The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 08, 2024, 09:08:44 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350895 Posts in 28608 Topics by 6828 Members
Latest Member: GSW Racing
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  Rear Wheel Alignment on swing axle bugs
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rear Wheel Alignment on swing axle bugs  (Read 5512 times)
Martin S.
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 990



« on: August 06, 2014, 21:38:03 pm »

Talking to local wheel/suspension guru here in So. Ontario, Lanner told me the reason my lowered 68 doesn't go as straight as a stocker was that I needed to add toe out to the rear end. He said to push the axles back all the way in the slots and to grind them even longer if it's a really lowered car. I remember reading in the Berg bible the same thing but Gene didn't explain exactly how to do it, or how to measure it.
So I tied a string all the way around the car over the tires below the centerline and saw that the right rear had a tiny bit of toe in. I did what Lanner said and got 2 or 3 mm's movement to the rear on both sides. Driving it last night the steering felt lighter and car seemed to go a LOT straighter. Anybody else out there experiment with this? I can't figure out how to measure toe out at the rear, as the string only shows toe in - maybe a straight edge?
Logged

Cal Look white 68 Bug with AJ Sims EFI Turbo 2332. 194hp 240tq @ 5500 rpm 3psi boost.
brian e
Full Member
***
Posts: 141


« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2014, 23:37:27 pm »

I just had a 4 wheel alignment done on my lowered baywindow.  It is IRS, but toe-in is toe-in.  I also noticed a huge difference in driving.  Even at 45mph the bus now goes straight as an arrow, and the rear stopped wandering.  Before at 65mph on the highway I had my hands full keeping it from wandering into the next lane.  Now I can take my hands off the wheel.  I was amazed.  Best $100 I have spent on the bus.   

I have done this a few times to check the rear toe.  Take 2 broom sticks, same length, and bungy cord one too each wheel.  Middle of the sticks right at the middle of the wheel front to back.  You might have to do it on the lower part of the tire so the stick is under your running board.  Make them parallel to the ground, then measure between the sticks in front of the tire (tape measure under the car) and the back of the sticks (tape measure under the rear bumper).  Get them as close as you can, and you will be good to go.  All the measurements have to be done at ride height. 

Brian
Logged
Martin S.
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 990



« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2014, 23:44:13 pm »

Hmmm, I have a 71 Bus with the wanderlust problem and I think it needs toe out too. Do you know what spec yours ended up at? I had mine checked years ago at a VW dealer and they said it was ok but I think it needs a different setting than the manual says. According to Berg the SA and IRS are totally different because the SA changes toe with the arc of the suspension travel and IRS does not have that problem. He wrote a page on SA and then at the end of that said that with IRS just use a toe in tool and set it. I don't have the book in front of me, but many people have it, it's this one... http://www.amazon.com/GB-801-Book-Technical-Articles/dp/B000JM8N6M/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1407364861&sr=1-4
Logged

Cal Look white 68 Bug with AJ Sims EFI Turbo 2332. 194hp 240tq @ 5500 rpm 3psi boost.
Sepi
Full Member
***
Posts: 102


« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2014, 21:24:41 pm »

Talking to local wheel/suspension guru here in So. Ontario, Lanner told me the reason my lowered 68 doesn't go as straight as a stocker was that I needed to add toe out to the rear end. He said to push the axles back all the way in the slots and to grind them even longer if it's a really lowered car. I remember reading in the Berg bible the same thing but Gene didn't explain exactly how to do it, or how to measure it.
So I tied a string all the way around the car over the tires below the centerline and saw that the right rear had a tiny bit of toe in. I did what Lanner said and got 2 or 3 mm's movement to the rear on both sides. Driving it last night the steering felt lighter and car seemed to go a LOT straighter. Anybody else out there experiment with this? I can't figure out how to measure toe out at the rear, as the string only shows toe in - maybe a straight edge?
You cannot use a string if your front and rear track widhs are not the same. I have also used sticks, like Brian. Here is one typical debate of this topic, maybe there are some good advices
Logged
Martin S.
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 990



« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2014, 21:50:11 pm »

The string will show you what each side is relative to each other regardless of the track front and rear being different. The front and rear do have to be square with each other and Berg explained that process in detail in his tech article. An alignment tool (like the broomsticks) only works well at the front as the steering will center itself because of the caster working as you drive. In the rear you need to be able to find the toe angle of each wheel separately to be sure that the car won't steer one way or the other if weight is transferred to that wheel. Berg said they have to match or you can crash easier.
Logged

Cal Look white 68 Bug with AJ Sims EFI Turbo 2332. 194hp 240tq @ 5500 rpm 3psi boost.
Dougy Dee
Full Member
***
Posts: 154


« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2014, 01:34:07 am »

Measure from the centerline of your case and transmission to get a base dimension to measure rear toe. The broomsticks are an interesting addition.
Logged
Martin S.
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 990



« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2014, 02:05:56 am »

That should work, measuring from the trans center-line out to the front of each broomstick!
Logged

Cal Look white 68 Bug with AJ Sims EFI Turbo 2332. 194hp 240tq @ 5500 rpm 3psi boost.
brian e
Full Member
***
Posts: 141


« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2014, 19:45:46 pm »

But you would have to measure both ends of the broomstick.  Cant just measure the fronts and match them side to side.  The front of the stick must be very similar to the back of the stick. 

Measuring off the trans never occurred too me.  Good one!

Brian
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7121



« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2014, 20:04:47 pm »

Measure from the centerline of your case and transmission to get a base dimension to measure rear toe. The broomsticks are an interesting addition.

This is what I do, along with split line of case (in front of and behind deep sump) and measured center point between outer ends of lower control arms and lower shock mounts. I transfer marks to garage floor and measure outward and set up string lines parallel to these marks on floor. I then use vernier dial caliper to measure toe. Check out the HP Book, you need to know rolling radius in order to compute toe, dependent on tire size. The formula is in that book. Puhn is the author, I'm not referring to the HP Hot rod Vw book.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!