The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 22:13:04 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350689 Posts in 28577 Topics by 6823 Members
Latest Member: Riisager
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  set up to 48 IDA..
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: set up to 48 IDA..  (Read 6588 times)
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« on: January 09, 2007, 19:48:08 pm »

Hi guys,
i make often experiments so now i think about to change my carbs from 40 DRLA to 48 IDA only for racing , for street i want to take my 40DRLA, in a 1951ccm engine...But the fact is, i have tuned 043er heads with stock Valves (35,5x32)...I have good results on the 1/4mile with 15,8s with the 40 DRLA...
And next season i don´t wanna change engine parts like heads , because of less time etc...
So my question is: Does it have an effect to my current engine specification to change to IDAs?

I changes these season to 1,25 rockers and Mallory hifire ignition...

Current specification:
- schleicher 324° cam, 0,378"  lift at the cam
- stock heads 043, ported
- 9,3:1
- 1 5/8" A1 sidewinder
- 90,5x76
- 40 DRLA, 34 vents,148 main, 180 air,60 idle
At which rpms does it fact to have IDAs?? And they look so nice  Roll Eyes
I want only know hart facts, what can i expect on performance..i know about some guys, how take 48 IDFs, 48 DRLA with 37,38 vents etc on 35,5 intake valves...
So lets talk about.. Grin
Bye
Tom
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2007, 06:27:40 am »

With your engine I think the 40s will work best. If you put big valves in the heads then the IDAs will make a big difference!
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
alex d
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1033



« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2007, 11:00:17 am »

- schleicher 324° cam, 0,378"  lift at the cam


isn't that  A LOT of duration? it sounds like a ratio rocker cam, do you have 1,4s?
Logged
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2007, 13:28:23 pm »

No,
it is a german cam with a lot of duration!! Engle, buck pack etc take lower duration, but more lift...so different ways...So the schleicher cam is nearly the same like eagle cams...
Tom
Logged
alex d
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1033



« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2007, 15:11:33 pm »

IMHO you could use 1,25 rockers with that cam to gain some lift at the valve, then you could take some use of the IDAs...
Logged
Fastbrit
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4730


Keep smiling...


« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2007, 15:19:29 pm »

In my opinion, you are ultimately wasting your time staying with such small valves. You need a minimum of 40 x 35.5 to make it worth using the IDAs. You say you don't want to make other changes because of time, but it would be better to wait and have your heads modified or buy some new heads than try to make this combination work.  Smiley
Logged

Der Kleiner Panzers VW Club    
12.56sec street-driven Cal Looker in 1995
9.87sec No Mercy race car in 1994
Seems like a lifetime ago...
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2007, 20:47:43 pm »

hi,
is there no other method without change the heads, to get more rpm or more horsepower at higher rpms..? I will change my valvesprings to harder remmele ones and take titan retainers...
And my 40 drla with 34 vents...i have the opinion, that they hold the system down...so are the 40 DRLA the optimum for this combination? Which max. rpm is possible with HD scat/bug pack valves springs..??

Ok thanks for your opinion
bye
Tom
Logged
TiDi
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 289



« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2007, 16:38:34 pm »

In my opinion, you are ultimately wasting your time staying with such small valves. You need a minimum of 40 x 35.5 to make it worth using the IDAs. You say you don't want to make other changes because of time, but it would be better to wait and have your heads modified or buy some new heads than try to make this combination work.  Smiley

I have a 1776 with Magnum 044 heads and 40x35,5 inox valves (127.7 Hp - 111.1 Hp @ wheel)
Which is the best configuration for the IDAs??

Thanx TD
« Last Edit: January 11, 2007, 22:41:28 pm by TiDi » Logged

4 Wheel Ripperz - http://cal-look.tumblr.com/
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2007, 12:35:25 pm »

In my opinion, you are ultimately wasting your time staying with such small valves. You need a minimum of 40 x 35.5 to make it worth using the IDAs. You say you don't want to make other changes because of time, but it would be better to wait and have your heads modified or buy some new heads than try to make this combination work.  Smiley

I have a 1776 with Magnum 044 heads and 40x35,5 inox valves (127.7 Hp - 111.1 Hp @ wheel)
Which is the best configuration for the IDAs??

Thanx TD

a friend of mine had a 1914ccm with 42x37..he had changed from 40 idf to 48 ida (37 vents) and the it was awesome the difference in performance...He made with 48 IDA 131 HP..With 40 IDF it was nearly 15 HP less...
So it does work...
Bye
Tom
Logged
alex d
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1033



« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2007, 11:48:15 am »



a friend of mine had a 1914ccm with 42x37..he had changed from 40 idf to 48 ida (37 vents) and the it was awesome the difference in performance...He made with 48 IDA 131 HP..With 40 IDF it was nearly 15 HP less...
So it does work...
Bye
Tom

your heads are way milder than your friends' , you need head flow to go with the bigger carbs, in fact without changing carbs I bet you would notice quite a difference swapping heads for something bigger.
Logged
Andi/DFL
Full Member
***
Posts: 200



WWW
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2007, 12:11:39 pm »

this corresponds my experiences. switching from 40IDF to 48IDA made no noticable difference in performance for my engine (small valves, small engine, small anything...), but it didn't get worse, either. so I kept the IDAs, 'cause they look and sound better :-)
Logged

ESH
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2006


« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2007, 21:50:37 pm »

...I kept the IDAs, 'cause they look and sound better...

Can't say fairer than that really! Though maybe it's time to do something with the motor? Smiley
Logged
Andi/DFL
Full Member
***
Posts: 200



WWW
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2007, 08:16:26 am »

Quote
Can't say fairer than that really! Though maybe it's time to do something with the motor?

thank you, more salt for my wounds please :-))
Logged

Rasser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 488



« Reply #13 on: January 18, 2007, 19:00:00 pm »

In my opinion, you are ultimately wasting your time staying with such small valves. You need a minimum of 40 x 35.5 to make it worth using the IDAs. You say you don't want to make other changes because of time, but it would be better to wait and have your heads modified or buy some new heads than try to make this combination work.  Smiley

I have a 1776 with Magnum 044 heads and 40x35,5 inox valves (127.7 Hp - 111.1 Hp @ wheel)
Which is the best configuration for the IDAs??

Thanx TD

a friend of mine had a 1914ccm with 42x37..he had changed from 40 idf to 48 ida (37 vents) and the it was awesome the difference in performance...He made with 48 IDA 131 HP..With 40 IDF it was nearly 15 HP less...
So it does work...
Bye
Tom


My old 1914 made 147hp  using 40mm dellortos (36mm vents).......       what venturis did you have in your 40idf´s ?
Logged

For a good time, call:    1-800-Cal-look
1955 type1
1966 type2 13w deluxe
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #14 on: January 18, 2007, 20:43:26 pm »

Thanks Guys all for your replies..I will waiting for bigger heads :-)
Bye
Tom
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!