The Cal-look Lounge
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 13, 2024, 07:39:23 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Thank you for your support!
Search:
Advanced search
351179
Posts in
28652
Topics by
6853
Members
Latest Member:
Hacksaw Racing
The Cal-look Lounge
Cal-look/High Performance
Pure racing
The weight saving thread
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
8
9
[
10
]
11
12
...
34
Author
Topic: The weight saving thread (Read 578577 times)
cpalma
Newbie
Posts: 29
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #270 on:
September 24, 2009, 09:30:55 am »
hey guys, i stumbled onto the "aluminum face" KEP pp ib the optional selection and it says the same thing in the site - 2.5-3lbs wgt. reduction. It also says with a sprayed on matrix to reduce wear (wonder what that is?)....but if it helps quicker revs why not. Plus 110usd on top of the pp price, check this out:
http://www.aircooled.net/new-bin/viewproductdetail.php?keyword2=CFP0003
«
Last Edit: September 24, 2009, 10:54:30 am by cpalma
»
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
Posts: 1420
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #271 on:
September 25, 2009, 04:59:56 am »
Also from the Aircooled.net page:
"We do NOT recommend this if you are planning on burnouts, clutch slippage will hurt the face of the Pressure Plate."
Where's the fun in that??!?
I wonder if this aluminium shoe has the same propensity to wear into a cone shape like the iron one does? Anyone used one of these clutches?
Logged
Fastbrit
Hero Member
Posts: 4731
Keep smiling...
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #272 on:
September 25, 2009, 10:03:56 am »
Quote from: Bruce on September 25, 2009, 04:59:56 am
Anyone used one of these clutches?
Here ya go!
Quote from: Peter Shattock on September 23, 2009, 08:05:30 am
In terms of the pressure plates, Kennedy still do them, and when I bought mine (recently) the 200mm were off the shelf, but the 180mm were special order. I have to say they were really good to deal with and shipped all the bits out top speed.
Be aware that the ali version should only be used with a regular disc like a Dakin or similar, not a puck or a Black Magic etc.
Peter
Logged
Der Kleiner Panzers VW Club
12.56sec street-driven Cal Looker in 1995
9.87sec No Mercy race car in 1994
Seems like a lifetime ago...
benssp
Hero Member
Posts: 1655
www.callookvw.com
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #273 on:
September 29, 2009, 12:39:45 pm »
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=852152
shotgun lightening
Logged
www.vwheritage.com
My Job
www.bernardnewbury.co.uk
My Team
any work related enquiries to
ben@vwheritage.com
PM's about work will not be answered
Bitburg Motor Boat Club Founder Member
YMCA
Bruce
Hero Member
Posts: 1420
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #274 on:
September 30, 2009, 07:55:35 am »
Quote from: Peter Shattock on September 23, 2009, 08:05:30 am
In terms of the pressure plates, Kennedy still do them, and when I bought mine (recently) the 200mm were off the shelf,
Peter
Peter, have you installed this yet? What's it drive like?
On another board, someone stated that the face is coated with a "Tungsten/Cobalt" coating. That should wear quite well.
Logged
Peter Shattock
Sr. Member
Posts: 359
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #275 on:
September 30, 2009, 08:19:44 am »
I have not used the 180mm one yet, but I have used the 200mm one for two races which was 9 burnouts and 9 full passes. I've also done around 500 road mikes. The first meeting there was no problem at all with 2 12 sec passes and 3 in the 11's (the car with me in it weighs around 1560lbs (Phil can you remember as I appear to have lost the weigh in bit of paper the MSA guy gave us) and has around 170-180hp). The second meeting I messed up the first burn out as I did not tape up the button on my Hydraulic handbrake and it slipped the clutch. After each of the 4 runs that weekend the clutch did smell but there was no sign of slip on my data logger so I'm guessing there is not an on going problem as the car ran 2 more 12 sec passes and another 2 11's and was OK with the drive home which is a bout 2 1/2 hours long.
Obviously it will depend on your combination (weight and power / torque) but if you’re in this sort of Ball Park, you should be fine. Interestingly when the pressure plate was first fitted we did try shimming it, and there was more pressure available. From memory it was almost exactly 170 out of the box, and I think we had it to around 200 with 0.5mm shims (I would need to check the actual figures but it was in that order). It was not shimmed when installed, it was just to check what we had, if we needed it.
The motor will be out of the car in 3 weeks time so I'll check to see how the parts are looking and post up here with what I find.
Hope this helps
Peter
Logged
The fastest beetle in the village
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #276 on:
September 30, 2009, 17:56:22 pm »
Peter,
your car weighed in at 1346lb if i remember correctly, exactly 30lbs lighter than mine, although not for long....
cheers
andy
Logged
L.B.C.R.
Peter Shattock
Sr. Member
Posts: 359
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #277 on:
September 30, 2009, 18:03:06 pm »
Thanks Andy,
I'll have a look through my stuff tonight, as I've lost a timing slip as well. It doesn't bode well for the Club, if the chief paper shuffler, is loosing all his paperwork!
See you soon Peter
Logged
The fastest beetle in the village
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #278 on:
September 30, 2009, 18:06:07 pm »
old age is a terrible thing, it's a good job you're not driving to sweden on your own
Logged
L.B.C.R.
Phil West
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #279 on:
October 02, 2009, 07:55:03 am »
Quote from: andy M. on September 30, 2009, 17:56:22 pm
Peter,
your car weighed in at 1346lb if i remember correctly, exactly 30lbs lighter than mine, although not for long....
cheers
andy
Actually his ticket said 1,340lbs although that included the helmet at 3.3lbs so actual car weight was a smidge under 1,337lbs, or roughly 606KG.
Another 6 kilos to break the magic 600 mark!
Cheers
Phil
Logged
Peter Shattock
Sr. Member
Posts: 359
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #280 on:
October 02, 2009, 13:53:17 pm »
Thanks guys, the poor old man actually found his time slip, and the bit of paper with the weights on (1346lbs actually) in my wallet. It’s just a shame there was no money in there, but finding the previously lost bits of paper softened the blow!
So the car is 1343lbs and I weigh in at 155lbs with my suit and helmet etc, so my all up race weigh is around 1498lbs now in race trim (no muffler, fan belt, oil cooler, or heavy old radials) so it will be quite a bit heavier at the stop lights on the street. I think the majority of the weight loss this year has come from revolving parts in the gearbox and engine (wheels as well) so its not just dead weight in the car either, it’s mostly revolving, which is obviously good. I don't think I'll be saving another 10kg though, in fact if anything the car will be heavier next year I suspect.
So Phil you are still the lightest by some margin, but look out Woodentop is coming in 2010 (I think he really is this time too!) and don't forget Heir Marriot, as he will no doubt be scheming over the winter, to take your crown with all his fangled aircraft technology! Not forgetting Greg, as he seams to have weight “problems” these days too!
I'm looking forward to the 2010 weigh in contest already.
Peter
Logged
The fastest beetle in the village
Phil West
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #281 on:
October 02, 2009, 14:05:45 pm »
whoops sorry mate I actually read the ticket with the last digit as a zero but evidently it's a '6'.
Mine ended up at 601kg / 1323lb before me but I'm not skinny like you so mine was 1500 with me in it. So you've done me by 2 pounds. Likewise once I put the bigger motor in she's gonna weigh a heck of a lot more.
Plus as you say once Woodie arrives all bets are off - I reckon way lighter than either of ours. Oh and in theory Jim's tube chassis came out at 1298 (if I remember right?) but that was before the Pauter block which must have added, what, 50lbs? The Sting was 1330 I think but that's gone now. Which means I may just have it until Woodencar blow us all away.
Logged
Neil Davies
Hero Member
Posts: 3438
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #282 on:
October 02, 2009, 14:15:36 pm »
Quote from: Phil West on October 02, 2009, 14:05:45 pm
whoops sorry mate I actually read the ticket with the last digit as a zero but evidently it's a '6'.
Mine ended up at 601kg / 1323lb before me but I'm not skinny like you so mine was 1500 with me in it. So you've done me by 2 pounds. Likewise once I put the bigger motor in she's gonna weigh a heck of a lot more.
Plus as you say once Woodie arrives all bets are off - I reckon way lighter than either of ours. Oh and in theory Jim's tube chassis came out at 1298 (if I remember right?) but that was before the Pauter block which must have added, what, 50lbs? The Sting was 1330 I think but that's gone now. Which means I may just have it until Woodencar blow us all away.
Well as I weigh a hell of a lot more than you two (probably the two of you put together!) I'm going to need something seriously light! I'm going to race just a bonnet on a floorpan I think!
Logged
2007cc, 48IDFs, street car. 14.45@93 on pump fuel, treads, muffler and fanbelt. October 2017!
Fastbrit
Hero Member
Posts: 4731
Keep smiling...
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #283 on:
October 02, 2009, 18:18:16 pm »
Race driver for rent. Weighs in at 126lbs (57.2kg)...
Logged
Der Kleiner Panzers VW Club
12.56sec street-driven Cal Looker in 1995
9.87sec No Mercy race car in 1994
Seems like a lifetime ago...
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #284 on:
October 02, 2009, 19:21:41 pm »
at least none of us have gone this far.... yet
andy
Logged
L.B.C.R.
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #285 on:
October 11, 2009, 18:17:57 pm »
More anorexia, just under a kilo,
andy
«
Last Edit: October 11, 2009, 18:29:51 pm by andy M.
»
Logged
L.B.C.R.
Pas
Hero Member
Posts: 562
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #286 on:
October 17, 2009, 20:37:34 pm »
Quote from: Chris W on September 21, 2009, 17:23:25 pm
I am running a bus master in my 66, definitely lighter.
Hey Chris
Is that an ali or iron master cylinder ?
Cheers Pas
Logged
You stay classy, Cal-look Lounge.
Chris W
Sr. Member
Posts: 363
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #287 on:
October 20, 2009, 00:15:01 am »
No its not aluminum.
Logged
bill stipe
Full Member
Posts: 171
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #288 on:
October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm »
Bosch SR15N. Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid. Came from a swap meet this past weekened.
Logged
Frallan
Hero Member
Posts: 933
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #289 on:
October 21, 2009, 16:22:52 pm »
Quote from: Bruce on September 25, 2009, 04:59:56 am
Also from the Aircooled.net page:
"We do NOT recommend this if you are planning on burnouts, clutch slippage will hurt the face of the Pressure Plate."
Where's the fun in that??!?
I wonder if this aluminium shoe has the same propensity to wear into a cone shape like the iron one does? Anyone used one of these clutches?
Some Swedish friends built their own billet pressure face for the Kennedy. I am not sure how they solved the face but not with coating. Probably a separate replacebale riveted steel face.
It worked quite well as proven when they became class winners for several years with their buggy..and the clutch as far as I remember. They did a lot of burnouts, for sure.
These are the same guys that built their own 61.2 mmTerminators from billet plus many more inventions.
The Bug Professors son and father Martin and Ambjörn Karlsson.
Logged
Some of my cars:
http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=116265
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #290 on:
October 21, 2009, 17:29:53 pm »
Quote from: bill stipe on October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm
Bosch SR15N. Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid. Came from a swap meet this past weekened.
I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #291 on:
October 22, 2009, 16:59:54 pm »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 21, 2009, 17:29:53 pm
Quote from: bill stipe on October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm
Bosch SR15N. Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid. Came from a swap meet this past weekened.
I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!
Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!
«
Last Edit: October 22, 2009, 17:09:19 pm by Zach Gomulka
»
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Bruce
Hero Member
Posts: 1420
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #292 on:
October 23, 2009, 03:59:45 am »
Even better, it comes off the heavy end of the car. Don't forget to drill a few holes in the flange!
Logged
Lee.C
Hero Member
Posts: 6458
I might be an Idiot but I'm not an Arsehole!
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #293 on:
October 23, 2009, 04:30:15 am »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 22, 2009, 16:59:54 pm
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 21, 2009, 17:29:53 pm
Quote from: bill stipe on October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm
Bosch SR15N. Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid. Came from a swap meet this past weekened.
I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!
Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!
Thats incredible!!!
Logged
You either "Get It" or you don't......
Phil West
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #294 on:
October 23, 2009, 07:25:43 am »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 22, 2009, 16:59:54 pm
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 21, 2009, 17:29:53 pm
Quote from: bill stipe on October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm
Bosch SR15N. Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid. Came from a swap meet this past weekened.
I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!
Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!
Over here we use a Brize engineering starter which is basically based on an early 911 unit, but all newly built. They come in at 2,577 gms complete.
Logged
Zach Gomulka
Hero Member
Posts: 6991
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #295 on:
October 23, 2009, 17:24:10 pm »
Quote from: Phil West on October 23, 2009, 07:25:43 am
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 22, 2009, 16:59:54 pm
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 21, 2009, 17:29:53 pm
Quote from: bill stipe on October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm
Bosch SR15N. Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid. Came from a swap meet this past weekened.
I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!
Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!
Over here we use a Brize engineering starter which is basically based on an early 911 unit, but all newly built. They come in at 2,577 gms complete.
Really? I'd love to see some more pics/info on that one.
Logged
Born in the '80s, stuck in the '70s.
Phil West
Sr. Member
Posts: 402
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #296 on:
October 24, 2009, 08:19:39 am »
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 23, 2009, 17:24:10 pm
Quote from: Phil West on October 23, 2009, 07:25:43 am
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 22, 2009, 16:59:54 pm
Quote from: Zach Gomulka on October 21, 2009, 17:29:53 pm
Quote from: bill stipe on October 21, 2009, 12:11:21 pm
Bosch SR15N. Haven't had a chance to weigh it but the starter motor is barely larger than the solenoid. Came from a swap meet this past weekened.
I've got one of those in my stash, too. I've heard 3 pounds. I'll be sure to weigh the difference soon!
Here we go... Stock "Made in Germany" starter from my '67, weighing in at 5,633.9 grams. Bosch SR15N hitting the scale at a scant 3,130.5 grams... a savings of just over 2.5kg, that's 5 1/2 pounds!!!
Over here we use a Brize engineering starter which is basically based on an early 911 unit, but all newly built. They come in at 2,577 gms complete.
Really? I'd love to see some more pics/info on that one.
http://www.brise.co.uk/Porsche_starter_motors.html
It's the middle one, for the 911. Reliable and powerful - mine starts in a flash with this baby.
Logged
Bruce
Hero Member
Posts: 1420
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #297 on:
October 24, 2009, 17:44:10 pm »
Here are the comparison numbers for those starters.
The Brise starter is 550g lighter than the Bosch, but costs $220 more (plus shipping)
Logged
andy M.
Sr. Member
Posts: 323
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #298 on:
October 24, 2009, 17:54:46 pm »
I've had one of the Brise starters in my car now for over three years and it's always been ultra reliable, cranks over a high comp engine really easy and looks cool too, and half a kilo is half a kilo,
andy
Logged
L.B.C.R.
SlingShot
Hero Member
Posts: 600
Re: The weight saving thread
«
Reply #299 on:
October 25, 2009, 00:24:31 am »
This blows em all out of the park
Logged
Will Race For Beer !!!
Pages:
1
...
8
9
[
10
]
11
12
...
34
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cal-look/High Performance
-----------------------------
=> Cal-look
=> Pure racing
=> Technical stuff
=> Top Racers lists
=> In Da Werks
-----------------------------
The Cal-look classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For sale!
=> Wanted
-----------------------------
Happenings
-----------------------------
=> Happenings
=> Scandinavian Cal-look Classic (the event)
-----------------------------
Tyre kicking
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic
Loading...