The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 06:16:28 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350681 Posts in 28573 Topics by 6820 Members
Latest Member: chicochemxli
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  porsche power!
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Author Topic: porsche power!  (Read 37050 times)
modnrod
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 795


Old School Volksies


« Reply #60 on: June 17, 2015, 03:02:03 am »

I was going to redo my 2332 with a smallish cam. The heads will still remain large, so I reckon the rpm's will be limited to under 6500, but it'll still pull hard up to that as a result of moderate compression, static approx 9.8 to 1. Gone are the days of high lifts and durations, been there done that and got bored with it, smallish cams with a little engine management seems the way forward.

Looking at production cars these days, and what has happened in the last 10 years highlights this. It's normal for a 2.0 n/a motor to make  a smooth 170hp, deliver 35++ mpg and not worry about high temps.

But those are multi-valve engines with very light springs. Direct injection and 11:1+ CR too. And boring powerbands.

And LS motors, and Hemi Sixes, and Ford Cleveland V8s..........although the Clevo's are 4 times the weight, 3 times the size, 2 times the HP, and half the economy!  Cheesy
If you going to run larger "good" heads with a smaller cam, try to open up the LSA a bit too. Most LS motors run 114, and the old 4Vs used to run 112.
Logged
speedwell
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14701


the archivist


WWW
« Reply #61 on: December 15, 2015, 12:19:14 pm »

nicolas found this  on fb
Logged

http://speedwell55.skynetblogs.be/
oldspeed 61 standard empi/speedwell
speedwell
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14701


the archivist


WWW
« Reply #62 on: December 15, 2015, 12:19:36 pm »

Logged

http://speedwell55.skynetblogs.be/
oldspeed 61 standard empi/speedwell
speedwell
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14701


the archivist


WWW
« Reply #63 on: December 15, 2015, 12:20:07 pm »

Logged

http://speedwell55.skynetblogs.be/
oldspeed 61 standard empi/speedwell
speedwell
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14701


the archivist


WWW
« Reply #64 on: December 15, 2015, 12:20:27 pm »

Logged

http://speedwell55.skynetblogs.be/
oldspeed 61 standard empi/speedwell
speedwell
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14701


the archivist


WWW
« Reply #65 on: December 15, 2015, 12:20:53 pm »


Logged

http://speedwell55.skynetblogs.be/
oldspeed 61 standard empi/speedwell
nicolas
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3996



« Reply #66 on: December 16, 2015, 19:54:40 pm »

hahahaha.

i always thought a fastback was a bit of a porsche…  but this is even better. it IS a porsche. cool. and flares… i am looking at quite a bit olf BMW's and the 2002's with flares are the icing on the cake. but a type3 would be great!

i just came home from a drive with the fastback as a matter of fact. haven't taken the car out in more then a month, but i had to pick up my daughter and i took the fastback.
i still have some fiddling to do to get it all working crispy clean again, and i still need to get the LM-1 fitted. the MSD is still playing tricks, so it is just a regular compufire and coil now again. but this car runs great! i think i have achieved what i wanted it to be (porsche power like-wise).
so what can i say, i need to do a bit of work on the car and hopefully i'll be able to fit the LM-1 and make some progress. i do have a good baseline now and i will keep you posted what mods will be done, what upgrades (if they really are upgrades) will be done and hopefully enjoy the car as planned this year.

looks like there are no winters anymore, so no salt on the roads and just keep on driving  Grin


oh, and as nice and tempting as this is, i will not join FB, i'll chose my own charity!
Logged
mg
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 974



WWW
« Reply #67 on: December 16, 2015, 23:24:09 pm »

what model red Porsche was that donor car?
Is that a GT2 rear wheel factory turbo?  Cool
Displacement: 3,600 cc (220 cu in); 2 valves per cylinder
Bore × stroke: 99.1 mm (3.9 in) × 76.2 mm (3.0 in)
Maximum power: 331 kW (444 hp) @ 6000 rpm
Specific power: 93.25 kW/liter (2.05 hp/cu in)
Maximum torque: 585.7 N·m (432 lb·ft) @ 3500 rpm
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #68 on: December 17, 2015, 07:15:09 am »

what model red Porsche was that donor car?
Is that a GT2 rear wheel factory turbo? 

It would have been cool if it was a GT2 but it isnt. It is a "ordinary" 996 turbo.

More pictures for those not on Facebook: http://www.carfinder.pl/galeria/vw_typ3___porsche_turbo_996#category The job is being done in Poland at a shop where quite a few guys here in Norway have delievered their cars for some TLC. It looks like they know what they are doing that is for sure.

-BB-
Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Mags
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 465


2,2L 577Hk.


WWW
« Reply #69 on: December 17, 2015, 08:09:52 am »

930Turbo engine
G50 Gearbox
Mendola front and rear.
Logged
kev d
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1163



« Reply #70 on: December 31, 2015, 19:38:11 pm »

930Turbo engine
G50 Gearbox
Mendola front and rear.

That's ace Cool
Logged

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body , but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride"
nicolas
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3996



« Reply #71 on: August 27, 2017, 13:45:46 pm »

last year at DDD i had quite an issue with a campulley coming lose and the fan that rubbed the housing too much, so that was junk as well.

i was quite confident this would be a easy and straightforward rebuilt, but it ended up a bit longer as expected. parts only coming in after the vacation i have, things needing more time to do, plans changed,…
so in the end the rebuilt took the better part of 8 months, but things were ready for EBI and i got to drive it there. now a few months later i have been driving my car a lot more than last year and it feels better and better.
what have i done to it. i did in the end swap the 1.25's for 1.4's, put in new pushrods, lifters and new bearings, sealings. and i went with straight cut timing gears as i had them.

so the package i had before was allready exceding my expectations, but this is better. the engine responds more 'openend up' with the 1.4 rockers. yes i have lost a bit of bottom end power, but apart from that the engine is much more responsive and dare i say fun  Grin

so in a way it isn't the best as i want to limit it to 6000 rpms (this goes beyond 6000 easily  Roll Eyes ), but the way it makes power is an improvement. more fluid and fun. so i am very happy with it.

i hope to put more time in the car to have it tuned even better, the eternal quest for better i guess.  Wink
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!