|
Bad bug
|
 |
« on: December 26, 2015, 00:26:33 am » |
|
Is anyone here running these heads.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
numbnuts
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2016, 21:52:28 pm » |
|
Jeff denham has been for hears on the street
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2854cc 1956 cal looker coming to this space shortly
|
|
|
|
Fiatdude
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2016, 23:29:25 pm » |
|
I got a set 50x40's  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fiat -- GONE Ovalholio -- GONE Ghia -- -- It's going Get lost for an evening or two -- http://selvedgeyard.com/Remember, as you travel the highway of life, For every mile of road, there is 2 miles of ditch |
|
|
|
Bad bug
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2016, 17:49:50 pm » |
|
Jeff Denham. I went to their website ( 4inch bore ) sometime ago and it was down. I am thinking of doing a 4 inch bore daily driven car but for some reason i keep leaning towards JPM heads. Has anyone in recent time wrote Johannes by mail and did you get a response.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kb
Newbie
Posts: 41
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2016, 09:14:30 am » |
|
He can be very slow at replying at times. He's as far as I know still a 1-man shop, and when there's alot of engines to build and orders to ship out.. Well, you get the idea.
Easiest is to call him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bad bug
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2016, 11:48:39 am » |
|
Thanks for the reply KB.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BeetleBug
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2016, 12:46:27 pm » |
|
I had angle flow heads on a wild race engine a few years ago. It was a tight fit with a Gene Berg 2" exhaust but I managed to make it fit without cutting the car. 281hp at 8080 rpms:  -BB- |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
|
|
|
|
Bad bug
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2016, 00:24:50 am » |
|
What size engine was this. I am looking to go 101.6 x 78.8 for a daily driver with hopefully JPM 230 heads.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BeetleBug
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2016, 07:18:36 am » |
|
What size engine was this. I am looking to go 101.6 x 78.8 for a daily driver with hopefully JPM 230 heads.
2386ccm. 51x40 valves. 15:1 CR. FK98 cam. Best rgs BB |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
|
|
|
|
UltraOrange67-2443
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2016, 20:20:19 pm » |
|
I had angle flow heads on a wild race engine a few years ago. It was a tight fit with a Gene Berg 2" exhaust but I managed to make it fit without cutting the car. 281hp at 8080 rpms: -BB- Nice looking motor dude |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1967 1200 2920cc EFI
|
|
|
|
Fiatdude
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2016, 20:50:04 pm » |
|
Did Berg make a header that bolts to the angle ports?  ? I've had to make my headers because of the different angle coming out of the heads |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fiat -- GONE Ovalholio -- GONE Ghia -- -- It's going Get lost for an evening or two -- http://selvedgeyard.com/Remember, as you travel the highway of life, For every mile of road, there is 2 miles of ditch |
|
|
|
BeetleBug
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2016, 07:08:44 am » |
|
Did Berg make a header that bolts to the angle ports? ? I've had to make my headers because of the different angle coming out of the heads Indeed they did. Thanks UltraOrange. Best rgs BB |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
|
|
|
|
Eddie DVK
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2016, 15:40:58 pm » |
|
I had angle flow heads on a wild race engine a few years ago. It was a tight fit with a Gene Berg 2" exhaust but I managed to make it fit without cutting the car. 281hp at 8080 rpms: -BB- Man that is a mean looking engine... if I had an engine like that,  I would not go turbo... Why did you BeetleBug if I may ask. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards Edgar
" Type 4, it is a completely different engine. You have to drive one to understand! "
|
|
|
|
Chip
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2016, 16:35:28 pm » |
|
Turbo made the car streetable and almost a full second faster...why would anyone ever stay NA?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BeetleBug
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2016, 20:07:55 pm » |
|
Consider this; A good. strong NA car will cross the 1/4" mile finish line at around 115 mph. A decent turbo car will have the same speed half way. Once turbo you will rarely look back. The 2386 was fun. Absolutely nothing below 5000 rpms but from there and up to 10200 rpms it was fast. But my 1641ccm turbo engine is faster  -BB- |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
|
|
|
|
Fiatdude
|
|
« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2016, 20:26:57 pm » |
|
I still trying to get over that Berg header for the angle ports --- -- That is only I've ever seen or heard of ---
But that transition to turbo is one of those Ah HA moments in ones life
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fiat -- GONE Ovalholio -- GONE Ghia -- -- It's going Get lost for an evening or two -- http://selvedgeyard.com/Remember, as you travel the highway of life, For every mile of road, there is 2 miles of ditch |
|
|
|
Eddie DVK
|
|
« Reply #16 on: January 14, 2016, 15:37:44 pm » |
|
Turbo made the car streetable and almost a full second faster...why would anyone ever stay NA?
Consider this; A good. strong NA car will cross the 1/4" mile finish line at around 115 mph. A decent turbo car will have the same speed half way. Once turbo you will rarely look back. The 2386 was fun. Absolutely nothing below 5000 rpms but from there and up to 10200 rpms it was fast. But my 1641ccm turbo engine is faster -BB- Ok clear, I get you on the faster part, I have never driven a turbo bug so can not comment on that. I personally like the sound/look/feel of the carbs and 281HP would make me very happy, I have half now  Regards Edgar |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards Edgar
" Type 4, it is a completely different engine. You have to drive one to understand! "
|
|
|
|
Chip
|
|
« Reply #17 on: January 14, 2016, 17:14:26 pm » |
|
Once you experience boost, you'll never be satisfied without it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff68
|
|
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2016, 15:10:05 pm » |
|
The 2110 in my car is carbureted (IDA's) but I think about turbocharging it at least three times a day.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Cal-look Lounge
Author
