)

How long would the 92's last do you think?

I know they used to be the hot setup but.....

Can you explain the RPM bit? I guessed I'd rev it to those numbers just as I guessed that where it would sign off and for engine longevity ?

I'm totally open to opinions and ideas, I'm very much on a learning curve Smiley

Thank you very much for the input, it's very helpful!!
Logged
andy198712
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1063



« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2012, 22:38:32 pm »

well, i think i'm going to sell my 92's  in favour of the 90.5s....
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!