The Cal-look Lounge

Cal-look/High Performance => In Da Werks => Topic started by: Jim Ratto on March 23, 2008, 17:25:11 pm



Title: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on March 23, 2008, 17:25:11 pm
here is where we can go back and forth and lose our minds through this ordeal....

thanks,

Jim


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jesse/DVK on March 23, 2008, 19:03:07 pm
Cool Jim, show me the post with all the tools I will need to build my engine so I can order them at the shops :).


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Zach Gomulka on March 23, 2008, 21:26:42 pm
Second point: I often hear people say they want to build the "shortblock" and let it sit and wait while they source the top end stuff to finish the "longblock". I really suggest against building the motor in stages like that.


I totally agree with this statement! Along the same lines... I always hear of guys wanting to slap the motor together now just to get it running and then make updates/improvements later. I feel the most common one is "Can I just install stock rockers with my FK8 cam, then upgrade to 1.4's later??" Yeah, sure you can. But it's stupid. You will have to set up rocker geometry- twice, cut pushrods- twice, do all this work- twice. Just save up the $200 for a nice set of rockers, do it once, get it over with.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on March 23, 2008, 22:20:59 pm
Problem is, much of the checks that have to be performed during trial assmebly require lifter to cam contact and rotating engine. Do this after the shortblock is assembled and you will wipe lubricant from the faces. More on this later....

any effort that can be made to keep final assembly lubricant where it belongs is a good idea


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Bewitched666 on March 24, 2008, 16:39:09 pm
So far i agree with everybody here so no discussion from my part yet. ;D


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on March 24, 2008, 20:24:35 pm
Couple of notes on the engines that will be shown in the pics:

Both motors are kind of atypical, wierdo motors. Sheep's motor is way off-the-wall small cc thing, built with nostalgia in mind, not the latest greatest technology. Not to say it will run like a pig, but it isn't the easiest way to get some power under the decklid. All the same, it is a cool conversation piece (I guess). Derek's motor is all together different.... 94 x 84, huge VW heads, drag-spec billet steel cam, high CR, big rockers, 48IDAs with big chokes, etc. This one is going to be all about twisting the snot out of it for power.

Anyway, my point is, the combinations here are not ones that I would suggest for fast street motor stuff. One is too wierd and ancient and the other is too wild and on ragged edge. But all of the techniques to build them should pretty much apply to any street motor, even a stock one.

Combinations I would suggest would be:

1776, round port 40 x 35.5 heads, 8.5-8.8:1, Engle 120 or Web 110 cam with stock rockers, Weber 44IDF or Dellorto 45DRLA or Weber 48IDA (with some patience) merged 1-5/8 header, Bosch 010 or 009, 12lb flywheel

1914, small oval port heads, 8.5-8.8:1, Engle K8 or Web 86B with good 1.4 rockers (Autocraft black or Scat), same carbs as above, same header, etc...

2016/2165/2276 (90.5x78, 94x78, 94x82), larger oval port 42 x 37 heads,  Engle K8 (1.4 rockers)or W130 (stock rockers or 1.25), 8.5-8.8:1, 48mm IDF or 48DRLA or 48IDA, 1-3/4 header, same ignition, 12lb flywheel...etc.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: j-f on March 24, 2008, 21:24:58 pm
I have a question Mister Professor  :D :D ;)

Do the gearbox ratio as importance in the choice of an engine?

I always thought that a 8*31 gearbox will work better with a strocker than with a stocker.

For example, if I plan to use a 4.12 gearbox with tires as 185-70-15,will a 1955 will work better than a 1915?


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Rune on March 24, 2008, 22:57:56 pm
Combinations I would suggest would be:

1776, round port 40 x 35.5 heads, 8.5-8.8:1, Engle 120 or Web 110 cam with stock rockers, Weber 44IDF or Dellorto 45DRLA or Weber 48IDA (with some patience) merged 1-5/8 header, Bosch 010 or 009, 12lb flywheel

1914, small oval port heads, 8.5-8.8:1, Engle K8 or Web 86B with good 1.4 rockers (Autocraft black or Scat), same carbs as above, same header, etc...

2016/2165/2276 (90.5x78, 94x78, 94x82), larger oval port 42 x 37 heads,  Engle K8 (1.4 rockers)or W130 (stock rockers or 1.25), 8.5-8.8:1, 48mm IDF or 48DRLA or 48IDA, 1-3/4 header, same ignition, 12lb flywheel...etc.


Why allways that conservative on the CR when you talk about street motors..? Is that because of the poor quality fuel available in the states? I get the impression that there is the US way of thinking and then there is the European (or maybe just scandinavian?) way when it comes to streetmotor thinking. Is'nt those low cr's kinda like trowing power out the window?


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Rune on March 24, 2008, 23:02:25 pm
I have a question Mister Professor  :D :D ;)

Do the gearbox ratio as importance in the choice of an engine?

I always thought that a 8*31 gearbox will work better with a strocker than with a stocker.

For example, if I plan to use a 4.12 gearbox with tires as 185-70-15,will a 1955 will work better than a 1915?

Would depend on the state of tune of the engine, not just the size.. A big cc motor would give more "free" torque though.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: louisb on March 24, 2008, 23:04:54 pm
Combinations I would suggest would be:

1776, round port 40 x 35.5 heads, 8.5-8.8:1, Engle 120 or Web 110 cam with stock rockers, Weber 44IDF or Dellorto 45DRLA or Weber 48IDA (with some patience) merged 1-5/8 header, Bosch 010 or 009, 12lb flywheel

1914, small oval port heads, 8.5-8.8:1, Engle K8 or Web 86B with good 1.4 rockers (Autocraft black or Scat), same carbs as above, same header, etc...

2016/2165/2276 (90.5x78, 94x78, 94x82), larger oval port 42 x 37 heads,  Engle K8 (1.4 rockers)or W130 (stock rockers or 1.25), 8.5-8.8:1, 48mm IDF or 48DRLA or 48IDA, 1-3/4 header, same ignition, 12lb flywheel...etc.


Why allways that conservative on the CR when you talk about street motors..? Is that because of the poor quality fuel available in the states? I get the impression that there is the US way of thinking and then there is the European (or maybe just scandinavian?) way when it comes to streetmotor thinking. Is'nt those low cr's kinda like trowing power out the window?

So what is the line of thought for Scandinavian motors as far as CR is concerned? I think Deano was going to do some sort of comparison between gas from CA and Texas one time. Not sure what came of it. 

--louis


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Rune on March 24, 2008, 23:14:32 pm
Just have the impression that most guys up here build higher cr streetmotors, like 10:1 or more.. But then again we have short summers, so maybe we are just after the most bang for the buck and won't mind redoing the motors during winter  :D  Kidding aside, why shouldnt a higher cr motor live just as long? Like, would the same motor suffer more problems than gains when at 10,5:1 instead of 8,5?


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on March 24, 2008, 23:20:57 pm
high CR motors are less forgiving when it comes to driving technique, and tuning.
setting up deck-height is pretty easy compared to getting a pair of carbs to live happily with engine in real high state of tune.
It gets hot here where I live, and I would hate to steer people in the direction of short-lived gratification and a pile of holed pistons.

If a guy built a 10:1 2276 here, and was off on the jetting, may a smidge lean, and had timing turned up and laid into it on the freeway on a hot day here.....he'd never make it.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Rune on March 24, 2008, 23:30:22 pm
Ok, thanks for the input. I guess there might be some small benefits of living up here in this refrigerator of a country after all then :)
Looking forward to see the motors coming together, espesially the tools and measuring involved. Thanks for taking the time to do this Jim.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: airstuff on March 25, 2008, 09:10:58 am
Few guys here in Croatia are alo runnig high compression with 98 octane fuel,one has even 12:1 and 10::1 on the 1776 with Engle 120.

His builder says that the more compression,more the usable power so I wonder is this really so ???



Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: louisb on March 25, 2008, 14:05:18 pm
Few guys here in Croatia are alo runnig high compression with 98 octane fuel,

Best we can get is 93 - 94 here in the states at the pump. (Not sure if they have different ways of measuring the octane over there though.) And in some areas, like So Cal, they have to add a bunch of crap to the gas to keep the emissions levels down. I think that might have something to do with it too.

--louis


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: airstuff on March 25, 2008, 14:15:41 pm
We even have the new OMV 100 octane fuel,but not many people use it,and it si pricey


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on March 25, 2008, 20:37:51 pm
I have a question Mister Professor  :D :D ;)

Do the gearbox ratio as importance in the choice of an engine?

I always thought that a 8*31 gearbox will work better with a strocker than with a stocker.

For example, if I plan to use a 4.12 gearbox with tires as 185-70-15,will a 1955 will work better than a 1915?

the engines above are based on use of stock 4.37 or 4.12 gearbox with stock 1st -  4th
I don't like the way VW's run with stock 3.88 gearbox, even with big cc strokers.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Bewitched666 on March 25, 2008, 20:51:05 pm
why not Jim?? 8)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on March 25, 2008, 20:56:08 pm
why not Jim?? 8)

too lazy.... off idle, upon take off in 1st gear, no SNAP like 4.12 or 4.37
and even worse in 4th gear even with 84mm stroker motor, conservative heads, cam...   

maybe I have driven too few cars with 3.88, but they always seemed lazy dogs


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Bewitched666 on March 26, 2008, 08:19:02 am
I'm going to look for a 4.12 gearbox,i think my 69 has a 4.37 gearbox in it but the 4th gear is to high for my regular freeway cruising.
I will keep this box just for dragracing then,upgraded of course.

Keep the post comming Jim. ;D


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on April 03, 2008, 05:59:21 am
Hi all, sorry I haven't made any progress at all ..... yet.

I'm getting closer to making time to wrap up Sheep's 88 x74   ::)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Harry/FDK on April 03, 2008, 20:53:26 pm
I'm finally putting my 2165 aluminum cased motor back together again, with lots of PM's between Jim and me. Even with not too much heat during the summer (Netherlands), my Bugpack case produces a lot of heat.
Anyway, after taking the engine apart after hard 4000 km's, ALL bearings and lifters looked perfect.
Keep you posted.

PS. Lifters are Scat Lube-A-Lobes, SLR treated from Aircooled.net


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: airstuff on April 04, 2008, 08:42:32 am
What do you guys say for the lightweight CB Performance lifters used with Engle camshafts,is this a possible combination?


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on April 04, 2008, 21:14:49 pm
I think they can be used against an Engle. According to CB's website, they can be used against all popular cam types.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: dirk zeyen on April 04, 2008, 21:37:45 pm
i'm not happy with the cb parts...
if you buy a IDF-update kit the main jet is stamped as an xxx and in real it is xyz, problems with dropped spindels, problems with cranks, the list goes on.but i'm from germany, don't know if it is bettter over there.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: JS on April 04, 2008, 21:44:22 pm
About CB...
Just mocked up a couple of "CNC match ported Big Beef" manifolds on my 044 wedgeports. I don´t think "match porting" means the same in US and Norway.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: dirk zeyen on April 04, 2008, 21:51:13 pm
 ;D ;D ;D
no words


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: JS on April 04, 2008, 22:38:16 pm
To sliiiide our rambling back to topic, where do you buy the blue stuff that you use to make an imprint on where you´re going to take away material?


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Lee.C on April 04, 2008, 22:46:18 pm
To sliiiide our rambling back to topic, where do you buy the blue stuff that you use to make an imprint on where you´re going to take away material?

Any GOOD motor spares shop should still have some laying around or try asking your machine shop  :)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Peter on April 05, 2008, 00:06:08 am
Yep , count me in the list with the manifolds :)
nice huh


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Zach Gomulka on April 08, 2008, 02:37:16 am
Its called Dykem (sp?)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: stealth67vw on April 08, 2008, 04:09:21 am
To sliiiide our rambling back to topic, where do you buy the blue stuff that you use to make an imprint on where you´re going to take away material?

www.mcmaster.com

I order from them everyday for work. They have everything.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Bewitched666 on May 03, 2008, 13:47:33 pm
Jim any news?? ;D


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: airstuff on May 06, 2008, 11:50:11 am
Hej guys,

Can anybody tell me,what is the advantage of running 5.5 VW rods in a 2276 in comparison to 5.4 rods ???

Cheers


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: airstuff on May 07, 2008, 15:33:46 pm
Maybe I would exchange the I-beams for the H beams


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: SlingShot on May 08, 2008, 06:36:06 am
Its called Dykem (sp?)

Correct ! I use Dykem regularly. Don't take too many deep breaths when using it though, you will forget what your doing in a hurry  ;)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on May 13, 2008, 18:25:06 pm
Jim any news?? ;D

Only news I really have is that time is very hard to find right now. Sheep's 88 x 74 motor is my main focus right now, he's been waiting for over a year. I did spend much of the weekend smoothing the inside of his case. Sorry no time for pictures and stories right now. I'll be back.........



Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on May 14, 2008, 20:51:25 pm
Hi guys,
Sheep's heads are nearly done, though they are going to be 40 x 35.5 now, not 35 x 32
My garage is still a mess, and in no shape for putting a nice new motor together. Next step will be getting the heads sent off for bigger seats and cut for dual springs and 88mm bore. While they're out, I will take some pics of other parts and tools and share on the other thread. Sorry for lagging.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Rick Meredith on May 14, 2008, 21:27:50 pm
Hi guys,
Sheep's heads are nearly done, though they are going to be 40 x 35.5 now, not 35 x 32
My garage is still a mess, and in no shape for putting a nice new motor together. Next step will be getting the heads sent off for bigger seats and cut for dual springs and 88mm bore. While they're out, I will take some pics of other parts and tools and share on the other thread. Sorry for lagging.

Slacker... it's not like you're working a full-time job, your wife's near the end of her pregnancy and you have to get things ready for the baby's room!  ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Bewitched666 on May 15, 2008, 07:19:41 am
 ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: nicolas on May 15, 2008, 08:10:27 am
here is a question i have to ask:

what trans works for a 1776? i want to drive it, but it needs to be stronger. it is a 4.12 type3 case from a 66. so i was thinking of a late model swingaxle with shorter gears, but with super diff and sideplates...

just something that will keep it together and will drive me around.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Bewitched666 on May 15, 2008, 13:44:58 pm
That will keep you going Nicolas.You can use those urethane mounts for more riggedty and a tractionbar also. 8)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jesse/DVK on July 28, 2008, 11:13:21 am
Any news yet? Love to see some posts on engine building.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on July 28, 2008, 22:41:45 pm
sorry.... too much to do and no time right now.... maybe if you have specific questions? I can try to help.  :)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jesse/DVK on July 28, 2008, 23:10:23 pm
Not really questions yet, but maybe you can tell me a little more on cam choice, if you compare camshafts with each other where to look for, what gives more bottom end torque, more rpm etc. So look at duration, valve lift, heads, carbs etc.

And one other question, when to use chromoly head studs instead of OEM VW?


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on July 28, 2008, 23:27:54 pm
this thread was supposed to be an assembly technique guide more than a "what parts to use" guide. Sorry.
Camshafts can be tricky and really, deserve their own thread.... let's start one....  ;)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Mike Lawless on July 29, 2008, 05:23:37 am
Here's some stuff one might find helpful. It was my first experience with CBs raised roof case when it first came out.

http://home.comcast.net/~mlawless29/NewMotor.htm


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on July 29, 2008, 05:27:32 am
got word that sheep's squared 40 x 35.5's are almost done.... then we can get back on topic with his 88 x 74
no fair taking up this post with my 2165 revamp

sorry for lagging


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: stealth67vw on July 29, 2008, 05:35:04 am
got word that sheep's squared 40 x 35.5's are almost done.... then we can get back on topic with his 88 x 74
no fair taking up this post with my 2165 revamp

sorry for lagging
Friggin slackers  ::) ;D


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: John Rayburn on July 29, 2008, 21:17:59 pm
We interupt these commercials with...... The topic.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jesse/DVK on August 03, 2008, 18:14:44 pm
Well Jiim do you have a list with all the tools you need to build an engine, to measure up parts etc. So I can start buying them to check out the parts when they arrive.


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jim Ratto on August 04, 2008, 18:15:23 pm
Well Jiim do you have a list with all the tools you need to build an engine, to measure up parts etc. So I can start buying them to check out the parts when they arrive.

off the top of my head....  to complete the "build sheet" i will post later....

(depending on rod bolt type too)
full set 1/4" drive metric sockets/ratchet/extension
same but 3/8" deep and std metric
good dependable and calibrated 3/8" torque wrench (click) or beam indicator
small jeweler or hobby file set
1" travel dial indicator (in .001") and magnetic or snake base
set of feeler gauges
strong magnet
depth gauge measured in .001 or .0015"
vernier caliper/dial measured in .001"
bench mount valve spring tool

more to come....


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Bewitched666 on August 06, 2008, 07:18:01 am
Between all this Jim,how's the kiddo doing? ;D


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: airstuff on August 06, 2008, 10:56:34 am
Talkin about the torque wrench,

Do I need one whick has 10-150 foot pounds range,or do I need one with 120-960 inch per pounds

here is where I have some I might get:

http://www.mamotorworks.com/acvw?frame=1.3105 (http://www.mamotorworks.com/acvw?frame=1.3105)

http://www.mamotorworks.com/acvw?frame=1.3101 (http://www.mamotorworks.com/acvw?frame=1.3101)


Title: Re: discussion of high perf engine posts here...
Post by: Jesse/DVK on February 20, 2009, 13:05:39 pm
Hi Jim any news?

About the torquewrench. How NM should it have max? I don't need one for the flywheel cause i can borrow one from 200-500 nm from a friend.