The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 24, 2024, 11:19:40 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351212
Posts in
28657
Topics by
6854
Members
Latest Member:
74meanmachine
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
The weight saving thread
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
14
15
[
16
]
17
18
...
34
Author
Topic: The weight saving thread (Read 581344 times)
Phil West
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #450 on:
April 01, 2011, 07:30:58 am »
I see their lightest seat is the sprint lightweight which comes in at around 4kg without cover (pic attached hopefully). I like the drilled look!
PAS have you run without the cover? Is is comfortable? Neil you mentioned your mate's was ok - without the cover? I reckon there's got to be an extra pound or two in a cover.
Logged
BeetleBug
Hero Member
Posts: 2836
Snabba grabben...
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #451 on:
April 01, 2011, 07:51:16 am »
They are suprisingly comfy with the cover. Without the cover they are race only but you can always buy a padded cycle shorts.
BB
Logged
10.41 - 100ci - 1641ccm - 400hp
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #452 on:
April 01, 2011, 08:19:27 am »
Quote from: Phil West on April 01, 2011, 07:30:58 am
PAS have you run without the cover? Is is comfortable?
No not yet, I have only sat in it for mock up purposes so far (I did find it pretty comfortable without a cover on though). Like BB suggested, for racing I am not using a cover but for the street I am getting a seat pad made up by Bernie.
«
Last Edit: April 01, 2011, 08:26:51 am by Pas
»
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
tikimadness
Hero Member
Posts: 966
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #453 on:
April 01, 2011, 18:36:47 pm »
I have a kirkey without padding in my oval and it's much more comfortable then you would think.
Michael
Logged
member of team YAC ; the guys who write history.
GASSER GARAGE a few friends creating history.
NIDGAFWYT
Lids
Hero Member
Posts: 3527
show me the chedder
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #454 on:
April 01, 2011, 20:02:57 pm »
In the interests of getting a decent time in the summer, I am heading up stairs to go on the cross trainer, think the 5 stone excess i'm carrying needs to be shed first!
Logged
If there's enough horse shit around, there must be a pony!
Buy your ciderberry here.
http://www.thatcherscider.co.uk/
Basti
Sr. Member
Posts: 435
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #455 on:
April 03, 2011, 15:03:23 pm »
I like this version! 9 kgs less with a new battery!
And it has the same power tha a standard 65ah!
Let me know if you like one
[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Logged
- black 62 cal look beetle
- Pro Mod Race car
Fasterbrit
Hero Member
Posts: 1009
OFF#23 - The Fastest Outlaw in the West!
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #456 on:
April 03, 2011, 19:25:07 pm »
Phil, avoid giving yourself asteroids and go for the cover. To offset the slight weight disadvantage you could always trim your beard, get titanium spectacle frames or go for a good dump before you race...
In all seriousness, this is my favourite thread by far and long shall it continue
Logged
9.563 @ 146.25 mph Cal Look Drag Day, Santa Pod, April 2011
OFF#23 OUTLAW FLAT FOUR
www.outlawflatfour.com
www.air-kraft.com
www.marcomansiperformance.com
Diederick/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 3692
They're never done till they're sold
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #457 on:
April 12, 2011, 09:41:53 am »
I was reminded of this thread when I swapped my stock starter for my Skoda starter last Sunday. Minimal effort, huge weight reduction.
Logged
Diederick
-
Proud member of:
DVK ~
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
AntLockyer
Sr. Member
Posts: 351
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #458 on:
April 12, 2011, 14:47:07 pm »
Quote from: 67-indeed/DVK on April 12, 2011, 09:41:53 am
I was reminded of this thread when I swapped my stock starter for my Skoda starter last Sunday. Minimal effort, huge weight reduction.
How much reduction? What Skoda was it from?
Logged
12.618 @ 104.87mph
Diederick/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 3692
They're never done till they're sold
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #459 on:
April 12, 2011, 18:10:31 pm »
i didn't actually weigh it on a scale, but it's almost half the size.
http://cal-look.no/lounge/index.php/topic,6655.msg187097.html#msg187097
Logged
Diederick
-
Proud member of:
DVK ~
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
AntLockyer
Sr. Member
Posts: 351
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #460 on:
April 13, 2011, 07:59:58 am »
Cool, I wonder what it will be like on a high comp motor.
Logged
12.618 @ 104.87mph
Rocket Ron
Hero Member
Posts: 2861
It's old school for a reason
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #461 on:
April 13, 2011, 10:31:41 am »
I'm told by a friend that they work better than my hi torque starter motor, he tried both
Logged
13.12 @ 101.84
Grooving out on life
You can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter
Lee.C
Hero Member
Posts: 6458
I might be an Idiot but I'm not an Arsehole!
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #462 on:
April 14, 2011, 10:35:20 am »
Hmmmm anyone got a Part No: for this starter
Or better still a link to a supply
Logged
You either "Get It" or you don't......
Diederick/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 3692
They're never done till they're sold
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #463 on:
April 14, 2011, 16:37:12 pm »
those are listed in the link i provided. got mine off german eBay over a year ago
Logged
Diederick
-
Proud member of:
DVK ~
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
Lee.C
Hero Member
Posts: 6458
I might be an Idiot but I'm not an Arsehole!
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #464 on:
April 14, 2011, 21:42:53 pm »
Quote from: 67-indeed/DVK on April 14, 2011, 16:37:12 pm
those are listed in the link i provided. got mine off german eBay over a year ago
Cool cheers dude
Logged
You either "Get It" or you don't......
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #465 on:
April 15, 2011, 03:00:32 am »
I think this is what we need.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=390173135566&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
Brise starters are top quality and the lightest available (I think) at 2.5 kg but cost nearly £400 with delivery, the Skoda units weigh 3kg and cost £90.
http://www.brise.co.uk/Porsche_starter_motors.html
«
Last Edit: April 15, 2011, 03:07:23 am by Pas
»
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Elnef
Hero Member
Posts: 566
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #466 on:
April 15, 2011, 05:20:10 am »
I had a high torque starter on the weight yesterday 3,9kg
John
«
Last Edit: April 15, 2011, 05:22:48 am by Elnef
»
Logged
Jon
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 3214
12,3@174km/t at Gardermoen 2008
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #467 on:
April 15, 2011, 08:16:46 am »
Quote from: AntLockyer on April 13, 2011, 07:59:58 am
Cool, I wonder what it will be like on a high comp motor.
That would depend on your cam.
Logged
Grumpy old men have signatures like this.
Diederick/DVK
Hero Member
Posts: 3692
They're never done till they're sold
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #468 on:
April 15, 2011, 10:30:29 am »
i prefered a used OEM starter over a (possible China-made) replacement part.
those old skodas don't last very long anyway, so i bet a used starter deserves a second life in a proper car
Logged
Diederick
-
Proud member of:
DVK ~
Der Vollgas Kreuzers
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #469 on:
April 15, 2011, 19:38:22 pm »
Quote from: 67-indeed/DVK on April 15, 2011, 10:30:29 am
i prefered a used OEM starter over a (possible China-made) replacement part.
those old skodas don't last very long anyway, so i bet a used starter deserves a second life in a proper car
I emailed the seller yesterday asking who the manufacturer is and if they are new or recon, I will let you know what the reply was.
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #470 on:
April 19, 2011, 20:35:32 pm »
Porsche 356 Carrera GT brakes with aluminium shoes and RSK Spyder aluminium wheel cylinders
And the RSK drums that cover them up
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=706514
«
Last Edit: April 19, 2011, 20:38:15 pm by Zach Gomulka
»
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #471 on:
April 20, 2011, 15:09:21 pm »
Quote from: Pas on April 15, 2011, 19:38:22 pm
Quote from: 67-indeed/DVK on April 15, 2011, 10:30:29 am
i prefered a used OEM starter over a (possible China-made) replacement part.
those old skodas don't last very long anyway, so i bet a used starter deserves a second life in a proper car
I emailed the seller yesterday asking who the manufacturer is and if they are new or recon, I will let you know what the reply was.
I had a reply from the seller today and they are not OEM but new copy units, so I presume they are Chinese.
«
Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 00:17:07 am by Pas
»
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Rocket Ron
Hero Member
Posts: 2861
It's old school for a reason
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #472 on:
April 20, 2011, 15:42:01 pm »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on April 19, 2011, 20:35:32 pm
Porsche 356 Carrera GT brakes with aluminium shoes and RSK Spyder aluminium wheel cylinders
And the RSK drums that cover them up
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=706514
look cheap and nasty better send them to me , I'll pay the postage
Logged
13.12 @ 101.84
Grooving out on life
You can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter
kingsburgphil
Hero Member
Posts: 876
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #473 on:
April 21, 2011, 01:20:30 am »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on April 19, 2011, 20:35:32 pm
Porsche 356 Carrera GT brakes with aluminium shoes and RSK Spyder aluminium wheel cylinders
And the RSK drums that cover them up
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=706514
Wow! Did you win the Lottery? That stuff was rare and expensive thirty years ago when we ran a
set up like that on our Formula V/slalom car. Needless to say I'm pea green with envy
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #474 on:
April 21, 2011, 01:50:31 am »
No no no, they aren't mine! I wouldn't have a clue what to do with parts like that, that setup is worth more than my car. I just saw the pics on a 356 site, and put them here.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
kingsburgphil
Hero Member
Posts: 876
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #475 on:
April 22, 2011, 04:55:30 am »
You never know, perhaps some day you might have the means to purchase a set of brakes like those.
Logged
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #476 on:
May 14, 2011, 21:09:11 pm »
Sorry folks I have nothing to contribute at the moment, instead I have a couple of weight saving questions that hopefully some of you will be able to address.
Firstly a question on fasteners, I am planning to use aluminium fasteners wherever possible on my build, i.e anything that is not safety critical, wings, doors, trim etc. For the safety critical areas, suspension, steering, engine/gearbox mounts etc. I am going to use titanium as much as possible. So what is my question? Well in an attempt at keeping costs down I wonder if I can use aluminium nuts with titanium bolts ? I know Porsche, for example, use alloy wheel nuts with steel studs, so can this thinking be reapplied to other components ? I am thinking spring plate/axle bolts, front trailing arm/stub axle bolts etc. Can I replace the steel gearbox casing nuts for alloy? Also is a particular grade of Ti and ali required?
Lots to think about there I know and would appreciate any input.
My second question is a little more straightforward, has anyone compared the weight of different brake set ups ? I am planning on using stock 5/205 drums all round but if I were to switch to disc brakes would I see any weight saving ?
Again thanks for any input.
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Lightning
Newbie
Posts: 17
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #477 on:
May 15, 2011, 23:24:56 pm »
Interesting idea using alloy hardware. As long as you keep your car out of salty water, there shouldn't be a problem to mix materials. When it comes to strength there might be some issues depending on the alloy and heat treatment. In general, both aluminium and titanium has a lower tensile strength and hardness than steel, this limits how much tension they can handle. E.g. if an M8 bolt needs 30Nm torque, this might snap an aluminium bolt or stretch a titanium bolt beyond it's elastic limit. The suppliers I know for alloy bolts clearly advise not to use these fasteners for important components like brakes and suspension.
Have not weighed discs vs. drums, but would say that discs have more stopping power per kilo than drums!
Logged
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #478 on:
May 17, 2011, 18:45:49 pm »
Quote from: Lightning on May 15, 2011, 23:24:56 pm
Interesting idea using alloy hardware. As long as you keep your car out of salty water, there shouldn't be a problem to mix materials. When it comes to strength there might be some issues depending on the alloy and heat treatment. In general, both aluminium and titanium has a lower tensile strength and hardness than steel, this limits how much tension they can handle. E.g. if an M8 bolt needs 30Nm torque, this might snap an aluminium bolt or stretch a titanium bolt beyond it's elastic limit. The suppliers I know for alloy bolts clearly advise not to use these fasteners for important components like brakes and suspension.
Have not weighed discs vs. drums, but would say that discs have more stopping power per kilo than drums!
Thanks for the input lightning, I agree about using alloy bolts for brakes/suspension etc, a strict no no.
I will try and get some info on the strength of the nuts below.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280668167297&var=580030238469&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
I have looked into titanium strength grades, grade 5 is the most commonly used grade in the aerospace and automotive industries and is an alloy of Titanium aluminium and vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V). It has a tensile strength of around 1000 Mpa and hardness of Rockwell 36, which I think, is comparable to high tensile steel.
«
Last Edit: May 17, 2011, 22:07:05 pm by Pas
»
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Carsten
Full Member
Posts: 141
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #479 on:
May 18, 2011, 13:11:47 pm »
Some more :
http://www.isa-racing.com/index.php/cat/c851_Aluminiumschrauben.html
;-)
Logged
1969 IRS bug
Pages:
1
...
14
15
[
16
]
17
18
...
34
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...