ugly duckling
|
|
« Reply #150 on: August 11, 2008, 02:56:14 am » |
|
thoght i would keeper small with the 51.5 inlet. compared to the other side man thats a dinkey hole. UD.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Marty
Jr. Member
Posts: 67
|
|
« Reply #151 on: August 12, 2008, 02:48:54 am » |
|
how much would a CNC set be?
If there is enough interest in the 94 bore version then we may going back and having those made next. Where would you put the studs? Also, the valves would be VERY shrouded and the valve spacing is for a 4"+ bore.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ugly duckling
|
|
« Reply #152 on: August 12, 2008, 06:54:26 am » |
|
hello marty. my original set of A flows on the jhon deer were 94 bore before i welded the holes up and made them big bore. and the guide centers are way tighter. i dont see why a 51x38 would not fit in the 94 bore A flow. dont know if the 94 bore core box is the same one for the big bore. both the rnd port styel 94 bore and the 101 heads look idenicle. except for stud location and guide centers. yes it would be a tight fit with the bigger valves. UD.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NoBars
|
|
« Reply #153 on: August 13, 2008, 02:29:46 am » |
|
why not cast some big azzed manifolds to go with those bad boys? As long as you are pouring aluminum...
|
|
|
Logged
|
My real name is Anthony Consorte.
|
|
|
drgouk
|
|
« Reply #154 on: August 13, 2008, 11:22:49 am » |
|
Hi Jeff, When you did your flow testing, Did you do any velocity checks? If so, do you mind sharing? thanks David.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Marty
Jr. Member
Posts: 67
|
|
« Reply #155 on: August 14, 2008, 19:50:56 pm » |
|
hello marty. my original set of A flows on the jhon deer were 94 bore before i welded the holes up and made them big bore. and the guide centers are way tighter. i dont see why a 51x38 would not fit in the 94 bore A flow. dont know if the 94 bore core box is the same one for the big bore. both the rnd port styel 94 bore and the 101 heads look idenicle. except for stud location and guide centers. yes it would be a tight fit with the bigger valves. UD.
I have some originals too and it seems like it would be fine. The new style intake ports are indeed in the way now - I have tried both the 94mm stud pattern as well as the 96.7 pattern.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rick Sadler
|
|
« Reply #156 on: August 15, 2008, 02:02:00 am » |
|
94mm Bore Models available soon.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Der Kleiner Panzers
|
|
|
TexasTom
|
|
« Reply #157 on: August 16, 2008, 15:56:40 pm » |
|
Beautiful work, Jeff. The CNC proposal is very incouraging! WOW, that would save you an awful lot of time ... you can sit on the couch and eat Cheetos while 10 sets get thru by the end of the day! OK, maybe not 10 sets, but I can eat a whole lot of Cheetos thru the course of a day ... I just tell everyone is orange Dykem on my fingertips , who's to know. Did I just write that out loud? Can't wait to see the flow numbers from the round ports! So mine are still way up close to the front of the line, right? NO CUTS, guys!!!
|
|
« Last Edit: August 16, 2008, 20:28:55 pm by TexasTom »
|
Logged
|
Work, work, WORK!
Modesty accepted here ...
|
|
|
58vw
|
|
« Reply #158 on: August 16, 2008, 19:09:35 pm » |
|
Texas tom..... we regret to inform you that due to recent events your heads have been sold to pay for the CNC start up so that we may facilitate the new orders coming in, however you will be first in line next time...... JK
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TexasTom
|
|
« Reply #159 on: August 16, 2008, 20:36:54 pm » |
|
Don't make me come out there ... Aw hell, I'll take another set .... That's OK, Jeff assures me the stock casting welded units on the way to me now will flow the same as the AFs, that is as long as I can get the lift up over 1.200" and run it in a vacuum.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 16, 2008, 20:53:00 pm by TexasTom »
|
Logged
|
Work, work, WORK!
Modesty accepted here ...
|
|
|
Dominick Luppino
|
|
« Reply #160 on: August 17, 2008, 00:53:38 am » |
|
94mm Bore Models available soon. Heck, I work there and I didn't know that
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steve D.
|
|
« Reply #162 on: August 17, 2008, 07:30:16 am » |
|
that bulletin must have been during your nap time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Über Alles
5 tracks, 5 days, 1000+ miles. 10.77 avg. on pump fuel. 238I
|
|
|
ugly duckling
|
|
« Reply #163 on: August 17, 2008, 07:35:07 am » |
|
cool let the 94 bore ones come. just a few more one of a kind made in the good old USA type 1 ACVW cly heads to flood the market just a bit. UD .
|
|
« Last Edit: August 17, 2008, 07:41:28 am by ugly duckling »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ian c
|
|
« Reply #165 on: August 17, 2008, 09:41:26 am » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i spent half my money on beer , cars , and women .
the other half , i just wasted .
(o\ ! /o)
|
|
|
Dominick Luppino
|
|
« Reply #166 on: August 17, 2008, 14:40:21 pm » |
|
Heck, I sweep the floors there and I didn't know that So that's what you do! You told me you made the coffee! Making coffee is a big job; someone there at least needs to know the difference between decaffeinated and regular
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dominick Luppino
|
|
« Reply #167 on: August 17, 2008, 14:52:05 pm » |
|
that bulletin must have been during your nap time.
It's called a power nap, you earn one of these when you are the one working during the day…
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve D.
|
|
« Reply #168 on: August 17, 2008, 16:09:40 pm » |
|
It's called a power nap, you earn one of these when you are the one working during the day
Can't be that much power, how many stages of nitrous does it have? BTW, do you need your lawn mowed?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Über Alles
5 tracks, 5 days, 1000+ miles. 10.77 avg. on pump fuel. 238I
|
|
|
Fastbrit
|
|
« Reply #169 on: August 17, 2008, 16:11:41 pm » |
|
Heck, I sweep the floors there and I didn't know that So that's what you do! You told me you made the coffee! Making coffee is a big job; someone there at least needs to know the difference between decaffeinated and regular I can understand – that kinda stuff is way past Rick's comprehension.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Austin Larsen
Newbie
Posts: 24
|
|
« Reply #170 on: August 17, 2008, 21:50:28 pm » |
|
that bulletin must have been during your nap time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Austin Larsen
Newbie
Posts: 24
|
|
« Reply #172 on: August 18, 2008, 02:29:08 am » |
|
i dont need a car fast enough to blow ur doors off ull probably be napping at the tree
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dominick Luppino
|
|
« Reply #173 on: August 18, 2008, 03:05:31 am » |
|
Just have your money their!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve D.
|
|
« Reply #174 on: August 18, 2008, 03:26:10 am » |
|
i dont need a car fast enough to blow ur doors off ull probably be napping at the tree
Sorry Austin, I'm with Dominick here- he'll be finished with his nap and at the thousand foot mark before yours finishes booting up- Mike and I will be waiting at the top end for our $$$. Seriously though, this is getting off topic- let's move this feud to a new thread. I can't wait to see more pictures and progress of the new angleflows.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 18, 2008, 03:30:09 am by Steve D. »
|
Logged
|
Über Alles
5 tracks, 5 days, 1000+ miles. 10.77 avg. on pump fuel. 238I
|
|
|
Dominick Luppino
|
|
« Reply #175 on: August 18, 2008, 03:34:17 am » |
|
I'm done with this post, it's about the A/F heads not about dumb ass stupid talk.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Marty
Jr. Member
Posts: 67
|
|
« Reply #176 on: August 18, 2008, 20:15:20 pm » |
|
94mm Bore Models available soon. How soon? I need them YESTERDAY.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gabetion2000
Newbie
Posts: 25
|
|
« Reply #177 on: August 27, 2008, 07:51:58 am » |
|
Any more progress on the heads UD? Any updates? Your head work is awesome. Im interested in the difference between the big port and the small port. Is the smaller port better for drivability? And is the big port better for max power?
Thanks Gabe
|
|
|
Logged
|
A and G's Racing 73 Super
|
|
|
ugly duckling
|
|
« Reply #178 on: August 27, 2008, 23:28:14 pm » |
|
here ya go. sorry it took me so long to flow the other side. never enghouf time in the day. im not done yet with the street port but this is a good start. big chamber 60cc+ relitive small manifold (NO WELD) and only flowing to 600 lift to keep it STREET REAL. as it stands right now on low comp 9.5 and 91 oct NA 240+hp is possible. this is a 50X42. int is 241cfm at 600 and ex is 184 cfm at 600. defenetly resepectible street cfm. heres some pictures. UD.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 27, 2008, 23:55:26 pm by ugly duckling »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ugly duckling
|
|
« Reply #179 on: August 27, 2008, 23:30:53 pm » |
|
again a true 25in flow test.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|