The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2024, 05:47:23 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351205 Posts in 28655 Topics by 6854 Members
Latest Member: 74meanmachine
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  JPM head drilled to 101.6 (stud pattern question)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: JPM head drilled to 101.6 (stud pattern question)  (Read 3700 times)
fastbus
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 54



« on: January 24, 2015, 07:01:05 am »

Hi Loungers,
                 I'm slowly building an oxyboxer and i'm planning on using a set of JPM heads which look like they have 94mm stud pattern spacings.
These heads have been apparently cut for the 101.6 cylinder liners and are now showing through on the the stud inserts, where the liners meet the chamber in the heads.

Is this common practice or should the stud spacings have be drilled from a blank head to accept the correct pattern?

Any helpful and grateful advice is appreciated.

Cheers
Paul
 Wink
« Last Edit: January 24, 2015, 07:06:00 am by fastbus » Logged

13.66@102mph in my old T3 crew cab builders truck!
13.01@109mph in my bug so far!
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2015, 09:18:41 am »

Not exactly sure what you mean? they are either 94bore or 101.6 bore, 94 bore opened up to 101.6 would have the stud holes in the cylinder sealing area

This is what the chamber side looks like on my JPM head
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2015, 09:19:21 am »

Just to be clear, that is a 101.6mm head
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
fastbus
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 54



« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2015, 11:06:00 am »

Hi Richie
Cheers for the pic. Your head chamber is showing more
metal against the barrel. Can this be a weak point to the head barrel sealing point?
Logged

13.66@102mph in my old T3 crew cab builders truck!
13.01@109mph in my bug so far!
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2015, 12:43:25 pm »

Hi Richie
Cheers for the pic. Your head chamber is showing more
metal against the barrel. Can this be a weak point to the head barrel sealing point?


Shouldn't be, mine have been opened up slightly more since that pic so they fit all the common available cylinders, before we cut the cylinder to suit

cheers Richie
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
spoolin70
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 605



« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2015, 15:27:53 pm »

Hi Paul

Mine have broken through slightly more than Richie's in his pic - the top couple of mm of the wall has gone and the rest is pretty thin. A good poke with a screwdriver and it would all break through completely. Sorry, no pics though, they aren't with me at the moment.

I did question this and it was pointed out that the cylinder seals on the top mating surface to the head so any area that does break through (on the side) is effectively covered over by the cylinder.

Hope that makes sense
Darren
Logged
fastbus
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 54



« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2015, 15:49:45 pm »

Cheers guys. Your answers are very much appreciated.
 Wink
Logged

13.66@102mph in my old T3 crew cab builders truck!
13.01@109mph in my bug so far!
neil68
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538



« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2015, 22:04:31 pm »

I was recently looking at some 101.6 mm MS230 heads for sale.They appear to have broken through at the stud holes, but the cylinder sealing should be fine:

« Last Edit: January 24, 2015, 22:15:17 pm by neil68 » Logged

Neil
Der Kleiner Rennwagens
'68 Beetle, 2332 cc, 204 WHP
12.5 seconds @ 172 KM/H (107.5 MPH)
Dynojet Test:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9B_H3eklAo
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!