The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 01, 2024, 16:17:44 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350869 Posts in 28606 Topics by 6828 Members
Latest Member: GSW Racing
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Cal-look
| | |-+  78 vs 82
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print
Author Topic: 78 vs 82  (Read 26221 times)
bugnut68
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1751


« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2010, 18:18:40 pm »

this motor is starting to sound like the 2007cc that hot vws put together in 1996 which can't be all bad


I'm bulding that identical engine, only difference is in the heads (Steve Tims Stage II's versus Fumio's 40x35.5mm) and the carbs (45 Dells vs. IDAs).  Not to say it won't have IDA's someday...Grin  Maybe someday I'll save up some coin for my first set of 'castles.'
Logged
dirk zeyen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 292



« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2010, 18:23:08 pm »

the engine was on the dyno with 40drla 45drla (38 vents- i think to big) and 48 ida

love my steve tims stage 1 but stage 2 will be better Wink
Logged

back again!!!
speedwell
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14708


the archivist


WWW
« Reply #32 on: October 29, 2010, 21:55:38 pm »

you can ask "speedwell"

for sure he can scan!!!
you can also ask him about the dellorto drla build up article he had scanned for me....

ASK THE ARCHIVIST!!! Grin

 Wink
Logged

http://speedwell55.skynetblogs.be/
oldspeed 61 standard empi/speedwell
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #33 on: October 30, 2010, 01:45:27 am »

this motor is starting to sound like the 2007cc that hot vws put together in 1996 which can't be all bad


I'm bulding that identical engine, only difference is in the heads (Steve Tims Stage II's versus Fumio's 40x35.5mm) and the carbs (45 Dells vs. IDAs).  Not to say it won't have IDA's someday...Grin  Maybe someday I'll save up some coin for my first set of 'castles.'

just what i was thinking
Logged

arabia slugs
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #34 on: October 30, 2010, 02:03:47 am »

You know what your first thought will be after you drive it? "Wonder what it woulda been like with the 82..." Wink
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
rick m
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1296


Driving Hot VWs for 44 Years Strong!


« Reply #35 on: October 30, 2010, 02:33:45 am »

My thoughts exactly Zach.  I love long stroke motors. I take the extra time to do all the clearancing, etc.  I like the displacement and torque of the long strokes and big bores.

RM
Logged

Rick Mortensen
Driving Hot VWs since 1970
dirk zeyen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 292



« Reply #36 on: October 30, 2010, 04:15:25 am »

4mm more stroke...... for sure more power....... but a lot more work and parts!!!
like mr. ratto said!!!
Logged

back again!!!
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #37 on: October 30, 2010, 05:38:31 am »

An 82 with Chevy rods fits in the same case as a 78 with VW rods Wink To each his own Smiley
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #38 on: October 30, 2010, 08:37:55 am »

i have the 78 and its my first one
there is next winter
Logged

arabia slugs
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #39 on: November 11, 2010, 23:12:48 pm »

so
More parts coming and arrived
pump oil
5.5 I-rods
8 doweled flywheel
and cylinders

any bod have some heads That don't need Cheesy

Logged

arabia slugs
bugnut68
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1751


« Reply #40 on: November 12, 2010, 00:35:15 am »

Invariably, there's no way to build a one-size-fits-all engine...I'm sure this one will become bigger someday when I have the time and funds to go more radical.  In the meantime, the 2017 combo should prove to be more than enough fun to bracket race and cruise on the streets of Lakeview, Oregon, population, 2,500.  And the majority of that population drives loud, obnoxious diesel bro trucks.  Lol.  Difference between here and the city is that bro trucks get USED, so in that regard they're not really bro trucks.  Cheesy
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #41 on: November 12, 2010, 00:47:07 am »

I'm hoping for something faster then my old 30 hp   Grin
its a long time to may so hope its all done then

sill wondering what cam to do
Logged

arabia slugs
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7121



« Reply #42 on: November 12, 2010, 01:02:42 am »

5.500 rods are on the long side for a 78mm crank.
A stock 5.394 or Porsche 5.352 would make your life much easier when setting deck and valvetrain up.
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #43 on: November 12, 2010, 01:10:34 am »

explane place
The other forum i was told to get the 5,5
i can get the 5,4
if that's beater

b pistons and co max 9:1
Logged

arabia slugs
Jim Ratto
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7121



« Reply #44 on: November 12, 2010, 01:34:17 am »

two schools of thought of long vs short
(Really, in my opinion, the long rod is a way to get parts to clear when using 82-84-86+mm stroke.)
Aside from the mechanical end of things, meaning necessity of a long(er) rod to have things like skirts not hit counterweights, etc, some think a longer rod will make more power. This is all down to engine configuration, how well it responds to tuning, VE %, which all comes back to breathing charateristics and valve timing. In a nutshell, where you want the piston in relation to valve opening at desired rpm range. A 5.500 rod is a good fit, if needed to clear parts on 84mm-86mm crank.
I use 5.394 on my 78 stroke. Deck height with no shim @ base of cylinder (on my case) comes in right @ .061"
My take on rod length vs piston speed (within reason): you want the speed up, as long as parts are up to the task. It makes the intake ports and the carbs "think" they are on a bigger cc motor before the cam comes in. A guy I worked under said it well: "A piston sitting still ain't doing it's fair share". Which I get, though that isn't 100% true.

I would suggest 5.394 or 5.352".
Logged
Donny B.
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1340



« Reply #45 on: November 12, 2010, 02:06:17 am »

I have 5.352 on my 78 stroke motor.  It makes for a narrow engine that fits well in the engine compartment.  some think that the shorter stroke actually provide a better signal for the carbs especially if you don't run a lot of compression which I don't.
Logged

Don Bulitta
Wolfsburg Registry
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #46 on: November 12, 2010, 02:16:50 am »

OK so i have my 311 vw rods looked at
thanks
Logged

arabia slugs
Udo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2077



« Reply #47 on: November 12, 2010, 06:45:03 am »

A crank with Vw rod journal size is much stronger than chevy's . I have build an 82x90.5 engine for my street car in the past dynoed at 195 hp for street and strip. I also drove it on the ciruit track . Very nice and fun engine. All you need is a good crank.
Udo
Logged

fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #48 on: November 12, 2010, 16:48:25 pm »

have a good crank
where can i get my rod rebid in Europa ??
Logged

arabia slugs
Udo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2077



« Reply #49 on: November 12, 2010, 17:50:16 pm »

This is what i do with original rods. Works great for higher rpms

Udo
Logged

Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #50 on: November 12, 2010, 18:03:35 pm »

Those look pretty Smiley
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #51 on: November 13, 2010, 14:49:27 pm »

this any good

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=1053251


just noticed they  are 5.325 and not 5.352  Cry
« Last Edit: November 13, 2010, 14:54:05 pm by fredy66 » Logged

arabia slugs
nicolas
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3998



« Reply #52 on: November 13, 2010, 15:06:02 pm »

this any good

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=1053251


just noticed they  are 5.325 and not 5.352  Cry

he meant 5.352  Wink

and if i am correct Taylor Walton is in DKP??? and all depends on where the damage really is...
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #53 on: November 13, 2010, 15:16:11 pm »

to good to be true.
why is this going to be so hard .
my local shop have 5.5 and 5.4 I-rods not the
5.394 and is not inn my budget to spend 340 € to rebuild my old rods.
what to do  Huh 
Logged

arabia slugs
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #54 on: November 13, 2010, 15:30:59 pm »

5.394 & 5.4 is the same thing. Don't worry about .006"!
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #55 on: November 13, 2010, 15:32:49 pm »

5.394 & 5.4 is the same thing. Don't worry about .006"!

ok thanks man  Grin
Logged

arabia slugs
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #56 on: November 13, 2010, 16:38:15 pm »

OK so now we have

78.4 AA crank
8 doweled flywheel (coming)
5.4 AA rods (coming )
94 b male pistons
AA cylinders (coming )
as 41 case
26 oil pump
and some small bits and pieces

i,m drooling on the heads and carbs inn the for sale part
but think that have to wait  Angry
Logged

arabia slugs
fredy66
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 595



« Reply #57 on: December 03, 2010, 00:00:55 am »

so what heads to go for ??

Steve tims looks good and the price is good thanks to the $$

stage1

ore save some moor money and do the stage 2

any is there any other i need to consider
Logged

arabia slugs
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #58 on: December 03, 2010, 01:44:04 am »

Stage 2, or something similar from another head porter.
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
stealth67vw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2261



« Reply #59 on: December 03, 2010, 01:50:51 am »

this any good

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=1053251


just noticed they  are 5.325 and not 5.352  Cry

he meant 5.352  Wink

and if i am correct Taylor Walton is in DKP??? and all depends on where the damage really is...
5.325 H beams have been available in the past. My 1990s Bugpack catalog has them in Chevy journal.
Logged

John Bates
JB Machining Services
1967 street bug 2020lbs w/driver
12.34 @ 108 mph 1/4
7.76 @ 89mph 1/8
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!