|
Jøran Larssen
Sr. Member
Posts: 264
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 19, 2006, 21:10:01 pm » |
|
Mooohaahaaahaaa The ugly duckling!
|
|
|
Logged
|
SCC 2010: 11.103 @ 192.00 km/h
|
|
|
speedwell
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 19, 2006, 21:48:33 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Andi/DFL
|
|
« Reply #33 on: March 20, 2006, 12:27:24 pm » |
|
bwaaaharrrharrr
*hualp*
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lid
Newbie
Posts: 48
|
|
« Reply #34 on: March 20, 2006, 22:44:08 pm » |
|
I think Eyebrows is the worst vwpart ever to be made
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SilverPig
Full Member
Posts: 100
Alles klar?
|
|
« Reply #35 on: March 23, 2006, 21:27:57 pm » |
|
So...simple math points in the direction of a winner, and thus far it seems like EYEBROWS are the most hated add-on...closely followed by mudflaps. Baaah.....
|
|
|
Logged
|
Say hello to my little friend!
|
|
|
Roman
|
|
« Reply #36 on: March 23, 2006, 22:45:21 pm » |
|
In Sweden mudflaps were stock, so that is not a add-on, it is a take-off.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SilverPig
Full Member
Posts: 100
Alles klar?
|
|
« Reply #37 on: March 24, 2006, 08:54:24 am » |
|
Hmm...good point Anders.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Say hello to my little friend!
|
|
|
Ivan
|
|
« Reply #38 on: April 27, 2006, 11:15:23 am » |
|
GRAVEL GUARDS!
Oh, and people who take the bumpers off a late model Type 3 and think it looks better. Or worse still, people who take the bumpers off a late model Type 3 and tell you it is now... California Look. It isn't!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fast54vw
Jr. Member
Posts: 76
|
|
« Reply #39 on: April 29, 2006, 09:23:14 am » |
|
a narrowed front end. well at least narrowed any more than to put the tires where they should be
|
|
|
Logged
|
Its not what you do, its how you do it!
|
|
|
BABOON
SCC Official
Jr. Member
Posts: 95
|
|
« Reply #40 on: April 29, 2006, 15:07:29 pm » |
|
a narrowed front end. well at least narrowed any more than to put the tires where they should be
You are so correct. Too narrowed looks stupid.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ZaNy
Newbie
Posts: 23
|
|
« Reply #41 on: April 30, 2006, 13:24:50 pm » |
|
Most of the parts you mentioned above does not belong in the cal-look genre/style, like roof racks, eye brows, mud flaps aso. It's like putting low profille tyres on a off-road car, or KC lights on a FATF(Fast and The Furious) Car. I think all the parts we are talking about here looks cool on a custom/old school bug though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fast54vw
Jr. Member
Posts: 76
|
|
« Reply #42 on: May 02, 2006, 07:56:56 am » |
|
how about that "Cal Look" emblem Johnnys speed & chrome use to sell.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Its not what you do, its how you do it!
|
|
|
SilverPig
Full Member
Posts: 100
Alles klar?
|
|
« Reply #43 on: May 02, 2006, 10:01:09 am » |
|
Well...what's the point? If it really is a true looker, there shouldn't be any reason to put on a sign telling everyone what it is...now is it? It's like letting Jesus have a tag hanging around his neck with "Jesus" on....or something like that. It kinda speaks for itself is what I mean.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Say hello to my little friend!
|
|
|
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 3214
12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008
|
|
« Reply #44 on: May 02, 2006, 13:11:06 pm » |
|
Fast54vw: I think that is the funniest one yet, just the presence of that bling bling badge turns a cal-looker into a resto looker...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
|
|
|
Luftkraft
|
|
« Reply #45 on: May 02, 2006, 13:40:11 pm » |
|
that's a good one! in fact that stupid "cal look" emblem is the complete opposite to the whole cal look philosophy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
LUFTKRAFT Hopped-Up Vee Dubs since 1998 LOWTECH Traditional Hot Rods and Customs Online ...because stock sucks.
|
|
|
SOB/RFH
Sr. Member
Posts: 329
Have fun!!
|
|
« Reply #46 on: May 02, 2006, 16:28:32 pm » |
|
The most hated add on to a Cal-looker has to be the stock engine!!!!! Like a padded bra!!!!! Looks good but ends up as a dissaponintment!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SilverPig
Full Member
Posts: 100
Alles klar?
|
|
« Reply #47 on: May 03, 2006, 08:15:28 am » |
|
Hmmm...since the stock engine is...erm...stock, it's hardly an add-on...now is it?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Say hello to my little friend!
|
|
|
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 3214
12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008
|
|
« Reply #48 on: May 03, 2006, 08:53:11 am » |
|
If it's not a "add on", it's a "let down"
|
|
|
Logged
|
Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
|
|
|
Mangokid
Full Member
Posts: 150
"Inhale the world", (in memory of MH)
|
|
« Reply #49 on: June 21, 2006, 20:25:00 pm » |
|
Kinda wonder why no ones mentioned a big, blastin, dumbass piece of stereo with a real horny lookin' cd-player underneath the tachometer. Shite that looks stupid!
Not to mention that thing on the hood that looks like a see through snowplough, supposed to "deflect mosquitos" from the windshield. PUKEPUKEPUKE!!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
To really know the edge and what lies beyond, one must have passed it.
|
|
|
pre-cal
Newbie
Posts: 23
|
|
« Reply #50 on: June 22, 2006, 11:15:48 am » |
|
...how come nobody has mentioned chrome . You could call it an add-on....from the factory . So guys..dechrome and no wash..haha
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mangokid
Full Member
Posts: 150
"Inhale the world", (in memory of MH)
|
|
« Reply #51 on: June 22, 2006, 12:17:51 pm » |
|
It most certainly IS an add on mr. Pre!
As far as I'm concerned, the factory itself built the first cal-lookers, but then they started adding crome and all was lost. Take a look at this one. No hubcaps, ass up, nose down, and where the hell is all the crome? It even has a pair of T-bar looking bumpers, but just a few minutes after this shot was taken the mechanics went bak to work.
"Ach, helmut, wir must srow away sose stoopid loking bumpers. It's naat callook at all".
|
|
« Last Edit: June 22, 2006, 12:21:05 pm by Mangokid »
|
Logged
|
To really know the edge and what lies beyond, one must have passed it.
|
|
|
pre-cal
Newbie
Posts: 23
|
|
« Reply #52 on: June 22, 2006, 12:25:48 pm » |
|
As usual Thomas...you´re spot on!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 3214
12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008
|
|
« Reply #53 on: June 22, 2006, 12:37:22 pm » |
|
I think they stuck the chrome on there to separate the hardcore guys from the wannabe's.... ;-)
|
|
|
Logged
|
Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
|
|
|
Olaf A./DFL
|
|
« Reply #54 on: June 22, 2006, 12:46:49 pm » |
|
"Ach, helmut, wir must srow away sose stoopid loking bumpers. It's naat callook at all".
huharahahahahaaaa -i just fell off my chair…
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mangokid
Full Member
Posts: 150
"Inhale the world", (in memory of MH)
|
|
« Reply #55 on: June 22, 2006, 12:52:26 pm » |
|
oh, sorry dude, or, ehrm, pardon my german.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To really know the edge and what lies beyond, one must have passed it.
|
|
|
Soddli
Jr. Member
Posts: 99
Thomas
|
|
« Reply #56 on: June 22, 2006, 13:29:59 pm » |
|
"Ach, helmut, wir must srow away sose stoopid loking bumpers. It's naat callook at all". ROFL
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gregor/DFL
Full Member
Posts: 170
No comment...
|
|
« Reply #57 on: June 22, 2006, 13:59:11 pm » |
|
"Ach, helmut, wir must srow away sose stoopid loking bumpers. It's naat callook at all".
Murrrharrhrarhar! The funniest thing I ever read in here-although I´m German
|
|
|
Logged
|
1965 black bug with Empi 5s
|
|
|
Gregor/DFL
Full Member
Posts: 170
No comment...
|
|
« Reply #58 on: June 22, 2006, 15:22:31 pm » |
|
"Re: What's the most hated add-on to a cal-looker?" Fur?
|
|
|
Logged
|
1965 black bug with Empi 5s
|
|
|
Lee.C
|
|
« Reply #59 on: June 23, 2006, 01:15:58 am » |
|
I think they stuck the chrome on there to separate the hardcore guys from the wannabe's.... ;-)
Couldn't agree more dude
|
|
|
Logged
|
You either "Get It" or you don't......
|
|
|
|