The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 24, 2024, 22:06:49 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351216
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Cal-look
Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP? (Read 16071 times)
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
on:
March 23, 2016, 03:59:47 am »
Interested in comparison in db, horsepower/torque and engine temperature between CSP Python 1-3/4" vs CSP/JPM Wasp Stage 1 with muffler.
And how is availability of Wasp exhaust in USA?
Thanks,
Jim Ratto
«
Last Edit: March 23, 2016, 16:54:57 pm by Jim Ratto
»
Logged
WPS
Full Member
Posts: 156
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #1 on:
March 23, 2016, 10:32:30 am »
Hi Jim,
I've not heard the Wasp with a muffler yet but I know the idea was to not restrict performance over the stinger/megaphone in any way.
When Johannes tested the Wasp over the Python he made 13-15hp!!...as I remember....in his 2276 street car.
He was so suprised himself that he immediately put the Python back on to check his Dyno wasn't lying!!
I've used a few Wasps now mainly on all out race cars and have been really pleased but maybe contact Peter at CSP direct if you want any technical details.....in my experience he's always happy to talk 'exhaust'!!
Really good products and a great bunch of guys!!
Good luck.
Ian
Logged
Wolfsburg Performance Services
WolfsburgPerformance.co.uk
Instagram: wpsengines
07880-311850.
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #2 on:
March 23, 2016, 16:24:24 pm »
Quote from: WPS on March 23, 2016, 10:32:30 am
Hi Jim,
I've not heard the Wasp with a muffler yet but I know the idea was to not restrict performance over the stinger/megaphone in any way.
When Johannes tested the Wasp over the Python he made 13-15hp!!...as I remember....in his 2276 street car.
He was so suprised himself that he immediately put the Python back on to check his Dyno wasn't lying!!
I've used a few Wasps now mainly on all out race cars and have been really pleased but maybe contact Peter at CSP direct if you want any technical details.....in my experience he's always happy to talk 'exhaust'!!
Really good products and a great bunch of guys!!
Good luck.
Ian
I was curious which exhaust the horsepower gain claims were made against. Thanks.
Logged
neil68
Hero Member
Posts: 538
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #3 on:
March 23, 2016, 19:37:35 pm »
Jim,
CIP1.com is a CSP dealer in North America and lists the Wasp headers, mufflers & stingers on their website.
http://www2.cip1.com/SearchResults.asp?search=Wasp&Submit=
«
Last Edit: March 23, 2016, 19:41:42 pm by neil68
»
Logged
Neil
Der Kleiner Rennwagens
'68 Beetle, 2332 cc, 204 WHP
12.5 seconds @ 172 KM/H (107.5 MPH)
Dynojet Test:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9B_H3eklAo
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #4 on:
March 23, 2016, 20:34:15 pm »
Quote from: neil68 on March 23, 2016, 19:37:35 pm
Jim,
CIP1.com is a CSP dealer in North America and lists the Wasp headers, mufflers & stingers on their website.
http://www2.cip1.com/SearchResults.asp?search=Wasp&Submit=
Thank you!
Logged
Torben Alstrup
Hero Member
Posts: 716
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #5 on:
March 24, 2016, 18:46:17 pm »
Ian is spot on. BUT, it is also worth noticing that the Python is relatively "better" if the engine produces a lot of hp below approx 6500. (Peaking low, if one can call it that) The Wasp is almost unbeatable if we are talking hi reving engines, and can assist in releasing an incredible amount of mid to upper end power.
T
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #6 on:
April 06, 2016, 19:07:48 pm »
Quote from: Torben Alstrup on March 24, 2016, 18:46:17 pm
Ian is spot on. BUT, it is also worth noticing that the Python is relatively "better" if the engine produces a lot of hp below approx 6500. (Peaking low, if one can call it that) The Wasp is almost unbeatable if we are talking hi reving engines, and can assist in releasing an incredible amount of mid to upper end power.
T
Thanks Torben
I talked to Peter earlier this week, and after he and Johannes discussed my engine spec/use of car, they suggested the Python, over the Wasp, in order to keep engine response strong where it is most needed. It was explained to me that the Wasp system truly is solely designed for racing applications and very high rpm, and that if used for street, milder application (like my USA pump gas motor) it would hinder low and mid rpm power.
I ran my engine specs through the exhaust formula I have access to, and it came up with "optimum" as 30.73" long primaries, 1.68" diam, and 2.27" muffler pipe diam.
So I've ordered a Python 42mm which was suggested by Peter and Johannes.
Jim
«
Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 19:14:40 pm by Jim Ratto
»
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #7 on:
April 21, 2016, 23:41:18 pm »
installed
Logged
Esky
Newbie
Posts: 5
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #8 on:
April 22, 2016, 06:45:45 am »
Well how do you like it? How does it compare to what you had before? Looks like a nice system.
Logged
peejke
Full Member
Posts: 113
Keep it simple...
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #9 on:
April 22, 2016, 13:39:51 pm »
got a phyton myself a couple of years ago. Fits great, sounds great and runs great...
Logged
way to much old shit at home, ...
'57 single cab, 1776 powered
'71 baywindow westy , 1835 powered
'54 oval ragtop , texas brown , stock as hell
flandria sport moped collection, other old mopeds, BSA A65 cafe racer, yamaha SR500 dirt tracker
RichardinNZ
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #10 on:
April 26, 2016, 03:18:17 am »
Very stealth; are your exhaust cut outs already filled? Looks great.
Be very interesting to hear what you find regarding volume/sound and also any impact on how hot your car runs.
Many thanks
regards
Richard
Logged
Richard, Auckland, New Zealand
'58 Bug; NZ assembled
Dual Carb 36hp
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #11 on:
April 26, 2016, 04:00:19 am »
Quote from: RichardinNZ on April 26, 2016, 03:18:17 am
Very stealth; are your exhaust cut outs already filled? Looks great.
Be very interesting to hear what you find regarding volume/sound and also any impact on how hot your car runs.
Many thanks
regards
Richard
Thanks
I drove the car on Saturday over 185 miles, and about 4.5 hr, on several backroads in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, to get a good impression of how the car responded. The powerband is definitely cammier now, not that the lower end has softened, it just comes on much, much harder at 36-3800 rpm. Even at small throttle opening, as you approach 3600, you can feel the torque come in and the car want to accelerate. On hilly, twisty 2 lane roads, it's fun now to really put your foot down and have the power surge in. The old exhaust was obviously not tuned for my engine, as I suspected for a long time, while I researched what I would eventually change to.
As far as engine temperature, coming home, I found an empty lane on 101S, in ambient 70-75F and ran for 15-20 min at 45-4600 rpm (86-87mph), including a climb up Conejo Grade, the oil temperature remained under 180F. Driving along back roads, keeping revs between 3000-6500 the oil also stayed under 180F so I will need to probably blank off my air duct to external cooler. I will wait until after the hot summer months. Once home, and shut off, I used a infrared heat gun and zapped base of manifolds just to see if 1/2 would be hotter than 3/4, so 12 min after exiting freeway and shut down, now in 77-80F ambient, 3/4 manifold showed 184F where it bolts to head and 1/2 side showed 152F.
The reduction in engine temperature tells me that this exhaust is tuned correctly when compared to old exhaust, pulling more fresh mixture into cylinders on overlap.
Overall, I am very happy with the change. The sound level is much more civil and easier to live with now, over the old A1 Magnaflow.
«
Last Edit: April 26, 2016, 04:03:23 am by Jim Ratto
»
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #12 on:
April 26, 2016, 04:56:17 am »
Great result!
Exactly which A1 system were you running previously? Sidewinder or Low Down? What size?
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #13 on:
April 26, 2016, 05:23:29 am »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on April 26, 2016, 04:56:17 am
Great result!
Exactly which A1 system were you running previously? Sidewinder or Low Down? What size?
I am not sure which header it was. 1-3/4" primaries, but 2 & 4 pipes were set back farther than Phoenix I used to run. The collector was small flange, like the typical 1-5/8 or 1-1/2". The mufflers I ran were Magnaflow (loud as all hell) and Super Turbo (mellower, but car was difficult to jet, tended to run rich at steady state mid rpm, where most street driving is done).
I think the combination of (probably) too large of primary pipe, and too small collector exit, created a situation opposite of what a good "stepped" header is supposed to do. During overlap, I think instead of exhaust energy helping to evacuate next cylinder, the restriction at the collector was negating what a good header should do. The collector of the Python appears to have much more volume over my old system. I have not measured both, so that statement is based on eyeballing both.
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #14 on:
April 26, 2016, 05:29:50 am »
Thank you for the detailed response, exactly what I wanted.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #15 on:
April 26, 2016, 05:52:30 am »
you're welcome
Logged
RichardinNZ
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #16 on:
April 26, 2016, 10:07:08 am »
Thanks from me too...my stroker is a little way off yet but good to have some real life information to think about. Sounds like a nice drive you had at the weekend!
Logged
Richard, Auckland, New Zealand
'58 Bug; NZ assembled
Dual Carb 36hp
K-Roc
Full Member
Posts: 194
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #17 on:
April 26, 2016, 15:31:22 pm »
Nice write up Jim, For reference What's your current displacement, cam and heads? ( Valve size ) and gearing / tire size if you don't mind.
I was wanting to experiment with a Stage 1 Wasp and Muffler, but that's an Expensive experiment.
Cheers!
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #18 on:
April 26, 2016, 16:22:18 pm »
Quote from: K-Roc on April 26, 2016, 15:31:22 pm
Nice write up Jim, For reference What's your current displacement, cam and heads? ( Valve size ) and gearing / tire size if you don't mind.
I was wanting to experiment with a Stage 1 Wasp and Muffler, but that's an Expensive experiment.
Cheers!
Thanks,
94 x 78, 86C Web, exhaust closes 68 ATDC, Clyde Berg 44mm x 37.5 (similar to Berg 871 heads, but done on old 044 casting), 0.89 4th / 4.375:1, 25.5" tire
Venturi 40mm, F4 emulsion tubes, Crane HI6R fired by 010 with one spring or Brazil 009, 34' total.
Logged
brian e
Full Member
Posts: 141
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #19 on:
April 26, 2016, 21:23:31 pm »
Did you get yours from Cip1?
If you dont mind, how much was the total to your door?
Brian
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #20 on:
April 26, 2016, 22:21:23 pm »
Quote from: brian e on April 26, 2016, 21:23:31 pm
Did you get yours from Cip1?
If you dont mind, how much was the total to your door?
Brian
Yes, nice doing business with them. Despite them being in the final stages of moving the store, they got it out quickly, with all kinds of follow through from their staff. It got hung up in customs up in Seattle, and they called UPS to help move it along. I'll be sure to send them some more business.
It was around $1100 for all of it, system plus matching forward pipes for 1 & 3. I really like the 8M nuts they shipped with it, sure beats fighting with weirdo 11 or 12mm crap I had on it. The hanger which secures muffler is nicely designed (looks to be Rabbit muffler hanger, could probably even upgrade it to a MBZ chain one to outlast the car). Like I said, I'm happy with the change, all around. Maybe someday I'll even set it up with their heat exchangers.
Logged
javabug
Hero Member
Posts: 2103
WHAT'S UP WID DA BOOM BOOM???
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #21 on:
April 27, 2016, 17:22:20 pm »
Quote from: Jim Ratto on April 26, 2016, 22:21:23 pm
. Maybe someday I'll even set it up with their heat exchangers.
Start saving and do this sooner than later. For the way you use your car, having heat will change your world. I drove my Baja Bug all winter (kept it out of the salt) with a properly-functioning heater. Coming home from work at 1:00 AM at temps around 0°F and I never thought twice about it.
Logged
Mike H.
Sven was right.
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #22 on:
April 29, 2016, 18:33:39 pm »
Quote from: javabug on April 27, 2016, 17:22:20 pm
Quote from: Jim Ratto on April 26, 2016, 22:21:23 pm
. Maybe someday I'll even set it up with their heat exchangers.
Start saving and do this sooner than later. For the way you use your car, having heat will change your world. I drove my Baja Bug all winter (kept it out of the salt) with a properly-functioning heater. Coming home from work at 1:00 AM at temps around 0°F and I never thought twice about it.
good point man. But, to be honest, it's rare, very rare that I'm actually cold in my car. There's been times, but a good parka and gloves and jeans/good socks have always been enough. Window defrosting though, that's another story. Even when I lived in Quincy CA (winter temps often 20F or below), and had the car up there, it never had heat. I was more worried about oil coming to temp than I was with me keeping warm. That's a good topic for another post sometime soon.... summer vs winter oiling systems/cooling
Logged
javabug
Hero Member
Posts: 2103
WHAT'S UP WID DA BOOM BOOM???
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #23 on:
May 02, 2016, 12:51:36 pm »
Quote
it's rare, very rare that I'm actually cold in my car.
Heating is a whole other thread, too. I think butt warmers (heaters) in those fancy new Recaros would probably take care of most needs for your climate. I'd even like to try them here.
And for defrosting, I find it hard to believe there isn't a small but efficient electric heater out there nowadays that could be plumbed in to the ducting for that. Never understood why new car manufacturers wouldn't have something similar for instant heat until the cooling system gets up to temp. Maybe they do, I just don't know anything about new cars. Heck, we have electric power steering now ... ?
Logged
Mike H.
Sven was right.
modnrod
Hero Member
Posts: 795
Old School Volksies
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #24 on:
May 03, 2016, 05:29:03 am »
Quote from: javabug on May 02, 2016, 12:51:36 pm
And for defrosting, I find it hard to believe there isn't a small but efficient electric heater out there nowadays that could be plumbed in to the ducting for that.
Lots of 90s Japanese cars have them, I always used the complete setup out of the early 90s Mazda 121 (the little "bubble car"), but some other also run them. We can get just about everything Japanese here easy, so can pick and choose then get it down fairly simply.
OR, maybe one of these might be worth a try.........
http://www.ebay.com.au/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2050601.m570.l1313.TR11.TRC1.A0.H0.Xelectric+car+heater.TRS0&_nkw=electric+car+heater&_sacat=0
Logged
modnrod
Hero Member
Posts: 795
Old School Volksies
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #25 on:
May 03, 2016, 05:31:08 am »
Oooooo. Wrong thread, sorry Jim.
But on this thread, have you ever tried one of your merged exhausts with a smaller diameter outlet pipe, say, 2.25" instead of 3"?
Logged
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
Posts: 7121
Re: Back to back exhaust comparisons? JPM/CSP vs CSP?
«
Reply #26 on:
June 25, 2016, 00:26:37 am »
A few months on now, and happier still with the new pipes.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...