The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:36:17 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350687 Posts in 28576 Topics by 6822 Members
Latest Member: tpb_karl
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  Web 251 camshaft advance?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Web 251 camshaft advance?  (Read 4979 times)
neil68
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538



« on: June 24, 2015, 19:06:42 pm »

I'm going to install a Web 251 camshaft that I've had for a few years. Will also bump up the CR to 11:1.

Should I install the cam straight up, or advance it 2 degrees, 4 degrees, etc?  I want to try it out primarily for the drag strip.

Anyone have experience with this cam?  The specs are similar to an FK89, as far as I can tell.

Thanks!
Logged

Neil
Der Kleiner Rennwagens
'68 Beetle, 2332 cc, 204 WHP
12.5 seconds @ 172 KM/H (107.5 MPH)
Dynojet Test:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9B_H3eklAo
LGK
Full Member
***
Posts: 142



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2015, 07:10:42 am »

I'm going to install a Web 251 camshaft that I've had for a few years. Will also bump up the CR to 11:1.

Should I install the cam straight up, or advance it 2 degrees, 4 degrees, etc?  I want to try it out primarily for the drag strip.

Anyone have experience with this cam?  The specs are similar to an FK89, as far as I can tell.

Thanks!

« Last Edit: July 06, 2015, 15:52:15 pm by LGK » Logged

neil68
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538



« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2015, 19:41:59 pm »

My current Raptor 06908 camshaft has more lift (10.8 mm/0.425") than the Web 251 (10.7 mm/0.420").

However the Raptor has a shorter duration (274 degrees @ 1.27 mm/0.050"). So I was looking at the advantage of having the intake valve open a bit longer with the Web 251 (285 degrees).

As it turns out, I had forgotten that my Web 251 was incorrectly ground...I think they used the smaller Type 4 spec in error.

I might try another Raptor with more duration, but CSP seems to be out stock at the moment.
Logged

Neil
Der Kleiner Rennwagens
'68 Beetle, 2332 cc, 204 WHP
12.5 seconds @ 172 KM/H (107.5 MPH)
Dynojet Test:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9B_H3eklAo
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 955

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2015, 08:06:19 am »

My current Raptor 06908 camshaft has more lift (10.8 mm/0.425") than the Web 251 (10.7 mm/0.420").

However the Raptor has a shorter duration (274 degrees @ 1.27 mm/0.050"). So I was looking at the advantage of having the intake valve open a bit longer with the Web 251 (285 degrees).

As it turns out, I had forgotten that my Web 251 was incorrectly ground...I think they used the smaller Type 4 spec in error.

I might try another Raptor with more duration, but CSP seems to be out stock at the moment.

Buy one directly from Johannes?
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
neil68
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538



« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2015, 20:41:49 pm »

Yes, I will, however the JPM website has been off line for a few days, and CSP only lists advertised duration, so I'll have to get additional information on what cams are available from Johannes.
Logged

Neil
Der Kleiner Rennwagens
'68 Beetle, 2332 cc, 204 WHP
12.5 seconds @ 172 KM/H (107.5 MPH)
Dynojet Test:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9B_H3eklAo
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 955

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2015, 22:51:15 pm »

Yes, I will, however the JPM website has been off line for a few days, and CSP only lists advertised duration, so I'll have to get additional information on what cams are available from Johannes.

Works fine for me; http://www.jpmotorsports.se

He'll do any custom cam also.
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Kiel
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 99



« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2015, 15:49:08 pm »

 I have the 251 i my 2,4 liter type 4 engine. 103mm x 71mm

comp is 11,5 and use jpm valve spring, run it to 8000 rpm. no problem with 48mm and 40mm type 4 valve.


The cam are set to o degress.


http://youtu.be/T0IsZAJPlgg
Logged
Torben Alstrup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 716


« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2015, 12:50:23 pm »

If you decide on a 251 , and the engine is for drag mainly, I would set it up in zero (108 lc) It does not need more spring pressure than an FK89 due to a better opening and closing ramp. Power wise I couldnt say which is the better 251 versus FK89. But the 251 seems to have a cleaner idle and pulls a tad earlier. At least that is what I have noticed.

T
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!