The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 04:02:01 am

Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:     Advanced search
350689 Posts in 28577 Topics by 6823 Members
Latest Member: Riisager
* Home This Year's European Top 20 lists All Time European Top 20 lists Search Login Register
+  The Cal-look Lounge
|-+  Cal-look/High Performance
| |-+  Pure racing
| | |-+  Small powerhouses and old school
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 29 Print
Author Topic: Small powerhouses and old school  (Read 659429 times)
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1414


« Reply #180 on: February 08, 2008, 07:37:47 am »

IMO, you are looking in the wrong direction.
The most reliable hp is displacement.  Getting 120hp out of a 1600 NA is not easy.  Don't believe anyone that says it is.
Logged
Torben Alstrup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 716


« Reply #181 on: February 08, 2008, 10:53:59 am »

In my time I have built a couple of these small engine with that hp range. 120 hp out of a 1600 cc for daily use is stretching it, witout saying impossible. 1680 cc. with 117 - 120 usable hp is not a problem. The few extra cc. helps making it driveable at all rpm. There are a couple of solutions. I have my own of course. Roll Eyes

I have a 1600 cc 110 hp version that works very well on the street, and a (rpm limited) 100 hp versoin built mainly out of stock parts. The key is to make the engine pull torque soon enough to make it decent in the lower rpm. Its absolutely possible, but you have to think a little different than mainstream.
But from there to JPM´s or Autocraft´s heads & engines is a giant leap.

T
Logged
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3214


12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008


WWW
« Reply #182 on: February 08, 2008, 11:10:40 am »

I have modified my post as it was unclear at one point, I was talking about a "non-stroker" (1915) not a 1600.
Thats why I mention the cylinder kit.

Bruce, I guess anyone that has seen this thread understands that "good heads" is beyond regular "good heads".
Nothing is Easy, but a having the help of a head porter makes it easyer, in my opinion.
Logged

Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #183 on: February 08, 2008, 17:44:12 pm »

My daily driver 1600 went 14.8's @ 88mph. The car was light (noisy), and had close 3-4. But it was a simple and relatively inexpensive combo that worked very well. Someday Ill build a "clone" with the new tricks Ive learned Smiley
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1414


« Reply #184 on: February 09, 2008, 04:28:44 am »

Bruce, I guess anyone that has seen this thread understands that "good heads" is beyond regular "good heads".
Nothing is Easy, but a having the help of a head porter makes it easyer, in my opinion.
I agree with that.
For Project X, if you build a 2110 with really badly ported heads, it will still make at least 100-110hp, and be very easy to build.
Logged
Project_X
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 81


« Reply #185 on: February 09, 2008, 06:54:10 am »

Bruce, I guess anyone that has seen this thread understands that "good heads" is beyond regular "good heads".
Nothing is Easy, but a having the help of a head porter makes it easyer, in my opinion.
I agree with that.
For Project X, if you build a 2110 with really badly ported heads, it will still make at least 100-110hp, and be very easy to build.
Yeah understand a 2L stroker can make that hp easy but Id rather have something smaller but capable of 100hp at least.You know, the little motor that nobody expects to be quicker than it looks, like that 1603cc, what kind of money has that guy put into it, anyone know?
Logged

Thinking outside the box? hmm...I dont wanna play in the box no more, so Im stepping out for a while..
Aircooled for a reason, waters for boats!
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #186 on: February 09, 2008, 09:17:25 am »

Bruce, I guess anyone that has seen this thread understands that "good heads" is beyond regular "good heads".
Nothing is Easy, but a having the help of a head porter makes it easyer, in my opinion.
I agree with that.
For Project X, if you build a 2110 with really badly ported heads, it will still make at least 100-110hp, and be very easy to build.
Yeah understand a 2L stroker can make that hp easy but Id rather have something smaller but capable of 100hp at least.You know, the little motor that nobody expects to be quicker than it looks, like that 1603cc, what kind of money has that guy put into it, anyone know?

expensive.....Heads and pistons are the most expensive parts...i think within all parts,+ his own working time it will be 4000-5000€ for this engine....

Bye
Tom
Logged
Udo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2077



« Reply #187 on: February 09, 2008, 11:12:23 am »

Bruce, I guess anyone that has seen this thread understands that "good heads" is beyond regular "good heads".
Nothing is Easy, but a having the help of a head porter makes it easyer, in my opinion.
I agree with that.
For Project X, if you build a 2110 with really badly ported heads, it will still make at least 100-110hp, and be very easy to build.
Yeah understand a 2L stroker can make that hp easy but Id rather have something smaller but capable of 100hp at least.You know, the little motor that nobody expects to be quicker than it looks, like that 1603cc, what kind of money has that guy put into it, anyone know?

For this horesepower it is not woth to build a 2,0 ltr engine . So stay at your 1600 or max. 1776 . It is very easy and cheep to built and both make very good street horepower .

Udo
Logged

Project_X
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 81


« Reply #188 on: February 09, 2008, 15:56:18 pm »

Bruce, I guess anyone that has seen this thread understands that "good heads" is beyond regular "good heads".
Nothing is Easy, but a having the help of a head porter makes it easyer, in my opinion.
I agree with that.
For Project X, if you build a 2110 with really badly ported heads, it will still make at least 100-110hp, and be very easy to build.
Yeah understand a 2L stroker can make that hp easy but Id rather have something smaller but capable of 100hp at least.You know, the little motor that nobody expects to be quicker than it looks, like that 1603cc, what kind of money has that guy put into it, anyone know?

For this horesepower it is not woth to build a 2,0 ltr engine . So stay at your 1600 or max. 1776 . It is very easy and cheep to built and both make very good street horepower .

Udo

ok, cool thanks, also anyone know what 4000-5000€ is in American money by chance?LOL
Logged

Thinking outside the box? hmm...I dont wanna play in the box no more, so Im stepping out for a while..
Aircooled for a reason, waters for boats!
Frallan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 933



« Reply #189 on: February 09, 2008, 19:26:35 pm »

4000 €  to 5000€ is 5700 usd to 7250 USD according to international rates of today.
Logged

Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1414


« Reply #190 on: February 09, 2008, 23:11:32 pm »

Bruce, I guess anyone that has seen this thread understands that "good heads" is beyond regular "good heads".
Nothing is Easy, but a having the help of a head porter makes it easyer, in my opinion.
I agree with that.
For Project X, if you build a 2110 with really badly ported heads, it will still make at least 100-110hp, and be very easy to build.
Yeah understand a 2L stroker can make that hp easy but Id rather have something smaller but capable of 100hp at least.You know, the little motor that nobody expects to be quicker than it looks, like that 1603cc, what kind of money has that guy put into it, anyone know?
There's nothing wrong with wanting to do something different.  But when you are on a tight budget, you won't get there.
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1414


« Reply #191 on: February 09, 2008, 23:28:09 pm »

For this horesepower it is not woth to build a 2,0 ltr engine . So stay at your 1600 or max. 1776 . It is very easy and cheep to built and both make very good street horepower .

Udo
A 2 liter is gonna cost you $250 more to build than a 1776.  What's the big deal about that?

Why don't you let us in on how easy and cheap it is to build a 1600 that outputs more than double the stock hp.
Logged
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3214


12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008


WWW
« Reply #192 on: February 10, 2008, 00:34:02 am »

JPM built this engine to test what could be done with cheap parts in combination with know how. As he does his own heads this has for him been a very cheap, as for the rest of us we have to add the cost of having a pair of head built.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2016, 00:03:11 am by Jon » Logged

Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
Project_X
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 81


« Reply #193 on: February 10, 2008, 04:35:45 am »

5700 bucks to build a 1603cc to get 176hp? Is that what your saying it would cost to build that motor? JPM is in Sweden right? So if I got heads from him and that exhaust it would cost double since IM in Florida...umm holy crap LOL
Logged

Thinking outside the box? hmm...I dont wanna play in the box no more, so Im stepping out for a while..
Aircooled for a reason, waters for boats!
Udo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2077



« Reply #194 on: February 10, 2008, 12:13:15 pm »

For this horesepower it is not woth to build a 2,0 ltr engine . So stay at your 1600 or max. 1776 . It is very easy and cheep to built and both make very good street horepower .

Udo
A 2 liter is gonna cost you $250 more to build than a 1776.  What's the big deal about that?

Why don't you let us in on how easy and cheap it is to build a 1600 that outputs more than double the stock hp.

Where do you get those cheap cranks , clearance the case ... ?

Everybody has his own experience , i only work with good quality cranks like scat , okrasa , gene berg .

Udo
« Last Edit: February 10, 2008, 21:50:32 pm by Udo » Logged

Bruce
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1414


« Reply #195 on: February 11, 2008, 00:29:19 am »

CB sells a perfectly good forged chromoly crank for $289.

Why don't you tell us how much you would charge for a turn-key 1600 that makes 120hp?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2008, 00:51:08 am by Bruce » Logged
stealth67vw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2261



« Reply #196 on: February 11, 2008, 01:36:18 am »

Quote from: Udo

Where do you get those cheap cranks , clearance the case ... ?


Hard to justify spending $150-200 for DPR or DMS stock c/w crank when you can find cheap Chinese 78-84 strokers for $199.00.
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=388182
Logged

John Bates
JB Machining Services
1967 street bug 2020lbs w/driver
12.34 @ 108 mph 1/4
7.76 @ 89mph 1/8
Udo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2077



« Reply #197 on: February 11, 2008, 07:31:33 am »

CB sells a perfectly good forged chromoly crank for $289.

Why don't you tell us how much you would charge for a turn-key 1600 that makes 120hp?

A longblock would be something about 3000 euros , depends on what new parts you want . And a 2 liter starts at 4000 .

Udo
Logged

Johannes Persson
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 67


« Reply #198 on: February 11, 2008, 22:46:53 pm »

Hi there!

Finally I got the time to put the "Mouse Motor" on the dyno and this is what I see.

POWER:138,8kW 188.7hp/7670rpm
TORQUE:192.4Nm/6100rpm(138,7lbs)

The ignition and fuel curve is optimized, the main venturies is 37mm, main jets is 145 the air is 160 idle jets are 65f10 and the E-tubes are F7.I will go bigger with the main venturies, the first step will be 39mm, this will hopefully raise the output alittle bit more and get me closer to the calculated max power rpm(8000).I will post a video later.


Talk to you later
Johannes

Logged
folkevogn
Full Member
***
Posts: 155



« Reply #199 on: February 11, 2008, 23:02:59 pm »

Holy crap!!!!!! Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
to me, that is taking it to the next level!
I`m going insane here, I desperatly want to hear the motor run,  please post a clip off the dyno run NOW  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
I`m speachless!your are making the same power numbers in your tiny little 1603ccm mousemotor as I do with my 2332ccm
« Last Edit: February 11, 2008, 23:08:33 pm by folkevogn » Logged

11.96 @ 180kmh - SCC 2013 Grin
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6991


Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.


« Reply #200 on: February 12, 2008, 00:04:06 am »

That is awesome. I never dreamed you could get those kind of numbers out of 1600cc. Even the torque figure looks very respectable. If you could, Id love to see a dyno graph to show the power and torque curves.

What is the compression ratio??
Logged

Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Lee.C
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6458


I might be an Idiot but I'm not an Arsehole!


« Reply #201 on: February 12, 2008, 00:57:37 am »

"your are making the same power numbers in your tiny little 1603ccm mousemotor as I do with my 2332ccm"

Exactly dude  Wink Smiley
Logged

You either "Get It" or you don't......
Torben Alstrup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 716


« Reply #202 on: February 12, 2008, 01:04:15 am »

Hi there!

Finally I got the time to put the "Mouse Motor" on the dyno and this is what I see.

POWER:138,8kW 188.7hp/7670rpm
TORQUE:192.4Nm/6100rpm(138,7lbs)

The ignition and fuel curve is optimized, the main venturies is 37mm, main jets is 145 the air is 160 idle jets are 65f10 and the E-tubes are F7.I will go bigger with the main venturies, the first step will be 39mm, this will hopefully raise the output alittle bit more and get me closer to the calculated max power rpm(8000).I will post a video later.


Talk to you later
Johannes
Shocked AAAALLRIIIGHT !!!!  Impressive numbers. Where does it begin to make power ?
Torben
Logged
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3214


12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008


WWW
« Reply #203 on: February 12, 2008, 01:31:44 am »

Johannes told me on the phone tonight that the engine has a very wide power band, in fact he compares it with a Japanese motorcycle.  Grin Grin Grin Grin

I knew from past experiences with JPM that he delivers when he says he's going to do something, but I confess to having thought that this was a far stretch. The man knows his stuff!

Can't wait for that video!!
 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
 
Logged

Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
Frallan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 933



« Reply #204 on: February 12, 2008, 02:23:16 am »

A little bit of JPM "bragging" ...I like to brag about you Johannes.
I subscribe to some Formula one and High tech racing magazines, in them I could read last year that the supercar manufacturer Koenigsegg are getting in to racing. Not just world record runs but real racing.
It was mentioned about some few companies that would assist them in further development of the car and on the engine company, JPM was mentioned.
I like that.

Anyway, Congratulations Johannes to the new Mouse concept!
Nice move, nice touch to the all of us in the ACVW comunity.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2008, 02:26:05 am by Frallan » Logged

Project_X
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 81


« Reply #205 on: February 12, 2008, 02:50:20 am »

Hi there!

Finally I got the time to put the "Mouse Motor" on the dyno and this is what I see.

POWER:138,8kW 188.7hp/7670rpm
TORQUE:192.4Nm/6100rpm(138,7lbs)

The ignition and fuel curve is optimized, the main venturies is 37mm, main jets is 145 the air is 160 idle jets are 65f10 and the E-tubes are F7.I will go bigger with the main venturies, the first step will be 39mm, this will hopefully raise the output alittle bit more and get me closer to the calculated max power rpm(8000).I will post a video later.


Talk to you later
Johannes



Thats awesome!
Now send it to Or. Florida and I'll be happy to test it in my bug....course I wouldnt ship it back to you  Grin
Logged

Thinking outside the box? hmm...I dont wanna play in the box no more, so Im stepping out for a while..
Aircooled for a reason, waters for boats!
eugene
Newbie
*
Posts: 34


« Reply #206 on: February 12, 2008, 04:36:07 am »

I think that Johannes build has shown what the modern understanding of flow, chamber shape, compression ratios, part limitations, coupled to engineering and practical knowledge really mean.  The beauty of the build is also in use of original parts that the vw have somewhat rejected as unworthy. The hot roders spirit we admire, is back with such builds. Bravo!
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836


Snabba grabben...


« Reply #207 on: February 12, 2008, 09:07:10 am »

I think that Johannes build has shown what the modern understanding of flow, chamber shape, compression ratios, part limitations, coupled to engineering and practical knowledge really mean.  The beauty of the build is also in use of original parts that the vw have somewhat rejected as unworthy. The hot roders spirit we admire, is back with such builds. Bravo!


I think you hit the nail on the head with your first post here on The Lounge and I totally agree - congrats with the impressive results Johannes!

Best rgs
Kalle
« Last Edit: February 12, 2008, 09:26:54 am by BeetleBug » Logged

10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Tobi/DFL
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 444



« Reply #208 on: February 12, 2008, 09:59:45 am »

I´m simply overwhelmed by those numbers! Thanks a lot for sharing so much knowledge with us, Johannes!

Tobi
Logged
Tom G.
Full Member
***
Posts: 139



WWW
« Reply #209 on: February 12, 2008, 12:50:14 pm »

I can only repeat...AWESOME....117 HP/L.......

Tom
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 29 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!