The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 24, 2024, 23:08:26 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351216
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
Cam question
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Cam question (Read 6724 times)
Sander/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 631
Cam question
«
on:
February 25, 2007, 17:42:59 pm »
Hi, a friend of my has a 1955cc.
The specs are:
90,5x76
041 heads with 40x35,5
44 DCNF with 34mm vents
CR is unknown yet, and a Scat C25 cam.
1:1,25 ratio rockers
The heads are off the engine, and we concluded that the CR are too low (1:6,4), so that would be changed, dependent to wich cam we gonna use
Now, the cam is a Scat C25 and that is too mild I think.
Wich cam would you guys use on this engine?
«
Last Edit: February 25, 2007, 18:19:48 pm by Sander/DVK
»
Logged
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #1 on:
February 25, 2007, 18:35:51 pm »
Engle 120, 9:1 compression.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Sander/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 631
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #2 on:
February 25, 2007, 18:41:49 pm »
Thanks Zach, but is the W-serie from Engle not a little bit "too old"?
Why not a cam from the VZ or the FK series?
Logged
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #3 on:
February 26, 2007, 02:18:36 am »
VZ cams are hard on lifter bores and they can't be used with your 1.25:1 rockers. FK cams require an upgrade to 1.4:1 rockers for best performance. So the most inexpensive way to upgrade using the parts your friend has, is using the 120 cam with your 1.25:1 rockers. Combined with the increased compression, he will notice a HUGE power increase over the little C25 in there now. If the heads are ported properly, the engine will make great torque and horsepower up to 7,000 rpm. Hows that for an "old" cam??
«
Last Edit: February 26, 2007, 02:20:26 am by Zach Gomulka
»
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
cedorUSA
Guest
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #4 on:
February 26, 2007, 04:13:39 am »
i run angle 110 with 1.4 and make over 2oo hopwer with 87m 69m witch is 1835 (yes) its all in the heads and its all good
all about heads and cariboraetors sometimes only idas will do
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #5 on:
February 26, 2007, 06:21:18 am »
Sure you do.
Why dont you go waste bandwith on a Honda forum? Theres lots of people there, just like you.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Sander/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 631
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #6 on:
February 26, 2007, 19:23:11 pm »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on February 26, 2007, 02:18:36 am
VZ cams are hard on lifter bores and they can't be used with your 1.25:1 rockers. FK cams require an upgrade to 1.4:1 rockers for best performance. So the most inexpensive way to upgrade using the parts your friend has, is using the 120 cam with your 1.25:1 rockers. Combined with the increased compression, he will notice a HUGE power increase over the little C25 in there now. If the heads are ported properly, the engine will make great torque and horsepower up to 7,000 rpm. Hows that for an "old" cam??
Thanks Zack, thats very interesting information!
"Old cam" is not the good word, but I think you know what I mean
The C25 is about the same as a W100, and thats crazy for a 1955
Thanks again,
Sander
Logged
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
Sander/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 631
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #7 on:
February 26, 2007, 19:25:27 pm »
Quote from: cedorUSA on February 26, 2007, 04:13:39 am
i run angle 110 with 1.4 and make over 2oo hopwer with 87m 69m witch is 1835 (yes) its all in the heads and its all good
all about heads and cariboraetors sometimes only idas will do
Are you sure?? Thats a lot HP for such engine!!
69x87 = 1641cc btw
Logged
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
Cheesepanzer
Sr. Member
Posts: 431
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #8 on:
February 28, 2007, 03:10:11 am »
Quote from: Jim Ratto on February 28, 2007, 01:30:21 am
Quote from: Sander/DVK on February 26, 2007, 19:25:27 pm
Quote from: cedorUSA on February 26, 2007, 04:13:39 am
i run angle 110 with 1.4 and make over 2oo hopwer with 87m 69m witch is 1835 (yes) its all in the heads and its all good
all about heads and cariboraetors sometimes only idas will do
Are you sure?? Thats a lot HP for such engine!!
69x87 = 1641cc btw
200hp from an 87 METER x 69 METER engine shouldn't be too much to ask for!!!!
But how the heck he fits it (or his big head) in his car is beyond me.
Jim, there's no substitution for displacement, right?
Logged
62 Beetle (street/strip build)
63 Type 2 Single Cab
Cornpanzers
cedorUSA
Guest
Re: Cam question
«
Reply #9 on:
February 28, 2007, 04:53:40 am »
im goin by my naybors man, they said its 1835 maybe i made a misteak,
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...