The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 26, 2024, 08:55:34 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351221
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: gearbox question... r&p vs gears?? (Read 3904 times)
folkevogn
Full Member
Posts: 155
gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
on:
November 27, 2007, 17:07:08 pm »
just wondering.....there is alot of different R/P and gears out on the market
f.ex if you have a 3.88 r&p with a 4.25 1st as one combo and another combo with 4.12 r&p and 4.11 1st....(keep in mind that the numbers are just randomly picked)
is there a difference in where the forces is applied on this two combos
And if so, is it better to increase the ratio of the r&p to f.ex 4.86 with a smaller ratio on 1st, or vice versa?
I understand that you can buy stronger parts, but thats not the clue..
If both r&p`s could handle the same amount of tension and the gears would handle the same amount of tension...witch one would break first?
Lets leave tire grip and the rest out of the equation....
Feel free to be scientific if you want too, and find it necessary..
Logged
11.96 @ 180kmh - SCC 2013
richie
Hero Member
Posts: 5687
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #1 on:
November 27, 2007, 17:21:23 pm »
Quote from: folkevogn on November 27, 2007, 17:07:08 pm
just wondering.....there is alot of different R/P and gears out on the market
If both r&p`s could handle the same amount of tension and the gears would handle the same amount of tension...witch one would break first?
Lets leave tire grip and the rest out of the equation....
If your summary was true then neither,they would both last the same.
But the 4.12 has weaker teeth due to more teeth in the same circumference as the 3.875.
The shorter the first gear the easier it is to get the car to move initially,hence why people use 4.11 and higher numbers on a heavy car or on a small engine without the torque to help overcome the weight.
cheers richie,uk
Logged
Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!
Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless
folkevogn
Full Member
Posts: 155
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #2 on:
November 27, 2007, 18:13:57 pm »
thanks Richie...
I see your point with the heavy cars and small engines, its very obvious(and after giving it a tought,so was the answer for my initial question on forces
)
But you pointed out one thing....the 4.12 is weaker because of more teeth in the same circumference
Correct me if I`m wrong, but what your saying is that if you could use a 3.5 r&p(with a "bigger" 1st) it would be stronger than a 3.78(with a smaller 1st)??
Or will the "bigger" 1st then be weaker and you wouldn`t gain strenght?
«
Last Edit: November 27, 2007, 18:25:26 pm by folkevogn
»
Logged
11.96 @ 180kmh - SCC 2013
richie
Hero Member
Posts: 5687
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #3 on:
November 27, 2007, 19:23:26 pm »
Less teeth = bigger teeth=stronger,thats the way i see it anyway,the 3.44 r&p should be stronger still but i am unsure if the material is as good a quality as the origional german R&P
Or bigger circumference[bus box or mendeola] =stronger teeth
cheers richie,uk
Logged
Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!
Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless
Roman
Hero Member
Posts: 656
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #4 on:
November 27, 2007, 19:38:06 pm »
Quote from: richie,uk on November 27, 2007, 19:23:26 pm
Less teeth = bigger teeth=stronger
cheers richie,uk
This is a strong one:
Logged
richie
Hero Member
Posts: 5687
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #5 on:
November 27, 2007, 20:32:08 pm »
Quote from: Roman on November 27, 2007, 19:38:06 pm
Quote from: richie,uk on November 27, 2007, 19:23:26 pm
Less teeth = bigger teeth=stronger
cheers richie,uk
This is a strong one:
His breath???
Looks a little like one of my old type 1 gears
cheers richie,uk
Logged
Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!
Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless
folkevogn
Full Member
Posts: 155
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #6 on:
November 28, 2007, 12:16:34 pm »
hehe nice one Roman
@richie...is the 3.44 a aftermarket part. If so, why didnt they make it as strong or stronger than the original ones, I would guess they made them for racing purposes(wild guess)
I cant see any reason why people shouldn`t use them if their stronger(given that they are the same quality as the original ones)
The cost might be one of the reasons, but those mendeola tranny`s aren`t eccactly cheap either
And either way, mendeola and bustranny`s aint an option for me
Logged
11.96 @ 180kmh - SCC 2013
richie
Hero Member
Posts: 5687
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #7 on:
November 28, 2007, 15:14:57 pm »
Quote from: folkevogn on November 28, 2007, 12:16:34 pm
hehe nice one Roman
@richie...is the 3.44 a aftermarket part. If so, why didnt they make it as strong or stronger than the original ones, I would guess they made them for racing purposes(wild guess)
They may well be as strong or stronger,I personally havent tried one,they seem more suited to a real light car[kit car. ie fake 356 etc] due to the taller gearing
Quote from: folkevogn on November 28, 2007, 12:16:34 pm
I cant see any reason why people shouldn`t use them if their stronger(given that they are the same quality as the original ones)
The quality is unknown as they are aftermarket[richmond gears I think] and i havent seen one tested to destruction.You want to try???
cheers richie,uk
Logged
Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!
Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless
folkevogn
Full Member
Posts: 155
Re: gearbox question... r&p vs gears??
«
Reply #8 on:
November 29, 2007, 23:48:18 pm »
Hmmm...I might wanna try it if I can find some info about it
why not try something different, I might learn from it, or not
You probably saw this coming
.....
my next question is if I choose a 3.44 r&p and then have to choose a taller 1st to make up for the "smaller" r&p. Lets say I choose a 4.12 1st instead of a 3.78 1st(if I had choosen 3.785r&p)
If the 1st gears where made of the same quality of steel, would they be equaly strong?(do they have the same amount of teeth and different circumference, witch i turn will make one of them stronger than the other?)I know 1st consists of mainshaft gear and pinionshaft gear...
Thanks for the replies...
Folke Vogn
«
Last Edit: November 30, 2007, 12:34:36 pm by folkevogn
»
Logged
11.96 @ 180kmh - SCC 2013
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...