The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 05, 2024, 06:39:00 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351094 Posts in 28640 Topics by 6846 Members
Latest Member: JamesBoyd
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  CSP vs. Berg linkage for 42 webers?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: CSP vs. Berg linkage for 42 webers?  (Read 2109 times)
marcd
Newbie
*
Posts: 31


« on: September 30, 2008, 02:51:23 am »

Hi guys, I'm trying to decide between a berg linkage or the CSP linkage. I like the quality of the CSP unit, but I'd like to hear from anyone that may have used/tried both.

Right now I am using the early bugpack/deano style since that's what my old man built the motor with. I'm not looking to build anything as "period correct" I just want a nice linkage.

Motor is an 1835 with dual 42's.

Thanks!
Logged

I like to go fast.

Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2008, 03:04:45 am »

I loved the CSP linkage on my T3 engine with 42 Specials. Smoooooth Smiley
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
beetletom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1686



« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2008, 15:02:29 pm »

but with the csp linkage, you can't rev it from the engine...?or can you?
i quite like the look of the berg linkage, but the csp one is cheaper?
Logged
Harry/FDK
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3613


Every Rule Was Made To Break, Even Callook...


« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2008, 15:41:00 pm »

CSP. Simple & Smooth.
Logged

Done ? Not Yet.
marcd
Newbie
*
Posts: 31


« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2008, 17:42:53 pm »

Awesome! Thanks guys.
Logged

I like to go fast.

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!