The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 25, 2024, 21:54:32 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351221
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
Rod ration and lenght
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Rod ration and lenght (Read 5235 times)
airstuff
Sr. Member
Posts: 431
Rod ration and lenght
«
on:
December 03, 2008, 17:17:42 pm »
Hello guys,
Can somebody explain thoroughly what is the advantage of running 5.500 rod on the 2276cc engine,versus 5.394 rod,if there is any marginal difference
Is it easy to assemble.
I assume engine will be much wider with 5.5 rods.
Logged
Peter
Hero Member
Posts: 1301
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #1 on:
December 03, 2008, 18:34:07 pm »
i used 5.5 rods
my engine is only a few mms wider than stock
Logged
Ohio Tom (DdK)
Jr. Member
Posts: 72
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #2 on:
December 05, 2008, 03:13:22 am »
5.500" rods are just plain easier to setup than 5.400" (5.397").
VW length rods with an 82 stroke crank is ceartainly do-able, but you will have to check the case-to-piston skirt clearance.
Also, the Piston skirt-to-crank shaft will also have to be checked.
You should do these checks in any case, but you will almost certainly have to do some extra clearancing with 5.400" rods.
Plus, I prefer to have longer rods that keep the piston "inside" the cyl at BDC. This reduces "piston scuffing" issues..
.100" doesn't sound like alot, but every little bit helps...
Logged
Ohio Tom
08'.. 3 R/U...3 Win...
Mohawk
Newbie
Posts: 34
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #3 on:
December 08, 2008, 21:20:20 pm »
What's the difference between VW rod journal - 5.500" and Chevy rod journal - 5.500"?
If I use 5.500" length on the rods must I use steel barrel spacers? I will run a crank with 82mm stroke and 94mm cylinders. I don't know if I should use normal pistons from Mahle or more expensive one from Wiseco?
Logged
I'm just here because I love VW
http://mohawk-vw.blogspot.com/
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #4 on:
December 08, 2008, 21:56:00 pm »
Quote from: Mohawk on December 08, 2008, 21:20:20 pm
What's the difference between VW rod journal - 5.500" and Chevy rod journal - 5.500"?
The diameter of the big end of the rod. Smaller diameter gives more room inside the case, but also makes for a weaker crankshaft.
Quote from: Mohawk on December 08, 2008, 21:20:20 pm
If I use 5.500" length on the rods must I use steel barrel spacers? I will run a crank with 82mm stroke and 94mm cylinders. I don't know if I should use normal pistons from Mahle or more expensive one from Wiseco?
You wont know until you trial assemble the engine. Mahle vs Wiseco... depends on what you are building the engine for I suppose.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Mohawk
Newbie
Posts: 34
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #5 on:
December 08, 2008, 22:12:56 pm »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on December 08, 2008, 21:56:00 pm
Quote from: Mohawk on December 08, 2008, 21:20:20 pm
What's the difference between VW rod journal - 5.500" and Chevy rod journal - 5.500"?
The diameter of the big end of the rod. Smaller diameter gives more room inside the case, but also makes for a weaker crankshaft.
Quote from: Mohawk on December 08, 2008, 21:20:20 pm
If I use 5.500" length on the rods must I use steel barrel spacers? I will run a crank with 82mm stroke and 94mm cylinders. I don't know if I should use normal pistons from Mahle or more expensive one from Wiseco?
You wont know until you trial assemble the engine. Mahle vs Wiseco... depends on what you are building the engine for I suppose.
Is the Chevy rod journal - 5.500" stronger?
Drive fast I guess but at the same time a engine that I can drive long tripps with without problem
Logged
I'm just here because I love VW
http://mohawk-vw.blogspot.com/
Lids
Hero Member
Posts: 3527
show me the chedder
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #6 on:
December 08, 2008, 22:23:48 pm »
what are peoples thoughts on a 5700 rod, I umed and arghed for ages, I still think this might make better power than a 5500
Logged
If there's enough horse shit around, there must be a pony!
Buy your ciderberry here.
http://www.thatcherscider.co.uk/
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #7 on:
December 08, 2008, 22:42:33 pm »
Quote from: Mohawk on December 08, 2008, 22:12:56 pm
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on December 08, 2008, 21:56:00 pm
Quote from: Mohawk on December 08, 2008, 21:20:20 pm
What's the difference between VW rod journal - 5.500" and Chevy rod journal - 5.500"?
The diameter of the big end of the rod. Smaller diameter gives more room inside the case, but also makes for a weaker crankshaft.
Quote from: Mohawk on December 08, 2008, 21:20:20 pm
If I use 5.500" length on the rods must I use steel barrel spacers? I will run a crank with 82mm stroke and 94mm cylinders. I don't know if I should use normal pistons from Mahle or more expensive one from Wiseco?
You wont know until you trial assemble the engine. Mahle vs Wiseco... depends on what you are building the engine for I suppose.
Is the Chevy rod journal - 5.500" stronger?
Drive fast I guess but at the same time a engine that I can drive long tripps with without problem
The smaller the rod journal, the weaker the crank becomes. The shorter the rod, the stronger it is.
Standard issue Mahle's will work great for your application.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
airstuff
Sr. Member
Posts: 431
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #8 on:
December 14, 2008, 13:46:34 pm »
i decided to torture myself clearencing 5.4 I-beams with the 82 crank
Logged
Fasterbrit
Hero Member
Posts: 1009
OFF#23 - The Fastest Outlaw in the West!
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #9 on:
December 14, 2008, 19:45:25 pm »
Quote from: lids_2001 on December 08, 2008, 22:23:48 pm
what are peoples thoughts on a 5700 rod, I umed and arghed for ages, I still think this might make better power than a 5500
Peter from CSP runs a 5.7 inch rod on his 78 x 94 turbocharged CSP Ghia. He swears by this ratio for upper end power and revs. It makes 500 hp at 9,200 rpm on the JPM dyno! One hell of a wide motor for a stock bodied car though!
Logged
9.563 @ 146.25 mph Cal Look Drag Day, Santa Pod, April 2011
OFF#23 OUTLAW FLAT FOUR
www.outlawflatfour.com
www.air-kraft.com
www.marcomansiperformance.com
Lids
Hero Member
Posts: 3527
show me the chedder
Re: Rod ration and lenght
«
Reply #10 on:
December 15, 2008, 21:20:35 pm »
thanks for the reply Mat, Jim @ stateside talked me out of it, said it would really need a flanged crank as well, or he wouldn't guarantee it. If I have a good new year I might change my mind. 84 flanged crank, 94 forged pistons, long barrels and a 5700 rod
Should be fun
Logged
If there's enough horse shit around, there must be a pony!
Buy your ciderberry here.
http://www.thatcherscider.co.uk/
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...