The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 06, 2024, 04:03:58 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350885 Posts in 28608 Topics by 6828 Members
Latest Member: GSW Racing
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  Gas Burners, tubes or not??
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Gas Burners, tubes or not??  (Read 9233 times)
sambaboy
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 62


« on: August 27, 2010, 09:21:17 am »

i have just got a set of genuine gas burners & im fitting 145 & 205 tyres. im a bit confused about the whole inner tube situation??

just wondering how many people on here are running genuine fuchs or gas burners without inner tubes & what your views are?

is it really that dangerous?
Logged
Rocket Ron
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2861


It's old school for a reason


« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2010, 09:30:09 am »

I've always run tubes, 145 n a 5-6 " rim is not really the best combo

they  are usually £5- 10 per tube and well worth the investment for piece of mind IMO 
Logged

13.12 @ 101.84

Grooving out on life

You can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter
sambaboy
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 62


« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2010, 09:42:25 am »

icheers ron.
is it just a standard 15" tube i need?
Logged
2manytoys
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 395



« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2010, 12:10:14 pm »

I have run wiith and without tubes on the real deal fuchs. The Fuch is a tube type rim, but there are some rubber valve stems that will work, although I suggest tubes. On Fuchs, it is the shape of the stem area the make it difficult.
Logged

Patrick Friel -..2manytoys, not enough time or money
GASBNR
Full Member
***
Posts: 166



« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2010, 13:33:21 pm »

I run tubes in mine. My understanding is you
have to due to not having a safety lip.
Logged

SUPPORTING CAL-LOOK DOWN UNDER
Sam K
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 746



« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2010, 15:26:18 pm »

I've been told that you need to run tubes in early fuchs since they don't have a safety bead, but I've been using mine without tubes for about ten years without any problems. I have 5.5's and 6's with 175/55's and 205/65's.
Logged
Rocket Ron
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2861


It's old school for a reason


« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2010, 15:27:37 pm »

icheers ron.
is it just a standard 15" tube i need?

15 " but they come in various sizes / widths
Logged

13.12 @ 101.84

Grooving out on life

You can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter
Chris W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 363



« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2010, 16:44:43 pm »

I have the same set up exactly, no tubes and no problems.
Logged
sambaboy
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 62


« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2010, 19:21:11 pm »

thanks for the replies guys. you can see why its confusing now, some say you have to run tubes & some say you dont. im still in 2 minds.

i want it to be as safe as poss as the car will be driven at fairly high speeds!

 Undecided
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2010, 19:37:10 pm »

Did Porsche use tubes on the lightest wheel the factory made? I doubt it. I'd go without.
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
madfrog
Full Member
***
Posts: 156



« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2010, 19:40:42 pm »

If i may , the problem is not only should I run tube or not but which tires am I using with tube or not.

The modern "tubeless" tires name is confusing because they are in fact equiped with a tube that cover the inner part of the tire.

The tube or the tube part of tubeless are made of the same  material called "butyl" and the problem if you put a tube in a tubeless tire

is that the two "butyl" surfaces are rubbing together and can wear very very quickly (ten time quicker from the tests conducted)

I didn't know that in the 70's when the "tubeless" tires came out and used tube with "tubeless" tires without problems

but it is not what the tire manufacturers recommend.

Michelin is selling a special tube to use in conjunction with  "tubeless" type tires, makiing the process safe if a little more expensive.

You can of course  use a tube with a tube type tire without problem


madfrog










« Last Edit: August 28, 2010, 21:30:50 pm by madfrog » Logged

Moderation, even in moderation.
GASBNR
Full Member
***
Posts: 166



« Reply #11 on: August 28, 2010, 00:43:52 am »

I run tubes in mine. My understanding is you
have to due to not having a safety lip.

here in Australia they will not fit tyres without
tubes without the safety lip I just learnt.
Fair point with tyre sizes Porsche didn't fit
145's to the gasburner I'm guessing

safety first IMO
Logged

SUPPORTING CAL-LOOK DOWN UNDER
Rocket Ron
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2861


It's old school for a reason


« Reply #12 on: August 28, 2010, 08:16:34 am »

For £20 is it not worth the extra piece of mind Huh

30 + year old wheels and the incorrect size tires dont add up to the best combination IMO.

porsche may not have run them but they weren't running the wrong size tires on there rims. I take it you have a street car , would the extra weight make any difference ?

It not a big deal if you feel comfortable running without then do it , it probably ok.

just my 2c

Logged

13.12 @ 101.84

Grooving out on life

You can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #13 on: August 28, 2010, 12:04:22 pm »

I take it you have a street car , would the extra weight make any difference ?
                                               

Then get repro wheels. And as a bonus, you get safety beads (not to mention quite a few extra quid in your pocket).
« Last Edit: August 28, 2010, 21:14:21 pm by Zach Gomulka » Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
sambaboy
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 62


« Reply #14 on: August 28, 2010, 20:27:55 pm »

they are for my street & occasional strip oval. im using firestone f560 145's & bridgestone dueller 205/70's.

im quite happy to use tubes, just wondered what other people thought about it.

sounds like tubes are the safest option.
Logged
Lightning
Newbie
*
Posts: 17


« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2010, 22:15:42 pm »

Haven't even thought about this. Just put the tires onto the burners and drove away. Been doing that for the last 5 years and app. 25' km without any trouble. But I use 185/65 tires both front and rear, prefer driveability over looks.
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1417


« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2010, 19:39:56 pm »

here in Australia they will not fit tyres without
tubes without the safety lip ........
Then the tyre guys downunder don't understand the purpose of safety bead humps.  Those humps have nothing to do with tubeless tyres, it's a separate design feature that Chevrolet invented in the mid 50s, but purposely did not patent as a gift to the automotive world.
For some strange reason, VW didn't want to use it right away.  In 1957, VW went to tubless tyres, but without safety bead humps.  For 10 years, VW manufactured MILLIONS of cars this way.  They waited until 1967 before they added the humps.
The only purpose of the humps is to help keep the bead of the tyre on the rim when the tyre loses all it's air.  If you get a blowout at speed, the car will be safer as you coast to the side of the road if the tyre's beads stay on the rim.
Logged
48IDA66
Full Member
***
Posts: 183



« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2010, 21:19:08 pm »

I got tubes as well on mine... Wink
Logged
flatfire
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 441


« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2010, 17:28:36 pm »

Interesting. The only downside to tubes in theory, would be they allow a substandard tyre to survive undetected untill catastrophic failure occurs.

Just thinking out the box Smiley
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1417


« Reply #19 on: September 01, 2010, 03:35:52 am »

One downside to using tubes is the unnecessary addition of weight to one of the lightest, strongest wheels you could put on your VW.
Logged
alex d
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1033



« Reply #20 on: September 01, 2010, 08:23:01 am »

back in the day (check the blue bentleys) VW didn't recommend running radials without tubes.....that being said I've run plenty of radials without tubes in different kinds of non-safety rims without any problem (besides the occasional leaking wheel)
Logged
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3214


12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008


WWW
« Reply #21 on: September 01, 2010, 10:26:10 am »

here in Australia they will not fit tyres without
tubes without the safety lip ........
Then the tyre guys downunder don't understand the purpose of safety bead humps.  Those humps have nothing to do with tubeless tyres, it's a separate design feature that Chevrolet invented in the mid 50s, but purposely did not patent as a gift to the automotive world.
For some strange reason, VW didn't want to use it right away.  In 1957, VW went to tubless tyres, but without safety bead humps.  For 10 years, VW manufactured MILLIONS of cars this way.  They waited until 1967 before they added the humps.
The only purpose of the humps is to help keep the bead of the tyre on the rim when the tyre loses all it's air.  If you get a blowout at speed, the car will be safer as you coast to the side of the road if the tyre's beads stay on the rim.

Thanks for great info Bruce!
Logged

Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
Straight Time
Full Member
***
Posts: 145



« Reply #22 on: September 01, 2010, 13:48:22 pm »


Can you run tubes on the strip ? I have oem Gasburners and hope to have the odd run on the drag strip. What would happen if the tyre grips well and the rim spins within the tyre ?
Logged

No retreat, No surrender !
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1417


« Reply #23 on: September 01, 2010, 15:42:21 pm »

back in the day (check the blue bentleys) VW didn't recommend running radials without tubes.....
Those would be tube type radial tyres.  I don't think you can buy tube type radials anymore.
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1417


« Reply #24 on: September 01, 2010, 15:43:43 pm »

What would happen if the tyre grips well and the rim spins within the tyre ?
I have seen the effect of this.  The tube spins with the tyre.  The valve stem doesn't like this.....
Logged
K-Roc
Full Member
***
Posts: 194


« Reply #25 on: September 01, 2010, 17:01:31 pm »

What you need to do is drill about six or seven 1/8 holes into the side of your Gasburners then use sheet metal screws and screw the rim to the tire bead... this will help it from spinning on the rim..... Roll Eyes
Logged
madfrog
Full Member
***
Posts: 156



« Reply #26 on: September 01, 2010, 19:42:55 pm »

back in the day (check the blue bentleys) VW didn't recommend running radials without tubes.....
Those would be tube type radial tyres.  I don't think you can buy tube type radials anymore.

Michelin  still carry a lot of those tube type radials in their vintage tyres range  Wink

madfrog
Logged

Moderation, even in moderation.
alex d
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1033



« Reply #27 on: September 03, 2010, 08:25:12 am »

VW recommended tubes even with tubeless radials

back in the day (check the blue bentleys) VW didn't recommend running radials without tubes.....
Those would be tube type radial tyres.  I don't think you can buy tube type radials anymore.
Logged
nigelg65
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 279



WWW
« Reply #28 on: September 03, 2010, 12:09:34 pm »

Can't see the problem, just run tubes.
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1417


« Reply #29 on: September 03, 2010, 17:27:51 pm »

What are you tube guys afraid of?  What problem do you think tubes solve?

Plenty of guys have run original Mahle wheels without tubes to prove there's no problem doing so. Same for early Fuchs.

The tube is just another part that can fail.  If it's not there, it can't fail.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!