The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
April 04, 2025, 11:21:05 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351480
Posts in
28720
Topics by
6875
Members
Latest Member:
Isaac Nelson
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Cal-look
78 vs 82
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Author
Topic: 78 vs 82 (Read 29353 times)
rick m
Hero Member
Posts: 1296
Driving Hot VWs for 44 Years Strong!
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #60 on:
December 03, 2010, 06:13:49 am »
Go with the 82 and run a Porsche length rod in it. I ran an 82 in my 2110 road trip motor and Porsche length rods. It makes a snappy motor at the bottom and through the mid range. It pulls the piston down faster creating more vacuum and yes....it does affect flow in the heads and the responsiveness of the motor.
Like a couple of posts have mentioned, it is not the size of the motor that determines the dependability. It is the quality of the parts and the build. Don and I have some fun trips where our cars performed well and they were the larger motors on the cruises. Looking forward to it again in my even larger 2275.
Rick M
Logged
Rick Mortensen
Driving Hot VWs since 1970
fredy66
Hero Member
Posts: 595
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #61 on:
January 02, 2011, 21:01:16 pm »
thanks Rick but i do have the 78.4 crank
and the 5.4 rods is here
and so is the forced fly wheal k-1 clutch the 94 pistons and there is a Mexico blox whetting for a trip to the machine chop
missing heads and cam
any body have some heads for sale
Logged
arabia slugs
fredy66
Hero Member
Posts: 595
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #62 on:
January 23, 2011, 10:04:25 am »
i,m so excited my case is going to the Macing chop inn to Weeks
cant Wait to start hammering some engine parts to getter
have a 1.4 rockers coming and a sump
this game is expensive
but i Hope it be wort it when the summer Com's
Logged
arabia slugs
bugnut68
Hero Member
Posts: 1751
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #63 on:
January 25, 2011, 00:48:17 am »
Quote from: fredy66 on January 23, 2011, 10:04:25 am
i,m so excited my case is going to the Macing chop inn to Weeks
cant Wait to start hammering some engine parts to getter
have a 1.4 rockers coming and a sump
this game is expensive
but i Hope it be wort it when the summer Com's
I'm getting close... my engine is nearing completion. Still need to dimple my head tin so I can get my intakes on, but the hardest work is pretty much done now.
Logged
Ron Greiner
Jr. Member
Posts: 61
DKP II
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #64 on:
January 25, 2011, 01:34:06 am »
Quote from: fredy66 on October 28, 2010, 03:52:57 am
Quote from: dragvw2180 on October 28, 2010, 03:45:26 am
I am not a rich man, I buy one part at a time and when I have all the parts for an assembly I will prepare all the parts to the best of my ability ,put them together and then wait till I can afford more parts. I like the I beam rods with arp bolts, but the ones I used on a friends engine required clearancing, the H beams went together with no problems. If I remember correctly with a 78 stroke and 5.4 rod I used A pistons with cylinder spacers , B pistons gave me too much deck .If you use a longer rod it would take care of the deck.
when i,m looking I-beam its my budget i,m thinking of .
a bit if clearing no problem.
5.5 rod ??
with the 78 mm stroke crank use the std length 5.394" rods with the stroker pistons, no barrel shims
with the A pistons you will need to use a barrel spacer about .193" thickness
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
Posts: 595
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #65 on:
January 25, 2011, 05:29:51 am »
looking good bugnut
what Do you have there
i have looked at cams
any body have any opinion
fk-8
ore one of the fk-40 seres cams
«
Last Edit: January 25, 2011, 05:34:35 am by fredy66
»
Logged
arabia slugs
bugnut68
Hero Member
Posts: 1751
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #66 on:
January 25, 2011, 18:15:03 pm »
Quote from: fredy66 on January 25, 2011, 05:29:51 am
looking good bugnut
what Do you have there
i have looked at cams
any body have any opinion
fk-8
ore one of the fk-40 seres cams
I basically copied the Hot VWs 1995 Cal-Look engine build, as well as Sarge's 2017 with minor changes...
I'm running a 78.4 DPR crank, stock reworked VW German rods, Engle 125 cam, 1.25 CB Performance rockers, Berg solid rocker shafts, 8.6:1 compression, Steve Tims Stage II heads (42x37.5mm valves), 1-5/8" exhaust with 2.5-inch Dynomax muffler, dual 45mm Dellorto carburetors, doghouse oil cooler, full flow oiling with filter, Scat 1.5 QT sump, 90.5 Mahle pistons/cylinders, 009 ignition (later want to try the new CB Performance Magnaspark unit!)
This is my first stroker build, and I gotta say, thanks to the machine work done by VW Paradise, it has gone together super smoothly... easier build than even my last 1776 or stock 1600 I built when in college. Can't wait to fire it off and get 'er broken in!
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
Posts: 595
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #67 on:
January 25, 2011, 22:13:35 pm »
sounds fun man
keep us updated
Logged
arabia slugs
bugnut68
Hero Member
Posts: 1751
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #68 on:
January 25, 2011, 23:08:31 pm »
Quote from: fredy66 on January 25, 2011, 22:13:35 pm
sounds fun man
keep us updated
No problem there...
I'm figuring I'll write a complete novel about my first impressions when I go for my first test drive.
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
Posts: 595
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #69 on:
October 24, 2011, 23:17:40 pm »
getting there
Logged
arabia slugs
bugnut68
Hero Member
Posts: 1751
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #70 on:
October 24, 2011, 23:44:41 pm »
Quote from: bugnut68 on January 25, 2011, 00:48:17 am
Quote from: fredy66 on January 23, 2011, 10:04:25 am
i,m so excited my case is going to the Macing chop inn to Weeks
cant Wait to start hammering some engine parts to getter
have a 1.4 rockers coming and a sump
this game is expensive
but i Hope it be wort it when the summer Com's
I'm getting close... my engine is nearing completion. Still need to dimple my head tin so I can get my intakes on, but the hardest work is pretty much done now.
I forgot all about thinking I was oh so close... now I'm facing rebuilding with another case. Oh, fortune, how you mock me, mm'kay?
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
Posts: 595
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #71 on:
October 25, 2011, 00:06:00 am »
I'm preying to the good of power that i want happen to me .
Logged
arabia slugs
bugnut68
Hero Member
Posts: 1751
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #72 on:
October 25, 2011, 02:00:21 am »
Quote from: fredy66 on October 25, 2011, 00:06:00 am
I'm preying to the good of power that i want happen to me .
If you didn't start with a 40 year old AE case that's been around the block a ton, odds are you're golden.
My issues have boiled down to simply aged equipment. Oil pressure wasn't so much an issue after all but after stripping out oil pump studs and having the helicoils pull out, I figured out my case is pretty much just tired/wore out/done.
Logged
fredy66
Hero Member
Posts: 595
Re: 78 vs 82
«
Reply #73 on:
October 25, 2011, 02:38:07 am »
yes i did killed a working dp 1300 to get the chase
«
Last Edit: October 25, 2011, 03:02:52 am by fredy66
»
Logged
arabia slugs
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...