The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2024, 05:06:42 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351216 Posts in 28657 Topics by 6854 Members
Latest Member: 74meanmachine
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Technical stuff
| | |-+  header calculation
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: header calculation  (Read 5690 times)
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« on: September 20, 2016, 21:04:04 pm »

Hello Guys,
After reading the small powerhouses topic I was interested in finding the optimal header for my engine.
What I calculated was the following:



Stroke: (Inches)   
3.2
Bore: (Inches)   
3.7
Number of Cylinders:   
4
Exhaust Valve Diameter: (Inches)   
1.49
Exhaust Valve Opening Point: (Degrees )   
70
Exhaust Valve Duration: (Advertised)   
282
Exhaust Valve Centerline: (Degrees)   
109
Peak Power RPM:   
8000
Volumetric Efficiency:   
12.5
 Calculate
Calculated information appears below
Input All Values please
Your Primary Tube Length is 27.33
Your Primary Tube Diameter is 1.25 inches
Your Collector Diameter is 2.16 inches   One Collector


What is interesting for me is the small tube diameter! A chart I found says youi need 1 3/4 in primaries to rev up to 7500..
Am I missing something here? one is perhaps inside dia and the other outside?

some stuff to think about Smiley
Logged
JeeWee
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 67


the Netherlands


« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2016, 15:05:56 pm »

which calculator did you use?
Logged
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2016, 15:11:07 pm »

Sure you punched the right numbers?

1,25" headers does not exist..

You wont be able any way to run 27" primaries, to a collector.


Smiley
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2016, 15:19:32 pm »

Peter


All USA built systems are quoted in OD size [as are most others now] which always seemed weird to me as I have seen different wall thickness tubing used over the years

cheers Richie 
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2016, 16:27:17 pm »

I'm curious to know how you arrived at 12.5 for volumetric efficiency.
282° exhaust valve duration, is that total? @ .050"? @.020"?
Your engine makes peak power at 8,000? Or is that max rpm?

I think the numbers are entered wrong somewhere.
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2016, 19:08:58 pm »

thanks for your replies..
got the calculator from here:

http://www.wallaceracing.com/header_length.php

I found the volumetric efficiency on the small powerhouses topic... I could be wrong
282 degrees at 0.050

my heads seem to peak around 8500 on my motor (only calculated intake though) (2276 cc 48 mm valve)
Logged
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2016, 20:53:23 pm »

Shouldn't VE be alot closer to 100?
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2016, 00:10:43 am »

Shouldn't VE be alot closer to 100?

That's what I thought, it was a percentage. If your engine is only 12.5% efficient then 1.25" headers would make sense.

Changing only the VE to 85 gives you 1.61" (roughly 1 5/8") primaries and a 2.8" collector. That sounds more on the right track.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2016, 00:14:03 am by Zach Gomulka » Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2016, 07:20:46 am »

I think I used 88% on my last NA engine. Ended up with a Berg 1 3/4 big flange header.
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2016, 07:23:34 am »

Also. Use PipeMax.

If I recall correctly, you can set the lenght of primaries to a set point (normal VW headers are 900-950mm-ish)

And that would correct the diameter needed.
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Peter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1301



« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2016, 10:53:47 am »

Cool! thanks a lot!!! Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!