The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 23, 2024, 22:16:10 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351211
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Cal-look
Washington anti-shocker opinions
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Washington anti-shocker opinions (Read 5299 times)
Sam K
Hero Member
Posts: 746
Washington anti-shocker opinions
«
on:
February 10, 2009, 01:35:38 am »
I've had an anti-shocker sitting around for a decade or so and I always seem to forget about it when I have the engine out of my bug. I'm planning on lowerimg my compression next month and I was thinking of giving it a shot. Does anybody here have any experience, good or bad with these things? It seems like a good idea in theory.
Logged
Jason Foster
Hero Member
Posts: 1255
7.69 87mph 12.35 106 mph
Re: Washington anti-shocker opinions
«
Reply #1 on:
February 10, 2009, 03:25:02 am »
I ran one for awhile but ended up taking it off. Lots of guys run lots of different types. The S/G car I crew chief still has one on it but I think there really is no proof of what setting works best or when boils down to personal preference I think it's not really needed but it can't hurt.
One thing I've seen happen though is without a side load adapter on it the seals will wear out and they can leak and end up not allowing the clutch to fully engage causing a slipping burned up clutch.
Logged
STRENGTH THROUGH JOY...........
Der Kleiner Panzers
bugkeeper
Jr. Member
Posts: 56
oldskool n numetal
Re: Washington anti-shocker opinions
«
Reply #2 on:
March 08, 2009, 10:42:32 am »
I made my own Washington Anti Shocker. I ordered a ACE Industry shock (MA225) and made a bracket.
I hope it will protect my drivetrain now that I have installed my freshly rebuild ZF LSD
Logged
If you think sex is a pain in the ass, try a diffrent position...
Beauty is only skin deep, and the world is full of thin skinned people.
numbnuts
Full Member
Posts: 125
Re: Washington anti-shocker opinions
«
Reply #3 on:
May 17, 2018, 08:19:11 am »
Old thread but any more info on this Washington anti shocker?
Logged
2854cc 1956 cal looker coming to this space shortly
Erlend / bug66
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 958
SCC Event
Re: Washington anti-shocker opinions
«
Reply #4 on:
May 18, 2018, 05:22:12 am »
I don’t get why you want to slip the clutch going to 2/3/4. gear..
Logged
The '67:
10.626 @ 132mph, SCC 2016
10.407 @ 134mph, SCC 2017
10.221 @ 135mph, SCC 2018
The '59:
Not yet..
modnrod
Hero Member
Posts: 795
Old School Volksies
Re: Washington anti-shocker opinions
«
Reply #5 on:
May 18, 2018, 06:40:27 am »
If it takes a 1/2 second to release fully, then I guess from the upright position it takes a 1/2sec to go the other way too when you change gear, so it won't have time to fully engage.
I think? Maybe?
LOL! Dunno, but if it works it's great.
Logged
numbnuts
Full Member
Posts: 125
Re: Washington anti-shocker opinions
«
Reply #6 on:
May 18, 2018, 12:08:08 pm »
need something to work in 1st only?
Logged
2854cc 1956 cal looker coming to this space shortly
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...