The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 22, 2024, 15:33:01 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351205 Posts in 28655 Topics by 6853 Members
Latest Member: Hacksaw Racing
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  In Da Werks
| | |-+  Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Print
Author Topic: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light  (Read 55155 times)
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #60 on: January 14, 2019, 19:44:32 pm »


But when the price jumped up almost 100% I really couldn't justify it.



Welcome to the world of street cars Shocked Grin

Your comment just needed a slight adjustment..  Grin
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #61 on: January 14, 2019, 21:19:08 pm »


But when the price jumped up almost 100% I really couldn't justify it.



Welcome to the world of street cars Shocked Grin

 Grin

Your comment just needed a slight adjustment..  Grin
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #62 on: January 15, 2019, 09:11:20 am »

Our new garage is about halfway between Oslo and Gardermoen, so I thought I should drive the car to SCC the first year it'll race..  Roll Eyes I think it's about 25km, so doable  Grin


Does anyone have a good tip about brakes? The car already have discs on all four corners, but 4x130 rotors. Money wise I should just buy new rotors in chevy PCD. 10,22 on EMPI brakes was no problem, so a second faster shouldn't be a big problem?  Shocked  Grin
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #63 on: February 02, 2019, 19:54:40 pm »

No car in the garage, so tore the engine for a checkup.

So far so good!


[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #64 on: February 02, 2019, 19:57:53 pm »

I can see a car in the garage Cheesy 

Hard to tell on plugs as looks like they done a few passes? but timing mark looks quite far down strap
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #65 on: February 02, 2019, 20:10:08 pm »

I can see a car in the garage Cheesy 

Hard to tell on plugs as looks like they done a few passes? but timing mark looks quite far down strap

Not my car  Grin

All last season. Dyno and SCC, and some street miles
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #66 on: February 02, 2019, 20:11:37 pm »

How does one read timing on the plug?
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #67 on: February 02, 2019, 20:32:23 pm »

On the ground strap, if you do a pass on new plugs and check them after[ mustnt drive car back though, shut it off straight after pass] you will see a ring on strap, around the bend area or slightly before seems to be ideal on alcohol based fuels
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #68 on: February 02, 2019, 21:24:39 pm »

On the ground strap, if you do a pass on new plugs and check them after[ mustnt drive car back though, shut it off straight after pass] you will see a ring on strap, around the bend area or slightly before seems to be ideal on alcohol based fuels

Ok, i believe I’ve got around 20° timing at 32-33 psi.

Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #69 on: February 02, 2019, 21:31:06 pm »

I’ve also spent some time to figure out the angles to mount the coil overs at.

At level axles (0° camber) they will be angled 20° inwards to the middle of the car, and 90° to the upper ladder bar tube.

This will aid the coil overs to not loose wheel rate (spring rate measured at the wheel).

If you mount them straight up, they will get a wrong angle due to the arching of the swingaxle, and get less and less wheel rate as the wheel travels up.

Now the wheel rate should get higher as the car squats more and more.

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
leec
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2599


« Reply #70 on: February 02, 2019, 22:33:45 pm »

Hi,

Are the heads  CB wedgeports?
What cc is in the chambers

Thanks,
Lee
Logged
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #71 on: February 02, 2019, 23:06:41 pm »

Hi,

Are the heads  CB wedgeports?
What cc is in the chambers

Thanks,
Lee

Yup, the new style.

67cc chambers, 1,2mm deck and 8,2-1 I think.

Haven’t touched the heads.
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
leec
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2599


« Reply #72 on: February 02, 2019, 23:19:06 pm »

What barrels and pistons? Have you dished the pistons?
Thanks,
Lee
Logged
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #73 on: February 02, 2019, 23:56:27 pm »

What barrels and pistons? Have you dished the pistons?
Thanks,
Lee

Wiseco and REVs.

No need for dishing pistons with big enough chambers
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
kalle155
Newbie
*
Posts: 18


« Reply #74 on: February 04, 2019, 12:26:12 pm »

Are you using only the stock dh oil cooler or do you have an extrenal also? , and does your oil temp stay cool with that?
Logged
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #75 on: February 04, 2019, 12:45:16 pm »

Are you using only the stock dh oil cooler or do you have an extrenal also? , and does your oil temp stay cool with that?

Stock and an Atoimic cooler also. I might skip the DH cooler. The engine will be 3" higher in the new car, and I think I'll need to be able to remove the shroud by just pivoting it out.

Oil temps are manageable  Grin
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #76 on: February 08, 2019, 08:41:56 am »

Tore the rest of the engine last night, rod bearings are shite and mains may work again.

I'll change the oil pump as it finally got some nicks in it.

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Frallan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 933



« Reply #77 on: February 08, 2019, 08:50:17 am »

Solution: Dry sump. Check out TP pump. Very good stuff.
CB is more affordable but needs massaging and has some questions marks.
Pauter, Autocraft are jewels but are probably overkill for most applications.
Logged

Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #78 on: February 08, 2019, 08:56:03 am »

Solution: Dry sump. Check out TP pump. Very good stuff.
CB is more affordable but needs massaging and has some questions marks.
Pauter, Autocraft are jewels but are probably overkill for most applications.

I've thought the same thought.. However I've never had any oil pressure problem.

I believe this may be a crank issue? The crank only has 1 oil port per rod, and consequently the rod bearing needs to drag the oil 1 round, before being oiled on the same spot?
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #79 on: February 08, 2019, 10:57:05 am »

Looks like oil contamination from E85 & maybe some aeration of oil to me, center main looks pretty good for all the abuse it gets, also oil pressure like boost pressure is only a measure of resistance, its flow the bearings really need, thick cold oil gives lots of pressure but no flow which is why we pre heat oil Smiley
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #80 on: February 08, 2019, 11:01:19 am »

Looks like oil contamination from E85 & maybe some aeration of oil to me, center main looks pretty good for all the abuse it gets, also oil pressure like boost pressure is only a measure of resistance, its flow the bearings really need, thick cold oil gives lots of pressure but no flow which is why we pre heat oil Smiley

Thanks!

I never drive it before the oil is hot. But yeah, I admit to using thick oil  Grin

Maybe I should start to get parts for a dry sump system after all..
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #81 on: February 08, 2019, 11:04:49 am »

Richie: Internal vs. external bearing grooves. Done any research?
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #82 on: February 08, 2019, 21:21:31 pm »

I used plenty of both, never seen any real evidence of either being better or worse, more important to make sure oil holes line up and bearing is decent quality material
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #83 on: February 08, 2019, 22:09:08 pm »

I used plenty of both, never seen any real evidence of either being better or worse, more important to make sure oil holes line up and bearing is decent quality material

Jo said you’ve got silverlines in stock? Any good?
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Berger
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 899


www.bugrent.no


« Reply #84 on: February 08, 2019, 22:48:04 pm »

Solution: Dry sump. Check out TP pump. Very good stuff.
CB is more affordable but needs massaging and has some questions marks.
Pauter, Autocraft are jewels but are probably overkill for most applications.

I've thought the same thought.. However I've never had any oil pressure problem.

I believe this may be a crank issue? The crank only has 1 oil port per rod, and consequently the rod bearing needs to drag the oil 1 round, before being oiled on the same spot?

You need to use a better oil, Ester base handles E85 very well, gives a stronger oil film and hangs on to metal longer. It`s all about when the oil film gives up Wink
Logged



This is my simple religion:
-Be cool
-Don't be an asshole
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #85 on: February 09, 2019, 15:54:07 pm »

Solution: Dry sump. Check out TP pump. Very good stuff.
CB is more affordable but needs massaging and has some questions marks.
Pauter, Autocraft are jewels but are probably overkill for most applications.

I've thought the same thought.. However I've never had any oil pressure problem.

I believe this may be a crank issue? The crank only has 1 oil port per rod, and consequently the rod bearing needs to drag the oil 1 round, before being oiled on the same spot?

You need to use a better oil, Ester base handles E85 very well, gives a stronger oil film and hangs on to metal longer. It`s all about when the oil film gives up Wink

I'm sure oil plays it’s part also!

I’ll clean the case and internals up good and slap new bearings in it. Might do a dry sump, if the money is right..



I only need a few bits and bobs on the engine this year, so quite pleased!
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #86 on: February 18, 2019, 14:13:04 pm »

While the car is in Sweden, the engine in pieces, and the transmission in plastic waiting to get re-sealed, I'm thinking about making the new exhaust  Grin

I think I need a new header, as the "CB-style" I have will interfere with everything.. Tubo will hit the rear valance at the minimum.




That said, I also need to make new plenums, or at least redo the ones I have. They will be too tall, at least the entrance pipes into the plenums.

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

I was hoping to not have to cut away the "roof" below the window inside the engine room.


Looking at old pictures, I'm hoping I can use the intake/TBs at all..

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]
« Last Edit: February 18, 2019, 14:15:48 pm by Erlend / bug66 » Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #87 on: February 18, 2019, 19:01:52 pm »


Welcome to the world of race cars Shocked Grin

Again Grin
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958

SCC Event


WWW
« Reply #88 on: February 18, 2019, 21:21:07 pm »

Hah! I’m not complaining.. I’m just breaking everything down, so I can sleep at night without crying  Grin
Logged

The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018

The '59:
Not yet..
richie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5687



« Reply #89 on: February 18, 2019, 21:29:30 pm »

With all that room you have over trans now seems stupid to not move turbo forward anyway to help with weight distribution Smiley
Logged

Cars are supposed to be driven, not just talked about!!!   


Good parts might be expensive but good advice is priceless Wink
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!