The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 28, 2024, 23:04:46 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351225
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Cal-look
BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations (Read 3868 times)
Dougy Dee
Full Member
Posts: 155
BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
on:
March 06, 2010, 19:49:33 pm »
Any one remember the suffixes attached to the various BugPack grinds?
Did they denote different lobe centers, rocker preferences or???
I've got a new 4063-10 here with something like 268 @ .050 with .390 lift that I've been considering for my 1914 build. I understand it is a 1.1 rocker grind. Interestingly the Web 86C has similar .050 numbers and IC event
I also have a NIB 4065-11 that seems to be a ratio cam. .343 lift and 253 @ .050 but I've seen numbers for a 4065-10 .331 lift and 234 @ .050. (This may be a dual pattern grind...)
There must be some old school guys that remember some BP cam lore.
Logged
Rick Sadler
Full Member
Posts: 233
Re: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
Reply #1 on:
March 06, 2010, 20:24:16 pm »
I can have the info to you Monday am California time if someone else does not chime in first.
Logged
Der Kleiner Panzers
Dougy Dee
Full Member
Posts: 155
Re: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
Reply #2 on:
March 07, 2010, 02:50:22 am »
Thanx in advance...
Logged
stoneloco808
Newbie
Posts: 38
Re: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
Reply #3 on:
March 07, 2010, 04:36:08 am »
Well, in the current Bugpack catalog, only the 4063-10 is listed. I don't have my Interchange Parts book with me at work. But I did look it up in my cam spec list on my laptop. Both cams are listed as 108* lobe centers. I find it a bit odd that the current catalog, the 4063-10 doesn't really specify if its for use with 1.1:1 rockers, as it also shows lift figures for 1.25:1 and 1.4:1. On the same note my cam spec list shows its designed for 1.1:1 rockers.
Now on my cam list the 4065-11 has a note stating to be used with 1.5:1 rockers. According to the duration @0.050" and lift at cam it looks to be similar to a Web Cam 86A, but the 4065-11 will achieve a tad more lift.
Now the 4065-10 is stated for use with 1.1:1 rockers. The side note states its a turbo cam and great bottom end.
As fort the -10 and -11 designations, I have no clue. I see no obvious pattern according to the numbers given.
Logged
Rick Sadler
Full Member
Posts: 233
Re: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
Reply #4 on:
March 08, 2010, 19:11:53 pm »
4063-10 .390 Lift at the cam and 268* duration @ .050 Can be used with 1.1 or 1.25 rockers
4065-11 .343 Lift at the cam and 253* duration @ .050 Can be used with 1.4 or 1.5 rockers. This is not a dual pattern grind.
The only Dual Pattern Grind numbers we produced were the 4064-10 and 4064-11
Hope This helps.
«
Last Edit: March 08, 2010, 19:24:04 pm by Rick Sadler
»
Logged
Der Kleiner Panzers
Dougy Dee
Full Member
Posts: 155
Re: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
Reply #5 on:
March 08, 2010, 23:03:08 pm »
Thanx for digging up that info. Unfortunately doesn't shed any real light on the - numerical suffixes used in the grind identifiers.
I also have info that there was a 4064-12 in the dual pattern mix as well. (Drag Race Competition grind with 328 degrees of advertised duration.) The higher numerical suffix seems to have a longer duration attached.
Logged
Rick Sadler
Full Member
Posts: 233
Re: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
Reply #6 on:
March 09, 2010, 05:30:49 am »
When the part number were assigned the suffix -10, -11-, +12 etc had nothing to do with the lift or duration other thsn thst it was differant. The beginning numbers ie 4062, 4063, 4064, etc had more to do with the grouping 1.1 to 1 ratio, 1.4 or 1.5 to 1 ratio or dual ramp grinds. Hopefully this answeres your question a little better.
Logged
Der Kleiner Panzers
Dougy Dee
Full Member
Posts: 155
Re: BugPack Cams -10, -11, -? designations
«
Reply #7 on:
March 10, 2010, 00:59:20 am »
Thanx for the info.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...