The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 05, 2024, 05:51:45 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
351094 Posts in 28640 Topics by 6846 Members
Latest Member: JamesBoyd
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  Rockers question
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rockers question  (Read 3462 times)
xbacax
Newbie
*
Posts: 34


« on: September 11, 2009, 21:46:36 pm »

hi,

this is my first post here, so I would like to say hallo Smiley this forum is awesome and it is my everyday visit point Wink

well, I'm in a middle of unpopular Mexican fuel injected project. every step I take is another piece of experience. I've already changed the original heads to DRD L3, put Engle w100, nothing spacial to be honest. it has 62 HP 4500RPM and 102Nm 3700RPM almost stock, but last time on local races it left behind two 1776 cars and was first in >1600 class Wink runs 11,94 on 1/8 mile and 17,663 on 1/4 mile Wink

but anyway, this is my question
as I said before the peak of power is now on 4500rpm (I have Engle w100 cam) how would it change if I add 1.25 rockers ? will the dyno show some more ponnies ?

sorry for this lame question, but I'm new in this business, and want to learn as much as possible

thank You very much

best wisches
baca

« Last Edit: September 13, 2009, 22:57:49 pm by xbacax » Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2009, 22:56:10 pm »

1.25 rockers might help. What are you using for carb(s)?
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
xbacax
Newbie
*
Posts: 34


« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2009, 23:03:43 pm »

the intake system remain stock, except air filter. single throttle body and 4 injectors over the head ports. Lack of air is the problem, but in next year I plan to change it to VWSPEEDSHOP double throttle bodies Wink
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2009, 03:10:05 am »

The rockers will probably make little or no difference now, your restriction is the intake. So put the dual throttle bodies on there first, then some 1.25's.
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
jamiep_jamiep
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1587



« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2009, 15:16:44 pm »

Quick for a 1600! Any pictures of your car?
Logged

Lee.C
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6458


I might be an Idiot but I'm not an Arsehole!


« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2009, 23:04:15 pm »

I was thinkin of the same thing for my 1641cc BUT I was advised against it due to more load being placed on the valvetrain,

You can gain ALOT more with only minor headporting Wink

Here's my new ports - the look almost "stock" but trust me they don't perform like stock  Wink
Logged

You either "Get It" or you don't......
xbacax
Newbie
*
Posts: 34


« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2010, 22:38:02 pm »

hi,

sorry for this digging up but .... I have those throttle boddies instaled, and now my friend is working on Megasquirt.

and my question is ...

what do you think about adding the 1,25 rockers now, when I've already solved the stock intake problem ??
and how about performance gain ??


thank you.
cheers my friends
baca
Logged
ALB
Newbie
*
Posts: 36


« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2010, 14:42:06 pm »

I'd put the rockers on now. The hp increase won't be huge (4? 5? 6?) but it will make more power throughout the rpm range and you will get more flow out of the heads. Some people will say ratio rockers  aren't worth it, but they aren't expensive and if you get more power....
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!