The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2024, 10:49:38 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351211 Posts in 28657 Topics by 6854 Members
Latest Member: 74meanmachine
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  15X6 ERCO WITH 4" BACK SPACING..WILL THEY FIT UNDER STOCK REAR FENDERS?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 15X6 ERCO WITH 4" BACK SPACING..WILL THEY FIT UNDER STOCK REAR FENDERS?  (Read 5386 times)
Stephen schmidt
Full Member
***
Posts: 104
« on: July 11, 2018, 00:52:06 am »
As the title states. I have 1 1/2" widened rear fenders, but it wold be great to run a stock width fender if possible.

The car isn't together yet so I haven't had time to mock it all up.  Just curious if it will work!

Trans is a short axle with type3 5x130 drums.

Car: 1959 VW Beetle

Tires are M&H 26x15x6 Slicks.

Thanks!
Logged
neil68
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2018, 05:54:19 am »
I have CMS 6” wheels (CMS produced the ERCO wheels). Mine are 3.5” backspace with short axles and with M&H 215/65 drag tires it fits just nicely under my stock 68 fenders.  So you should be fine with 4” backspace.
Logged
Neil
Der Kleiner Rennwagens
'68 Beetle, 2332 cc, 204 WHP
12.5 seconds @ 172 KM/H (107.5 MPH)
Dynojet Test:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9B_H3eklAo
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2018, 09:30:22 am »
I have MH 215/65-15s with 5,5" ET30 wheels. Fits under stock fenders easy.

Same with 7" ET23 Porsche rims and 205/70 tires so I guess you are good to go on stock fenders.
Logged
The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Stephen schmidt
Full Member
***
Posts: 104
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2018, 17:57:35 pm »
Yah, I was thinking it would be fine! Most people run 15x6 with 3.5" pack spacing.  So the tires would tuck in another 1/2" and the type 3 drums are a hair wider, so it might wash in the end.

Thanks guys!

Stephen
Logged
Neil Davies
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3438
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2018, 07:30:50 am »
If you have adjustable springplates you could have clearance issues on the inside of the tyre. You could always run a small spacer to find tune the position of the wheel.
Logged
2007cc, 48IDFs, street car. 14.45@93 on pump fuel, treads, muffler and fanbelt. October 2017!
Stephen schmidt
Full Member
***
Posts: 104
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2018, 15:29:26 pm »
Quote from: Neil Davies on July 13, 2018, 07:30:50 am
If you have adjustable springplates you could have clearance issues on the inside of the tyre. You could always run a small spacer to find tune the position of the wheel.

I won't have adjustable spring plates, however a spacer may not be a bad idea! Thanks!
Logged
nicolas
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4010
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2018, 10:41:50 am »
Quote from: Erlend / bug66 on July 12, 2018, 09:30:22 am
I have MH 215/65-15s with 5,5" ET30 wheels. Fits under stock fenders easy.

Same with 7" ET23 Porsche rims and 205/70 tires so I guess you are good to go on stock fenders.

is this with short axles? i have IRS and it seems not possible with the ruff trialfitting i did a few weeks ago.

Logged
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2018, 20:22:00 pm »
Quote from: nicolas on August 19, 2018, 10:41:50 am
Quote from: Erlend / bug66 on July 12, 2018, 09:30:22 am
I have MH 215/65-15s with 5,5" ET30 wheels. Fits under stock fenders easy.

Same with 7" ET23 Porsche rims and 205/70 tires so I guess you are good to go on stock fenders.

is this with short axles? i have IRS and it seems not possible with the ruff trialfitting i did a few weeks ago.



Short.

I’ve done it on long axles also.
Logged
The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
nicolas
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4010
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2018, 12:27:47 pm »
Quote from: Erlend / bug66 on August 19, 2018, 20:22:00 pm
Quote from: nicolas on August 19, 2018, 10:41:50 am
Quote from: Erlend / bug66 on July 12, 2018, 09:30:22 am
I have MH 215/65-15s with 5,5" ET30 wheels. Fits under stock fenders easy.

Same with 7" ET23 Porsche rims and 205/70 tires so I guess you are good to go on stock fenders.

is this with short axles? i have IRS and it seems not possible with the ruff trialfitting i did a few weeks ago.





Short.

I’ve done it on long axles also.

oh, i wasn't able to do that on IRS… it does have type3 drums, but i need to look at it better. i want cookies to fit under the fenders. still puzzling.  Grin
Logged
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2018, 12:50:42 pm »
Long axles. I think the rears are 6 inches. 215/65-15 MH DOTs

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Logged
The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
nicolas
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4010
« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2018, 07:28:50 am »
yes they are.   Wink i was putting the 7's on, but no chance. they are too wide on long axles or IRS. without narrowing. but thank you very very much.
Logged
Neil Davies
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3438
« Reply #11 on: August 21, 2018, 12:28:31 pm »
7s are too much on long axles.

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Logged
2007cc, 48IDFs, street car. 14.45@93 on pump fuel, treads, muffler and fanbelt. October 2017!
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!