The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 10, 2024, 19:33:57 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351169
Posts in
28652
Topics by
6853
Members
Latest Member:
Hacksaw Racing
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Cal-look
42 DCNFs
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
Author
Topic: 42 DCNFs (Read 21035 times)
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
42 DCNFs
«
on:
September 01, 2009, 14:13:20 pm »
Are 42 DCNFs to big for a mild 1776? Would 40 DCNFs work better? (Or still too big?)
stock ported heads
w110 or w120 cam
1 3/8 exhaust
Playing with engine combos for the Manx and trying to come up with a good driver that will keep up with modern traffic. I have the 2332 going in the '66 for going fast.
Thanks,
--louis
«
Last Edit: September 01, 2009, 14:17:03 pm by louisb
»
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Rennsurfer
Hero Member
Posts: 7391
D.B.O. Not a club; a state of mind.
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #1 on:
September 01, 2009, 14:16:52 pm »
That was a very common set up for Cal Look cars in the '70s & '80s. I don't see why it wouldn't work today. Those are some great carbs... too bad they're a pain in the neck in the Type 1 engine bay. Other than that, good stuff. Since you're putting those in an open car/body, they'll work well.
Logged
"You can only scramble an egg so many ways."
~Sarge
Donny B.
Hero Member
Posts: 1340
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #2 on:
September 01, 2009, 14:17:47 pm »
42s will work great on a 1776. I had them on mine and ran an Engle 110 cam with stock valve size heads. It was so fun to drive and had plenty of torque. I've seen them run on a 1600 with no issues. You just have to jet them properly then enjoy!
Logged
Don Bulitta
Wolfsburg Registry
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #3 on:
September 01, 2009, 14:19:55 pm »
Okay, then it sounds like the 42s are the way to go.
Thanks,
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Dave Rosique
Hero Member
Posts: 1310
nobodyouno
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #4 on:
September 01, 2009, 14:31:38 pm »
Quote from: louisb on September 01, 2009, 14:19:55 pm
Okay, then it sounds like the 42s are the way to go.
Thanks,
--louis
Excellent choice!
As an added bonus, 42's sound really good
~DR.
Logged
Fastbrit
Hero Member
Posts: 4731
Keep smiling...
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #5 on:
September 01, 2009, 16:45:10 pm »
Pain in the neck carburetors which were never designed to run on a VW! They were designed to run on a Ferrari engine, with the throttle shafts across the car. Turning them by 90 degrees to work on a VW engine causes them to flood when turning sharp corners. On a Ferrari they only temporarily flooded when braking hard. You need to make sure they have extended emulsion tubes which Berg sell – or used to – to make them work properly. Used to fit them a lot back in the 1970s and breathed a huge sigh of relied when Weber brought out the IDF and Dell'Orto the DRLA.
Logged
Der Kleiner Panzers VW Club
12.56sec street-driven Cal Looker in 1995
9.87sec No Mercy race car in 1994
Seems like a lifetime ago...
Donny B.
Hero Member
Posts: 1340
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #6 on:
September 01, 2009, 16:50:57 pm »
Keith may not like them, but I have over 100k trouble free miles on them. They aren't as purdy as IDAs, but Oh well...
Logged
Don Bulitta
Wolfsburg Registry
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #7 on:
September 01, 2009, 16:53:42 pm »
I built a Bus motor for a friend in 1991-92 that ran 42's. Motor was fairly mild, small Scat cam, stock valved dual ports, low CR, 90.5x69. I recall it idled very smoothly, but like KS said, get the bus in a corner, and it was like somebody turned the lights out. He regretted using those carbs, but they came with the bus, so he compromised.
In a dune buggy, IDF's would be a snap to keep happy. You could practically clean the idle jets while driving.
My vote would be for 44IDFs
Logged
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #8 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:02:41 pm »
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 16:53:42 pm
I built a Bus motor for a friend in 1991-92 that ran 42's. Motor was fairly mild, small Scat cam, stock valved dual ports, low CR, 90.5x69. I recall it idled very smoothly, but like KS said, get the bus in a corner, and it was like somebody turned the lights out. He regretted using those carbs, but they came with the bus, so he compromised.
In a dune buggy, IDF's would be a snap to keep happy. You could practically clean the idle jets while driving.
My vote would be for 44IDFs
You don't think 44s would be too big? I would think 36s or 40s for a 1776. Mostly I want something that I don't have to fiddle with after getting them dialed in. Trying to make this something even the wife could drive.
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #9 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:14:11 pm »
Quote from: louisb on September 01, 2009, 17:02:41 pm
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 16:53:42 pm
I built a Bus motor for a friend in 1991-92 that ran 42's. Motor was fairly mild, small Scat cam, stock valved dual ports, low CR, 90.5x69. I recall it idled very smoothly, but like KS said, get the bus in a corner, and it was like somebody turned the lights out. He regretted using those carbs, but they came with the bus, so he compromised.
In a dune buggy, IDF's would be a snap to keep happy. You could practically clean the idle jets while driving.
My vote would be for 44IDFs
You don't think 44s would be too big? I would think 36s or 40s for a 1776. Mostly I want something that I don't have to fiddle with after getting them dialed in. Trying to make this something even the wife could drive.
--louis
40mm Webers are good for 1700 and under, in my opinion. One of the best and smoothest motor combos I know of for mild street is 1776, Engle 120, ported stock valve or 40 x 35 heads, and 44IDFs
you have Excel?
Logged
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #10 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:16:08 pm »
Yep, I sure do. That sounds like a nice driving motor.
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #11 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:16:29 pm »
Quote from: louisb on September 01, 2009, 17:16:08 pm
Yep, I sure do. That sounds like a nice driving motor.
--louis
pm me your email
Logged
Dave Rosique
Hero Member
Posts: 1310
nobodyouno
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #12 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:21:48 pm »
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 17:14:11 pm
Quote from: louisb on September 01, 2009, 17:02:41 pm
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 16:53:42 pm
I built a Bus motor for a friend in 1991-92 that ran 42's. Motor was fairly mild, small Scat cam, stock valved dual ports, low CR, 90.5x69. I recall it idled very smoothly, but like KS said, get the bus in a corner, and it was like somebody turned the lights out. He regretted using those carbs, but they came with the bus, so he compromised.
In a dune buggy, IDF's would be a snap to keep happy. You could practically clean the idle jets while driving.
My vote would be for 44IDFs
You don't think 44s would be too big? I would think 36s or 40s for a 1776. Mostly I want something that I don't have to fiddle with after getting them dialed in. Trying to make this something even the wife could drive.
--louis
40mm Webers are good for 1700 and under, in my opinion. One of the best and smoothest motor combos I know of for mild street is 1776, Engle 120, ported stock valve or 40 x 35 heads, and 44IDFs
you have Excel?
Hmmmmm... didn't know we had a choice here... I thought you had the 42's and wondered if they would work... I should slow down and read all the text
The combo "The Other One" posted is superb! I've run basically that same combo in Baja's, Bugs & Buses... Go for it!
~DR.
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #13 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:37:00 pm »
I loved the 42 Specials on my mild 1776 (K65, ported stock valve heads, 8:1)... ran smooth as butter and still returned 25mpg in my heavy Fastback at 80mph. I later put the carbs on an original stock 1600 dual port and they still worked fantastic.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #14 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:43:09 pm »
No, this is still a paper motor sort of. I more or less have the short block and a set of stock heads I plan to self port via the Fischer book. I am still debating the P&Cs, carb & cam size. My requirements are that it be cheap, reliable and powerful enough to push a stocked geared 26-27" tall tired buggy to highway speeds for hours on end. (Up and down steep grades too) I am trying to think of a carb that would work with that size motor and my choices were the DCNFs, Kads or even a center mount of some sort. I am following the KISS principle with this one. That way if I break down in Resume Speed, North Dakota with it I can fix it easy.
Thanks,
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #15 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:47:10 pm »
Quote from: Dave Rosique on September 01, 2009, 17:21:48 pm
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 17:14:11 pm
Quote from: louisb on September 01, 2009, 17:02:41 pm
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 16:53:42 pm
I built a Bus motor for a friend in 1991-92 that ran 42's. Motor was fairly mild, small Scat cam, stock valved dual ports, low CR, 90.5x69. I recall it idled very smoothly, but like KS said, get the bus in a corner, and it was like somebody turned the lights out. He regretted using those carbs, but they came with the bus, so he compromised.
In a dune buggy, IDF's would be a snap to keep happy. You could practically clean the idle jets while driving.
My vote would be for 44IDFs
You don't think 44s would be too big? I would think 36s or 40s for a 1776. Mostly I want something that I don't have to fiddle with after getting them dialed in. Trying to make this something even the wife could drive.
--louis
40mm Webers are good for 1700 and under, in my opinion. One of the best and smoothest motor combos I know of for mild street is 1776, Engle 120, ported stock valve or 40 x 35 heads, and 44IDFs
you have Excel?
Hmmmmm... didn't know we had a choice here... I thought you had the 42's and wondered if they would work... I should slow down and read all the text
The combo "The Other One" posted is superb! I've run basically that same combo in Baja's, Bugs & Buses... Go for it!
~DR.
I remember a very nice white 66 Ghia this mousey little girl owned, a good customer we had @ BH, she wanted a good "freeway motor" for her KG, so we built the motor I listed above with stock valved heads (she wanted heaters) and I swear, that motor was one of the smoothest, yet potent 1776's I can remember. Based on her gender, I was a little nervous of the nature the 120 and 44's, but when I test drove it, it pulled so smooth off idle and just kept pulling, with a wonderful high pitched howl from the carbs as the revs climbed. To top it off, the girl was really pleased with the engine and said it was night and day compared to the stock 34pict dual port 1600.
For a mild daily driver, it's a hard combo to beat. Change to K8 and bigger valves and you've upgraded to very hot street. That's the nice thing about 44IDFs, they run well on a wide array of combinations.
Logged
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #16 on:
September 01, 2009, 17:49:09 pm »
That sounds pretty good.
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #17 on:
September 01, 2009, 18:03:05 pm »
Zenith
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Fastbrit
Hero Member
Posts: 4731
Keep smiling...
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #18 on:
September 01, 2009, 18:53:26 pm »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on September 01, 2009, 18:03:05 pm
Zenith
Dual Bugsprays!
Logged
Der Kleiner Panzers VW Club
12.56sec street-driven Cal Looker in 1995
9.87sec No Mercy race car in 1994
Seems like a lifetime ago...
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #19 on:
September 01, 2009, 18:56:56 pm »
Quote from: Fastbrit on September 01, 2009, 18:53:26 pm
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on September 01, 2009, 18:03:05 pm
Zenith
Dual Bugsprays!
I actually have a set of dual 350s.
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Dave Rosique
Hero Member
Posts: 1310
nobodyouno
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #20 on:
September 01, 2009, 19:19:15 pm »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on September 01, 2009, 18:03:05 pm
Zenith
I've always had a weak spot for the Zenith.
~DR.
Logged
John Rayburn
Hero Member
Posts: 2481
Der Kleiner Panzers
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #21 on:
September 01, 2009, 19:41:14 pm »
Dave, you are King Zenith!
Logged
I also park at Nick's.
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #22 on:
September 01, 2009, 19:51:00 pm »
Sheep says if he ever has a baby girl her name will be Zenith
Logged
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #23 on:
September 01, 2009, 20:23:08 pm »
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 19:51:00 pm
Sheep says if he ever has a baby girl her name will be Zenith
Not sure what would scare me worse, the name or sheep having offspring.
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
John Rayburn
Hero Member
Posts: 2481
Der Kleiner Panzers
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #24 on:
September 01, 2009, 20:34:41 pm »
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 19:51:00 pm
Sheep says if he ever has a baby girl her name will be Zenith
Awesome! When she gets older she'll have duel Zeniths!
Logged
I also park at Nick's.
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #25 on:
September 01, 2009, 20:40:05 pm »
I suggested the name "dry sump" but Zenith won out.
Logged
louisb
Hero Member
Posts: 3274
Runs with Scissors
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #26 on:
September 01, 2009, 20:40:52 pm »
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 20:40:05 pm
I suggested the name "dry sump" but Zenith won out.
Guess that is better the Stroker.
--louis
Logged
Louis Brooks
The Beatings Will Continue Until Moral Improves!
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #27 on:
September 01, 2009, 20:43:03 pm »
Quote from: louisb on September 01, 2009, 20:40:52 pm
Quote from: The Other One on September 01, 2009, 20:40:05 pm
I suggested the name "dry sump" but Zenith won out.
Guess that is better the Stroker.
--louis
...or
Racer Brown
, which is Sheep's other nickname from his frequency of bathroom visits at BH
Logged
Dave Rosique
Hero Member
Posts: 1310
nobodyouno
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #28 on:
September 01, 2009, 20:46:06 pm »
Little boy could be Rod... only if he's cranky while trying to get his bearings...
nevermind
Logged
Rennsurfer
Hero Member
Posts: 7391
D.B.O. Not a club; a state of mind.
Re: 42 DCNFs
«
Reply #29 on:
September 02, 2009, 00:36:52 am »
Forgive my crusty and old memory... but I remember a few of my friends that liked the 42s and also liked to take turns fast. So they simply added the extra length breather tubes and the problem was solved. Aren't those still available? I think the Berg family offered 'em at one point. But this was almost three decades ago.
Logged
"You can only scramble an egg so many ways."
~Sarge
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...