The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 24, 2024, 22:18:52 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351216
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
Author
Topic: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe (Read 25504 times)
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
on:
November 12, 2009, 07:14:56 am »
ok hmm here's the plan (maybe Jim might find this odd yet interesting.. lol i hope)
an odd ball of an engine
88mm machine in p/c
74mm stroke crankshaft
rods - yet to figure out if i should have the stockers rebuilt or get some cb unitech's or rebuilt rods from brothers or chico
sumthing decently priced would be great
35.5x32 SP head (to be ported and a good valvejob)
single HD springs and chromo retainers
chromo pushrods
Engle w-110 cam
bugpack racing lifters (if i could get away with brazilians i would.. but i may not risk that )
ICT sp manifold (gona be modded to work with kadrons) will take pics once the fabbing goes underway
should give a good taper from the carb base down to the port entry..
myt work well (atleast in my head)
Kadron 40s , prepped and set by Art Thraen of ACE
already have an extractor type header (non merge)
but would like to try a 1 1/2 merged header or maybe 1 5/8 (dunno.. was under the impression the bigger one myt help top end) since sp heads provide good torque and grunt
+ all the bits and pieces, like full flow cover, plugged oil pump n blueprinted, etc
- was wondering are the single HD's ok ? or would duals be better in the long run..
- compression was thinking 8.1:1 static (maybe sum seasoned brothers could shed a comment on this)
- have forgotten a few details, will add more as i remember
- all opinions and suggestions are gona be very much welcome,
- not really gona race in Prostock so.. top power isnt much of a concern.. just sumthing fun and different
plus living at sea level but with nearby hills.. low end grunt and torque should be fun on a daily
fire away guys
ps- if this is the wrong section/forum hope the mods could put it in the right place
thanks..
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #1 on:
November 12, 2009, 07:17:06 am »
oh and its going into this white turd
maybe then i could rightfully go to 195/55/15 fronts and 215/65/15 rears
currently its on 195/60/15s on all 4s
plus id have an excuse to change the pea shooters
current engine is a 1500cc sp
Logged
Udo
Hero Member
Posts: 2077
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #2 on:
November 12, 2009, 12:47:13 pm »
Hi
I think you can go with a bigger cam.
Udo
Logged
www.Udobeckertuning.de
Bewitched666
Hero Member
Posts: 863
Bewitched
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #3 on:
November 12, 2009, 12:52:31 pm »
I agree with Udo,
cousin of mine is building a 78x85.5 engine with stock ported heads and 40mm webers.
Cam is a w120.
Depends how it runs he might switch to bigger valve heads
Logged
Fast vw beetle's rule
Diederick/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 3692
They're never done till they're sold
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #4 on:
November 12, 2009, 12:53:06 pm »
perhaps a webcam 218 or 163?
if it were dual port, jim ratto described a nice 14 second car with a webcam 110 cam and 40IDFs. do a search on SODA or S.O.D.A. can't remember.
Logged
Diederick
-
Proud member of:
DVK ~
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
RMS Boxer Service
Sr. Member
Posts: 308
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #5 on:
November 12, 2009, 12:55:45 pm »
Why ruin such a fine engine with single port heads?? Give it a set of dual port heads and you will be HAPPY
Just my two cents.
/Rolf
Logged
Neil Davies
Hero Member
Posts: 3438
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #6 on:
November 12, 2009, 13:27:44 pm »
Agree with all the others, a set of stock dual port heads will be better than a set of ported single ports, so if you are having headwork done, you may as well go for some dual port heads.
Logged
2007cc, 48IDFs, street car. 14.45@93 on pump fuel, treads, muffler and fanbelt. October 2017!
richie
Hero Member
Posts: 5687
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #7 on:
November 12, 2009, 18:14:16 pm »
More compression,and why not use kadron sp manifolds?
cheers richie,uk
Logged
Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!
Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #8 on:
November 12, 2009, 20:14:31 pm »
wow thanks for the replies (loving it!)
first of
thank you Udo for the first reply..
to answer to your suggestion / opinion on running a bigger cam (sure who doesnt want that?)
- i was trying to avoid the typical, super cammed, high strung untested aproach though if you guys have suggestions im really open to it , at first i was opting for the mild stuff, simply for the reason of running Kadron 40s and SP heads
thanks for the opinions and suggestions very much apriciated
Ralf,
«
Last Edit: November 12, 2009, 21:59:12 pm by RFbuilt
»
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #9 on:
November 12, 2009, 20:15:05 pm »
double checked the posts, and my main worry is.. IF i had 40idf's or even 44idf's most def i would have gone to an engle 120 atleast or web110 , but my worry right now is more on the fact that i am using Kadron40s
is a bigger advertized duration then 284* ok with 1bbl duals? would like to try avoiding the ports canibalizing each other's air/fuel source
about the singleport heads, i do agree on the capabilities of the dp head, even in stock form.. no doubt
i do however have the singleport heads handy right now.. actually 2 sets , and no dp heads
the porting part, (i port cylinderheads, but not vw) not saying i know what im doing, but i think id follow the how to HR vw book
and clean the ports up and perform a good valvejob to it.. which wont really cost me anything (finding a set of dp could be really hard here too)
anything else we can throw in the mix.. and consider or talk about?
im really not trying to race this thing, just sumthing good for daily,
i or we could always build sumthing funner after this engine, that i am sure of
-udo
-deed, 67-indeed/dvk
-bewitched
-callook_67 / rolf
-neil davies
-richie,uk
thanks for the replies guys very very much apriciate it
Ralf,
«
Last Edit: November 12, 2009, 21:58:47 pm by RFbuilt
»
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #10 on:
November 12, 2009, 20:19:15 pm »
about the ict manifold
i tried looking for sumthing in SP form for the kadron's and most are either pricey or just busted up steel units
(not that im complaining with the price, as rare as that is.. every seller would se fit to price it accordingly)
so the ICT manifold was cheap and easily obtainable
+ our fabricator could do the adapters for free to me LOL
would just be a simple procedure
cut a 8mm thick alu flange to match the ICT manifold's opening/entry (carb base)
weld up an alu tubing of apropriate ID and OD (maybe 1.5-2inch tall) and weld on top of it.. a 8mm thick flange that matches the kadron base
should prolly put it at the same total height (kadrons) when using the EMpi manifolds for dp hehehe
Ralf,
«
Last Edit: November 12, 2009, 21:58:16 pm by RFbuilt
»
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #11 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:26:36 pm »
I would switch to dual port heads, you will get the best of all worlds and go more aggressive on valve timing and lift. I think the big merged header on those single port heads is going to make them over scavenge. You need a balance.
If you go 35 x 32 dual port and do a simple "garage clean up" on the intake and exh ports, send them out for a nice valve job, and still run your Kadrons, with Engle 120 or Web Cam 110, my thoughts would be to use 1-1/2" header. use stock VW rods but have them clearanced for 74mm stroke. I used bone stock VW rods in the 74 stroke on my stand but had to clearance notches in roof of the case to clear. Not a big deal, but I think clearanced rods are prettier (little bit lighter too) than a case with grooves ground in the roof... but it's what we had. If you go 120 Engle or Web 110 I would use the Bugpack 4046 springs, put a .030 shim under them.
If you stay single port just realize that you can't go too wild on valve timing or you'll have a lot in intake reversion and the carbs won't know if they're bolted on right side up or not.
have fun
Logged
Udo
Hero Member
Posts: 2077
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #12 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:28:08 pm »
Quote from: RFbuilt on November 12, 2009, 20:14:31 pm
wow thanks for the replies (loving it!)
first of
thank you Udo for the first reply..
to answer to your suggestion / opinion on running a bigger cam (sure who doesnt want that?)
- i was trying to avoid the typical, super cammed, high strung untested aproach though if you guys have suggestions im really open to it , at first i was opting for the mild stuff, simply for the reason of running Kadron 40s and SP heads
thanks for the opinions and suggestions very much apriciated
I did not see the sp on your post . Dual port heads will give you much more power and if you take some new 043 they are easy to port and polish . You can sell the 2 sets of sp heads.
Kadron's are ok ...
Udo
«
Last Edit: November 12, 2009, 23:52:00 pm by Udo
»
Logged
www.Udobeckertuning.de
richie
Hero Member
Posts: 5687
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #13 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:37:18 pm »
I cant remember on the sp version,but on the dual port kadron manifold it has almost a small plenum to help with each cylinder pulling from 1 carb to balance things out,not sure if the ict manifolds do?
cheers richie,uk
Logged
Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!
Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #14 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:38:10 pm »
thanks mr brownshorts jim (or is that sum1 elses shorts LOL)
thoroughly understood your point Jim, as i still hold close the pm's we exchanged at around exactly 1 year ago LOL reg'ding the engle 120 and or web110
man... and i just finished cleaning up the 2 sets of sp heads here, so theyre ,well easy to hold and not get ur hands dirty..
Udo noted of that thanks!
i might give that a shot.. but maybe not for now
does everyone think the engle w110 is fine for SP heads + kadrons @ 8.1:1 comp ? (95-96oct. pump is available)
looks like the DP head would be a nice step up , to when we get to the point that the above engine, needs freshen up, maybe after one year of daily use, pull the engine , crack open case, replace bearings, cam , change head studs, and assemble as DP
how's that sound?
thanks Jim and Udo! nice to see awesome minds share their thought
and in that thought, Jim u could sell me bits n pieces of that engine on the stand.. more reason to keep it in the stand
HAHAHAHAHA kidding man!
Ralf,
«
Last Edit: November 12, 2009, 21:57:32 pm by RFbuilt
»
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #15 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:41:49 pm »
Quote from: richie,uk on November 12, 2009, 21:37:18 pm
I cant remember on the sp version,but on the dual port kadron manifold it has almost a small plenum to help with each cylinder pulling from 1 carb to balance things out,not sure if the ict manifolds do?
cheers richie,uk
you're right Richie, looking at the EMPI manifolds i have right now here, theres roughly half inch of single dia. space right below the carb base flange, bfor it splits into 2 (with divider) asuming the BP units have this same thing..
but i was thinking, for SP's wouldnt that be just a bigger albeit huge'r LOL plenum since the divider is in the ports of the sp head itself?
always was curious to why this was how it was, looking at the speedwell sprint kits, the single runner length is long for some odd reason
although one reason could be the carbs on those are kinda "side draft" so it has to bend to accomodate..
curious to how kadrons (the sp manifolds ive seen in pics) are also longer, than their dp counterpart
another reason i wanna try the sp aproach, not to prove sumthing or to try outrun dp's but more so to learn sumthing..
prolly learn that im hard headed i know hahahaha
Ralf,
«
Last Edit: November 12, 2009, 21:56:58 pm by RFbuilt
»
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #16 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:51:01 pm »
Quote from: RFbuilt on November 12, 2009, 21:38:10 pm
thanks mr brownshorts jim (or is that sum1 elses shorts LOL)
thoroughly understood your point Jim, as i still hold close the pm's we exchanged at around exactly 1 year ago LOL reg'ding the engle 120 and or web110
man... and i just finished cleaning up the 2 sets of sp heads here, so theyre ,well easy to hold and not get ur hands dirty..
Udo noted of that thanks!
i might give that a shot.. but maybe not for now
does everyone think the engle w110 is fine for SP heads + kadrons @ 8.1:1 comp ? (95-96oct. pump is available)
looks like the DP head would be a nice step up , to when we get to the point that the above engine, needs freshen up, maybe after one year of daily use, pull the engine , crack open case, replace bearings, cam , change head studs, and assemble as DP
how's that sound?
thanks Jim and Udo! nice to see awesome minds share their thought
and in that thought, Jim u could sell me bits n pieces of that engine on the stand.. more reason to keep it in the stand
HAHAHAHAHA kidding man!
It was time to stop picking on my buddy Carlos... he gets enough grief from the rest of DKP (not to mention Fullerton PD)... so I changed my avatar.
Anyway, RF why not just build the motor with dp heads the first time out? the time and money spent on updating it later and opening up bottom end later and swapping things... I would get the bucks saved up to find some VW dual ports (not Huber aftermarket), 043's like Udo said (I ported a nice set of 043's 40 x 35 over this past year, nothing radical.. 35mm intake port, nice blend into valve pocket), and use the Web 110 from the get go. Single port heads are becoming harder to find, so maybe you can get some good dough for those...
The motor I am spending my life on for Sheep... I would never suggest anybody else do what he is doing. But, like most things he does, it will work for him and only him.
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #17 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:55:39 pm »
hahaha sorry man.. wasnt picking on the shorts really.. i have that same kind of shorts thats why
(wait thats for another thread)
sigh... now its gona be weird.. looking for a set of DP heads
the other one ... send me sumthing DP half way across the world will ya LOL! kidding
ok will have to reevaluate things, and monetary issues too..
prob is i do have the engle w100 ,w110 and w120 handy right now
being that il also be rebuilding the other beetle's engine the brazilian 1979 (currently 1300cc late model) upgrading it to turn to a stock 1585dp motor with whatever cam i do not use (most likely it will get the w100)
things il be ordering soon are
lifters (bugpacks as per Theotherone)
pushrods
springs and ret.
Ralf,
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #18 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:57:23 pm »
wish I had some good dual ports sitting around, I'd sell you some cheap... years ago I had them stacked up like towers. I was using them as wheel chocks to hold cars in the driveway.
Good luck
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #19 on:
November 12, 2009, 22:02:45 pm »
hahaha wow!!! well... i will try my best to source some DP heads here
good thing is.. aftermarket heads are quite uncommon here, so most def if im in luck.. id find some 040 or factory dp's
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #20 on:
November 12, 2009, 22:52:09 pm »
i might opt for
CBperformance's Unitech rods (not the hd plus) being that they should be clearanced for strokers
(dont mind doing grinding though)
cuz i cant realy drive around so-cal sourcing out good rebuild stroker clearanced factory rods
unless someone has a good source for em' ?
thanks hehe
Logged
Torben Alstrup
Hero Member
Posts: 716
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #21 on:
November 12, 2009, 23:19:32 pm »
Hello.
I never was much of a fan of the W110 cam, except for the power that it can give. But in this case I would say that it most likely would be about the best off the shelf cam choice you could make, followed up by a Web 218/119 retarded 2 degrees for better vacum at idle.
The single ports will "limit" upper end performance and rpm, so HD single springs will be enough. I would suggest CB lightweight lifters over Bugpack, for the weight alone.
A 1½" header is more than sufficient. Most likely a 1 3/8" will do the job too. It´s not so much the exh. that needs help, but the intake.
I would raise the CR to 9 - 1. 8-1 just makes for a lazy engine.
I know what is and has been said about sgl port heads, - and do also agree, to some extend. For milder engines where people look more for good overall torque you can get quite some way with sgl. ports, without ever being able to reach a good ported DP head of course.
Right now I´m playing a little with a 1600 sgl. port with a VERY mild cam, ported heads and Kads. It was relatively easy to get the first 70 hp out of it. But it does not want to bleed much torque above 4500 rpm. which means that top speed is also at 4500 rpm. But power from idle to just over 4000 is good. I´m going to make a couple of small changes to see if I can extend the torque another 300 rpm or so.
T
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #22 on:
November 13, 2009, 01:54:32 am »
Quote from: 67-indeed/DVK on November 12, 2009, 12:53:06 pm
perhaps a webcam 218 or 163?
if it were dual port, jim ratto described a nice 14 second car with a webcam 110 cam and 40IDFs. do a search on SODA or S.O.D.A. can't remember.
that was a 88 x 69 with Roger Crawford 35 x 32 heads, Web 110, 8.5:1, 40IDF Webers w/ 32mm vents, 1-1/2 merged header in Bryan's '65 stock Bug
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #23 on:
November 13, 2009, 06:51:23 am »
Torben thank you for your input..
i see some one else.. had the same thing in mind as i had.. when i started the thread
the other one - thats one cool motor!!!
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #24 on:
November 16, 2009, 07:10:15 am »
jim will apriciate this
- just got a pair of dual port heads off a 1302 , cost is equivalent to 150$ pair
looks like sumthings working out right LOL
Logged
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #25 on:
November 16, 2009, 10:40:49 am »
another thing is..
i cant seem to find this 4046 BP dual springs online.. wonder where i can source them
so naturally the choices ive found wer
CB dual springs and CB chromo ret.
or DRD/darrens high rev spring kit, duals and retainers
still unsure on cam choice as id like this to last atleast a year or so not necesarily 2yrs lol
daily driven (everyday) and traffic stop n go..
dunno what others experience with w120 on that kind of use..
would like to hear them though...
thanks guys
Logged
Diederick/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 3692
They're never done till they're sold
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #26 on:
November 16, 2009, 11:07:14 am »
4046 springs are $59.99 at VWParts.net
good luck, sounds like it's gonna be a champ... especially if you follow the specs of the engine of Jim's buddy.
Logged
Diederick
-
Proud member of:
DVK ~
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #27 on:
November 16, 2009, 13:30:24 pm »
hey thanks died!!
i kept finding the 4047 ones.. didnt know if there was a diff except for the +1 digit LOL
now the next worry..
engle w120 for daily and stop n go traffic..
and i mean traffic like 1-2 hours to get to the next 50km LOL
Logged
Diederick/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 3692
They're never done till they're sold
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #28 on:
November 16, 2009, 14:09:59 pm »
web 110 if you follow the recipe
Logged
Diederick
-
Proud member of:
DVK ~
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
RFbuilt
Full Member
Posts: 244
Re: a 88x74 project that needs opinions hehe
«
Reply #29 on:
November 16, 2009, 15:21:42 pm »
i could and would follow the recipe if it was gona be a 1/4 mile car
no offense to anyone and ofcourse not to sound like im not taking in opinions..
i do have the 3 engle grinds already.. ordering from the u.s. is costly ,
and curiously id like to know from the other one/jim how hard or not hard are the web110 on the valvetrain , lifter bores etc
this beetle/engine wont be raced, purely street and sole daily driver
thank you died for the sharings, (you could share ur beetle il take it anyday hahahahahaha kidding)
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...