The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2024, 16:17:47 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351219 Posts in 28657 Topics by 6854 Members
Latest Member: 74meanmachine
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  max cfm / horsepower thru stock valve diameter (35 x 32mm)?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: max cfm / horsepower thru stock valve diameter (35 x 32mm)?  (Read 16486 times)
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7121



« on: January 29, 2008, 22:17:10 pm »

With all the talk about the small cc powerhouses, what about cfm / hp possible with stock diameter valves (dual port head, of course)

Reading some of the info in the old Bill Fisher book, some of the simple mods made to stock dual port heads gave some pretty impressive increases in flow. Unfortunately, they never published any results as far as these heads on a motor, on a dyno.

Does anybody have any hard facts? Engine specifics?

My friend ran a 1679cc, stock valved (ported by Roger Crawford/Heads Up), Web Cam 110 (think Engle 120), 1.25 rockers, 40IDF Webers (32mm vents), 8.4:1, 1-5/8 header. With this motor, and muffler, radials, bumpers, interior....etc, the car went 14.71 @ Sacramento. Doing some rough math, that's what....128hp or so?

Logged
John Maher
Full Member
***
Posts: 140



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2008, 12:16:59 pm »

In theory, an engine fitted with 35.5mm inlet valves could flow enough air to make well over 160 bhp normally aspirated but in the real world you might make 140 bhp with an optimised port.

How the theory works....

Max possible airflow at 28" test depression is 147cfm per square inch (sharp edge orifice)

Due to port shape, valve angle, chamber design etc, true absolute maximum for an optimised port and chamber design will not exceed 133cfm/sqin (most heads get nowhere near this figure)

Smallest area of the port (max flow limiter) is likely to be seat ID, which would be no bigger than 92% of valve diameter

Some maths....

35.5mm = 1.286 inches

1.286" x 92% = 1.183"

1.183" diam has an area of 1.099 square inches (pi x radius^2)

Subtract the area occupied by an 8mm valve stem: .0764 sqin....

Flow area available = 1.0226 sqin

Max theoretical flow for the port: 1.0226 x 147 = 150.3cfm @ 28" test depression

Using the 133cfm/sqin calculation instead: 1.0226 x 133 = 136cfm @ 28"

Superflow's formula for converting port flow @ 28" into bhp...

CFM @ 28" x 0.257 x number of cylinders

gives us...

136 x 0.257 x 4 = 140 bhp

Tuning the intake and exhaust lengths to boost volumetric efficiency above 100% (possibly as much as 120% at peak torque) could result in bigger numbers.

-------------------------------------------------

As useful as the theories and formulas are, they only count if you put them into practice   Wink

PS,  the Bill Fisher book doesn't state what test depression was used for the published flow numbers. Also, I assume the flow bench they used wasn't calibrated against a known standard because the figures are so high, meaning the results are only useful for comparison with tests carried out on the same bench
« Last Edit: January 30, 2008, 13:22:47 pm by John Maher » Logged

John Maher

Udo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2077



« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2008, 20:45:51 pm »

140 hp is the same as my thought's , i had a 1776 in the mid 80's with 130 hp with 35,5 x 32 valves , but this was in the begining of building engines .  Wink

Udo
Logged

Jim Ratto
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7121



« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2008, 21:00:20 pm »

Thanks John and Udo. I was thinking 120hp tops. There is an interesting formula to compute air-speed vs. cam profile and its effects on engine powerband in AG Bell's book "4-Stroke Performance Tuning" and it came up with sorely conservative figures for stock valve diam and larger cc motors.
Logged
Bewitched666
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 863


Bewitched


« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2008, 21:59:43 pm »

My first 1679 engine with
69 c/w crank
stock ported and polished heads
40 dells
w120 cam
1:25 rockers
made 100 hp on a dyno back in the mid 80's
 Grin
Logged

Fast vw beetle's rule
dirk zeyen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 292



« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2008, 22:25:49 pm »

hello,

that is a perfect question!!!
my engine is a 78x90.5, w120, dellorto 45 drla, 35.5/32 valves and 1.5/8 merged header, and i hope to run in the low 14 or maybe high 13, so what do you think?!?
i am thinking about thining the valve stem on the inlet valve from 8mm to 7 or 6.5 mm under the valve guide to increase flow?!?
i run a stock 4.375 r/p gearbox with 195/65-15 tires.
what do you think? any tips?

dirk zeyen ( friend of power and stock size valves)

ps: sorry about my english Wink
Logged

back again!!!
Torben Alstrup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 716


« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2008, 01:04:53 am »

Yes, real life (street)engines typically have a max around 130 hp. with stock valved heads. 120 hp out of 35/32 mm valves is relatively easy. From thereon up, its getting more difficult. Race is another story.
T
Logged
Udo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2077



« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2008, 07:17:06 am »

run in the low 14 or maybe high 13

Dirk

For this you need something about 150 hp i think . Depends on the car and gear ratios .

Udo
Logged

Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2008, 11:44:47 am »

run in the low 14 or maybe high 13

Dirk

For this you need something about 150 hp i think . Depends on the car and gear ratios .

Udo

yes i have also done so far tests with my 1955ccm engine with 35x32 valves, 324° german cam, 9,3:1, 205/70, 4,375 transmission, and 40 dells...My best run was 15,5s in a 63 bug w/o bumpers, rear seats, only one driver seat...if you done more compression, better valve job, better porting, bigger carbs,  i think low 14s are possible....but only with a lightweight car....
This season i will take the compression higher, 1.25 rockers and change to fuel injection, 205/60 tires.. i hope this could be the step to high 14s...Maybe:-))

Bye
Tom
Logged
dirk zeyen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 292



« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2008, 20:07:56 pm »

hello,

i think an important thing is lightweight!!! 1ps/5kg means 160ps/800kg or 180ps/900kg and 140ps/700kg!!!
so if i canīt spent much money for the engine - lighten your car!!!
with a stock valve engine my car pulls hard from 2500-6000rpm so i donīt need a close ratio gearbox, i will use my 4.375 gearbox with small diameter tires on the 1/4 mile.
hey tom i say it again, you use the wrong tires, put some 195/50-15 in the rear and you think you have won 20ponys Wink Wink Wink
ok they look ugly but it will work on the quarter with your engine and gearbox!!!
hey udo you said i need 150ps but what about the weight of this car you mean, thanks for info?

dirk zeyen
Logged

back again!!!
Bewitched666
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 863


Bewitched


« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2008, 20:17:37 pm »

There is this guy running stock heads and stock valves with some work on them on a 1835.
Think he runs in the 12's,saw it on you tube or some thread here or the other forum Grin
Logged

Fast vw beetle's rule
dirk zeyen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 292



« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2008, 20:42:23 pm »

hello,

12īs with stock valves?Huh more infos!!!
thatīs what i want Grin Grin Grin Grin

dirk zeyen
Logged

back again!!!
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2008, 00:56:15 am »

There is this guy running stock heads and stock valves with some work on them on a 1835.
Think he runs in the 12's,saw it on you tube or some thread here or the other forum Grin

there is the thread for the 13,??s 1835ccm car with stock heads...
http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,188.0.html
But the car weight nearly 650kg or so....

Marcus nwe project is now a WBX turbo concept in a Type 3 fastback...

Bye
Tom
Logged
dirk zeyen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 292



« Reply #13 on: February 14, 2008, 22:48:05 pm »

hello,

now i think we should ask johannes persson how much stock valve heads can flow Wink Wink Wink
he take them to a new lewel!!!

dirk zeyen
Logged

back again!!!
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2008, 12:45:55 pm »

Hi,
Johannes has talked to me, that 170 HP with a 2,3l with stock heads (35,5x32) are realistic....with right cam (W120 with 1,25 rockers) and 40 Dells (34 vents) or Fuel injection....

Bye
Tom
Logged
dirk zeyen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 292



« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2008, 16:46:28 pm »

hey tom

that's music to my ears Grin Grin Grin

if you are interrested i can give you different tires for some test at DDD. i'll be there with two cars so i can give you 195/50, 195/60 and 195/65 alll with 130/5 porsche pattern.

dirk zeyen
Logged

back again!!!
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!