The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2024, 03:02:10 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351216 Posts in 28657 Topics by 6854 Members
Latest Member: 74meanmachine
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Technical stuff
| | |-+  2. turbo thru a 3. intercooler back to 2.5
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 2. turbo thru a 3. intercooler back to 2.5  (Read 2778 times)
carbite
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


« on: September 09, 2016, 04:37:58 am »

turbo is 2. out. then to a 3. water/air intercooler. then  to 2.5.
whats the positives and negatives of doing this?
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2016, 11:16:10 am »

turbo is 2. out. then to a 3. water/air intercooler. then  to 2.5.
whats the positives and negatives of doing this?

Loss of airspeed.
Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Airspeed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 593



« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2016, 20:23:30 pm »

I think the loss of airspeed is not much of a concern in the example described. The cu-ft in and out remains the same. The turbulence from such transitions is what will cause a little resistance. However, the reduction in airspeed when the flow gets into the "huge" box which is called the intercooler, will be much, much bigger and that causes hardly any problem either. So, as long as these changes in cross-sections are not smaller then the 2" out of the turbo (in this example), its not a problem at all.
The only thing that you might feel, is that bigger tube sizes after the compressor will increase 'plenum'-volume, which could increse turbo-lag/response a little. No biggie usually in my experience.
Logged

"...these cars were preferred by the racers because the strut front suspension results in far superior handling than the regular torsion bar front end..."  - Keith Seume.
10.58 @ 130 mph (2/9/2022 Santa Pod)
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!