The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 24, 2024, 23:34:33 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351216
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
The weight saving thread
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
9
10
[
11
]
12
13
...
34
Author
Topic: The weight saving thread (Read 581476 times)
benssp
Hero Member
Posts: 1655
www.callookvw.com
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #300 on:
November 05, 2009, 12:52:09 pm »
A tiny one this time, brake hose clips genuine 7.8g, stainless 5.5g saving 13.8g per car, not including the rust on old ones
and they're shiny
Logged
www.vwheritage.com
My Job
www.bernardnewbury.co.uk
My Team
any work related enquiries to
ben@vwheritage.com
PM's about work will not be answered
Bitburg Motor Boat Club Founder Member
YMCA
Chris W
Sr. Member
Posts: 363
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #301 on:
November 05, 2009, 18:56:10 pm »
Where do you get stainless ones?
Logged
benssp
Hero Member
Posts: 1655
www.callookvw.com
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #302 on:
November 05, 2009, 20:01:58 pm »
Quote from: Chris W on November 05, 2009, 18:56:10 pm
Where do you get stainless ones?
www.vwheritage.com
Logged
www.vwheritage.com
My Job
www.bernardnewbury.co.uk
My Team
any work related enquiries to
ben@vwheritage.com
PM's about work will not be answered
Bitburg Motor Boat Club Founder Member
YMCA
The Ideaman
Hero Member
Posts: 625
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #303 on:
November 05, 2009, 20:23:43 pm »
Quote from: Bruce on September 24, 2009, 03:00:39 am
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on September 20, 2009, 22:13:51 pm
200mm KEP 1700# pressure plate vs aluminium version of the same. Savings of 1,528.7 grams or just under 3lbs 6oz
I sent a message to KEP, and they don't make a Type 1 clutch where the stamped part is Aluminium. What is that clutch you weighed for?
KEP said their aluminium Type 1 clutch is a "Stage I with aluminum face".
How does this work? Anyone ever used a clutch with an aluminium shoe?
Scott Sebastian runs my old one in his class 11 car.
Logged
It is the soldier,
Who salutes the flag,
Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped in the flag,
Who allows the protestor to burn the flag.
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #304 on:
November 08, 2009, 19:59:09 pm »
Does anyone know what the weight difference is between a super diff and a quaife lsd? I keep hearing that they are heavy but how heavy is heavy?
andy
Logged
L.B.C.R.
Martin
Hero Member
Posts: 810
Cash Converter....
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #305 on:
November 08, 2009, 21:29:12 pm »
Ask Peter,
Its quite a lot.
Logged
Martin
9 sec street car, its just simply not fast enough
Swing axle to CV convertion is on the website now
www.taylormachine.co.uk
OFF/500
Steve D.
Full Member
Posts: 204
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #306 on:
November 08, 2009, 21:49:18 pm »
Can't help you with the weight of a quaife, but off the top of my head my old T1 IRS ZF weighed in at 16.5lbs if I remember correctly, and my 091 Peloquin TBD is roughly a fokken tank.
Logged
Über Alles
5 tracks, 5 days, 1000+ miles.
10.77 avg. on pump fuel.
238I
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #307 on:
November 09, 2009, 08:43:37 am »
I shall give Mr E a call later,
andy
Logged
L.B.C.R.
FIDDE
Jr. Member
Posts: 68
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #308 on:
November 09, 2009, 12:54:23 pm »
How many kg is it in a single skin body,if i remove all the the inner panels?.The bulkhead and the rear sheet metal
is already gone,and its going to be replaced with 0.7 alu panels,is it worth the job?what do you think?
Logged
58vw
Hero Member
Posts: 520
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #309 on:
November 10, 2009, 08:41:28 am »
has anyone had sucess with an aluminum beam in a full bodied car? do they hold up? pros? cons?
Logged
www.4inbore.com
Angleflows...order them now
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #310 on:
November 10, 2009, 10:54:39 am »
I've got one in my '66, it's stood up to a years worth of wheelies and street driving with no real problems,
it's a jamar one with the billet shock towers. If you get one be sure to check the alignment of the top and bottom adjusters, the one i got was out by about 1.5 mm and caused a bit of head scratching when it came down to sorting the camber!
Saved around 15 kg over the original b/j beam
And they look good too, my mot tester was v. impressed
andy
«
Last Edit: November 10, 2009, 11:03:05 am by andy M.
»
Logged
L.B.C.R.
Neil Davies
Hero Member
Posts: 3438
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #311 on:
November 10, 2009, 10:59:09 am »
Quote from: 58vw on November 10, 2009, 08:41:28 am
has anyone had sucess with an aluminum beam in a full bodied car? do they hold up? pros? cons?
Pete Shattock and Andy Marriot from the Outlaws both run aluminium beams, Andy only swapped over recently but Pete has been running one for several years, having driven all over europe with it. Both run stock stroke motors in all steel cars (Pete has a 1776 '61, Andy has a 1914 '66) running 11.9's and 12.0's!
I'm sure either of them would chime in with more help!
Logged
2007cc, 48IDFs, street car. 14.45@93 on pump fuel, treads, muffler and fanbelt. October 2017!
58vw
Hero Member
Posts: 520
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #312 on:
November 10, 2009, 17:41:40 pm »
thanks for the input guys
Logged
www.4inbore.com
Angleflows...order them now
Peter Shattock
Sr. Member
Posts: 359
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #313 on:
November 10, 2009, 22:42:06 pm »
As Andy and Neil have already said there is no problem in principal with and ali beam with a street car but I would suggest you keep an eye on two things. The bushes in the beams don't necessarily fit to well and I've ended up making new ones (speak to Paul Woodhead on here about suitable material) and now the bushes fit the beam and the arms very nicely so there is no play. The other issue is if you use a standard steering box you need to be carefull that when you bolt it up to the beam that the you do not over tighten the clamp as the beam goes out of round and pinches the arm in the beam and you loose free suspension travel on that side of the car with some nasty handling consequences. I ended up locating the steering box and torquing it to the recommended VW spec 22-25ft-lbs (I think) and reaming the bush in position in the beam, to ensure you still have free travel.
There is one other thing the look good with the wheels up off the startline!
Hope this helps
Peter
Logged
The fastest beetle in the village
58vw
Hero Member
Posts: 520
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #314 on:
November 11, 2009, 01:30:39 am »
thanks peter
Logged
www.4inbore.com
Angleflows...order them now
PPRMicke
Sr. Member
Posts: 376
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #315 on:
November 12, 2009, 21:51:45 pm »
Door hinges in aluminum
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
Posts: 1420
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #316 on:
November 13, 2009, 04:16:25 am »
Quote from: PPRMicke on November 12, 2009, 21:51:45 pm
Door hinges in aluminum
Dibbs!
Did ya make more than 1 set?
Logged
PPRMicke
Sr. Member
Posts: 376
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #317 on:
November 13, 2009, 13:58:21 pm »
Quote from: Bruce on November 13, 2009, 04:16:25 am
Quote from: PPRMicke on November 12, 2009, 21:51:45 pm
Door hinges in aluminum
Dibbs!
Did ya make more than 1 set?
Mail me
You might want a door skin of carbon fiber 500g
Logged
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #318 on:
November 14, 2009, 01:12:38 am »
Quote from: Bruce on November 13, 2009, 04:16:25 am
Quote from: PPRMicke on November 12, 2009, 21:51:45 pm
Door hinges in aluminum
Dibbs!
Did ya make more than 1 set?
If you are making more than one set of these,I am sure there will be a few people on here who are interested (me included).
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
C.O.R.
Newbie
Posts: 15
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #319 on:
November 14, 2009, 07:54:47 am »
We're interested as well...not to be rude, but do you have a price in mind?
Aloha, Frank
Castagnetti Ohana Racing
Honolulu and Hilo
Logged
Gino and Frank
Castagnetti Ohana Racing
Honolulu and Hilo
Griebel
Full Member
Posts: 199
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #320 on:
November 14, 2009, 19:17:25 pm »
A bit of d.i.y...0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses
Cheers from Griebel
«
Last Edit: November 15, 2009, 18:01:52 pm by Griebel
»
Logged
Instagram: c.griebel
http://www.griebel.blogspot.com
"BEYOND 4 INCHES"
MIB,DENMARK
Bruce
Hero Member
Posts: 1420
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #321 on:
November 15, 2009, 08:30:27 am »
Quote from: Griebel on November 14, 2009, 19:17:25 pm
A bit of d.i.y. -0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses
Planning on making more?
I'm liking what Stephan did to his coil bracket:
«
Last Edit: November 15, 2009, 19:58:25 pm by Bruce
»
Logged
Griebel
Full Member
Posts: 199
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #322 on:
November 15, 2009, 09:21:51 am »
Quote from: Bruce on November 15, 2009, 08:30:27 am
Quote from: Griebel on November 14, 2009, 19:17:25 pm
A bit of d.i.y. -0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses
Planning on making more?
.
This was my very first "pull", but yes,-I'm planning to make more....Casting a model of the old symetric lenses too.....
Logged
Instagram: c.griebel
http://www.griebel.blogspot.com
"BEYOND 4 INCHES"
MIB,DENMARK
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #323 on:
November 16, 2009, 21:35:48 pm »
Quote from: Griebel on November 15, 2009, 09:21:51 am
Quote from: Bruce on November 15, 2009, 08:30:27 am
Quote from: Griebel on November 14, 2009, 19:17:25 pm
A bit of d.i.y. -0,6 mm. polycarbonat lenses...app.40 gram...made over a casting(and not over the glass !),so they will fit inside the chrome rim like the original lenses
Planning on making more?
.
This was my very first "pull", but yes,-I'm planning to make more....Casting a model of the old symetric lenses too.....
Keep us posted
«
Last Edit: November 16, 2009, 21:37:35 pm by Pas
»
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Straight Time
Full Member
Posts: 145
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #324 on:
November 21, 2009, 14:06:17 pm »
Some great ideas for weight saving here but what about safety issues ?
Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?
Any ideas as i'm now stripping my 67 for a full rebuild though it will be road biased with some strip action.
Anyway, dont we need a bit of weight at the front end . . . . . .
Logged
No retreat, No surrender !
Bruce
Hero Member
Posts: 1420
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #325 on:
November 21, 2009, 19:39:05 pm »
Quote from: Straight Time on November 21, 2009, 14:06:17 pm
Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?
When you're looking at the fasteners for the steering or suspension, leave the original steel bolts in there. To hold the wings on, aluminium is plenty strong enough. How much does a wing weigh?
«
Last Edit: November 21, 2009, 22:11:32 pm by Bruce
»
Logged
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #326 on:
November 21, 2009, 19:53:37 pm »
Quote from: Bruce on November 21, 2009, 19:39:05 pm
Quote from: Straight Time on November 21, 2009, 14:06:17 pm
Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?
When you're looking at the fasteners for the steering or suspension, leave the original steel bolts in there. To hold the wings on, aluminum is plenty strong enough. How much does a wing weigh?
Or if your budget allows replace steel bolts for titanium.
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Phil West
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #327 on:
November 22, 2009, 08:44:45 am »
Quote from: Bruce on November 21, 2009, 19:39:05 pm
Quote from: Straight Time on November 21, 2009, 14:06:17 pm
Are there certain things that shouldnt be lightened or certain nuts and bolts that need strength rather than lightness ?
When you're looking at the fasteners for the steering or suspension, leave the original steel bolts in there. To hold the wings on, aluminium is plenty strong enough. How much does a wing weigh?
Steel rear wing = 8lbs
Steel front wing = 12lbs
Day Mouldings rear wing = 4lbs
Day Mouldings front wing = 6lbs
(Race weight wings)
Total weight saving = 20lbs
Logged
Rocket Ron
Hero Member
Posts: 2861
It's old school for a reason
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #328 on:
December 09, 2009, 19:33:59 pm »
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=745441
Logged
13.12 @ 101.84
Grooving out on life
You can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter
181
Hero Member
Posts: 632
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #329 on:
December 10, 2009, 16:50:34 pm »
can you say
light:-)
Logged
Pages:
1
...
9
10
[
11
]
12
13
...
34
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...