The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2024, 02:19:14 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351211 Posts in 28657 Topics by 6854 Members
Latest Member: 74meanmachine
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  Two supposedly same cams
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Two supposedly same cams  (Read 3284 times)
Chris bugster
Full Member
***
Posts: 189


« on: October 14, 2012, 14:04:34 pm »

We ran two Scat cams in the same engine- C85 and though they are supposed to have 287 degrees of duration at 50 thou checking, the first one came out at 280 and the second one at 292. I won't even go into the difference in lift- the smaller duration one had more lift. Anyway, I mainly use Scat cams and was wondering if everyone makes cams of such vastly different specs even though they are supposedly the same or if it's just Scat.
Logged

11.2@124mph
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2012, 14:23:01 pm »

Maybe wrong markings? Do the specs match another scat cam?
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Chris bugster
Full Member
***
Posts: 189


« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2012, 14:47:34 pm »

Well, the second one was close to a C75 (FK 98) on duration, but down on lift. I have a C75, but never checked what it ACTUALLY has and so am going by what the card reads.
Logged

11.2@124mph
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2012, 19:20:11 pm »

Well, the second one was close to a C75 (FK 98) on duration, but down on lift. I have a C75, but never checked what it ACTUALLY has and so am going by what the card reads.

Chris

is this lift at the cam? how old are the cams you are measuring?


cheers richie
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
dangerous
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 270


« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2012, 22:28:16 pm »

292 @ .050" at the cam is what I have dialled in the C85 as. I like the profile but it is a big sucker.
Perhaps the other one is a mis-marked C89.
Logged
fish
Full Member
***
Posts: 224



« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2012, 01:33:37 am »

280@.050 with higher lift sounds like C89 to me also
Logged

Had a fight with a Magneto, it won!
Chris bugster
Full Member
***
Posts: 189


« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2012, 07:35:34 am »

Sounds like that's the answer then, one is just badly stamped. Thanks Gents.
Logged

11.2@124mph
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!