The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 22:43:25 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350689 Posts in 28577 Topics by 6823 Members
Latest Member: Riisager
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  Throttle Bodies - Single or twin ?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Throttle Bodies - Single or twin ?  (Read 2805 times)
71CALRIPPER
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1530



« on: January 29, 2010, 10:06:35 am »

I know this question cant have a simple answer but what are the pros and cons of having a twin throttle bodies on a flat 4 motor over a large single throttle bodie?
I know porsche and Scoobys tend to use single ones but can anybody shed some light as to why.

Turbo or N/A


Thank you for helping me with my search for knowledge
Roberto
Logged
james wotton
Full Member
***
Posts: 144



« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2010, 10:32:15 am »



I used to have  twin 48 throttle bodies the down side I felt was you had to keep them them in  sync
I now have a single throttle bodie but due to it size (75mm) it's a bit of a on/off switch.

p.s may be twin's would be good for n/a but singel for turbo apllications.

james
Logged

9.91 @ 139.90
outlawflatfour 2010 and 2011 champion.
Martin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 810


Cash Converter....


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2010, 10:58:06 am »

Twin's give you a better throttle responce on a N/A motor, but are just a pain in the arse on a turbo motor. due to having to keep them in sync.

Pesonaly, if going for a hipo asperated motor, then a throttle per cylinder is the best way, instant response and you keep the throttle plate as close to the vavle as posible. There easy to keep in sync as you can just put your airflow guage strait onto them.

In the turbo aplication they also work great, but there just not so easy to keep in sync, as you have to remove all the pipwork to get a guage onto them.

Ive tried both ways and for me ive found the single throttle a lot less hassel. Ive gone for a 80mm throttle with a progressive linkage, its very smooth and transiant across the range.

Hope this helps

Martin

Logged

Martin

9 sec street car, its just simply not fast enough

Swing axle to CV convertion is on the website now

www.taylormachine.co.uk

OFF/500
warp
Newbie
*
Posts: 18


« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2010, 12:32:42 pm »

You can run more cam using individual TB's and still have decent idle which I find to be a big advantage on a hot street engine.
...this is on a N/A engine
« Last Edit: January 29, 2010, 12:35:07 pm by warp » Logged
Martin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 810


Cash Converter....


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2010, 19:07:36 pm »

You can run more cam using individual TB's and still have decent idle which I find to be a big advantage on a hot street engine.
...this is on a N/A engine

Very True, my last motor, was 2915cc Fk98 cam 58mm throttle bodies and it would idle like a baby at 900 rpm.
Logged

Martin

9 sec street car, its just simply not fast enough

Swing axle to CV convertion is on the website now

www.taylormachine.co.uk

OFF/500
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3214


12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008


WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2010, 22:01:13 pm »

About more cam, are you talking about separate runners or TBs ?
Logged

Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
warp
Newbie
*
Posts: 18


« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2010, 15:38:30 pm »

I'm talking about individual TB's
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!