The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 26, 2024, 21:06:15 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351224
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
intake diameters
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: intake diameters (Read 4769 times)
Peter
Hero Member
Posts: 1301
intake diameters
«
on:
December 29, 2006, 02:27:08 am »
hi guys,
in the megamanual i read that with a 40 mm throttle bore , you can have up to 368 hp, with 4 throttle bores..
so why do we need for example 48 mm bores to make lets say 200+ hp on our engines?
cheers, Peter
Logged
Roman
Hero Member
Posts: 656
Re: intake diameters
«
Reply #1 on:
December 29, 2006, 07:35:21 am »
Don't trust everything you read on the internet.
Normally you step up when the carbs/throttle bodies are the limiting factor. You don't take them to the bitter end.
Check Jenveys FAQ:
http://www.jenvey.co.uk/Tech_QA.htm
Logged
Peter
Hero Member
Posts: 1301
Re: intake diameters
«
Reply #2 on:
December 29, 2006, 12:46:02 pm »
hi guys,
and how do you decide if the are the limiting factor?
jenvey says 40 mm s are still good for 50 bhp per cilinder; maybe this is when the engine is boosted?
Its probably a whole other thing in real life right?
thanks, Peter
Logged
Roman
Hero Member
Posts: 656
Re: intake diameters
«
Reply #3 on:
December 29, 2006, 16:56:21 pm »
Read all:
Factors influencing size are; Power output, RPM, cylinder head design, cylinder capacity, position of the throttle body in the inlet tract and position of the injector.
Choice of bore size is a balanced compromise resulting from the following;
1) A larger bore leads to lower flow resistance, but obeying the laws of diminishing returns.
2) A smaller bore leads to better throttle control and response (never underestimate) and improved fuel mixing.
3) The system should be considered in total - from (at least) trumpet flange to cylinder and proportioned accordingly.
Basic references for BHP per cylinder, assuming ca 120mm from butterfly to valve head and a max of 9,000 rpm are;
Up to 30 - 30mm, up to 33 - 32mm, up to 39 - 35mm, up to 46 - 38mm, up to 51 - 40mm, up to 56 - 42mm
Up to 65 - 45mm, up to 74 - 48mm, up to 80 - 50mm, up to 87 - 52mm, up to 93 - 54mm.
These power figures may be increased by up to 10% in a purpose - designed and well proportioned system.
As butterfly to valve distance increases, butterfly size will need to increase in proportion to system taper and vice versa.
You have more than 120 mm from butterfly to valve, thus larger bore.
Add up to 10% in a well designed system - I hope you haven't made a bad design?
Logged
Peter
Hero Member
Posts: 1301
Re: intake diameters
«
Reply #4 on:
December 29, 2006, 17:58:04 pm »
its just that i allready have dual 40 mm throttle bodies,
i thought they are probably too small if i compare them to other guys' setups,
but then i read this in the manual; then i got confused
Logged
Roman
Hero Member
Posts: 656
Re: intake diameters
«
Reply #5 on:
December 29, 2006, 18:19:09 pm »
Well maybe you won't get max power but you will get good throttle response and good torque. In a street engine that means more than peak power.
Logged
Peter
Hero Member
Posts: 1301
Re: intake diameters
«
Reply #6 on:
December 29, 2006, 20:25:59 pm »
well, if they arent sold ,
i will surely give the'm a try...
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...